The RACY WRITING RESOURCES - sex appeal, a fundimental of fiction

All manner of situations, even quite unforeseen, may present any range of obstacles, from an empty bread box standing in the way of the perfect sandwich, perplexing riddles and secrets denying truth, engineering limitations in the path of invention or a natural disaster barring very survival, but also, no less, a bad hair day spoiling Romance or a misunderstanding threatening love.

Each event in sequence that follows from motivated character action consistent with background, must in turn initiate from observable proximate stimulus unless entirely emerging from inner life, and, either way, rather than simply remaining mysterious, known only the mind of the character, must one way or another be shown intelligibly to the audience, even if none of any other characters; either way, in turn, quite probably another vitally important plot point. Whenever the cause and effect chain ever omits such links, expect plot holes stumbling amid succession of unrelated events.

A. Tension, every Technique of Suspense plotting, anticipation, clues and doubt as to the outcome, hence pathos and, leave us face it, discomfort and aversion, may arise even from mystery, onstage sex appeal, the unknown, opportunity and/or threat, conflict many levels with an obstacle, events unfolding or outcome in any way in doubt. Tension is stress, and the innate or conditioned emotional, neurochemical and physiological preparative change or stress response to challenge, stimuli or stressors may be either distress and dread as to threat and emergency or eustress, the euphoric stress of pleasant anticipation, even sexual tension or the demands of pleasant activities in general, creativity, power and opportunity.

Even humor or comic relief depends upon foreplay, tension from an insecurity brought to a resolution or climax called the punch line, that may be either surprising or else even obvious and anticipated, just so long as the tension builds and then crests. Teasing, well meaning or otherwise, also cultivates and builds stress, tension. So does flirtation, but likewise manipulation, rejection or indifference and harassment or threat. Tension, stress, can be either dystress or eustress:

Or, most dramatically, an attempt at howsoever the wiser course may instead press a character into conflict on every level with their own motivating values for which they will be compelled to sacrifice the easier way because the moral course and the more difficult among free willed choices may so often coincide.

Of course, neurochemistry is bound to reflect changing emotion. But there are also clear special cases of the reverse, of emotion instead subordinate to neurochenical fluctuation, as for examples: puberty and menopause. Hence, arguing from sheer stubborn lack of imagination and circuitous reasoning, simply ignoring rather than howsoever investigatively eliminating all that is well known applicably regarding traumatic and environmental causation, springs forth the myth of endogeny, of congenital neurochemically spontaneous anxiety or even Existential depression, among other chronic cognitive or emotional states, together with the Stress Vulnerability Model of Psychiatric Disorders being flawed only in how what is called: biological vulnerability is, again, no determinant on it's own, being, of course, actually universal and even generally uniform in the human condition. Indeed, clearly the determinant is nurture, not nature or: nature via nurture [Matt Ridley]. Obviously, neurologucal heredity, biological evolved behavioral genetic nature, only and fairly consistently enables the Empirical capacities for learning by encoding from the Phenomena, from experience, from nurture, to begin with. Experience is also now understood to trigger epigenetic change in genetic expression. Fraudulent obfuscation and denial to the contrary on either count, are only the current preferred high powered junk science marketing tactic of the Psychopharmacolical industry, pandering to compassion burn out and desperation, "soullessly" mocking and trivializing such cherished illusions as the yearning for understanding and with them all Philosophically meaningful values arising from the deep wellsprings of human emotional needs. Whereas it used to be that when a patient complained of anxiety out of the blue with no trigger, administering the old talking cure, the Therapist would gently ask the patient what they just happened to be thinking of at the time, however supposedly unconnected to whatever mysterious attacks from out of the blue, and guide them past their denial into catharsis and insight. Instead, disregarding the mind still leaves the physical brain, therefore Behaviorism is routinely called into service in standing support of neurochemical Reductionism along with the myth of endogeny, comprising the long refuted blanket rationale for so often reckless Psychopharmacology.

Stories and scenes are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the plot situation, but because of the reader or audience relationship, actual motivated feelings elicited for or even against the characters.

No matter the tone or attitude, atmosphere or ambiance, as evoked by the perfect setting, by Writing from the Senses, SUBTLE AND sensuously, with some reference to sensory perception in every paragraph, describing not only what a character sees, but hears, smells, tastes; the wind on his or her skin, the drone of insects, whatever, for richness of texture the senses remain key to Techniques of Suspense plotting and particularly to building onstage sexual tension and even aversion. Therefore, details of reflection, perception and experience must be chosen to draw out the moment that the reader may in turn be drawn into whatever the ambiance or other qualities of the passage or sequence, whichever point in the narrative.

Why, even a real boy like Pinocchio, yearning for his Blue Fairy, may instead become beguiled and exploited by Dracula's daughter or even the pedophile Coyote spirit of traditional Native American cautionary fables! Or, more prosaically, in the course of growing up, any ordinary person might, likewise, simply become drawn, by a crush of any sort, to relate to anyone else more human, imperfect and complicated.

Indeed, at the risk of seeming unduly Freudian, with all those big eyed bashful peek-a-boo, cuddly bump and tickle, what, exactly, is 'Teletubbies' but the most blatant and puerile porno for toddlers?! Brilliant in it's simplicity. Or has some narrative subtlety eluded me, here?

Kidding aside, 'Teletubbies', targeted at the youngest viewing audience ever in the history of television, is age appropriately educationally effective, precisely because preverbal tots do respond. Indeed, the key in writing to any younger audience or any other tender sensibility, is never expurgation but simply toning it down or perhaps sublimation one way or another.

And the point of truth in jest remains, that the appeal of 'Teletubbies' includes such attention, contact and expression that is only arbitrarily distinguished and divorced from that which may be deemed sexual foreplay, indeed such that Freud might well classify as infant sexuality, and without which babies are well known to actually and literally die from neglect and loneliness. That is why, necessarily, controversy and ambivalence not withstanding, perception is shaped and boundaries are drawn not only for protection of the innocent, but also to define and allow some range of licit interaction at all throughout life, instead of complete isolation, or so one might hope.

Infant and childhood sexuality is often manifest in the intrinsically motivated non-directive initiative in entirely natural behavior of children, however awkward socially, and hence reshaped in parenting. Nevertheless, or so the theory goes, adults initiating sex with children and even pubescents, is to be so taboo because of the danger of subversion of normal development by manipulative suggestion, much less influences of bribery and outright coercion, all in conflict of interests and abuse of trust in fiduciary relationship. The growth and psychological development of children, then, must be scrupulously non-directed. But no parenting in general, even comes close to that benchmark. Moreover, by that high standard, our educational system, similarly destructive to autonomy, engages in ongoing molestation, however Platonic, that has engendered in the population, a pandemic of lifelong generalized anxiety disorder, and all for our own good! The problem isn't with sex but with love, with coercion manipulatively rationalized and trust continually imposed upon, of intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation as ever, and the corruption that frequently attends upon power relations at all. Though all such gambits and conceits must be embraced more poetically than scientifically, a ttempt has even been undertaken to quantify tradeoff between freedom and security, Thermodynamically!

One even shopworn narrative cliché is of recovered childhood memory of a pedophile encounter, benign and even nurturing because of being completely non-directive and entirely at the initiative of drives of infant sexuality on the part of the child, rather than coercion, manipulation or naive trust in fiduciary guidance from the adult involved. Then the memory is allowed to recede into the child's unconscious so that the child can return to sexual latency and normal development.

Indeed there is precisely such a tropic scene in the works of the master of literary pandering, Robert Heinlein. Indeed, it all seems something perhaps of a somewhat strained variant of the dramatic single never to be repeated tryst in the wilderness of Tristram and Isolde, then put aside forever upon return to society replete with socialized roles and expectations in the court of King Mark.

But any such true to life claim may readily be dismissed as deep seated denial, and just such credulous revulsion in turn likewise dismissed as bigotry and limited imagination. Similarly, much as peyote usage is supposed to be rendered non addictive amid the extensive rites and guidance, behavioral structure, of the vision quest, indeed serving even all manner of beneficial Psychotherapy even including recovery from drug addiction, there is also the romanticized notion from Cultural Anthropology of very young sexual initiation, likewise safely enshrouded in meticulous ceremony and ritual and likewise providing behavioral structure ruling out not only doubt and distraction, but mixed signals to engender inner conflict. And in Science Fiction at its most pandering propagandistic, every taboo imaginable has been flouted in both glowing Utopias and in horrific cautionary Dystopias.

Neurosis begins as those wishes of a sexual nature are shamefully repressed in childhood, from socialization in guilt ridden suppression of infant sexuality. Therefore, can it seriously be suggested or argued that incest and Pedophilia are traumatic only because of taboo? Where incest and Pedophilia simply destigmatized, as a consequence, would trauma be eliminated or even at all diminished? Indeed, is such a disturbing hypothesis readily amenable to investigation, save by decidedly unethical experiment? And what notions could ever be so boundlessly handier for fictional exploration, Science Fiction thought experiment and general all around shock value!

Does precisely all such blatant shopworn mythology then remain the vexing pinnacle of human self knowledge? What dangerous ignorance! Or Am I the only one in the dark? Even in optimistic stretch of theoretical imagination, and speaking of unethical experiment, given human frailty and inherent fiduciary conflict of interests, any stringent laboratory conditions of benign pedophilia would be no less utterly contrived than any tropic fiction. At least transition in public consciousness, from a tabooistic and traumatic rules-based socialization of children by those who know best, to sincere investigation into and respect for the sanctity of their own sensibility of comfort, does seem like genuine progress. Now if only that same principle can ever be applied to begin any serious reform of the ongoing Platonic molestation that is what passes for our educational system.

But even if utterly consistent harm from Pedophilia is not autarky demonstrable, the dangers from Pedophilia remain manifest even if poorly understood and whatever the well debatable causes, reasons and explanation. Just imagine struggling to explain the human dangers of Pedophilia an alien life form! According to a certain extreme individualistic perspective, infants and helpless mute idiots, should be deemed consenting merely by displaying pleasure. And what an elegant highly principled ethics of Pedophilia! -Indeed, in truth, somewhat tidy and simplistic, quite without regard to complex unconsidered consequences in reality, especially under fiduciary obligation to the vulnerable. Likewise, every known theory in Cultural Anthropology, ideology or literary trope of possibly safe conditions for Pedophilia seems somehow of other over simplistic, unlikely, extremely contrived and romanticized, fancifully optimistic and impractical, smacking of the downright unrealistic. -And therefore remains, in a word, again: mythological: imaginary, the stuff of fable. Speculation raising healthy skepticism, nevertheless it all just needs work! In truth, we still have too far to go in rendering average family life and education anywhere near safe and wholesome, much less the cultural advent of any at all perhaps implausibly ideal harmless and nondirective non demanding Pedophile encounter and consummation in nigh transcendent consummate sensitivity, completely natural, impulsive, initiated and motivated by the child.

Nevertheless, what still undeniably complicates the issue is that children, though clearly different from adults, are not actually asexual, and never have been, no matter what we are more comfortable pretending. Indeed, babies denied all tactile affection simply die. It is even declared by bio-science that the comfort sought by a perfectly normal child curling up in the embrace of an adult care giver, if monitored and recorded with whatever sort of biosensors, might often physiologically qualify as sexual, even if the very thought scarcely occurs in the innocent mind of the child, never emerging into consciousness. All that the latter signifies, however, is that the boundary between what is benign and what is dangerous to children, between what Freud calls: infant sexuality and pedophile exploitation, will likely never be quantifiable merely physiologically. Differentiation of the sexual from chaste isn't even to the point.

Machiavelli recommends in war and statecraft, seeking only weaker allies. But can that advice find similar application throughout the entire rage of personal relationships? Obviously not. The problem of avoiding all conflict of interest, is that any desirable personal asset one might seek in another, can also be turned against you or to take undue advantage. And this is a particular danger in child rearing because actual equality of knowledge and ability is impossible and not only impractical. Indeed, the lines have been drawn so completely differently by different cultures throughout history. And culturally variable inconsistent arbitrary demarcation of the licit from the illicit is inadequate. The question remains: How ought we best see to both the safety and the physical and emotional needs of the vulnerable, and children in particular?

Now, who in their right minds can actually be so gullible as to foment such mindless taboo and endorse any so simplistic and half-baked a mandate of social intervention? Consistency would only be melodramatically typical of Manichean culture-war, and inconsistency hypocritical, even often howsoever typical and ubiquitous self-serving and exploitative cockblocking, as ever, the metaphorical foxes set to guard the proverbial chicken coop.

Pandering if not as literally to act as a go-between or liaison in sexual intrigues or function as a procurer, denotes similarly even however vicariously to cater to the lower tastes and desires and wish fulfillment fantasies of others or most specifically, thereby to titillate and exploit their weaknesses, as even by the most obsequious flattery in the guise of affirmation, validation, and even thereby exploitatively winning unearned trust by ploys of however manipulative and dishonest propaganda manipulation outright, even demagoguery.

Sex sells. Such emotional appeals or motivation, to the heart, passions, sympathies, gut feelings or even the lowest common denominators of self serving rationalization to malice, jealous rage, outright devilry of thinly disguised hate speech and self loathing. Quintessentially, the transparent lies of the Faux News deceive no one, rather they pander irrationally. Blatant hate and fear mongering propaganda panders to any lowest common denominator of basest instinct, also include loaded or slanted emotional appeal employing language that is calculated to get a particular reaction from readers. Pandering and hence the repertoire of propaganda, also includes out and out sob stories and soppy sentimental tearjerkers, even to be rated by the number of hankies needed! manipulating readers' emotions in order to lead them to draw however unwarranted or poorly supported and even well refutable conclusions.

The three motivating principle cofactors in effective manipulation also applicable in pandering, propagandistically or otherwise, are whatever the incentive and disincentive vulnerabilities of the target or targets, the tactics of the manipulator(s), and time for the relationship to develop under whatever conditions, free or captive.

The phenomenon of manipulation is best defined as undue advantage from trickery via the exploitation of affective innate and conditioned triggers or "push buttons" to undermine and overwhelm, even barrage, resistance, caution, better judgment and autonomy of the target, via insidiously motivating subtext of emotional positive incentive and negative disincentive. –As distinct from open coercion alone or substantive disinformation, lies. Typically, the manipulator obfuscates the nature of their coercion exercised, along with whatever self-serving advantage thereof, whatever their own ultimate motivation.

Positive incentive manipulation or pandering is such as deviously appeals to value in fantasy and desire, love, sex greed, promoting false hope of whatever gain, in order to circumvent or overwhelm resistance, caution, better judgment and autonomy of the target. Whereas an example of negative disincentive manipulation, such insult as condescension that after all comes of love can be less painful than insult that comes without it, or more so, or equally so, as the case may be: but be that as it may, it is, in any case significantly more harmful. This is because insult provokes anger and hostility, but hostility towards people who even sincerely profess to love you and act on your own best interest is curbed and turned inwards, internalized, and experienced on the level of inner conflict of self-hostility, namely guilt. Such deceptive appeals undermining the target’s credulity and defenses even whilst actually exercising coercion constitute often likewise internalized flagrantly manipulative behavior, conscious or unconscious, selfish, indifferent or just desperate.

Though certainly, there are, always, of course, if not drama per se, then other whatever loftier social or entirely artistic aims in any subject matter, delicate or indelicate, then again, for writers no less than their characters, pandering and personal disclosure alike often present such blocks and barriers of inhibition to overcome as self-consciousness or even sheer anhedonic Moralism and squeamishness outright.

Stories are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the plot situation, but because of the reader or audience relationship, actual motivated feelings elicited for or even against the characters. And any motivation may do!

Yes, leave us face it, sex appeal may simply pander to sensationalism and/or flights of fantasy, escapism and wish fulfillment for the reader's guilty vicarious pleasure. After all, as the old saying goes, sex sells! Blatant or subtle. Certainly, the erotic is a value, indeed, an aesthetic category.

WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH - and leave us not forget: Death is glorious Life Eternal! The first rule of propaganda pandering, is that anything can most readily be either glamorized or vilified, formulaically, so that in the slippery slide from willing suspension of disbelief into the tenacity of utter credulity, vivid illustration takes on the very semblance of airtight convincing demonstration. After all, seeing is believing, as the old platitude goes, but ultimately, it is the mind and not the eye that sees. Never mind what history really teaches us. In the vivid pandering of unfettered propaganda fantasy that pretends all manner of daring and provocative perspective, slaves can be happy, totalitarianism efficient and humane, and even wild sex a real drag until the protagonist finds God! Even life and survival can be made wearisome and disgusting, heightened and ecstatic only by the thrill of self destruction, so that death itself may be extolled as transcendent and beatific release from all cares and woe, indeed in ultimate crowning fulfillment of the Zen Mystic's quest for futility, committed sacrifice making way for return to innocence in generations to come.

But, please GHOD not just the belabored bludgeoning obsessions of the writer! Only tiresome zealots need to be pandered to and stoked upon every single point of dogmatic ideology. Of course, the most truly destructive is manipulative dishonest propaganda pandering to hypocritisy. But if POV will not be thoughtful and literate, then, at least let us have good trash, pandering if we must, self indulgence of the reader, not the writer, grabbing the readers, not beating them over the head. Remember to evoke the senses, show don't tell action that actually advances the plot. And building the tension of every Technique of Suspense plotting, even in vicarious pandering, depends upon pacing.

Because, to follow another old saying, capable writing still reveals something about human nature. Even sheer vicarious pandering in it's appeal to the universal fantasies of the audience. While bad self indulgent obsessive writing reveals far too much about the author. Particularly when it comes to such awkward self indulgence that only displays whatever especially obsessive proverbial "axe to grind", personal preoccupation, attachment or morbid fixation, prurient or otherwise, to the exclusion of all else.

Prolong the Agony by making life difficult so as to motivate characters. Don't be nice to your character! No Powderpuff Pitty-Pat! Even pander to vicarious wish fulfillment, but also inspire p athos, anticipation, every Technique of Suspense plotting even dread and even the discomfort of sheer aversion. Stir any range of emotions and force the reader to empathize, to feel. That's what makes for good entertainment, a real page turner.

nevertheless, perhaps the most debilitating of all fetish to fiction writing remains the overwhelming and unthinking compulsion to censor or to Bowdlerize. Again, of necessity, the key in writing "child safe" to any younger audience or to any other tender sensibility, is never true and utter expurgation, but simply in toning down anything even remotely explicit, skirting the central question by mere tender suggestion, leaving characterization, motivation and drama intact.

Moralism is Justificationist and motivated from the Transactional inner controlling parent and/or compliantly decidophobic inner adaptive child, demanding impossible and unnecessary justification in objective grounds for ethics, often in moral heteronomy to God , thereby rejecting as imperfect, all conjecture, evidence and refutation from criticality available only to the Transactional adult ego state. Masochism and heteronymous submission come in reaction formation in order for the neurotic individual to function and seek gratification at all, even while coping with overwhelming and paralytic feelings of guilt. Reciprocally, moralistic voyeurism panders to, relishes and delights in even while burning with envy towards, all that it so Sadistically and judgmentally condemns. Moralism hypocritically panders to and whitewashes unsympathetic fetish objectification in voyeuristic titillation and Sadistically delicious overture to self righteous self serving and envy, thus providing alibi and denial along with impunity in appeal to evil, mobbing, shunning, bullying, ostracism, repression both in the individual psyche and in society, the glorification of controlling judgmental sex negative jealousy acting

out, as somehow or other actually pro-social and benevolent. But of course, all such revolting pretence aside, hypocritical cockblockers are monumentally self serving, not philanthropic at all!

Indeed, various manipulative and destructive cliques, particularly obscurantist cults and scams, exploit Stockholm Syndrome (prevalent in varying degrees) to draw in the mark in vein hope that things will begin to make more sense as the mystery unfolds. Alas, real life happy endings are never guaranteed in the face of passivity and love conquers nothing without backbone and the courage for individual growth.

Alas, there are always those so tragically hardcore and deeply disturbed, genuinely masochistic and anhedonic, that only real danger and self destruction remain enticing, acceptable and licit.

All all others more fortunate, need never let reality spoil a good fantasy! Few would actually conclude that if war movies are good, then actual combat experience must be even better! Thankfully, just as roller coasters and other popular "barf-rides" harmlessly simulate the thrill of a nearly averted vehicular disaster, classic fairytale ravishment, bondage and captivity fantasies and erotic role-play can safely liberate into fantasy and teasing sexual foreplay all the classic drama or shameless melodrama, as the case may be, forbidden thrill and every other Technique of Suspense plotting, desperate approval seeking, of hope toyed with, of the captive struggling seductively to win whatever small kindness of the threatening captor or attacker and survive, and all manner of desperate desire to be expressed, received and fulfilled in an all to blatant and obvious paradoxical intention of "Reverse Psychology."

Indeed, the kinky fairytale of Stockholm Syndrome, by adamant denial unfettered beyond the burdensome restraints logical contradictions in hard reality, all of the unflagging faith, goodness empathy and connection of the innocent and unrecognized virtuous victimized princess soiled dove, can in the flights of fantasy of impromptu Psychodrama, finally and truly be vindicated by finally at long last redeeming their own unflagging faith in the biggest jerk, most hopeless confirmed loser or even the very worst villain, abuser or bully! I knew there was good in you, Daddy...

Fantasy and denial come in surreal malignant optimism, sublimation explaining away hostility and abuse as expression of love, control and callous indifference as passion and desire, and imagining that there can be any resolution or happy ending for helplessness in toxic relationship, in hoping to reform, lame bad boys, bullying douchebags and outright scheming Malignant Narcissistic sociopaths, whist self sabotagingly shunning any one better.

The delusions are dangerous, sad and doomed. Not all that is intense is intensely good. The realism of edge-play is for losers. But the exploration of fantasies running hot and deep, affords safer outlet, confronting our fears in drama, mocking them in farce, and even the experience of impossible fulfillment in defiance of all logic via sheer imagination in Psychodrama.

Synopsis: Meet Sedgwick Exeter, SEXtER for short, always seen grinning as his thumbs dance across the controls if his smart phone at lightening speed. For SEXtER is community organizer, renowned in the community for his ready wit and mastery of humorous vulgar double entendre and innuendo in to the most routine and pedestrian communication. But little does anyone suspect the darker purpose concealed behind all of SEXtER's clowning. For ensnaring his prey with provocative SMS, SEXtER goes meting out his own brand of poetic justice upon all manner of sex offenders, either who have evaded the law, or are devious enough to operate with impunity. SEXtER regularly volunteers at a rape crisis center, where his sense of humor is overlooked in light of his dedication and hard work, in order to track down fresh leads. SEXtER sodomizes serial rapists flouting the law, and captures spouse beaters (mostly male, but not all) in order to keep them as sissified domestic slaves! SEXtER stalks, infiltrates and brutally humiliates and intimidates privileged and powerful corporate sexual harassers, and then silences them by blackmail. SEXtER robs and breaks the heart of an amoral sweetheart scammer, and returns the ill gotten gains to the victims. SEXtER dishes out penance to a rehab group of pedophile priests under church protection and cover up. Then one day at the rape crisis center, SEXtER discovers several vulnerable rape victims being driven away, facing further abuse from serial false accuser whom SEXtER immediately recognizes as an old crony of the corporate sexual harasser, a Munchausen demanding all the attention for herself exclusively and who seriously undermines operations at the rape crisis center with her constant intrigues and acting

out. So SEXtER exposes her and destroys her credibility, and then later rapes her. And as with the fabled boy who cried wolf, no one believes or sympathizes anymore.

We finally flashback to the origin of SEXtER, when SEXtER finally gets a lead on his own brutal serial rape gang and takes savage revenge. Meanwhile, as SEXtER learns, the serial false accuser, a fragile personality as it turns out, has made a suicide attempt. And then one of the rape gang, a fugitive from the law, dies from infection and intestinal hemorrhage before SEXtER can track him down again and drag him forcibly to the hospital. And this last incident finally brings SEXtER onto Dexter's proverbial radar, as SEXtER finally begins wrestling with doubt and remorse. Dexter intercepts the identification of Sedgwick Exeter from genetic markers of the seamen found in the dead rapist, and then derails the investigation in order to have this new prey all to himself. Dexter then begins tracking down SEXtER even as SEXtER hunts the leader of the brutal rape gang whom SEXtER then engages in epic battle. Finally, with his own long ago brutalizer at his mercy, SEXtER savors the moment. But the hardened leader of the rape gang is uncowed, and spits right in SEXtERs eye, laughing that nothing SEXtER can do to him will be any worse than what he has already endured many times in his own life. Stunned in a flash of insight, SEXtER finds himself identifying with his nemesis, and commits the ultimate and unendurable invalidating cruelty in forgiveness, turning his back and walking away forever. Dexter, having arrived just in time to bear witness, muses that SEXtER has accomplished that which has so long eluded Dexter, by overcoming and leaving behind the dark passenger of obsession and violence. But as fate would have it, the leader of the rape gang is also a killer, now at Dexter's mercy! But leader of the rape gang, cornered all over again, summarily botches a suicide attempt...

The allegedly miraculous that tends to obscure rather than better explaining morality, likewise reinforces all stigma inflicted by Moralism wherein morality in the abstract may become lost in wandering because of focus entirely upon purity of ostensibly motivating intention, losing sight of concrete responsibility of autonomy regarding feasibility of implementation, any attempt at any realistic cost-benefit projection, reasonably foreseeable consequences together with moderation and fairness of accountability in the real world, that rightfully ought to be the focus of outwardly directed compassion and compunction. Such is another example of paralytic demands for impossible and unnecessary perfection typical of irresponsible, unaccountable and decidophobic heteronomy. Actually, it was the nigh saintly Born Again Christian President Jimmy Carter who declared: "You can't legislate morality." Indeed Alexis de Tocqueville cites "more vices and fewer crimes" as among the hallmarks of democracy. Otherwise, Machiavelli counseled his Prince that a competent criminal makes for a better ruler than the inept clueless high-minded Moralists, too pious for any worldly good, that where in charge in his day. -And even then that such an iron fisted ruler reluctantly proffered thereto, must eventually adapt to change or be deposed and replaced.

And yet instead, Reactionary Moralism only reemerges in new trappings and guise: Indeed, the only Atheists who deny Evolution are the Communists. For no matter how creatively Capitalism ever mutates for the better, the Communists like all Utopists remain scornful of progress in very principle. In truth, no less than the Christianity they have so forsworn, they simply disapprove of greed.

Taboo: Forbidden therapy: $filthy lucre$

In Communism no less than in religion or Zen, it is Moralistic to locate the problem with individuality and selfish desire to begin with. Hence Religion strives to redirect worldly desire into yearning for God, Zen to crush the ~~spirit~~ ego, and Communism to bring about the purely altruistic new Soviet Man. Morality may serve as a motivation of individual restraint in curbing amoral harmful action, whereas Moralism seeks to govern by principles and expectations of the highest morality on the part of each citizen, and indeed by the annihilation and reconditioning of of guilty impulses thereby however only to engender guilt and inner conflict. Indeed, in the words of H. G. Wells: “Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo.” Alas however, Moralsm remains a doomed enterprise for under any conceivable social order or economic system because just as in nature, so long as there is any advantage to be gained in dishonest unfair play, a certain percentage of the population will. And it is difficult enough at all to curtail the worst abuse of the worst offenders and tending to whatever damage control and harm reduction or sensibly dealing with cultural and economic circumstances of social ills and malfeasance, all even without deranged wasteful and destructively unrealistic Moralistic social programs of ever simply bullying the entire population wholesale into perfect selfless little angels.

Masochism and heteronymous submission then come in reaction formation in order for the neurotic individual to function and seek gratification at all, even while coping with overwhelming and paralytic feelings of guilt. Reciprocally, Moralistic voyeurism hypocritically panders to, relishes and delights in even while burning with envy towards, all that it so Sadistically and judgmentally condemns. Moralism hypocritically panders to and whitewashes unsympathetic fetish objectification in voyeuristic titillation and Sadistically delicious overture to self righteous self serving and envy, thus providing alibi and denial along with impunity in appeal to evil, mobbing, shunning, bullying, ostracism, repression both in the individual psyche and in society, the glorification of controlling judgmental sex negative jealousy actingout, as somehow or other actually pro-social and benevolent. But of course, all such revolting pretence aside, hypocritical cockblockers are monumentally self serving, not philanthropic at all! Nor has Moralism as has, as well shall see, so continually undermined any sound public policy of sexual health, ever otherwise well served the public interest.

Perhaps worst among pipedreaming malagenas are Moralism and Utopism being the doctrine that responsibility is impossible save in the lights of perfect (or justified) knowledge of whatever ultimate truth and/or towards whatever ultimate good (to which of course, the ends ever justify the means), responsibility is impossible. Thus by promising the impossible and the unnecessary, do high-minded scoundrels ever evade even the most minimum and ordinary of obligations and pedestrian expectations of minimal responsibility to which private citizens, service providers and public officials are held accountable under democratic civility and the rule of law. -By entirely removing responsibility from foreseeable consequence, into a realm of perfect and pure abstraction. Such mad and dangerous Utopist thinking remains entirely distinct from what is simply Utopian merely in terms of even laudably embracing high ideals or altruistic ambitions entirely without the madness of Utopist ideology. Moralism has outlived it's origins in religion, surviving often as an Heteronymous decidophobic feature of Utopism as, for example, in Communism.

And Moralists, religious or otherwise, are often irresponsible in blithe and stubborn disregard of well foreseeable consequences in public policy, as for example, of the disastrous war on vice, in child rearing and in what passes for education, and more, all in utter denial of the manifest superiority of Empirical case based reasoning over blind and dogged rules based decision making. All such prudish admonitions, dire prohibitions and coercive legislative have all never failed only to consistently make things by far the worse! Indeed, as in the Environmental mainstream, the appeal of virtuously thrifty conservation, is often misleading away from any true hope of the most noble and crucial of desired results better obtainable by the pragmatism of workable public policy and sound engineering solutions. Indeed, self abnegation is meant to free the spirit for loftier occupation of the mind, but more often engenders simmering obsessive bitter judgmental envy of those less inhibited. And Moralistic envy only rationalizes and panders to spite and voyeuristic fascination.

But the desperately Heteronymous Moralist ever persists in futile destructive and self destructive Behavior Modification from puffed up pure intentions, ignoring catastrophic results. More to the case in point, sex negative celibate Moralists strive to abstain from sex, rejecting contraceptive and prophylactic preparedness as the occasioning of sin, let alone responsible remedy for consequences thereafter. By the twisted Moralism of the Pro-Lifers against abortion, one might likewise argue that to take responsibility for the weakness of eating sweets, one must refuse dental treatment of cavities! And the statistically consistent eventual result of Moralistic striving for abstinence, is the very most impulsive and ill considered unplanned and unprotected sex. Then guilty helplessness thereafter in dealing with even the emotional results. And while true spontaneity is certainly wonderful, desperately peer pressured inane fake fun and the ironically awkward and uncomfortable so called casual sexuality of chronic willfully oblivious disassociated states, with or without chemical assistance, only become crucial in the mitigation of ever mounting and intolerable shame and guilt. The Moralist can then either excuse themselves on the claim of good intentions after all, or repent miserably of moral wickedness and weakness. And then the Moralist can only redouble their statistically futile and always distressfully guilt ridden and often vengeful struggles with inner conflict. But instead to confront their hypocritical irresponsibility in the face of foreseeable consequences would be at long last to transcend Moralism and Utopism, worst among pipedreaming malagenas, being the doctrine that responsibility is impossible save in the lights of perfect (or justified) knowledge of whatever ultimate truth and/or towards whatever ultimate good (to which of course, the ends ever justify the means), responsibility is impossible. Thus by promising the impossible and the unnecessary, do high-minded scoundrels ever evade even the most minimum and ordinary of obligations and pedestrian expectations of minimal responsibility to which private citizens, service providers and public officials are held accountable under democratic civility and the rule of law. -By entirely removing responsibility from foreseeable consequence, into a realm of perfect and pure abstraction of virtuous motivating intentions. Such mad and dangerous Utopist thinking remains entirely distinct from what is simply Utopian merely in terms of even laudably embracing high ideals or altruistic ambitions entirely without the madness of Utopist ideology.

The history of successful reform is never of Moralism, but of Humanistic pragmatic tolerance, of progress and not of sweeping perfectionism. Indeed, beyond constructive positive intervention instead futile Reactionary police or military action or else distain and isolation, the compassion of assistance and treatment instead of punishment and coercion for the disadvantaged and for the outright most wretched, there is even very real hope in the most seemingly depraved of nonjudgmental harm reduction including not only such measures as sanitary clean needles for drug addicts, but even the recommendation by Anti-Slavery International of labor unions for sex workers. It's not a matter of simply giving up on all our most damaged, but of howsoever dignified interim stability as the first step towards any willing change for the better.

TRIZ to the subversive rescue of Utopism?

dishonesty and The Lifecycle of Social Systems

“History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.” — Abba Eban

And though nevertheless, some actually even do so Moralistically decry that effortless weight loss and management would be facilitated in the advent of the thin pill, even in the face of perpetually ecstatic gluttony, all without effort and sacrifice, would eliminate the virtuous discipline and character building derived from arduous exercise and diet under the natural punishment for unnecessarily consuming food so desperately needed for immediate survival by the masses of those inescapably trapped in impending sickness and death by starvation and malnutrition, at least no one seriously predicts the moral downfall of modern society from the improved per capita mass market sex appeal as resulting from an on average vastly slimmer citizenry, the way they so often do population explosion as somewhat erroneously projected consequence from extended youth and life!

True, it is, indeed, manifestly unfair, how the rich, but not the poor who starve, can pay inflated prices for food during crop failures. Moralism dwells upon that aspect of the problem to the exclusion of all practicality, entirely ignoring how even the most virtuous diet and exercise, transmit not so much as one calorie of food to the desperately malnourished. In the end, Moralism, angry judgment and sacrifice without compassion or generosity, is as heartless as it is irrational and impractical. Rather, Hedonism is what inspires sympathy for any who suffer, and efficiency is what drives solutions to all wont.

And likewise as with curtailed gastronomic pleasure, in the end, statistically, the ever virtuous slut-shaming Moralism of consistent proper usage of condoms, a frustrating and purpose defeating technology, and yes: for women too and not only for men, is little different from that of abstinence outright. Compassion and reason demand abandonment of manipulative propaganda and Behavior Modification, instead, indeed the very farthest from suborning or condoning heedlessly unprepared unsafe behavior, actually engaging with the public from reciprocal Transactional inner adulthood and respect for intelligence and autonomy in the responsible dissemination of substantive information however taboo, of the various tradeoffs entailed with the entire range of safer sex strategies, meanwhile striving ever to discover and implement ever more effective but also reliably convenient and unobtrusive technologies to the market as quickly as safe and possible.

The priceless unthinking bile of Rush Limbaugh has at least once even achieved the philosophical Zen malapropism of a Yogi Berra: “Abstinence prevents sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy - every time it's tried.” Though, truth be told, the very same blithe irony actually applies no less, regarding the glorified semi-abstinence of condom use, not surprisingly far more successful under laboratory conditions than in the field, due much to the same or similar obvious inevitable and intractable threshold of frustration and temptation, drunk, stoned or cold sober.

Sweet reason often amounts to sheer Ecclesiastical futility, especially when sweet reason is actually nothing of the sort, but only the coercive and traumatizing manipulative sex-negative shame. Politically correct lip service aside, any range of boneheaded risky behavior simply driven underground, has often only become the more dangerous. The statistics for condom usage remain poor. Anecdotally, crypto-moralistically guilt tripping people into sexually frustrating condom usage, has largely resulted in worsening unprepared risky behavior, specifically: bareback natural sex, and all too often increasingly drunk or stoned and hence the more immune impaired, but nevertheless, even if and when stone cold sober, no less at the naturally eventual and inevitable threshold of temptation and frustration. -Or even effective abandonment of precaution at all entirely! Such results are consistently foreseeable, observable and true. Placing blame only makes things worse, and then denial of precisely such Moralism compounds the harm even further still:

The most unsafe behavior of all is pervasive subtext tacitly slut-shaming of others into irresponsible silence.
Behavior Modification remains degrading dire failure in very principle, an ongoing malpractice in heedless abrogation of the core medical ethic of Psychotherapy, being the injunction against suggestion. Therefore, better by far, to abandon propaganda, instead remaining open and consistent from the get go, than to continually tempt backsliding and fate later on. Indeed, this entire simple truth of human nature, though no secret, being both entirely natural and completely normal, is nevertheless quite taboo. The inevitable problem of such flagrantly purpose defeating technology is simply written off as "human failure." -Because, after all, condoms are perfect and infallible, completely reliable, when used correctly. Which to say: under laboratory conditions, and preferably by androids! Likewise, in the blithe irony of Rush Limbaugh: "Abstinence prevents sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy - every time it's tried." Indeed, does not the very expression: "human failure" that sounds so bland and technical, likewise squarely place blame and pass judgment on the individual? How Orwellian anti-sex! Instead of "human failure." why not be more honest and simply call it: customer dissatisfaction? Because, with AIDS awareness so-called, in contie9nuation from the similarly misanthropic and patronizing irresponsible Moralism of the incarceration that passes for education, the customer is always wrong! For rather than engaging the interests of students, consequent boredom and distress is deemed a character flaw of indolence then subject to unrelenting coercion and manipulation. Indeed, and likewise, hope for no escape any time afterwards in the fabled embrace of Morpheus: CPAP now does for sleep what condoms do for sex. Indeed, I must confess my entire failure at all to relate to erotic fixations with respirators and the like, never mind catheterization. But I digress.

And though while it may even be all but presumed to bash domineering pleasure centered males, it will be especially dangerous for any woman even so much as to admit the ability to discern flesh from plastic. Natural sex is always better, and secret disgust with condoms is therefore entirely understandable. Freud's criticism of condoms as alienating, is often conveniently forgotten under the rationalization of how the technology, indeed, has improved. Modern condoms are actually less obtrusive, therefore, however, it follows, only that much less icky, stridently alienating and therefore only the more prone to dismal and denial into the lurking unconscious.

For shameful socially inconvenient human motivations do not simply fade away, never to return. Indeed, in the words of Sigmund Freud: "That which is not expressed, is actedout." People break before condoms do! Yes, oppressed women cannot negotiate safer sex, but neither can free and equal sex partners negotiate the trade offs of the various safer sex strategies other than condoms, unless they can find the autonomy to resist conformity and think for themselves; because, actually initiated driven and motivated by the ever manipulative and controlling Transactional inner Parent, crypto-moralistic Behavior Modification constrains all options to the false binary of compliance versus recalcitrance.

And sheer physical gratification can never truly be so neatly compartmentalized from the emotional comfort of palpable interpersonal contact, both undermined by the frustrating and even emotionally hurtful tactile barrier of the condom.

Purpose frustrating, when used correctly

Condom usage as the only socially acceptable condition of sexual intercourse, remains a patronizing, intolerant and foolish strategy towards the inculcation of a partial abstinence, flying in the face of human nature and doomed to significant partial failure no less than abstinence only education is to fairly complete failure. I have only ever made the unfortunate acquaintance of but one person for whom condoms are actually enticing, and he is an emotionally unstable retarded rubber fetishist. Perhaps all that suggests a more potent behavioral conditioning solution to the problem at hand. I shudder to think!

Study concluding that condomless sex is better for mental health: weathers under evident reciprocal political bias and allegedly vague Methodology

Of course, any focus upon STD control, may tend to leave birth control as a separate issue. And it's no secret either, how crisis pregnancy is more often actually motivated by psychological unloved feelings of inadequacy, demonstration of potency and every social dysfunction whereof such unhappiness emanates, and in truth no accident, simple birth control failure, or even, really deep down, anything to do with howsoever sentiment towards the unborn.

Therefore, societal response is typically misguided, even surreal in absurdity, entirely inappropriate and in need of strategic reform in order to discover and contend with the real issues. Under any circumstances, self control tends to be by far the more debilitating under pressure than by at all free choice however constrained by circumstances or situation. That is why, until inoculation against and/or cure for AIDS, a more effective responsible respectful autonomy supportive sex-positive approach to AIDS prevention, might include dissemination of up to the minute research following optimal development of every promising resource and good information about all tradeoffs variously entailed in every known strategy towards safer sex. Indeed, anything so redemptive of the dignity of sex for pleasure, might at the same time also even help at whatever the true root socio-psychological impulses behind many a crisis pregnancy, as well as the pandemic shamefully repressed and inhibited inability to function sexually unless intoxicated, which fairly well rules out safer sex.

Indeed, politically incorrect as it has been to admit, both men and women have been known to report any degree of actual physical pain from the use of condoms, tolerated from fear of risking STD transmission or pregnancy, so, again: might that not pose anything of a false dilemma? Two alternative strategies available for autonomous and sensible people, have been ever less obtrusive spermicidal products ever coming onto the market, and ever better, simpler, quicker and more readily available tests for HIV infection beforehand, that are still a viable option for prophylaxis strategy, though, of course, then perhaps requiring whatever separate measures for birth control. But the circumstances regarding spermicides marketed only for birth control has been especially confusing: Obviously, the thought occurs that Nonoxinol-9, for whatever mysterious reason long the only spermicide long available, though never explicitly claimed to stop AIDS transmission, was more than strong enough to destroy any retrovirus, given that it was considered suitable for killing sperm! Otherwise, why where all lubricated condoms lined with Nonoxinol-9? Answer: For added protection. Added protection from what? Answer: Why, AIDS, the HIV, of course. The nonprescription vaginal spermicide Nonoxinol 9 has been the active ingredient in most spermicide and kills viri by destroying their protective fatty outer coating or shell, though, technically, by whatever happenstance, Nonoxinol 9 was never actually certified by the Food and Drug Administration for any such specific purpose. Therefore, Nonoxinol-9 was howsoever surreptitiously employed not just prophylacticly but antivirally to protect against AIDS transmission, furthermore suggesting that those vaunted reliable condoms alone, costly, awkward, cumbersome, leave us say it at long last: frankly repulsive and frustrating, frighteningly subject to tearing, breakage and even degradation from prolonged exposure to sunlight at point of sale, where never really so trusted after all as we have all been so emphatically assured. Indeed, unlubricated condoms where marketed only in case of allergy to Nonoxinol-9, an irritating detergent after all. So, actually, two flawed technologies where combined in order to optimize safety. And how commonsensible and obvious that seems, finally stated openly, which it never quite is. However, condoms containing nonoxynol-9 have never been shown to be any more effective at protecting against pregnancy and STDs than condoms without spermicide. Worse, it turns out that not only anal but as summarily discovered, also vaginal membrane irritation caused by Nonoxinol-9, especially in more frequent use, actually opens the way thereby increasing risk of HIV infection! Two microbicide alternatives to Nonoxynol-9 have com onto the market, oxtoxynol-9 and benzalkonium chloride, but irritation may still pose a problem, especially as depending upon concentration strength.

Honesty, faithful up to the minute reportage and open discourse upon the best information in quest of the widest range of varied strategic options available for individuals together towards maximizing benefit while minimizing risk, remains the best policy. And so it should come as no surprise that once again, scientific openness essential to respectful autonomy support, might have better served us all than Orwellian mealy mouthed propaganda righthink peer pressure socialization and failed wholesale patronizing consensus manipulation and b ehavioral conditioning that has not only always been so doomed to backfire psychologically and behaviorally, but that the chilling effect whereof has also so thoroughly undermined rational thinking and stifled all reasoned discourse. But exactly such is the appeal thereof, of the sadomasochistic and prudish siren song of virtuous self sacrifice, of demonization and placing blame, of the same endlessly dreary politics of mortification.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is now funding development of the so-coined: Molecular Stealth Condom. [DISCUSSION] And after cautiously rising hopes, it was even anticipated that SPL7013 VivaGel® Intravaginal STD Defense could be on the market by 2012. But tests are still underway. [bibliography] Therefore one night naively expect that any prospect of either such ever less intrusive and more effective prophylactic technology would be eagerly welcomed and by all, but apparently that would be pleasure seeking and sinful! Therefore, (birth control at first having been so morally controversial because of religion) much as the pill was initially marketed ostensibly as a medication for menstrual irregularity and thus purportedly an aid to conception, now the tried and true publicly condoned marketing ploy of pandering to man-bashing by focusing only upon the awful plight of oppressed women in the third world even confronted with sexual violence and unable to negotiate safer sex, is employed towards the all important patronizing propaganda mission of directing the sheeple for our own good and for public safety instead of ever daring to trust and openly empower sex-positive human autonomy.

A full recapitulation of raging controversy over whether AIDS is actually caused by the sexually transmitted HIV in the first place, exceeds the scope of this written work. Suffice that the alternative theories so urgently need neither to be embraced nor debunked, in exhortation to faith and belief, one way or the other, as demanded by competing Moralism, but rigorously tested in honest and objective quest of truth: of correspondence to reality, so that we can more quickly find out and ever actually know.

The prospect of Zinc Alpha 2 Glycoprotein therapeutic supplementation and gluttony without consequence

Caveat

Despite all above weighty discourse addressing such questions so seriously and earnestly, for some reason, allegations of lewd content on this website persist. Mouse over the animation to discover how Online prudes may best cope running afoul of those awkward squeamish downloads.

"Share and enjoy!"

Moreover, perhaps warning and apology for the risk of disappointment may actually be in order after all the build up fuss and flame, that despite every good faith effort to include at least some at all racy material, content on this site may still turn out rather tame in comparison to the norms of free expression on the Web in whichever applicable literary genres or artistic styles. Take the PORNPOLL !


Legal:
Definition of "the average person" remains problematical, as does determination of any aggregate viewpoints. Are we speaking of statistical averages, and from what sample? The average folks encountered by your truly, the Webmaster, would tend, generally speaking, to find sex-negativity, intolerance and tabooism frankly ludicrous and even dangerous if not, indeed, actually defamatory. Community standards and even prurience, blasphemy and treasonous expression, are well known and understood to vary, incidentally and even arbitrarily, between communities and cultures, leaving the terms even more ill defined than before. Even definition of community itself remains open. Redeeming value is also highly debatable, especially as relates to different conceivable audiences, indeed often prior context dependant or else unappreciated. Moreover, harm what so ever, Psychiatric or otherwise, has yet to be objectively or conclusively demonstrated simply from exposure to content of expression. Alas, the same cannot be said as regards taboo, intimidation and restriction of communication, which are so often so grievously destructive, traumatic and oppressive.. Also, what does it mean, in this context of an electronic media, "to display", never mind knowingly? Indeed, in this context, what constitutes knowledge thereof? And is there any fine distinction between "display" and Constitutionally protected open publication at all? And what does it mean to assert that anything is "on display" to anyone in particular any more than anyone else other, given that all content is Online and hence accessible much the same? And what constitutes knowledge in this regard, as in knowingly displaying, whatever that means? All in all, the laws here, even aside from being so vague, are flagrantly Unconstitutional, unenforceable and a damnable witch hunt. Fortunately, the meaning and Constitutionality of the law remains hotly contested. The most that can be presented in the matter are competing legal hypotheses.

This being stated, click this hyperlink to review content advisory request procedure for this website

"One man's vulgarity is another's lyric." -- Justice John M. Harlan, Cohen v. California (1971)



Quotegarden: censorship
“dirty books are fun”
Fake Science and Pornography


	Trusting and naive ingénue or conniving coquette?