!
Trigger warning:
 
Suspicion alas, so often remains entirely prudent and wise. For such is life. Therefore, quite without disparagement:
 
In case of
all consuming
paranoid mistrust,
please click here
in order to help put
your mind at ease.
 
Welcome to FoolQuest.com
 
In order to peruse and engage interesting and important web content,
please just continue browsing at will.

Then let's talk    Post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

 

But in case of difficulties reading and understanding text,
navigating hypertext, or in order to critique prose and composition,
then please click here.

Thank you.

for substantive conversation and cooperation
Calling all brainstormers!
 
BLUEPRINT and SOLICITATION for CREATIVE COMMUNITY
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

Disclaimer:  ‘Mistakes are the Essence
The Way of the Sympathetic Copy/Language Editor or beta reader

 

Too serious yet not serious enough, remains such quasi-authoritative rightthink in such picayune enmity with writing style, authorial voice, or even hypertext webdesign, all to such dogged and inane diversionary and obstructive irrelevant soft-flame exclusion of message content from due consideration. And what strange, passive hostile, short attention backhanded invalidation ever can there be, more manipulative and conflicting than whatever craven proffer howsoever ostensibly of such well meaning help and advice, but only while keeping distance? Indeed, without engaging or becoming involved? Indeed, without respect or regard toward substance and authorial intent? Of what relevance?

By contrast, first valid consideration arising and remaining ever crucial in more substantive critique: Any serious author retains every right and bears full responsibility of explicitly seeking indeed whatever manner and kind of feedback as they themselves perceive the need and as most helpful and relevant. And under the human condition, communications struggle replete with all manner of genuine communications errors and failures, remains nigh inevitable. What then best may be done, ever incase of communications failure and reciprocal incomprehension? That is the question! And the answer remains: full collaboration in ever ongoing miscommunication repair.

Because writing is like photography: Easy to do but difficult to do well. In whatever context or application, writing is rewriting, hard work and never a waste of time. But to always get it right the first time, say very little and dare nothing new. And therefore ever the same interminably ubiquitous stock bad writing advice, and especially the witless anti-intellectual semiliterate exhortation to simple minded simple writing style, all be damned!

Honestly, if only I already knew whatever remains unclear in message content herein, how so and why, I would already have revised accordingly. So please, lets just go over it all, line by line, as ever necessary. I do as much for others. So, why all the fuss? Sorry to become so brusque, gentle reader, but the point seemingly escapes and somehow repeatedly and persistently fails to come across.

Therefore, to reiterate and request most emphatically, in any such event here on FoolQuest.com, fully engaged Socratic Dialectical participation in miscommunication protocols and discipline as further expounded herein, remains indispensable to excellence in Miscommunication Competence so crucial towards Conversational Adequacy.
 

 

 

 

 
 
A trenchant parable of lonely togetherness: Imagine a seminar upon of all things, and strained metaphor just for contrivance of illustration, how to form a regulation Bedrock barefoot bowling team. The great regulation bowling team formation guru, perhaps none other than The Dude Lebowski (Lebrockski? Lebstoenski?), regales the acolytes enthralled, with great purls of wisdom! And the attendees assembled together share all manner of sensitive personal disclosure, reciprocally sworn to silence once the seminar adjourns. Because what happens and all that is said at the regulation bowling team formation seminar, stays at the regulation bowling team formation seminar. And from the very dawn of time, so solemnly vow do they all.
 
And from the regulation bowling team organizing guru, indeed no less than The Dude Lebowski, even in such preposterous cartoon preincarnation, they all learn the purportedly foolproof secrets towards each their similar objectives. In precisely all such enduring antediluvian ritual, thus has it ever been, thus shall it ever be!
   
Afterwards, eyes henceforth forever averted, they all quietly disperse, each once again alone, filing out into the dark night of the soul, never to interact again, each having girded their loins for the solitary and arduous networking and recruitment outreach at hand. Yes, once again so blithely led about by the nose, flagrantly manipulated and then finding ourselves summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices.
 

And nobody at all even seems to have noticed that there were exactly enough people in the room right then and there, for the formation of a regulation bowling team! Easier said than done of course, but then, what isn't?

As in penetrating dialogue scripted by Bobcat Goldthwait for Robin Williams in the rôle of Lance Clayton in World's Greatest Dad: “I used to think the worst thing in life was to end up all alone. It’s not. The worst thing in life is to end up with people who make you feel all alone.” Superficially committed to such manic and desperate pep rallies encouraging one another, yet in subtext only inflicting such reciprocal shunning and contempt, what succor will ever rally and penetrate such abysmal defeat and indolent covert masochism? Yaba-daba-don't!

 

 

 

 

 

 
 The FoolQuest.com agenda:
                      Eudemonia in our time  
                                   
Asking of others what no one else dares ask, find extolled herein, that which only FoolQuest.com dares even seek to offer:

To wit: On the one hand, a select short but broad compendium, towards applied creativity called: innovation, of very different select sample entrepreneurial new venture proposals of various business startup ideas; and concurrently also, on the other hand, for the sake of pure creativity, of art for its own joy, a curated selection of sample original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations.

Because each among dual endeavor such as herein extolled, remains merely differing application of the dazzling power of narrative. After all, sound business planning amounts to feasibility study crafting and telling a persuasively realistic story.

And all, as herein proposed, in open and ongoing creative solution finding and collaborative brainstorming exploration, fully fleshing out right here on FoolQuest.com, all manner of both business startup plans and story ideas alike, via asynchronous text communication.

And by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch whatever your own notions!

Thus to initiate a vibrant process of (pre-)incubation online, indeed nurturing all manner of conceivable innovative new venture creation (various business startup), along with with an open ongoing genuine and intensive serious fiction writer's bull session online, for high quality and imaginative collaborative output in drama and Science Fiction. Thereby building team rapport in a culture of helping, wherein, to quote John Storrs Hall: Ideas should compete, bodies should cooperate. All such convivial freedom of varied and limitless creativity together, that so many only dare dream of, ours for the having: 

Dual vehicles indeed, for unique and unprecedented close collaboration in creative solution finding and brainstorming. Indeed toward nothing less than social engineering design thinking into the very identification, cultivation and orchestration, gentle reader, stimulation and arousal, of nothing less than your own unique and distinctly individual social and intellectual triggers for happiness, into an intentional social environment. No shit.

And thus therein also, just perhaps, a vibrantly better and more agreeable mode and reinvention of social life, outreach for vital connection and networking, even to begin supplanting the ubiquitously ever toxic rat-race of popularity and social success. Indeed, just perhaps, even an escape at long last, from mediocrity and the entire depressing failure of conventionality in every walk of life. 

Because, in those wise words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.” For as John Mason Good observed: Happiness consists in activity. It is a running stream, not a stagnant pool.” Indeed, to quote Alain de Botton: “One of the best protections against disappointment is to have a lot going on.” Indeed, to site Martin Seligman's celebrated happiness formula of Positive Psychology: Pleasure + engagement + meaning = intrinsic fulfillment.

And sound business planning amounts to feasibility study crafting and telling a persuasively realistic story. And thence, if all goes well, all the way through to ongoing recruitment, management team formation, multiple rounds of capitalization, detailed implementation, growth and then exit strategy, where and as ever applicable. But not to get ahead of ourselves. There ever will remains far to go and much to do, before the affronter of asking anyone in their right mind, to invest!

Indeed, perhaps most practically, all first via the institution of intentional community and infrastructure of social support conducive to entrepreneurship for the rest of us, no longer so daunting and obscure for the masses. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation. Perhaps even an open yet responsible working group and steering committee ever striving to bring all such bold vision into fruition. Although once again, not to get ahead of ourselves.

And all because, one way or another, at least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative must finally innovate: at long to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. Building team rapport in a culture of helping. Indeed, Eudemonia via, as extolled herein, ongoing collaboration in creative solution finding and brainstorming. A standing and open invitation to all comers, all interested parties.

Indeed even by subversive, disruptive and bold visionary design thinking social engineering innovation and exploration as propounded anon, in an unprecedented pioneering new Social Engineering design process herein extolled. Indeed all towards nothing less than the veritable orchestration of your happiness, gentle reader, by actual design, indeed veritable real life collaborative World Building, via nothing less than implementation and embedment indeed of unique and individually tailored social and intellectual stimuli and arousal into an intentional social environment or scenario.

And all because that which is named: stimulus struggle, remains nothing less than the ongoing and perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And by extension, more species specific, social and intellectual stimulus struggle in particular, remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of every aware human psyche, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment. And thereby to modify subjective experience, thus altering consciousness itself.

Alas then as has ever come to pass, how so many people deep down feel one way or another deprived of some or other very personal, specific and favorite but all too scarce, infrequent and sorely missed social and intellectual trigger bringing on most treasured peak life experience.

Or indeed, even so little as an intelligent conversation!

And commonly, one such arousing and empowering social and intellectual stimulus event indeed of  specific and favorite but all too scarce, infrequent and sorely missed social and intellectual trigger, remains any extended occurrence of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding and perhaps even brainstorming together. Indeed upon whatever probortunity as howsoever ratified to agenda. A typically so fondly remembered but alas scarce and infrequent fleetingly joyful chance experience, all at the whims, in whatever context, of whomever our controlling societal betters indeed, who set the agenda for us all, from day to day, whether one likes it or not.

For such remains the probortunity at hand. For the portmanteau: 'probortunity,' from the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' signifies nothing less than golden opportunity as inherent to the most urgent problems. Indeed, the more dire, the more propitious. And as ever, indeed in framing any and all probortunity at hand: Look for the Solution within the Problem!  

Therefore, in any possible better alternative to acquiescence within any malignant status quo, indeed in better autonomy and initiative, only consider the very probortunity at hand, of any conceivable more deliberate course of action: Indeed even conceivably any specific regimen of creative solution finding and brainstorming agenda most optimal for social and intellectual stimulus struggle and Eudemonia therein.

And one optimal agenda to that end, remains entry into innovative new venture creation (various business startup), in such freedom of limitless possibility that so many can only dream of. Yes, and if all goes well, all the way through to ongoing recruitment, management team formation, multiple rounds of capitalization, implementation, growth and then exit strategy, where and as ever applicable. But of course, not to get ahead of ourselves.

And even beginning from, for another and different specific solution finding and brainstorming agenda likewise most optimal in propulsion of vibrant social and intellectual stimulus struggle and Eudemonia, there remains as herein extolled, emersion into the pure creativity of serious collaborative fiction writing, no less heady and indeed most purely creative art for its own joy.

Therefore only imagine then, indeed some sort of regimen artfully combining both the two, ongoing, open and accessible to all online. As in vibrant pursuit of autonomy, creative fulfillment, freedom and power in, as herein conceived, an ongoing open collaborative (pre-)incubator online nurturing innovative new venture creation (various business startup). For indeed the possibilities do remain endless! Indeed, entrepreneurship for the rest of us. And beginning from, for pure creativity in art for its own joy, all concurrently and interstitially in tandem also with an open ongoing genuine and intensive serious fiction writer's bull session online, for high quality and imaginative collaborative output in drama and Science Fiction.

Find then provided herein, right here on FoolQuest.com, both a select short but broad compendium, for applied creativity, of various select innovative sample entrepreneurial new venture proposals, and concurrently also for pure creativity, art for its own joy, a curated selection of sample original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations.
Because each are merely different applications of the same vibrant power of narrative. After all, sound planning amounts to crafting and telling a persuasively realistic story.

This, with each of either likewise presented similarly, as herein extolled, even beyond even valued, crucial and fully appreciated mere critique/criticism and feedback alone. Indeed likewise, publicly invited further open and ongoing collaborative exploration, actionable feasibility study or merely narrative plot plausibility as applicable, modification, variation, expansion and improvement, back and forth, and all via asynchronous text communication. Fleshing out all manner of both business startup plans and story ideas alike. Therefore, openly discuss: Read and respond. Then read whatever replies, and begin sustained discussion. And by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch whatever your own notions!

And indeed, gentle reader, all to test the very hypothesis that completely honest, hard nosed and fully engaged Socratic Dialectical feasibility study, analytic yet strategic, as herein right here and now invited for all comers, all interested parties, upon precisely all such agenda of creativity, ambition and daunting challenge, nevertheless will already begin lifting spirits together in true creativity and the will to power. Indeed even entirely without cognitive dissonance from any of the usual ever manipulative socialization, brainwash and Behaviorist motivational grift of typically inane pep talks, so heartbreakingly insulting to the intelligence. 

And make no mistake: For precisely such as aforementioned dual Literary and Entrepreneurial collaboration, as shall be seen, remains entirely integral in addressing the human situation more broadly. And all so fraught with endless objectively real world dramatic obstacles and complications on nothing less than the Hero's Journey, attempting anything really cool together.  

Indeed, perhaps most practically, via the institution of intentional community and infrastructure of social support. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation. Perhaps even an open yet responsible working group and steering committee ever striving to bring all such bold vision into fruition.

And all therefore, only imagine if you can, if we dare, any brand new and ready alternative in very antithesis and sheer Peripeteia to the entire depressing petty and practical oppression as to render every personal freedom so entirely theoretical and thwarted. All such that we have known and suffered under heteronomy and knee-jerk conformity to hierarchical dominance. Indeed instead, any free and pure escape at long last, from the entire dispiriting, unhappy and alienating sore travail of mediocrity: the very rat-race of popularity and social success, along with the entire failure of conventionality in every walk of life.

Indeed even by subversive and disruptive design thinking social engineering innovation as herein propounded, of practical intentional community and infrastructure of social support. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation. Perhaps even an open yet responsible working group and steering committee ever striving to bring all such vision into fruition. Actually as herein, at least due social engineering design thinking exploration indeed of the vision herein on FoolQuest.com, of concurrent and interstitial Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration.

All hence find herein on FoolQuest.com, first concept of a more effective and fulfilling paradigm shift in authentic wellbeing in outreach for vital connection and networking, all serving as crux whereupon shall pivot, from precisely such aforementioned Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration as herein extolled right here on FoolQuest.com, any more transparent and readily available meaningful and pleasurable optimally reciprocally engaged and fulfilling alternative in social life, to the present conventional, learned helpless, Nihilistic, alienated, oppressive, toxic, stultifyingly superficial and predatory rat-race of popularity and social success.

Actually nothing less than an innovative social engineering design thinking vision of and outreach actually for an unprecedented new and subversively disruptive alternative way or modality of social life and function. And all centered upon as aforementioned, creative solution finding and brainstorming: Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration among equals in a culture of helping. A veritable Action Salon, online! 

Indeed even by subversive and disruptive design thinking social engineering innovation as herein propounded, of practical intentional community and infrastructure of social support. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation. Perhaps even an open yet responsible working group and steering committee ever striving to bring all such vision into fruition. Because, as Sir Karl Popper held forth, actual social change and liberation must be brought about most effectively by the forging of bold new lasting social institutions. Indeed as herein, via social engineering design thinking exploration and implementation, indeed of precisely the vision herein on FoolQuest.com, of as aforesaid, concurrent and interstitial Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration.

For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed beyond any mere individual trait, characteristic or mode of expression, creativity remains a key aspect of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle and authentic wellbeing. Not only that Creativity can and Should be Social, but even how Creativity Can and Should be Popular.

Not merely valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer dorky, awkward, bullied and routinely persecuted. And because, the forging of attachments of true friendship possible only under genuine and authentic autonomy, therefore arises only and entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise

For the masses remain ever languishing at the mercy of the Terrible Trivium, the more alienated with every breath, lonely enough to die, and just bored to tears.

Alas then, how under ever stifling authoritarian heteronomy, autonomy, independent thinking, solution finding creativity, innovation,  and especially truth to power, all remain so utterly threatening to that entire mindset. That is, until at long last, inevitably, as howsoever deemed by whatever great and good powers that be, precisely autonomy, independent thinking, solution finding creativity, innovation, and wonder of wonders, even bald faced truth, all become even momentarily indispensable in the face of whatever imminent and otherwise insurmountable probortunity, as ever, the more dire, the more propitious.

Alas however, that any such highly unusual occasions ever remain so few and far between. And intelligent and sensitive people must no longer remain endlessly compelled ever to wait for such all too brief, scarce and infrequent liberation!

All therefore, find herein, standing open invitation right here on FoolQuest.com, for all comers, all interested parties, into ongoing collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding, so heady and fondly remembered but alas needlessly infrequent and generally taboo experience, always most salutary for participants therein. Indeed, all generally as according to the very latest peer reviewed bleeding edge Empirical happiness science arriving at rediscovery of the most enduring wisdom from the greatest sages of old. Indeed, as proposed herein, yet even the more uplifting and productive endeavor as optimized, as indeed foreshadowed, via the following very specific and special dual foci:

Indeed, open and standing invitation for all comers, all interested parties, as herein proposed, into a gratifying and fulfilling Eudemonistic creative solution finding agenda for collaboration among equals, of innovative (pre-)incubation, feasibility study, planning and organization for all manner of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), the possibilities ever remaining endless. And in tandem as herein proposed, with an ongoing genuine and intensive fiction writer's bull session online.

Specifically, on the one hand, 1) together to pursue and undertake as herein proposed, in any among the multifarious glowing and ever popular dreams of entrepreneurship. Whether for profit or nonprofit, indeed Social Entrepreneurship, doing well by doing good, and even just perhaps adventure into grassroots politics and activism. Indeed, in heady pursuit of autonomy, creativity, freedom and power in, as herein conceived, an ongoing open (pre-)incubator online nurturing innovative new venture creation (various business startup) and entrepreneurship for the rest of us. Indeed, the possibilities remain endless!

And if all goes well, ever onward and upward in endless possibility, into the entire known gamut of subversive and disruptive innovative new venture creation (various business startup). Indeed, the possibilities remain endless! Indeed, if all goes well, all the way through to ongoing recruitment, management team formation, multiple rounds of capitalization, implementation, growth and then exit strategy, where and as ever applicable.

And also for building team rapport, as herein expounded directly, all concurrently, interstitially, additionally and distinctly with, on the other hand, starting with invitation into pure creativity, art for its own joy, via 2) entry as herein directly proposed, into an unprecedented open ongoing and extended genuine and intensive fiction writer's bull session online, replete with high quality and imaginative serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming of drama and Science Fiction.

And pertaining in the present standing invitation for all interested parties, along with various tools and guides, as a crucial initial facilitation, find provided both a select short compendium, for applied creativity, of innovative sample entrepreneurial new venture proposals, and concurrently also for pure creativity, art for its own joy, a curated selection of sample original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations.

With each of either likewise presented similarly, as herein extolled, beyond even valued and fully appreciated mere critique/criticism and feedback alone, for likewise publicly invited further open collaborative exploration, modification, variation, expansion and improvement, back and forth, and all via asynchronous text communication. Therefore, openly discuss: Read and respond. Then read whatever replies, and begin discussion. And by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch your own ideas!

Madness, yet method in't!

Indeed, gentle reader, all to test the very hypothesis that completely honest, hard nosed and fully engaged Socratic Dialectical feasibility study, analytic yet strategic, as herein right here and now invited for all comers, all interested parties, upon precisely all such agenda of creativity, ambition and daunting challenge, nevertheless will already begin lifting spirits together in true creativity and the will to power.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                             The solicitation
     

Desperately seeking entrepreneurial cofounder candidates for difficult, protracted, immersively laborious and necessarily innovative risk-tolerant undertaking together in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup) even with complete strangers coming together in a uniquely tailor made new online intentional community or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation, by social engineering design thinking.

We happy few.” “We band of buggered!”  — The Scoobs  

Hard work on spec, no wages upfront, long odds and overwhelming despair in unknown daunting obstacles at every turn. Gruelingly concurrent, collaborative and extensively voluminous, complicated and convoluted deliberation, interstitial and interdisciplinary research and due diligence, throughout (pre-)incubation, feasibility study, planning and organization, and if all goes well, all the way through to ongoing recruitment, management team formation, multiple rounds of capitalization, implementation, growth and then exit strategy where and as ever applicable.

With unflaggingly resilient perseverance in the face of repeated serial failure, demanding extensive preparation and quick recovery to pick ourselves up and start all over again from scratch, as many times as it takes. Because truth to tell, nothing less will even ever begin actually getting anything done. But realistically and at best, what else might one expect? It's never easy.

Every conceivable pitfall as only to be expected at every turn, of needless folly, bullying, drama, with bitter disappointment in untrustworthy dishonest and boneheadedly distant, unrealistic, petty and devious cross-purpose.

Indeed, beware the unaware incompetent, nowhere know-it-all so bereft of all Socratic Wisdom, so set in their ways, so blithely ignorant of all venerated traditional competence and capability, yet remaining so averse to all bold new innovation and anything different.

Alas, all too often, pearls cast before swine: Good faith trammeled under bad faith, leaving only bitter disappointment in untrustworthy dishonest and anxiously short attention boneheadedly distant, unrealistic, petty and devious cross-purpose, half measures and pipedream. Indeed, at every turn, every conceivable pitfall of obvious folly, flagrant bullying and needless drama. Ill prepared and failing to cope with all such strife and passive-hostile obstruction that needs to be expected, accepted and contingency planned for, ambitious endeavor already so tenuous, thence typically dissipates. And what a downer! Instead, in order to maintain cohesion, participants in earnest must commiserate and support one another in occasion of crisis and betrayal.

Again, and striking to the very heart of functioning individual self determination and autonomy, in the incisive perception of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” In the human condition, all so simple in principle, but daunting and complicated in practice. And yet happiness comes in meeting ones needs for capable interaction with responsible others, making progress every day. Likewise so clear and simple in principle, yet daunting and hard to come by in actuality.

Progress all therefore doubtful.

Flexible hours within any responsible timely manner to task interdependence. Task interdependence denoting the interconnection of tasks such that accomplishment of each task in turn becomes impossible save by first completion of necessarily preceding tasks. Thus in fluidity of collaboration among equals and culture of helping, unflinching reciprocity, leadership superordinate over others in initiative arising, yet service subordinate to one another throughout. Fortunate and successful are those who accomplish this. And lost are the rest of us, to malignant conditionality and passive hostility.

Like The Three Musketeers: “All for one, and one for all!” Or else, all for naught.

Thus for serious people ever finding one another at long last, fame and fortune in case of resounding success in doing well by doing good. And all in quest of Eudemonia and authentic fulfillment together along the way, heeding the call to adventure in embarkation proceeding at our own pace, upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship and authentic human connection attempting anything really cool together.

 

 

 

 

 

Look for the Solution within the Problem!

Down to the proverbial brass tacks
 
 
In the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” And to quote Sir Isaac Newton: “You have to make the rules, not follow them.” Find then proposed agenda herein, nothing less than paradigm shift into the most liberating and uplifting conceivable focus, regimen, circumstances or situation, of collaborative brainstorming and solution finding for the probortunity at hand. A problem so dire and so redolent with opportunity into the very meaning of life, with our work therefore so well cut out for us:

Individually unique, true to thine own self, and false to no one, all as according to programmer Gary Hamilton’s not unoften cited rules in social engineering by design thinking, for guiding all to rights in undertaking whatever ones' own conceivable and unique game of life:

If the game is rigged so you can’t win, find another game or invent your own.

If you’re not winning because you don’t know the rules, learn the rules.

If you know the rules but aren’t willing to follow them, there’s either something wrong with the game or you need to change something in yourself.

Don't play the game in a half-baked way. Either get all the way in or all the way out.

It shouldn’t be necessary for others to lose in order for you to win. If others have to lose, re-evaluate the game’s goals.

And all hence then here on FoolQuest.com, the striving at the imagination and inception, as above delineated, of any new and better game of life. In such parlance, anything passing beyond Postmodern Existential Absurdism and any purely performative notion of life as a grand gesture. Indeed, actually learning whatever applicable rules, expectations and just real causality that simply cannot be escaped. But no less importantly, in attaining the self-knowledge of what shall be discovered to be individually personally amenable, whole heartedly.
   
But precisely how might all such as above ever be accomplished?
   
Answer: First of all, in every due feasibility study towards any conceivable non-zero sum scenario for all, wherein indeed, no one has to loose.
     
But with no guiding agenda or vision indeed from intrinsic motivation, there can only be only confusion and resistance. And with no plan of action and no action  agenda, there can only be ill conceived, ill prepared and ultimately preemptive false start.
 
Our work cut out for us. Look for the Solution within the Problem!  Indeed, surely there remain as many categories of social dysfunction (society existing only as a relationship among participants, after all), as there are kinds of dysfunctional relationships to begin with. And likewise, there may also arise better observable and conceivable alternatives, progress, and even in paradigm shift, corresponding Transactional Antithesis to whatever preceding malaise.
 
  
Alas however, and there's the rub! that Hamilton's vaunted rules might easily come across as just a little glib. Because, beyond whatever kind of veritable solitaire just to pass the time, indeed perhaps any disciplined lone slacker hobbies and learning, all the best games require capable outreach for other players. A daunting challenge!
  
After all, tautologically, there can be no unilateral self-help, no reliable solitary rugged self-reliant self-made bootstrap DIY (Do-It-Yourself) "well-formed plan" for interaction among more than one individual. All therefore, as to practical execution as per Hamilton's rules, who has ever actually achieved such nigh dharmic aręte of Eudemonia, and precisely just how?

One might expect that as well as fulfilling intrinsic motivations, association within any similar creative corporate culture of helping the likes of IDEO, the world renowned ultra progressive design thinking work place, indeed by social engineering design thinking as herein extolled, would likewise also enhance access to more optimal social embedment, extended networking, contacts and the cultivation of all manner of quality relationships.

Likewise, just in case any such prized position remains tantalizingly beyond reach, the ancillary exploration: Creativity can be Popular raises the question of how best intentionally to maximize such social benefits for collaboration among equals on the part of cofounders participating in the primary proposal: Creativity can and Should be Social.
   
Indeed, outreach herein further proposed, called: Creativity can be Popular, ensues under the premise that if participation in an intentional creative group or social circle as herein proposed, Creativity can and Should be Social, indeed comes to be perceived by any wider public to produce more gratifying social interaction, then others will be attracted to join in and participate. Moreover, the interaction brought about in the progress of Creativity can and Should be Social  will bring new people into socially and intellectually stimulating contact and arousal. The question of Creativity can be Popular then will be: how best to leverage Creativity can and Should be Social not only for recruitment, but more importantly in order to improve for participants, individual interpersonal networking and new relationships.

And as shall be made plain in all whys and wherefores, anon, the probortunity at hand in collective decision and action, remain, not IDEO but DIO (Do-It-Ourselves) entrepreneurship for the rest of us, social engineering design thinking indeed actually efficacious even beyond playful Existential Absurdist life as a grand gesture.

Because together crafting the best possible game of life, remains in setting the most optimal brainstorming and creative solution finding agenda. The invitation for all comers, all interested parties, gentle reader, into deliberation, analytic yet strategic, all whereupon.

An what shall become the focus of such as above proposed Eudemonistic deliberation? Answer: Nothing less than an agenda of collaboration among equals in entrepreneurship in tandem with creative writing, indeed as shall be seen directly, all towards best possible intentionally optimized social and intellectual stimulus struggle: Namely, the heady experience of brainstorming and the eustress, the sustainable euphoria of creative tension, in creative solution finding together.

 

Because indeed in collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, a fondly remenered and needlessly infrequent experience so joyful and uplifting for participant therein...

Whereas fiction writing, indeed of Science Fiction, the Literature of ideas, and of drama, hailed by Socrates as most philosophical among the arts, together open every vista of pure creativity for its own joy...

Many endless possibilities in entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup) may yet serve as the very fulcrum from scratch, for action together towards actual realization of imagined bold innovation.

And because in the never ending  battle with boredom, loneliness and alienation...
    
Whereas stimulus struggle remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment...
   
And by extension, more species specific, social and intellectual stimulus struggle in particular, remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of every aware human psyche, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment.
    
And thereby to modify subjective experience, thus altering consciousness itself.

However, beware: Because eventually, in so far as resultant quality of stimulus struggle at all even most broadly, let alone social and intellectual stimulus struggle specifically, on any true path of entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup) even in endless possibility as presently herein extolled, one must expect, in due course, even actually dystressful hard work on spec, no wages upfront, long odds and overwhelming despair in unknown daunting obstacles at every turn. Gruelingly concurrent, collaborative and extensively voluminous, complicated and convoluted deliberation, interstitial and interdisciplinary research and due diligence, throughout (pre-)incubation, feasibility study, planning and organization.

Indeed, if all goes well, ever onward and upward into endless possibility of the entire known gamut of subversive and disruptive innovative new venture creation (various business startup). Yes, all the way through to ongoing recruitment, management team formation, multiple rounds of capitalization, implementation, growth and then exit strategy, where and as ever applicable.

But for serious people ever finding one another at long last, as in first baby steps upon Laozi's fabled Journey of a Thousand Miles, indeed embarkation upon the the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey forging true friendship and authentic human connection attempting anything really cool together.

Perhaps among most optimally fulfilling of possibilities in social and intellectual stimulus struggle, in the heady experience of creative solution finding together, brainstorming in collaboration among equals.  

Therefore, find herein standing and open invitations for all comers, all interested parties, before plunging right into all entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration in earnest, perhaps first into even whatever even most preliminary discussions and questions as in due course arising. And only then:

Standing open invitation right here on FoolQuest.com, for all comers, all interested parties, on the one hand, 1) together to pursue and undertake as herein proposed, in any among the multifarious glowing and ever popular dreams of entrepreneurship: Indeed, in heady pursuit of autonomy, creativity, freedom and power in, as herein conceived, an ongoing open (pre-)incubator online nurturing innovative new venture creation (various business startup) and entrepreneurship for the rest of us. For the possibilities remain endless!

Also as concurrent and interstitial as herein expounded directly, additionally and distinctly with, on the other hand, invitation into pure creativity, art for its own joy, via 2) entry as herein directly proposed, into an unprecedented open ongoing and extended genuine and intensive fiction writer's bull session online, replete with high quality and imaginative serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming of drama and Science Fiction.

The the latter excellently serving as convivial open and standing invitation for all comers, all interested parties, indeed to join together as herein extolled, into an invigorating ice breaker and team building exercise together, as only ideal for building rapport, preliminary indeed to the former!

And let new venture creation (various business startup) herein be taken to include either for profit or nonprofit, indeed Social Entrepreneurship, doing well by doing good, and even just perhaps adventure into grassroots politics and activism. The possibilities remain endless!

And pertaining in the present standing invitation for all interested parties, along with various tools and guides, as a crucial initial facilitation, find provided both a select short compendium, for applied creativity, of innovative sample entrepreneurial new venture proposals, and concurrently also for pure creativity, art for its own joy, a curated selection of sample original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations.

With each of either likewise presented similarly, as herein proposed and extolled, for publicly invited further open collaborative exploration, modification, variation, expansion and improvement, back and forth, in asynchronous text communication. Therefore, openly discuss: Read and respond. Then read whatever replies, and begin discussion. And by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch your own ideas!

Because, in those wise words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.” For as John Mason Good observes: “Happiness consists in activity. It is a running stream, not a stagnant pool.” Indeed, to quote Alain de Botton: “One of the best protections against disappointment is to have a lot going on.”  

However, just to lower the stakes at least initially, and better in every life lesson and wisdom of drama and dharma, plus the unfettered conjecture of Science Fiction and futuring scenario, to accustom and all better prepare us each as creative collaboration partners among equals, participants might, at least initially, all have that much more fun and be far better off, precisely as herein publicly invited, in serious collaborative fiction writing of drama and Science Fiction, in an open ongoing genuine and intensive fiction writer's bull session online. Indeed only to consider, in endless objectively real world possibility, new venture creation (various business startup), indeed entrepreneurship for the rest of us, at all later on and in due course.
  
Alas despite the renown of the best works of authorial collaboration, and not withstanding massive and meticulously encyclopedic projects of collaborative World Building and shared continuity online, there remains such lamentable dearth of ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming either as such, online. Only a glut of endless travesty. But more, anon. And hence the present outreach.
   
And resources for entrepreneurship, barring all manner of scams, even howsoever reputable, only seem actually to begin for established, advanced and successful serial entrepreneurs, after all, who can pay. Those rugged individuals overcoming all obstacles before them. And not catering at all, to any whatever howsoever somewhat quite different needs by contrast, ever as experienced by any of us softy frustrated wannabes! But more, anon. And hence the present outreach.
Moreover, not only indeed can and should Creativity be Social, but moreover, Creativity Can and Should be Popular. Not merely valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer dorky, awkward, bullied and persecuted throughout the entire conventional, lonely, alienated, boring and ever dystressful rat-race and racket of stultifyingly superficial popularity and social success that throttles and undermines all better value.
Therefore, in subsidiary proposed initiative, the ancillary concept of Creativity Can and Should be Popular explores the most probortune prospect of outreach by social engineering design thinking, towards better and more rewarding individual social life and more productive interpersonal networking, indeed as pivoting upon Creativity can and Should be Social as better alternative indeed to the entire conventional, lonely, alienated, boring and ever dystressful rat-race and racket of stultifyingly superficial popularity and social success that throttles and undermines all better value.

Now, Creativity can and Should be Social as conceived, if ever achieved, could surely deliver nothing less than all remaining truly best in life! Indeed, at last to provide any ready alternative to the entire dreary and soul crushing conventional, lonely, alienated, boring and ever dystressful rat-race and racket of stultifyingly superficial popularity and social success, in every walk of life.

Surely endeavor interesting and worthy of ratification to agenda of creativity and deliberation together, herein, pertinent to discovery and implementation indeed, of all that can be best in life.

And so in resumption of outreach herein and probortunity at hand, asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, all of that which only FoolQuest.com offers: Only imagine in due course, similar creative process as herein extolled in creative writing, but soon after repurposed together in cultivation also of subversively disruptive entrepreneurial innovation, all as merely another different application of the same power of narrative and critical thinking.

To quote Sir Francis Bacon: “Truth is so hard to tell, it sometimes needs fiction to make it plausible. However, whereas, barring the surreal outright, any good story or ripping yarn, only needs indeed to seem at all plausible, business or project planning remains a matter of rigorous, prediction, feasibility study and exploration of projected outcomes from proposed intentional action. And no less exiting and informative a presentation all thereof. Indeed of sweeping drama, bold conjecture, tantalizing futuring scenario, thorough research and laboriously task interdependent and objective real world feasibility study, all beginning from most embryonic first concept "kitchen table" stage or phase.

Indeed, so often cited as the single most important document produced in the course of new venture creation, various business startup in endless possibility, a business or project plan must present any realistic likely story, conjecture to persuade candidate recruits on spec and prospective investors alike, of uplifting adventure dawning and glowing profit potential.
   
Therefore, before investment, even if not of money but any other asset, especially as of sweat equity (part ownership purchased by contribution of time and work) on spec (towards hoped and risked for future profit participation), to keep things honest and rational, always insist to review, or indeed to participate and help to produce, whatever business plan or prospectus, rigorously to ferret out the devil in the details of meritable feasibility and foreseeable and avoidable unfeasibility. Let alone anything actually dodgy or just silly and dull.
   
Thus ever oppressive and downright unprofessional self deception of willful positivity all be damned. Because skeptically and credulously filtering out the unfeasible and unprofitable, steering away the unwary, from doomed ventures, may be the most important purpose of business or project planning. And for would-be entrepreneurs, also including all questions not only of skills and aptitudes, but concomitant temperament and thence expected experience of whatever expected activity as foreseeably entailed in whatever proposed participation, subjectively pleasant or unpleasant.
    
What skills are first requisite whatever action, interaction, rôle, function and duties undertaken and expected according to plan? What extensive background knowledge and experience? Indeed, what are the rational expectations including all realistic investment? Is there indeed the wherewithal? To reiterate, what will the experience actually be like? And what best results must one be willing to settle for?
    
All as taking priority only behind the values of criticism, error detection, and ongoing course correction, that has ever brought about eventual success: Indeed, all as remaining the crucial product of every due caution, named: pessimistic realism, the positive power of negative thinking!
 

 

 

 

 

 

As promised: A directory of select project proposals
Showcased here on FoolQuest.com find a select short compendium, for applied creativity, of sample innovative embryonic first concept entrepreneurial new venture business startup proposals. Ideas for the organization and inception of original game changing businesses and other projects. New ideas, innovations to address so vastly underserved needs and fill market gaps. These are presented for ongoing exploration, criticism/critique, attack and defense, modification, variation, elaboration, expansion and improvement, continually in vociferous and ebullient Dialectic, back and forth, collaboration among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding. Therefore, read and respond. Or by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch your own! Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!  
    In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

As envisaged in endless possibility and proposed herein, the outreach agenda in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup) indeed all the way from (pre) incubation, pertains to the heady ambitious and complex multitask interdependent interdisciplinary process of developing and transforming whatever new idea, innovation or technology, into a business of whatever kind (profit or nonprofit, traditional, Social Entrepreneurship or even grassroots politics and activism. Indeed perhaps even at long last, filling the yawning gap in support for entrepreneurship for the rest of us neophytes and wannabes at our own pace), that can even conceivably succeed, and therefore just might possibly even begin attracting investment of the very earliest Venture Capital.

But first of all, outreach in any such a vibrant project proposal must inspire and help recruit a varied range of trustworthy capable talent, knowledge and skill sets, in mutual respect, to join in and participate on spec and all from scratch. Yes, even from the most embryonic first concept inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase, through management team formation, business or project planning and feasibility study, indeed if all goes well, through successive rounds of Venture Capitalization and all the way to successful implementation and marketing. Embarkation thus upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship attempting  anything really cool together, entrepreneurship for the rest of us.

 

Serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming circle. Provided for pure creativity, art for its own joy, sweeping drama and unfettered Science Fiction speculation, a vibrant anthology of sample highly original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations.

Creativity Can and Should be Social: In endless possibility of subversive proposal in pursuit of fulfillment via intentional creative culture by design, focused upon entrepreneurship for the rest of us, innovative new venture creation (various business startup) in interstitial synergy concurrently with serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming Science Fiction.

Creativity can and should be Popular: Everyone who loves brainstorming, innovation, and creative solution finding, imagines a dream job at anytyhing the likes of the much renowned IDEO design company. But just in case any such prized position remains tantalizingly beyond reach, Creativity can and Should be Social is an entirely feasible proposal for an intentional creative solution finding social circle engaged in collaborative fiction writing together with subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubator. One might expect that as well as fulfilling intrinsic motivations, association within any similar creative corporate culture of helping the likes of IDEO, would also enhance access to more optimal social embedment, extended networking, contacts and the cultivation of quality relationships. Likewise, Creativity can be Popular raises the question of how best intentionally to maximize such social benefits for collaboration among equals on the part of cofoundes in Creativity can and Should be Social. An outreach herein is further proposed, called: Creativity can be Popular, under the premise that if participation in an intentional creative group or social circle as herein proposed, Creativity can and Should be Social, indeed comes to be perceived by any wider public to produce more gratifying social interaction, then others will be attracted to join in and participate. The question of Creativity can be Popular then will be: how best to leverage Creativity can and Should be Social not only for recruitment, but more importantly in order to improve for participants, individual interpersonal networking and new relationships.

Planet Frolic TM  An enriched immersive playspace environment also for adults! Curious? Know more...

Project Kriosgrad:  A subversive and disruptive new business model in rehabilitation of Cryonics, the ultimate heroic measure, via lateral integration and strategic partnership with organ donation in such deadly short supply and grizzly pillage. Because the option of becoming an organ donor helps people feel worthy of the prospect of living again! Free Cryonic Neurosuspension for post mortem cadaverous donors. From reviled taboo into greatest blessing. It's a win-win.  Know more...

Automated Sociometry: The concept of a universal filter of artificially Intelligent sophisticated compatibility profiling for all manner of recommendations, secure and private, constantly gathering and analyzing new information from end user activity and interaction online and at home, ever asking more and different questions, all for purposes of matching of individuals to others individuals and to groups or social circles, fostering improved social embedment, as well as offering all manner of other precision accurate recommendations of activities, purchases and more, a universal information filter ever learning and tailoring itself to individual needs, for every conceivable purpose, personal or professional, forging connection in order to foster improved social embedment, and optimally compatible friendship towards human flourishing and authentic wellbeing. In the future, everyone will be influential! Know more...

CliqueBusters TM Until the advent of automated Sociometry into widest availability as the universally preferred mode and conduit of social life, what can remain feasible in the here and now CliqueBusters TM remains the most radical and subversive known proposal of low guile in combating threatening dangerous pandemic serial bullying and cronyism that so dangerously undermines social connection in our times. The appalling destructiveness of serial bullying always arises eventually to thwart every conceivable constructive endeavor, and urgently must be addressed. Know more ...

The Green Pro-Space Agenda: Asteroids: Menace from above or tantalizing resource? What is Astro-Environmentalist Activism? Know more..

Solar furnace An audacious concept from Inventor/engineer: Jerry Scovel for cost effective climate regulation, clean water and power by way of lasers diffracted and focused from orbit about the sun! Solar hydrogen power from outer space.

Zinc Alpha 2 Glycoprotein: Not a hoax, not a dream, not an imaginary story! Pandemic obesity and complications is needless, and can be eradicated now! The thin pill has long been discovered, completely effective and safer than diet and exercise, indeed actually a potentially life saving breakthrough in medical safety, and yet for fifty years or so languishing in obscurity, is still withheld from the public by the clearly indispensable yet ever dysfunctional Food and Drug Administration, with no human trials in sight. And now there is also nannobubble water. Know more...

Time travel venture: A barest feasibility study. Can such a thing as traveling backwards in time, ever even at all become possible? And what meager beginnings even dare we to ponder in the here and now? 

An innovative and pioneering new social engineering design process proposed: Nothing less than the individually unique
veritable orchestration of your happiness!

Rotating Moderation is a highly effective and very open method of community outreach and organization in Israel, in omni purpose highly informal bricolage of Socratic method and parliamentary process. 

Rotating Moderation as a vehicle for the FoolQuest.com Master Plan: The FoolQuest.com Master Plan remains much reliant upon asynchronous text communication online. Therefore, raising the FoolQuest.com Master Plan to agenda under Rotating Moderation, may require preliminarily a motion to adapt and make available Rotating Moderation for asynchronous text communication online, in order thence to proceed.

 Lifestyle reciprocal peer coaching.

Love bombing de-weaponized? We am Bizarro uncult!

 

 
  
 

 

HyperGlossary
 
 
This  HyperGlossary constitutes hypertext glossary for the present hypertext, FoolQuest.com, hyperlinking varied key precepts.
 
 
To reiterate: Put forth to agenda for discussion by all interested parties, Creativity can and Should be Social as proposed, is conceived of, most concretely, as the inception of ongoing concurrent and vibrant dual endeavor, endless possibility of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the one hand, in concurrent synergy interstitial with, on the other hand, pure creativity, art for its own joy, in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. Moreover, new venture creation herein shall be taken to include both profit and nonprofit, indeed Social Entrepreneurship, doing well by doing good, and even just perhaps adventures into grassroots politics and activism.
    
The term: "Creativity can and Should be Social" hyperlinks to a presentation upon the proposal so named. While the term: "new venture creation" hyperlinks to a short list of innovative sample proposals for further development together. But by all means, pitch your own! It hardly seems in dispute, that aspiring entrepreneurs often meet with isolation, inertia and frustration. Therefore the term: "entrepreneurship for the rest of us" hyperlinks to a social engineering design exposition upon proposed intentional community or at least initially, more modestly, smaller intentional social circle or group, with provision and code of conduct towards the frustrated and unmet needs of more transparent and ready entry, even for the novice aspirant and experienced old pro together, into precisely such manner of collaboration among equals.
    
And the term: "fiction writing" hyperlinks to a resource upon creativity most broadly, along with brainstorming, dramatic  fiction writing and Science Fiction speculation, including also a list of sample unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations, indeed, for collaboration in fiction writing together. For which, find online message posting forum provided. And by all means, do pitch your own story ideas. And the distinct pre-qualifier: "serious" hyperlinks to an exposition upon the nature of serious fiction writing, exchange of critique, and the venerable discipline of the writing craft from time immemorial, in the traditionally solitary practice of serious fiction writing, plus the speculative element and unfettered conjecture of Science Fiction and futuring scenario, all alas hitherto so absent from prevailing half-assed philistine dilettante gawdawfull fiction writing collaboration travesty online, in such ideological contempt towards writing competency and literacy, so hypersensitive and resentful of all critique.
    
The term: "Creativity can and Should be Social!" hyperlinks to the one proposal to bind them all! Creative people need one another. Practice of hitherto unprecedented serious fiction writing collaboration can and should instead become available as a mode of social interaction, indeed even as herein proposed, indeed in endless objectively real world possibility, ancillary to innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us; a vision of unprecedented dynamic interstitial synergy concurrently between pure creativity on the one hand, and innovation on the other hand, via concurrent dual creative endeavors all as herein proposed.   
   
The term: "Creativity Can and Should be Popular" hyperlinks to a page of discourse upon even zany outreach and recruitment strategy for Creativity can and Should be Social named: Creativity Can and Should be Popular, and not just nerdy and awkward. Creativity should actively bring people together, not stigmatize and isolate us.

For the term: "Social Engineering" hyperlinks indeed to a brief entry upon Social Engineering. (Disambiguation, no: Not hackers scamming and phishing for passwords.) And probortunty ensues regarding unprecedented Social Engineering by design, of  stimulus struggle. For in accord with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, the expression: "stimulus struggle" endures as the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in the human zoo  October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And the term: "stimuli" hyperlinks internally to crucial and salient disambiguation of present usage. It's a fine point that matters. And the term: "arousal" hyperlinks externally to a brief entry upon arousal. All highly relevant in the never ending strife and striving against ongoing pandemic boredom from lonely under stimulation. And the term: "design" hyperlinks to an exposition (to put it without false modesty!) upon an innovative and pioneering new Social Engineering design process proposed indeed towards nothing less than the veritable orchestration of your happiness by actual design of uniquely individual gratification, via embedment indeed of tailored social and intellectual stimuli into intentional social environment.

    In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The FoolQuest.com work ethic
If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done
An online solution finders' brainstorming paradise for Literary and Entrepreneurial collaboration

   

In the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” And to quote Sir Isaac Newton: “You have to make the rules, not follow them.” Find herein a bold and unprecedented lifestyle entrepreneurship proposal in open ongoing collaboration into two distinctly different fields of endeavor: On the one hand, the entire conceivable range of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), along with, on the other hand, the boundless pure creativity of serious collaborative fiction writing, art for its own joy and no less heady.

Now, in any sort of traditional business proposal, the expected pragmatic emphasis shall pivot upon tangible projections of expected feasibility and profitability. And for that matter, beyond merely the ever vital ongoing exchange of critique in serious writing groups, in the prospectus of any sort of more ambitious writing workshop, the expected emphasis must pivot upon value of intended learning growth, and upon quality of expected resultant writing output. And even ever burning hopes of publication and success. Not to digress, however.

By contrast, in any sort of lifestyle entrepreneurship most broadly, all pragmatic questions, even while remaining indubitably so crucial, shall be discovered taking the proverbial back seat to Eudemonia and the pursuit of intangible intrinsic gratification and fulfillment as most important and highest priority rising up before all else, as indeed to be addressed herein, throughout.

That and how otherwise, how tenuous, pointless and miserable our lives so interminably drag on, whenever individual happiness remains so blithely and routinely sacrificed. Because as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being.”

All therefore, gentle reader, unmet friend, make no mistake and never fear: I am just another loser, stuck in a rut, a maladroit wanna-be with a cable modem, ever mouthing off online. And as my own boss, I have fired myself for utter failure and incompetence in the sore travail of life!

     • The Top 10 Things People Want In Life But Can’t Seem To Get - - I can't get no...”

And yet, if there shall be found no Promethean fire kindled in my very heart of hearts, then kindly refrain from lighting one up under my ass! For there must be no quota, needlessly urgent deadline or other such domineering high pressure facile and frenetic flimflam or cretin conjob of hot hurried hustle and deceptive manipulation. Nor passive hostile power plays of stalling and foot-dragging, such pointless betrayal and disappointment, proverbially pulling out the figurative rug metaphorically out from under with empty promises never meant to be kept. And then there always remains skilled incompetence, cult mimesis and pretense outright! Various sheer pointless collective cosplay and delusion of whatever desired way of life, pipedreams that so many will ever swear by.
  
Beware then all such bad faith: For the world remains ever so very full of exactly all such dullards, knaves and ninnies taking the helm, the dysfunctionally bizarre, erratic, mistrusting and untrustworthy, alas so wholly unreliable. All prior vested hope and effort must be written off as bad investment, until if ever unlikely, whomever such an offender changes their ways and redeems themselves. There can be no work around. Let the ball then remain in their court so long as they shirk all honest effort and thereby disappoint. No one will ever get through to them. And they'd better not have your money!

By contrast to whatever so destructive headgames, instead responsibly proceeding in true collaboration among equals, steadily at our own pace in small reversible steps, is always most happy and wise. Far as Aesop tells us: Slow and steady wins the race. Indeed, baring privileged resources and/or amazing talents, honest and hard nosed adult conduct and disposition remains the only advantage for the unsung and unknown coming together in any lofty and imaginative ambition. Because a culture of helping pivots upon realism together in active pursuit of even the most crazy dreams! And more anon.    

Moreover, the forging of attachments of true friendship possible only under genuine and authentic autonomy, therefore arises only and entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwiseAnd more anon.

For such shall ever remain chief among the true values and bedrock of competent capability and of Eudemonia in authentic fulfillment. And not just the utopian wishful fantasy of dime novel epics. Indeed, in lifestyle entrepreneurship as in any other context.

And all therefore: No, I don't want your money or your devotion. I am no penny ante conniving Behaviorist, no bogus formulaic callow motivational grifter even believing their own lies, here to tickle your ears, psyche you up, and then leave you in the lurch, abandoned once again to our own devices and set up for failure.

On the contrary:

Gentle reader, unmet friend, I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?

 

 

 

 

 

Wake up, Sheeple!

Stimulus struggle remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And by extension, more species specific, social and intellectual stimulus struggle in particular, remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of every aware human psyche, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment. And thereby to modify subjective experience, thus altering consciousness itself.

Alas, ever thwarting uniquely human intrinsic needs of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, indeed from prehistory and up to the present day, remains every boring and dystressful hierarchical structure and oppression derived in authoritarian heteronomy to that of the clan or extended family.

To wit: Cultural Anthropology studies human relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, all predicated upon competencies and aptitudes of hierarchically predictive social cognition for We the Sheeple,  glorified pack mammals all, by which to anticipate the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships and prediction of future behavior and in order to know what one is expected to do and how to behave. 

In short, that malignant subtext of only conditional acceptance: Consensus and superficial harmony in acquiescence to tacit threat of rejection and bullying. Indeed, in prevailing oppression replete with dishonest manipulative socialization, brainwash and invalidation. All as under heteronomy to hierarchical dominance, so routinely and systematically quashing all curiosity and creativity.

And yet, hope endures. Because, however rarely though nevertheless in accordance with repeated Empirical observation informing the anomalously democratic grand afterthought of generally hierarchical and authoritarian Cultural Anthropology, members in whatever sort of tribe, community or any manner of social institution, may however infrequently find themselves called upon by whatever generally overbearing powers that be, to participate and together experience some fleeting glimmer of joy, so scarce, infrequent and fondly remembered, in the heady experience of creative solution finding together. Indeed as of necessity undertaken via the temporary relaxation of authority into near hierarchical distance, indeed into howsoever transient collaboration among near equals.

So, how might we all be thus so much better fulfilled, precisely so pleasurably and meaningfully engaged, at all much more frequently, more regularly, optimally, reciprocally and over longer periods of time? And what stops us? That is the question!

Indeed, only imagine, if you can, any more readily available meaningful and pleasurable optimally reciprocally engaged and fulfilling alternative in social life, to the present conventional, learned helpless, Nihilistic, alienated, oppressive, toxic, stultifyingly superficial and predatory rat-race of popularity and social success.

Because of not only how Creativity can and Should be Social, but even that Creativity Can and Should be Popular. Not merely valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer dorky, awkward, bullied and persecuted.

All therefore as herein, the sheer audacity of collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding in social engineering design thinking, striving at optimal reciprocal engagement, something exiting, new and different, to attract eager participation online. Something very special, that upon discovery would immediately entice and inspire site visitors to investigate and to join right in online, upon unambiguous observation of clear and ongoing benefit, creativity, productivity, conviviality, and gratification all as accruing for interaction among participants.

Indeed, gentle reader, all to test the very hypothesis that completely honest, hard nosed and fully engaged Socratic Dialectical feasibility study, analytic yet strategic, as herein right here and now invited for all comers, all interested parties, upon precisely all such agenda of creativity, ambition and daunting challenge, nevertheless will already begin lifting spirits together in true creativity and the will to power. The very path to Eudemonia as suggested by the Empirical observations as herein expounded. Indeed even entirely without cognitive dissonance from any of the usual motivational grift of inane pep talks, so heartbreakingly insulting to the intelligence. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is best in life? And what to do about it?

    
And why are the terms of aforementioned agenda and open standing invitation to Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration, herein deemed so utterly crucial to all herein deemed best in life? No doubt therein lies the tale to be told!
    
Perhaps to begin with, indeed as to all ever deemed best in life, such may be hoped as anything decidedly less gratuitously calamitous in practice, than that notoriously expected stock Nietzschean rejoinder of one bloody minded Conan the Barbarian (well actually, Genghis Khan). Anything at all less antisocial even if disappointingly bereft in all remarkable visceral immediacy of violent delight.
   
And yet why, and indeed to what motivating purpose behind any human interaction at all, even online? And via what bold and vibrant implementation? Why, to redeem effete civilization, of course! Effete civilization remaining persistent complaint indeed of one Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, philosophical inspiration for Robert E. Howard, creator of Conan. Therefore, at least as Euripides would have it, tactless and forthright like Hector the Achaean and Thracian Rhesus, together of one heated barbarian blood, let us have no diplomacy:
   
Because in bringing to bear the sober ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in the very forefront of very serious bleeding edge modern happiness science, our chosen objective shall remain nothing any the less wild, heathen and sexy, than scheduling an orgy. But a heady, disruptive and subversive orgy of the intellect! An eternally boundless and shattering orgasm of innovation.

“Free Your Mind... and Your Ass Will Follow.  George Clinton

Because indeed much likewise, promotion all whereof remains, indeed no less than as with forbidden love, exactly a matter of covertly or overtly defying all bullying obstruction and pettiness of bourgeois sensibility, drawing close together and more regularly meeting even our most secret and shameful needs for one another: Most socially awkward, taboo and universally despised of all excruciatingly thwarted yearnings, that honest to Harrison Bergeron striving for intelligent conversation even online and around the world, via the decadent power of asynchronous text communication affording the leisure to compose one's own thoughts, then with the hitherto unprecedented quick turn around for actual timely dialogue in written correspondence.

Thus congenial and productive alternation between, on the one hand, the outreach and extroversion of Dialectical collaboration and on the other hand, the introversion and retreat of solitary reflection

Indeed, to quote Dr. Matthias Mehl in experimental Empirical observation of happy people: ...substantive conversation seemed to hold the key to happiness for two main reasons: both because human beings are driven to find and create meaning in their lives, and because we are social animals who want and need to connect with other people. After all, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being.”

Therefore make no mistake: Psychotherapists see two kinds of patients because, by and large and to begin with, indeed aside from that distinct minority of happy people, there remain distinctly two kinds people: Those so desperately unhappy, because of just not fitting in socially, and those no less desperately bored, lonely, unknown and dystressed because they can never be genuine. Indeed fitting in socially and consummately so. And miserable because of it. Indeed, because of every sacrifice, ever so phony, chameleonic and closeted under such ego dystonic conditionality requisite to social success and the popularity rat-race.

“I used to think the worst thing in life was to end up all alone. It’s not. The worst thing in life is to end up with people who make you feel all alone.”

   — As scripted by Bobcat Goldthwait for Lance Clayton as portrayed by Robin Williams in World's Greatest Dad

Indeed, popularity and relentlessly facile distant social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, even sometimes intense, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibilityMoreover, honest criticism especially, remains inherently friendly, valuable, nothing threatening but actually an expression of abiding respect.

Alas then that all too often, let alone even heatedly vociferous and argumentative controversy, substance and purpose at all, so deplored as burdensome, heavy and serious, therefore remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. Time then has come, so long overdue, for paradigm shift flouting timid taboo by speaking out and thinking for ourselves.

For as Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ close human relationship is Eros remaining not so much any bogus support group ethos banal and masturbatory co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, as just the opposite: collusion and transport of sublime and liberating union with alien difference also called: psychological visibility beginning with any glimpse into another's inner life.

Indeed psychological visibility and thereby true Eros, reciprocal understanding and recognition wherein good conversation the more uplifting, energizes and deepens acquaintance by free flowing investigative personal information exchange, the spark of lively controversy ostensibly on topics of mutual interest and concern, and given equal opportunity to hold forth unreservedly with full and pointed answers and then, likewise, to make inquiry in any depth and attend with undivided attention and concentration. And nowadays more that ever, thank you, gentle reader. Because in the immortal words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.

Indeed psychological visibility such as bridging psychological asymmetry, and psychological asymmetry merely denoting the contrast between the vast immediacy of the Phenomena on the one hand, the ongoing simulation of external reality from Empirical sensory input and prior experience, plus the entire gamut, the world in and of itself, of inner life, all in contrast with, on the other hand, the daunting and mysterious opacity of any other consciousness than ones own. For in the words of Tennessee Williams: We are all sentenced to solitary confinement inside our own skins, for life.
   
Thus from psychological asymmetry only ensues that we are all not so odd, but after all, only strangers. And so we wallow each in our own pervasive and inexhaustible reservoirs of  lonely and alienated secret anxiety and vulnerability, even honest and unjustly much maligned mortal terror, never suspecting much the same of others beneath ever crumbling facade of exterior presentation.
   
  
Social and intellectual stimulus struggle remains the ongoing and perpetual striving of all hideously inbred and cerebrally engorged human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment. And thereby to modify subjective experience, thus altering consciousness itself.

And all because of competition within the human species driving evolution, natural selection under The Survival of the Sickest, so very far beyond any extrinsic and practical needs of survival and adaptation to the environment. Indeed, the latter imperatives having already long been achieved and exceeded. And thence unique intrinsic needs of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal unique to evolved human consciousness, of unprecedented social and intellectual stimulus struggle.

Indeed, probortunity at hand therein enduring, the more dire, the more propitious, to address precisely as  aforementioned so vastly underserved needs, and thereby filling a long neglected market gap. That of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, remaining the perpetual striving of all human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment. And thereby to modify subjective experience, thus altering consciousness itself.

And most optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle must include most poignantly, important close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry. Indeed, Eros, remaining not so much any short attention bogus support group ethos co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, as just the opposite: collusion and transport of liberating union with alien difference. And all thereby forging true friendship in autonomy.

Indeed all whereof arising entirely as a byproduct of meaningfully purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and as shall be seen, believe it or not, never otherwise. Therefore accept no substitutes!

Because contrary to all of that thuddingly dull and eons long outmoded stultifyingly superficiality of prevailing common sense bad social advice: Indeed, just as Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, moreover the forging of attachments of true friendship in autonomy, capable human relationship and psychological visibility to begin with, indeed meaning in the very deepest sense, Eudemonia, optimal reciprocal engagement... All these and so much more, arise entirely as byproduct indeed of authentic attention, of often tabooed and sometimes emotionally risky purposeful interaction and/or no less so, substantive communication. And categorically to reiterate, never otherwise.

Because, as in the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” And so, we should all be living lives of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication. And for in any such genuine connection, no one else, no third party, ever need approve.

And surely that is what is best in life! And therefore what we should all be doing together allot more. If only we knew how!

For as Benjamin Disraeli declares: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” And hoped for results do matter.

Indeed, as so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” And such happiness comes in meeting ones needs for capable interaction with responsible others, making progress every day. Indeed, in the incisive perception of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” Indeed, to quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest.”

In the words of Jean Caldwell: “The only truly happy people are children and the creative minority.” And happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how [and there's the rub!], indeed embrace communications struggle and are Empirically observed in eye opening scientific experiments, to Talk More Seriously. And all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, a happiness killer! Because happy people remain value maximizers.

Furthermore, happy people indeed whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how [and there's the rub!], exert effort in order to actively make things happen, attentively pursue new understandings, choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, even improving their circumstances by centering their lives around whatever pleases them most.

And precisely all such remains the very probortunity at hand, our work cut out for us, the very thrust herein of concurrent and interstitial Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration, as per agenda, proposal and open standing invitation and outreach asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, all of that which only FoolQuest.com offers.

Indeed, as only consistent with the anomalously democratic grand afterthought of otherwise entirely hierarchical and authoritarian Cultural Anthropology, no human being can remain woebegone, unappreciated, uninspired, unimpressed, powerless, unproductive, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and creative solution finding together in collaboration among equals. And so, surely that indeed must be what we all should be doing together far more often and at greater length.

And better still, no mere scarce and infrequent transitory brainstorming event or tantalizing and individually fondly remembered special occasion of temporarily lowered hierarchical distance and collaboration among near equals in creative solution finding, such as any one time assigned task or assignment as of corporate employment or formal education, afterwards abandoned and forgotten in heteronymous return to braindead authoritarian status quo. Nor any sort of short term scheduled workshop, contest or seminar, typically concluding and vanishing entirety without any trace. Indeed even any sort of frantic and intensive "boot camp" ending in exhaustion with no debrief, no path any further, nor any follow up at all. Let alone any even conceivably disruptive and subversively capable organization and empowering action whatsoever towards whatever implementation and long term social change.

Alas that in the aftermath, as in the interim preceding, of typically transitory experience of creative solution finding in collaboration among equals, the same sore intrinsic human needs remain so vastly underserved. Indeed as so routinely and systematically quashed under such resoundingly effete authoritarianism of one stripe or another, in one conventional social context or another.

And therefore all so far too scarcely and infrequently gratified under routine status quo. Whereas in any remedy all whereof, as Sir Karl Popper held forth, actual social change and liberation must be brought about most effectively by the forging of new lasting social institutions.

Because all that is missing, remains some or other institution, one way or another, of any ongoing intentional and reproducible occasion and point of departure, for ongoing Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, imaginative yet rigorous and realistic feasibility study, even for the wildest ideas and loftiest ambitions. Indeed, the very probortunity at hand, the more dire, the more propitious.

Indeed even by subversive and disruptive design thinking social engineering innovation as herein propounded, of practical intentional community and infrastructure of social support. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation. Perhaps even an open yet responsible working group and steering committee ever striving to bring all such vision into fruition. Indeed as herein, at least due social engineering design thinking exploration indeed of the vision herein on FoolQuest.com, of concurrent and interstitial Entrepreneurial and Literary collaboration. All wherein, asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, all of that which only FoolQuest.com offers.

Moreover, as it turns out, creativity, alas ever squandered and rebuffed, is more than merely any solitary individual talent, trait, characteristic or mode of expression. Rather, indeed towards more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, Creativity can and Should be Social. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” ⁠—operation herein perhaps indeed best defined as organized activity in any social context.

One way or another, at least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: at long last to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.

Normalization of deviance occurs when any culture or milieu becomes discouraged and oblivious to whatever specific adverse circumstance, because of mounting despair when no solution is perceived. And indeed alas how status quo normalization of deviance often masks ongoing crisis such as ought to spur organization and activism. Organization and activism only pending agitation to fan the spark of outrage beginning in any specific niche. Because such a specific niche concern serves as pivot upon may turn any larger vision fueled by whatever sustained dissatisfaction. And thence at last, mounting activism must spawn advocacy to impact even the mainstream.

So famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Indeed, as Henry Ford so incisively attests: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” Therefore, change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change our world!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The present sorry state of affairs
for fiction writing collaboration at large online
  
Alas that so much of what endures, remains antithetical to every value of capable and inspired creative writing, willfully execrable and plenty of it, lends any very practice of collaborative fiction writing online, actually such a bad name among competent and serious writers! Because especially online, there exist also what amount to bogus support groups of unflagging encouragement for would be fiction writers, a travesty wherein salient critique is vehemently deplored and actively discouraged, indeed even forbidden, discouraged and actually penalized. And alas, existing collaborative fiction writing tends to fall into exactly that lamentable paradigm so determinedly celebrating the most Gawdawful badfic.

So much proposed herein pivots upon the validity of artistic practice as applicable to creative writing. Can then there ever be mounted any sound critical defense of the arts against the cretin nattering of braindead philistines?

And yet nevertheless, there remains no good reason why the experience of collaborative fiction writing online cannot be suitably cultivated to reach the highest standards and individual striving for aręte (excellence), of the best writer's groups and thriving communities. Those serious individual writers all alone, veritable hermits breaking solitude only for the very all important exchange of critique so repudiated under the very thin skinned dilatant Anti-Critical Bias of those aforementioned bogus writing groups.

But perhaps worst by far, remains the ever more popular esthetic Solipsism and Relativism of those rabidly anti-intellectual dilatants, the Cult of the Amateur Nihilistically declaring that all of art, creative writing included, indeed all of esthetics, remains entirely a matter of individual taste arbitrarily, with no element of relevant or even intelligible value or criteria of merit or quality whatsoever.

Indeed, as in recent history, from the very beginning, when all various qualified experts were effectively driven off from Wikipedia, in “a kind of reverse snobbery that seeks to excuse mediocrity” [Wikipedia talk:Anti-elitism] if not indeed precisely as we have seen, by far so much worse. Because even sheer mediocrity dares not discard every minimum standard. Indeed, true badfic never rises to competent mediocrity.

Thus it might seem that the mediocrity championing Cult of the Amateur on Wikipedia, in all of their would-be iconoclasm, has only reinvented Peer Review, that process of academic publication nindeed notoriously enforcing conformity and mediocrity by locking out deficiency and excellence alike and without distinction. But no further to digress.

Alas, such misguided dilatants typically dedicate themselves to a particular malagenda of ideological staunch heteronomy to groupthink, consensus and superficial harmony. And their inane co-validating opinions, ideologies, and especially their business ideas and other proposals, not even half baked. Just delusional pipedream.

Because just supposing that if, indeed as so goes the Latin maxim: De gustibus non est disputandum meaning that there is/can be no accounting for/disputing of taste, then where does that leave art appreciation, after all consisting entirely of disputation in even the most unaccountable matters of taste? And thence, where does that leave even any barest conjecture apprehendable as to the very nature of capable art, let alone inspiration and genius, drama very much included?
    
And yet, not only are matters of taste disputed and argued every day, but even, sometimes, quite sensibly, even meaningfully. Indeed, by exercises and studies in art appreciation, the tastes of other people, individually and culturally, can be better understood even if not quite reciprocally embraced.
   
Which remains, upon reflection, quite surprising! How can it ever be possible, and by what Epistemological Methodology, to argue Aesthetics sensibly, when taste is manifestly so subjective, quite beyond any proper Ontology?

Indeed, in drama or even in the most Postmodern anti-drama, the Aesthetics all whereof remain very much bound up in whatever meaningful morality explored, even despite how even the classical rules of drama, can never become so steadfast as actual physical laws. Nevertheless, without any critical disposition in the love labor of writing, readable and compelling fiction remains unlikely to result.

But why so? In seeking to answer such questions of Aesthetic validity, there may be found any tantalizing clue, in that Musicology can discover, discern and even most anciently mathematically express, innate characteristics and proportion not only of harmony but also, in modern times, of melody, musical pattern pleasing to the human ear.

Such accomplishment suggests that as well as obvious culture and individuality, there may actually remain indeed an innate neurological component even to artistic taste.

Plato held that patient reflection upon the whys and wherefores any instance or experience of subjective beauty may indeed yet reveal some meaningful truth in an idea. Nevertheless of course, truth is not beauty, nor beauty truth. Indeed, Aesthetics remains a value, not an Ontology. And values define importance in all things.

Therefore, might such as the above discovery regarding Musicology as extended to Aesthetics in general, also in any way somehow also pertain to other values, particularly and most crucially, morality and ethics? Or else, are even ethics and morality nothing but arbitrary questions of taste, just as the most bombastically amoral cynics contend? Clearly, no less than with Aesthetics, morality and ethics are rooted in human nature. And given the premise at all, somehow, at all howsoever sensible discussion ensues only every day. And so does the creativity of high drama along with the ongoing sociological inquest of bold Science Fiction conjecture.

All therefore, yes: Just perhaps there may yet indeed ever be mounted any sound critical defense of the arts, including the values of drama and those of Science Fiction, against the the quite literally tasteless cretin nattering of such braindead philistines. But only for anyone actually interested to think any of this through.

 

 

 

 

 

The present sorry state of affairs
for entry from scratch, into entrepreneurship
    
Alas that however, in all due Socratic Wisdom, entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup), such popular aspiration in endless possibility, of individual self determination and autonomy, nevertheless remain no less daunting and obscure to the masses. For in the words of Arthur H. Vandenberg: “It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity.”

Indeed rising to probortunity at hand, so dire and so propitious, such heady but vastly underserved needs, entrepreneurship for the rest of us remains most embryonic first concept of demystification towards practical intentional community and infrastructure of social support, by social engineering design thinking. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation onto the path of endless possibility called: innovative new venture creation (various business startup).

For more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, and every other benefit therein, what remains the current entry level for heady inclusion into innovative new venture creation? And can that bar be at all lowered for any initial inclusion and any sort of actual active involvement in that direction? After all, social support is so often deemed the single greatest predicator of success, and dearth whereof the specter of ignominious failure. Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him. Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

In conceivable alternative, the capability approach of Sen and Martha Nussbaum, is the idea that true freedom is resultant from real and practical empowerment to attain that which one has ones own reasons to value as important to do or to be or become. And this herein very much applies.

And not solely as nowadays, all manner of service, information and training typically marketed and provided only for experienced and established serial entrepreneurs who can pay. Indeed, a vision instead, to bring together all manner of different skill sets and levels of proficiency, thereby to support and provide traction along an active growth and learning curve, also even for hitherto isolated and squandered drive, aptitude and talent of the most clueless, vulnerable and disorganized beginners and greenhorns among aspiring entrepreneurs and wannabes currently only assailed and deluged with every cult Behaviorist motivational grift, brainwash and blandishment into all manner of dubious "business opportunities."

That leaves only perhaps the most notoriously dry and dreary academia of all, that of business school as traditionally geared to routine corporate careerism. And greed must be good indeed, if it can propel students through that infamous Hell of dystress and boredom! Alas that even in whatever those rare and vaunted entrepreneurship programs, ever the same dreary rat-race of formal education replete with heteronomy to extrinsically motivating reward and punishment systems, remains, as shall be seen, indeed as quite deliberately by the most paranoid authoritarian social engineering design even from deepest antiquity, guaranteed to extinguish any and all intrinsic motivation, zest, zeal, and autonomy as so vital to entrepreneurial ambition and spirit.

Whereas, the very concept of Creativity can and Should be Social more heralds any visionary return in spirit, to the autonomous study groups of the Renaissance, run by the students themselves. A movement so quickly suppressed by the powers that be, and replaced with formal education as we remain well familiar. And all still even today following the calculatingly stogy and repressive model of Plato's Academy.

For indeed, even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test and filter in favor of heteronomy and conformity and in exclusion of autonomy, by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society. And following in precisely that time honored and malignantly oppressive tradition, so magnanimously bequeathing us all our enduring and unhappy system of formal education and mass indoctrination into heteronomy to conformism, that great and good Captain of Industry, John D. Rockefeller so famously declared: “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” Of Marching Morons, of veritable Borg drones, so happy to comply! And all in the purest ideological holy name of collective efficiency. But efficiency of what, to what benefit or priority, and for whom?

And what a racket! Because a racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many.

Alas then how conventionally, one way or another, it all comes to pass, that with so much of any true meaning and importance in life, one way or another we all so quickly find ourselves, each and all, abandoned to our own devices and set up for failure. Most inefficient for the individual. Indeed efficient only for mass exploitation. Such then remains the probortunity at hand, the more dire the more propitious, the gap to be filled.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Applications of narrative
to probortunity at hand

Yes, even aspiring writers no less than even wannabe entrepreneurs, must prize and guard each our very own individual integrity. But then and therefore, must writers, never mind entrepreneurs, ever remain so solitary? After all, serious writers ever embrace the discipline of the writing craft as ever premised upon the principles of drama and also the speculative element of true Science Fiction. Alas however, that indeed except for the indispensable exchange of critique, by and large, serious writing remains solitary, with fiction writing collaboration remaining at best occasional for serious writers, and by no means any regular event or practice. Indeed, despite the renown of particular great works of writing collaboration. And so serious fiction writing becomes insolated and forgotten amid all ever more prevailing conformity and contempt for expertise in general as characteristic of a growing movement sometimes referred to as the Cult of the Amateur. And in the face of such colossal and arrogant ignorance, the discipline of the writing craft, a valuable body of knowledge, culture and capability so long open to everyone, instead of being effectively promoted and transmitted, looses all traction amid the great unwashed online.

And what squandered opportunities remain, not only for salient and informative interaction across levels of proficiency, but for more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle for all involved. For social and intellectual stimulus struggle remains the perpetual striving of all human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from the social environment.

Indeed, nothing less than the authentic wellbeing flowing from heightened creativity under Eudemonistic alternation between solitary contemplation and self expression in collaborative brainstorming. Hence, addressing by and large such blithely unaware and therefore so vastly underserved need, find open invitation herein for entry into brand new ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing as herein extolled.

Moreover, pure creativity as afforded in serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, presents such an excellent management team rapport building exercise towards the applied creativity and endless possibility called: disruptive innovation of new venture creation (various business startup) And the reason remains because of how business or project planning, case/feasibility study endures as only another application of narrative, another persuasive mode of story telling, to reiterate: applied creativity called: disruptive innovation, yet exceeding mere plausibility and transcending the mere willing suspension of disbelief (barring the outright surreal) ever remaining so essential for motivated drama, grfting or propaganda.

And all because whereas any good story or ripping yarn, only needs to seem at all plausible, business or project planning remains a matter of rigorous, prediction, feasibility study and exploration of projected outcomes from proposed intentional action. And no less exiting and informative a presentation all thereof. Indeed of sweeping drama, bold conjecture, tantalizing futuring scenario, thorough research and laboriously task interdependent and objective real world feasibility study, all beginning from most embryonic first concept "kitchen table" stage or phase.

Indeed in capable recruitment of suitable collaboration partner candidates on spec, management team formation, to be followed in due course, and if all goes well, with prospective rounds of Venture Capitalization bringing all into readiness for implementation and marketing, with the devil in the details. Such remaining probortunity at hand, the more dire, the more propitious, of Do-It-Ourselves entrepreneurship for the rest of us.

 

 

 

 

Serious people coming together

Serious writers and serious aspiring entrepreneurs alike, indeed serious people at all, therefore seek and value criticism, tough honest substantive feedback, not just pleasing compliments and encouragement. Indeed even beyond writing, the value of criticism constraining endless possibility, likewise takes every bearing upon information for entrepreneurship, new venture creation (various business startup), life in general and indeed, Epicurean freedom, friendship and thought. And more, anon.

But to quote Herbert Simon: What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it. Alas, in the words of Jean Boudrillard: “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning. All therefore, nowadays more that ever, in the immortal words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity. Because we each and all find ourselves situated in an overstressed attention economy, ever shorter attention ever spread so very thin.  And in the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.”

Indeed,  for anyone with free time on their hands and the secure technological wherewithal of survival under comfortable physical existence, any most important practical and philosophical question on their minds, of the best life to lead and perhaps indeed even meaning in any deeper sense, then ensues.

For as the saying goes, life is the journey, the yearned for experience along the way, and not merely whatever the destination, extrinsic reward, objectives or tangible end result. Indeed, as Epicurus declares: “Not what we have but what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance.” For Epicurus ever extols the pleasures and virtues of autonomy in freedom, friendship and thought. Indeed, to site Martin Seligman's celebrated happiness formula of Positive Psychology:

But none of the above, all fine sentiments however well reasoned, shall ever suffice until somehow brought into strategic action from deliberation analytic yet strategic.

For as Benjamin Disraeli declares: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” And hoped for results, which is to say: purpose, does matter.

Indeed, as so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” And such happiness comes in meeting ones needs for capable interaction with responsible others, making progress every day. Indeed, in the incisive perception of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” Indeed, to quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest.”

Alas then all anti-intellectual taboo indeed against bridging abstract and concrete. Of doers and thinkers ever consumed in reciprocal contempt and expert superiority. For thus ensues dubious practicality and concrete application (specifically how) bereft of all guiding abstract principle (generally why), and ivory tower abstraction uninformed by Empirical practicality and observation. A heedlessly divisive and deviously incapable conservative memplex forstaling all progress and substantive change.

Instead, in those wise words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.” For as John Mason Good said: “Happiness consists in activity. It is a running stream, not a stagnant pool.” Indeed, to quote Alain de Botton: “One of the best protections against disappointment is to have a lot going on.”

But  tautologically, there can be no unilateral self-help, no reliable solitary rugged self-reliant self-made bootstrap DIY (Do-It-Yourself) "well-formed plan" key to outreach towards any such cherished vigorous interaction and cooperation between multiple individuals. No, that, so we are told, ultimately remains the prize conferred by the star first follower or ally.

And all therefore, so many remain: Desperately seeking the star first follower or ally! For the star first follower or ally to emerge as the true leader and influencer, a rôle model blazing the trail, a volunteer leading by example, showing others how, by capable imitation, not only to join in participation, but how to relate.

Indeed, the star first follower or ally appears as a reoccurring and popular figure throughout history, and in our time, the very principle of the star first follower or ally, with such great flourish and fanfare all courtesy of publisher Derek Sivers, emerges into the zeitgeist, the spirit of our time, as a popular concept gone viral across the Internet.

For in the genesis of any new movement, the star first follower or ally, so desperately sought for, rises as the first person coming forth to publicly recognize and vindicate, by fully engaging and interacting with, the hitherto misunderstood and isolated lone nut dissident innovator with the guts to stand alone and appear so ridiculous.

Yes, via precisely above said principle of mob psychology and PR, ancillary then to Creativity can and Should be Social as expounded, the ancillary proposal: Creativity Can and Should be Popular therefore explores any prospect of somehow enacting and putting on public display, all the doings of Creativity can and Should be Social, in order thereby to entice more new participants to join in and help create a buzz.

Fame, fortune, love and understanding. All striving  towards every value so cherished and elusive in life, society and the human condition, beginning indeed with probortunity ever at hand, the more dire, the more propitious. Again to quote Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.”

Find then herein submitted to agenda for discussion by all interested parties, by social engineering design thinking, a "kitchen table" stage or phase most embryonic first concept of optimally synergistic dual foci most productive toward eustress, the dramatic and suspenseful sustainable euphoria and creative tension of collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding.

Indeed objective all whereof ultimately remaining as expended in the capability approach of Sen and Martha Nussbaum, being the idea that true freedom is resultant from real and practical empowerment to attain that which one has ones own reasons to value as important to do or to be or become.

And all such as above revealed as most conducive to most optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, the perpetual striving of all human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from the social environment. A phenomena and intrinsic need completely unique to the human psyche. But more, anon.

Hence proposed initiative dubbed Creativity can and Should be Social, conceived of as the inception of ongoing concurrent and vibrantly interconnected dual endeavor as indeed herein propounded.

And rising to such heady but vastly underserved needs, entrepreneurship for the rest of us remains most embryonic first concept of demystification towards practical intentional community and infrastructure of social support, by social engineering design thinking. Or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation onto the path of endless possibility, of innovative new venture creation (various business startup).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Planning for capable strategic interaction
with responsible others

As it turns out, creativity, alas ever squandered and rebuffed, is more than merely any solitary individual talent, trait, characteristic or mode of expression. Rather, indeed towards more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, Creativity can and Should be Social. For as John Cleese expounds: Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” ⁠—operation herein defined as organized activity in any social context. Moreover, Creativity Can and Should be Popular, not only valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer dorky, awkward, bullied and persecuted.

And that is why, in ancillary proposed initiative, Creativity Can and Should be Popular explores the most probortune prospect of outreach by social engineering design thinking, towards better and more rewarding individual social life and more productive interpersonal networking, as pivoting upon all the above. And all as remaining subject to an unprecedented subversively innovative and disruptive step by step design thinking process for human interaction tailor made best for optimization of individual social and intellectual stimulus struggle, the perpetual striving of all human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from whatever immediate social environment.

To wit: So famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Indeed, as Henry Ford so incisively attests: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.”

Therefore, change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change our world! Because happy people Talk More Seriously. And yet, to quote Anton Chekhov: ... only he is an emancipated thinker who is not afraid to write foolish things.”

Alas then, to quote Frederick Law Olmsted: “After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.” Indeed, and especially when it comes to every difficulty and challenge so typical of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), in endless possibility, all so much easier said than done. And never plain sailing, no mater whatever ambitious endeavor. And all therefore, in all brutal honesty, alas that the most searing ambivalence seems all but guaranteed. Indeed with every grounds for pessimistic realism losing heart.

For to quote Robert Burns: “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley.” (Go often awry.) For in the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, noted disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.” -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, true to life dramatic obstacle or complication.

And that is why, to quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: Plans are nothing, planning is everything.” For plans remain static, but the Dialectic exploration of the planning process, of necessity becomes ever more dynamic, connective and informative. And participants together gain far greater scope of insight and rapport building, than any meager wisdom in whatever fixed ideas and even the best work product.

Moreover, with no guiding agenda or vision indeed from intrinsic motivation, there can only be only confusion and resistance. And with no plan of action and no action  agenda, there can only be ill conceived, ill prepared and ultimately preemptive false start.

Indeed, as widely attributed to Alan Lakein: “Failing to plan, is planning to fail.” For as per summary aggregation of all known among the various and notoriously alliterative multiple p's: Properly Purposeful Pre-Planning and Prior Preparation Prevents Preemptive Production of Painfully Piss Poor Performance. And disruptive innovation so perfectly primarily perennially proactively pivots upon new mistakes instead of ever the same old ones. Even despite all due and comprehensive contingency planning for every foreseeable possibility. Indeed rapid fire serial failure until, at last, if ever, success.

Because, as Aesop tells us: Slow and steady wins the race! And all such probortunity of bold, tantalizing and discouragingly difficult ambition, herein submitted to agenda for deliberation together, for all comers, all interested parties.

And all to test the very hypothesis that completely honest, hard nosed and fully engaged Socratic Dialectical feasibility study, analytic yet strategic, upon precisely all such agenda of ambition and daunting challenge, nevertheless will already begin lifting spirits together in true creativity and the will to power.

 

 
         
 

 

 

 

The true lede: Why?

As we are all admonished per the venerable maxim of journalism: Never bury the lede! Yes, spare us all from thinking too hard. Get right to the point. Who, what, where and when, and only then, if ever at all: why.

No need of sweating the devil in the details. Nobody cares. Never wax philosophical. Don't build up an argument like some sort of academician! After all, logos, the appeal to intellect, remains most notoriously the least persuasive among all advertising strategies. But sometimes, it just cant be helped. And (anti)social media short attention be damned!

The lead or lede is the first few lines emphasizing the most important key salient aspects or points of any story. Or else maybe just the  hook or grabber, the most interesting and surprising details to arrest reader attention. But what is the true lede?

Indeed, it remains well understood, how the most authoritative, economical and ostensibly objective bare bones news reporting of every unending calamity, ever  up to the minute, and so devoid of all background, indeed meant thereby to be so authoritative and reassuring, instead only becomes so crushingly senseless and therefore instead has been found only to promulgate such pandemic mass anxiety. And all in such unresolved dramatic tension and suspense simply ever but never at all at last to learn, ever but never finally at all to explain, ever but never at all just to know and understand, Oh Dear Lord: Why.

And so, just perhaps, the true lede, alas so routinely buried, ever remains: Why?

Indeed, so famously to quote Friedrich Nietzsche: “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.” Yes: From amongst all of Kipling's Six Honest Serving Men, not last or least but most particularly first and foremost: Why, oh why?

So famously to quote Hennery David Thorough, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” Indeed, in the words of Brad Meltzer: “Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about.”

All hence, as Simon Sinek contends, dramatic and compelling branding to differentiate relevant value proposition and process to align strategy with whatever desired end results or objectives, begins not with what? or even how? but: Why? For meaningful engagement and outreach from the very core of the human condition.

Indeed, in the bold interrogative irony of Ross Perot's 1992 vice presidential running mate Admiral James Bond Stockdale: "Who am I, why am I here?" And for that matter at last, why and what for, is my own strange Message in a Bottle, this very website, FoolQuest.com?

Answer: Gentle reader, unmet friend, never fear: I am just another looser, stuck in a rut, a maladroit wanna-be with a cable modem, ever mouthing off online. And as my own boss, I have fired myself for utter failure and incompetence in the sore travail of life! No, I don't want your money or your devotion. I am no bogus formulaic callow motivational grifter here to tickle your ears, psyche you up, and then leave you in the lurch, abandoned once again to your own devices and set up for failure. On the contrary:

Gentle reader, unmet friend, I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?

After all, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him. Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

 

 

 

 

 


The scourge of superficiality

Why bother? Most specifically: Why go to such lengths in particular, as herein extolled? After all, as most commonly attributed to Burt Lance: If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Because the program never fails. You fail the program! And how's that been goin' for ya, fellas? Bah, humbug! Just what will it take to shake such blithe and blind faith? There are many reasons for all the bother of going to such lengths as herein extolled, beginning with recognition of the sheer extent of probortnity at hand, as ever, the more dire, the more propitious.

So famously to quote Hennery David Thorough, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” And in the words of Brad Meltzer: “Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about.”  

For as Barbara Sher declares: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And as Mark R. J. Lavoie attests: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.

All therefore make no mistake: Psychotherapists see two kinds of patients because, with  scarce exception only of those uncommonly happy few, by and large and to begin with, there remain distinctly two kinds people: Those so desperately unhappy, because of just not fitting in socially, and those no less desperately bored, lonely, unknown and dystressed  because they can never be genuine. Indeed fitting in socially and consummately so. And miserable because of it. Indeed, because of every sacrifice, ever so phony, chameleonic and closeted under such ego dystonic conditionality of the popularity rat-race.

Indeed, as per dialogue scripted by Bobcat Goldthwait for the fictional character of Lance Clayton as portrayed  by actor Robin Williams in World's Greatest Dad:’ I used to think the worst thing in life was to end up all alone. It’s not. The worst thing in life is to end up with people who make you feel all alone.”

Damned then if you will, but damned if you won't! Alas that only a happy few indeed so well adjusted or merely fortunate, have ever actually escaped this very dilemma in order to belong to neither quietly desperate and unhappy population.  

Alas that what is all too often most wonting to begin with, remains mere transparency. Indeed, it may often be that the usual prevailing common sense unserious bad social advice extolling all those dreary chores purportedly requisite to popularity, social success and meeting new people, beg all much the same questions as in any business or project planning in order to make any kind of rational and serious projections and expectations:
 
What skills are first requisite? What extensive background knowledge and experience? What are the expectations? What is the realistic investment? Is there the wherewithal? What will the experience actually be like? And what best results must one be willing to settle for?
 
For example: How many personals posting must be answered and followed up, even to get that first cup of coffee? At what cost in time and money, much less self esteem? And in truth, the skill sets and expectations are even more unspoken, particular and extensive, than in any lifetime employment or career experience.
 
It was once that fortitude in whole hearted and sincere unflagging effort and dedication just fitting in by performing and living up to social expectation, all in order to fit in, where praised, lauded and expected. But now they are become obscured, yes: in traumatized indolence with every sore travail, and consequently then in utter denial and defeat. Alas that nowadays, the pertinent tacit knowledge is taboo, never made plain, expectations therefore imparted and poorly expressed by the blithely least self-aware and empathetic most blithely people pleasing conformists and utter tools, and only inductively by evasive and dishonest manipulative socialization that none dare call: indoctrination, Behavioral Conditioning or most honestly: brainwash and invalidation.

Indeed, we have all been lied to, and in every walk of life, nothing seems to work, not even for good little girls and boys, approval seeking eager beavers, who all stick with the program or else prevail despite and not because of all that supposed tough love. Because society is no conduit, no primrose path, but an obstacle course, a filter to weed out the inventive, the rebellious and the unfit, all alike, to find our place in the process of falling by the wayside. Again, brutality once embraced for whatever greater good, but now confused and obscured as so unpleasant.

“The very language we use to describe the self-made ideal has these fault lines embedded within it: To “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” is to succeed by dint of your own efforts. But that’s a modern corruption of the phrase’s original meaning. It used to describe a quixotic attempt to achieve an impossibility, not a feat of self-reliance. You can’t pull yourself up by your bootstraps, anymore than you can by your shoelaces. (Try it.) The phrase’s first known usage comes from a sarcastic 1834 account of a crackpot inventor’s attempt to build a perpetual motion machine.”

The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
—  By John Swansburg

In truth, any even partial and imperfect achievement of indeed rightly admired social success dharma, especially as in any conceivable harmony at all also with intrinsic wellbeing and happiness, remains subtle, opaque, baffling, complicated and often oversimplified and thereby distorted under heteronomy to the ever pervasive cult of socialization.

Alas then, that not indeed those howsoever admirable and truly well adjusted, reasonable and rational, but merely they who by their shining example of operant behavior and adaptation, either by such emotionally broken, eager, unwavering and toadying compliance so convenient to whatever self-righteous and overbearing powers that be, or else of rugged lone independence entirely to spare all others any bother or concern, are held up to redeem an inept, unaccommodating, unsupportive and exploitatively domineering dysfunctional and broken down system, such incompetence and Neoliberal crushing oppression without qualm. Because if indeed they the most industriously compliant can succeed, then why won't the rest of us pathetic indolent wretches? Yes, cut the foot to fit the shoe! Bah, humbug!

And what a racket! A racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many. Any Absurd Big Lie to enflame dependency and the adoration of Big Brother, and thence retreat into that mythic embodiment of whatever soulless Borg collective, and thus to turn us each and all away from one another as individuals.

All therefore pandemic alienation, boredom and loneliness in perpetually ambivalent cognitive dissonance, ever mounting inner conflict, in ideological struggle, rightthink and crimestop, all in order to meet conventional expectations in an ever changing world. Alas that heteronomy to conventional socialization and toadying hierarchically predictive social cognition, falls so far short of real motivating intrinsic human fulfillment.

And all because popularity and relentlessly facile distant social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship, because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, even sometimes intense, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibilityAlas that all to often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo.

And all in a milieu of relentless peer pressure, bullying, intimidation, prevailing anti-intellectualism (hostility and mistrust towards intellect, intellectuals, intellectualism, and deprecation of culture whatsoever) but perhaps more precisely designated as: anti-intraception (a discomfort or opposition in very principle, toward the subjective, the imaginative, the tender minded).

Thus the stultifying rat-race of popularity, people pleasing and approval seeking all notwithstanding, indeed contrary to all of that thuddingly dull obdurate superficiality of prevailing common sense bad social advice: As Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, moreover the forging attachments of true friendship in autonomy, capable human relationship, and psychological visibility to begin with, indeed meaning in the very deepest sense, Eudemonia, optimal reciprocal engagement... All these and so much more, arise entirely as byproduct indeed of authentic attention, of often tabooed and sometimes emotionally risky purposeful interaction and/or no less so, substantive communication. And categorically, never otherwise. Therefore accept no substitutes!

But neither purposeful interaction nor substantive communication can ever be any objective, desired result, payoff or extrinsic reward howsoever to ever be permitted, obtained or achieved. Rather intentionally purposeful interaction and/or intentionally substantive communication are, much the same as with adequate and respectful social support, not any hoped for objective or reward, but the only viable beginning as vital as the breath of oxygen to the heat of fire. Indeed a precondition to human thriving, intrinsic and integral to personal disclosure, psychological visibility and interpersonal relationship. Otherwise, all important and much lionized social integration remains unduly conditional, even therefore invalidating if not actually somewhat Faustian, bitter, disappointing, empty and Existentially irrelevant, pointless and Absurd.

Furthermore, in the words of John Storrs Hall: Ideas should compete, bodies should cooperate. And so, rather than allowing ourselves to be pitted against one another, instead coming together and choosing the best ideas, by engaging in controversy, the welcome and appreciated free exchange of genuine criticism, remains nothing to fear, nothing threatening or hostile. Because criticism remains inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. And that is how even people who disagree even however strongly, heatedly and vociferously, and yet entirely without acrimony, are often the best at cooperation even quite without needless and slavish ongoing heteronomy to social cognition and hierarchical dominance so oppressively quelling all dissent, honesty and creativity.

Instead of heavy handed maximal authority simply for keeping everyone in line as mindless drones, by direct contrast, among the cherished values of democracy, first and foremost remains freedom under only most minimal authority and coercion absolutely necessary. Only imagine then, flipping the script. Rather than stifling and oppressive heteronomy to hierarchical dominance as prevailing norm, indeed as per the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, resorting only temporarily to near egalitarian solution finding finding only as and when completely indispensable, only imagine the very antithesis or sheer Peripeteia of any such closed society. A better liberated situation or circumstances named by Karl Popper as: the open society.

Indeed, even somewhat conspiratorial, subversive and disruptive paradigm shift into ongoing collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding together among equals as the norm, with appeal to authority serving only as ever actually needed or helpful.

All therefore, let us together stop just going with the effluent flow of our shitty little lives, and instead set any meaningful agenda and begin moving with any purpose, and good reason why. For as the wise and venerable old saying goes: No question is too stupid to ask, and no answer too wise to be given.  

Because indeed as so disastrously acceding to that entire gamut of onerous and erroneous common sense as constituting prevailing bad social advice... All towards the great and good boon of heteronymous socialization... And all so desperately in order to gain acceptance:

Everything that we have been taught, one way or another, about remaining so staunchly cheerful, agreeable, upbeat and bland...  All of that stands so blatantly exposed and debunked as yet another sad, pointless and pernicious propaganda manipulation

And all therefore remaining why, at long last, something  must be done differently. However, at least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: at long last to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.

And then collective endeavors of intentional community, or at least initially and more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation, can actually be organized by social engineering design thinking, no longer for petty intimidation and domination, but instead only so as to foster whatever most desired and dynamic interaction between participants, intentionally.

All hence, as herein proposed, the social engineering of most optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, would contrive by social engineering design thinking, the deliberate introduction of specific social and intellectual stimuli and social interaction, into an accessable social environment, in order better to optimize uniquely human social and intellectual stimulus struggle. And such remains the probortunity at hand: 

 

 

The FoolQuest.com value proposition

Fame, fortune, love and understanding. All striving towards every value so cherished and elusive in life and society, begins indeed with probortunity ever at hand, the more dire, the more propitious.

Again so famously to quote Hennery David Thorough, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” And in the words of Brad Meltzer: “Everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about.”

And whereas in all our lives, there remain those constants, the true to life dramatic themes, ever repeating, that we can all relate to, of struggle and frustration in every walk of life, only imagine instead, a subversively innovative and disruptive step by step social engineering design thinking process for human interaction and most optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, all tailor made to individual gratification, happiness and any life less ordinary.

And all beginning from something exiting, new and different, to attract eager participation online. Something very special, that upon discovery would immediately entice and inspire site visitors to investigate and to join right in online, upon unambiguous observation of clear and ongoing benefit and gratification as accruing for interaction among participants. Indeed, the unique and vibrant branding of FoolQuest.com, and purpose, all beginning with that certain spark.

Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally! For the star first follower or ally shall emerge as the true leader and influencer, a rôle model blazing the trail, leading by example, showing others how, by imitation, to join in and participate.

Not merely because Creativity can and Should be Social, but because Creativity Can and Should be Popular, indeed not only valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer dorky, awkward, bullied and persecuted. 

And all therefore, towards ever more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, indeed even in all of the most daunting and grandiose ambition, even then in pitched confrontation with the Existentially Absurd, and yet towards the most simple and most modest beginning, forming an open yet responsible working group and steering committee, gentle readers you are all invited! 

Let us together, yes: who and how else but I and thou, and thou, gentle readers, authentically strive and undertake even such minimal initiative as the inception and perpetuation of ongoing and unflinching Dialectic and deliberation together over probortunity at hand.

And so, indeed pursuant to agenda at hand, of freedom and responsibility, Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing via the eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension, to make uncertainty your friend, Look for the Solution within the Problem!

      Martin Seligman's celebrated happiness formula of Positive Psychology:

Indeed, in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in the very forefront of bleeding edge modern happiness science bridging abstract and concrete: No human being can remain woebegone, unappreciated, uninspired, unimpressed, powerless, unproductive, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely and systematically oppressed, and therefore all far too scarcely and infrequently in the human condition) optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding together. And that is how.

And thus in heady subversion of all prevailing and stultifying hierarchically predictive and toadying heteronomy to hierarchically predictive social cognition, instead pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled freely together among equals. The very key to ever more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle on the journey of life and exploration. And hence authentic wellbeing named: Eudemonia.

But precisely why, of all things, is ongoing Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, imaginative yet rigorous and realistic feasibility study, even for the wildest ideas and loftiest ambitions, cited herein as key to success in no lesser endeavor than than the attainment together of Eudemonia?

Well, first of all, because of how said interaction precisely, Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, alas so vastly underserved, scarce and infrequent in the human condition, is Empirically observed to bring about such ebullient high spirits. And even out from the most abysmally oppressive doldrums of heteronomy to even the most stifling hierarchically predictive social cognition.

Indeed, as so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” In other words, that via creative solution finding, remedies to improve even adverse situation, are being devised for implementation.

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Taking happiness seriously
 
 
 
When the going gets tough, work the probortunity:
    
As Empirically observed in scientific experiments, respectful, trustworthy, capable and happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And there's the rub!), who are sociable, extroverted, known to reach out and thrive, Talk More Seriously, and all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, such a happiness killer! Indeed, happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, and actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And all by meeting the individual need for autonomy achieved only via capable interaction with responsible others. Everything so heartily discouraged under heteronomy.
Little wonder then, how gifted students, bright, insightful and emotionally sensitive, among their own true gifted peers, mysteriously no longer require that great and good boon of heteronymous socialization, unwelcoming, toxic and sanctioned, that emotional violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination, Behavioral Conditioning or most honestly: brainwash. Indeed, the conventionally submissive and  expected distant and disingenuous willful positivity, patiently keeping everything light and innocuous, all simply in order to escape notice from bullying, by hiding ones light under a bushed and thereby such complacent mediocrity all so blandly merely in order to fit in socially, can be excruciatingly bored and lonely, painful and harmful, for sensitive, intelligent creative people. And so, just perhaps, instead of so brutally dumbing down our best and brightest for your own good, dear! can there be no better alternative? Might it not be so much more noble, productive, happier, and in defiance of the ever pervasive and ubiquitous cult of socialization, better to do exactly the opposite throughout life, and continually immerse even the most ordinary people into such interaction as so characteristic of the gifted? — Indeed, thereby cultivating, welcoming and drawing forth each ones own inner giftedness... And just perhaps, there can be a way. An actual detailed and specific implementation strategy. What then even at all beginning in the fairly short term, can actually be done better and differently, dare say and so to speak: more giftedly, even merely amongst ourselves, I and thou, and thou? Our work cut out for us!
    
Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own. And yet, mere interests and diversions in common, indeed so frequent among misguided criteria of group membership, remain perhaps among the least of determinants of personality profiling and compatibility and all that intelligent and sensitive human beings truly yearn for from one another, heading the call to adventure and Eudemonia upon the real world Hero's Journey. Again to quote Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.”
     
 
    
     How and why strategic dual endeavor as next herein propounded,
so excellently rises to probortunity at hand:     
 
Because as in the words of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” Yes, beginning even from (pre-)incubation in the most embryonic first concept inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), through recruitment, management team formation, endless possibility of business or project planning and feasibility study, indeed if all goes well, through successive rounds of Venture Capitalization and all the way to successful implementation and marketing. Embarkation thus, proceeding at our own pace, upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. Because, as Aesop tells us: Slow and steady wins the race!
    
An agenda and open solicitation ensues in extol of ebullient, innovative, often unfamiliar and even somewhat conspiratorial subversively disruptive model for new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation in collaboration among equals. Indeed, as to be discovered, an insight of endless possibility as constrained by human nature, perhaps even to be derived from drama and the hitherto largely solitary discipline of the writing craft. The term: New venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation in endless possibility, denotes entry into the most embryonic first concept "kitchen table" stage or phase of creative solution finding towards inception of any new venture. Already an ideal Eudemonistic probotunity for brainstorming and creative solution finding together in Socratic Dialectical collaboration among equals. And all in order thereby at long last to fulfill exactly that yearning hither to so vastly underserved. An undertaking entirely feasible, practicable, fun and productive, by serious people together even online, frequently and regularly, together exercising any willful due persistence in any capable and autonomy supportive culture of helping. For in the words of Arthur H. Vandenberg: “It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity.”
   
But more and better still: As proverbially casting our net most broadly, an aggressive recruitment and team building strategy is extolled. Such to consist of taking action in specific dual endeavor as follows:
On the one hand, indeed:
 
1) applied creativity and shared agency from (pre-)incubation into disruptively innovative and subversive visionary entrepreneurial new venture creation. Meaning: business or project startup from scratch, beginning from the identification of an idea or opportunity. And subsequently organization of a sequence of activities: networking, mobilization of resources and capability into an intentional social environment suitable in order to create value for candidate participants, stakeholders and prospective investors alike. Not to get ahead of ourselves, however.
 
But all undertaken concurrently and in synergy, on the other hand,
 
with 2) pure creativity for its own joy in highly original serious collaborative fiction writing, drama and Science Fiction, in an open ongoing genuine and intensive fiction writer's bull session online. A whole nother creative bonanza and learning curve!
Because, in the words of Alain de Botton: “One of the best protections against disappointment is to have a lot going on.”
 
And all replete respectively in provision of extensive and systematic tools and guides including directories of both
1) embryonic new venture first concept startup proposals
 
                   and
 
2) highly original and challenging unfinished stories.
       
 
 
Resultantly dynamic synergy is predicted because business or project planning, remains but another creative application of story telling. A rigorous prediction, feasibility study and exploration of future outcomes from proposed intentional action. An exiting and informative presentation all thereof. Indeed of sweeping drama, bold conjecture, tantalizing futuring scenario. And all for ignition of heady and freewheeling creative ongoing exploration, criticism/critique, attack and defense, exploration, modification, variation and elaboration. However, whereas, at least barring actually surrealism, passable fiction only needs to remain plausible, by contrast business or other plans ever possibly to be pitched persuasively and carried out responsibly, must first be thoroughly studied and rendered adequately feasible. And hence even transition from unbounded Science Fiction speculation into more rigorously realistic and definite futurological scenario planning. With expansion and improvement, continually in vociferous and ebullient Dialectic, back and forth. 
All hence fleshing out both 2) unfinished fiction and 1) embryonic first concept new venture proposals alike and indeed, in such dynamic synergy.
     
And additionally, optionally,
3) a subversively innovative step by step design thinking process in mapping out even ever of any other possibilities in individually tailored social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle. Indeed, pioneering and subversive novel social engineering design thinking towards actually nothing less than the individually unique veritable orchestration of nothing less than your happiness! And more anon. 
    
And to reiterate, all because  in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in the very forefront of bleeding edge happiness science, no human being can remain woebegone, unappreciated, uninspired, unimpressed, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely and systematically oppressed, and therefore all far too scarcely and infrequently in the human condition) under liberating circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals. Indeed, as optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and solution finding. Indeed, as optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and solution finding. And for which the collaborative power and capable innovation at the very interstice of such subversively disruptive dual endeavor as herein extolled, remains precisely so ideal. Because all three ever remain effulgent for collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding.
    
All thus, indeed in collaboration among equals and subversion of hierarchy, if all goes according to plan, not merely an unprecedented (pre-)incubation and Do-It-Ourselves career path into entrepreneurship for the rest of us, but for each participant, and as no less priority, a no less innovatively disruptive new and better gratifying and more effective paradigm of social interaction, networking and outreach.
       
Because creativity is more than merely any individual trait, characteristic or mode of expression, but rather, as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Therefore creativity must no longer shame and socially isolate intelligent creative people, alas so often bullied. Indeed, not only can and should creativity be social, but creativity ought actually even to make creative people popular, of only, in gloriously subversive and disruptive paradigm shift, one fine day collaboration among equals in creative solution finding ever becomes more widely practiced, public and better appreciated. Indeed, a more advanced and happier alternative in social interaction and connection. But in the meantime, let us proudly come together amongst ourselves for sharing precisely that joy, convivial creativity and will to power.  
   
 
Indeed, in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation and drama alike, and likewise out from relative ignorance, the value of criticism/critique in studious application of all known essential fundamentals of each endeavor and discipline. Inevitably, a lifelong and steep learning curve! Otherwise a determined quick descent into travesty and denial, pipedream of mere cargo cult mimesis, dull, even in whatever even perhaps concomitant rôle playing, rigid and nothing actually ever less playful. Indeed, not even at all, as per any arguable Post Modern recommendation of life as any sort of dramatic grand gesture amid lost cause. Indeed, only such stubborn great folly so stuffy and much too serious and yet not at all serious enough. Indeed, only such rôle play amounting merely to the most Existentially Absurd delusional enactment. Rather than by contrast, even in defiance of Existentially Absurd futility, at all honestly and seriously striving at rôles in life of ever actually planning and taking action effectively together.
     
Therefore in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in the very forefront of bleeding edge happiness science: Towards any minimal, simple and and most modest beginning, let us together, yes: who and how else but I and thou, and thou, gentle readers, take the initiative. Indeed, by even considering testing together the very hypothesis that even sustained Socratic Dialectical full engagement in analytic yet strategic deliberation together, realistic yet undaunted, in accordance with an agenda even merely in rational assessment of probortunity at hand, can actually discover true hope and already begin lifting spirits. Yes, it all begins merely with the most relevant discussion. Indeed, change our conversation, reset the agenda, and change the world!
     
Writing, of whatever kind and to whatever purpose, not unlike friendship, often discovers struggle for expression, ever fraught with miscommunication and incomprehension. All so difficult and complicated beyond any toxic maxims of oversimplification. Whether for stories or business/project plans, writing is rewriting, with Active Reading and Listening, indeed all hard work, and never a waste of time. Indeed to begin with, in the words of Henry Ford: Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason so few engage in it.”
   
Complicated and unending research and feasibility study, ever remains the least of responsible due diligence in all manner of endeavor. Alas then that, especially as entrenched in willfully positive cheerful attitudes, many never find the motivation for anything much more than utter denial and stuffy pipedream, both too serious and yet, not even remotely serious enough. And all therefore, writing ever remains so easy to do, but difficult actually to do well. And all of that is why there will never be found any shortage in malagenda of determinedly co-validating clueless unaware incompetence as that of delusional half assed gawdawful group badfic online, any more than in no less willfully positive and ever cheerful upbeat business pipedreams, hand waving and scams, bereft of all skeptical credulity.
    
  
 
The outreach at hand:
 
No, I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no formulaic callow motivational grifter here to tickle your ears, psyche you up,  and then leave you in the lurch! Only to find ourselves each and all abandoned to our own devices and thereby set up for failure in anything truly meaningful. Isn't there quite enough of that already? For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. Indeed, as it turns out, inner freedom by itself alone, is no freedom at all.
   
Indeed, as so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” In other words, that remedies to improve even adverse situation, are being devised for implementation. And oh, what a feeling! Dopamine that signifies: An indicator beyond mere (anti)social media short attention clickbait, distraction and whatever empty illusion of social life. Indeed, instead pleasure that actually reflects value and growth, true to thine own self becoming who you are.” In a word: Eudemonia. And not by any Nietzschean lonely self-made bootstrap rugged Individualism. For in the celebrated prose of John Done: No man an island.  Not even Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche!

So famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Therefore, change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change our world! And as unreasonably thoughtful and committed citizens, let's all talk more seriously!

Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally! For the star first follower or ally shall become the true leader and influencer, blazing the trail, leading by example, showing others how, by imitation, to join in and participate. Again, because Creativity can and Should be Social and Creativity Can and Should be Popular.

     • Or: 0) Taking a step back: The curious prospect of somehow instead beginning from lifestyle reciprocal peer or group coaching?
 
 
Context, situation analysis, problem statement, desire and discontent:
 
To quote Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” And alas all too commonly elusive simply for wont of the connection and wherewithal to organize freely. But specific aręte or excellence in cooperation remains the only possible crucial advantage to be together seized, without wealth, connections and marketable talent, genius beyond whatever mere giftedness.
    
Although, furthermore, of all things, precisely why is Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, imaginative yet rigorous and realistic feasibility study, even for the wildest ideas and loftiest ambitions, cited herein as key to success in no lesser endeavor than than the attainment together of Eudemonia? Well, first of all, because of how said interaction precisely, Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, alas so vastly underserved, scarce and infrequent in the human condition, is Empirically observed to bring about such ebullient high spirits. And even out from the most abysmally oppressive doldrums of heteronomy to even the most stifling hierarchically predictive social cognition. But even that remains merely a beginning. Because capable creativity only ignites the will to power.
      
Indeed, more specifically, how and why, precisely what collaborative implementation of concurrent dual endeavor together, in entrepreneurship on the one hand, and on the other hand, in creative writing? And by what projected and expected synergy?
    
Answer: Because disruptive innovation, applied game changing creativity, pivots upon detailed planning, rigorous feasibility study and capable implementation. All whereof along with fateful character motivation and growth, drama is dharma, the sagacious exploration of causation in context and consequence. And business or project planning is but another persuasive mode of narrative. Indeed, a likely story, conjecture to persuade candidate recruits on spec and prospective investors alike, of glowing profit potential. Indeed, leave us face it, those vaunted futuring scenarios are merely projected sociology or: Science Fiction speculation. All indeed as further expounded in fully detailed solicitation and agenda for deliberation among all interested parties, anon... But if, gentle reader, as it turns out, you just don't relate, then this is most profusely to apologize for wasting your precious time.
   
To begin with, a common real world dramatic obstacle remains in the prevalence of such blithely conflicting expectations and paradigms of cooperation, as so readily to bring us all into such deadlock of cross-purpose and strife. Indeed, derivative from prevailing heteronymous worldview, the lowest common denominator remains the most petty jumped up knee-jerk hierarchical dominance, incompetent authoritarianism and superficial harmony. And all buttressed by the most heavy-handedly coercive consensus manipulation and bullying. And yet there may still pass between any of us, each and all, anything better and finer instead of ever the same dreary primate politics of such glorified pack mammals,We the Sheeple. For there ever remain more capable and congenial options for serious people together in collaboration among equals, beginning in imaginative yet rigorous and realistic feasibility study, even for the wildest ideas and loftiest ambitions. Indeed, not merely in terms of desired outcomes or end results, but of whatever yearned for experience along the way. For as the saying goes, life is the journey, not merely the destination.
        
Its all a matter of actual human motivation as something to be served and respected, rather than as all too often, cajoled, reshaped, behaviorally conditioned, manipulated and exploited even however high-mindedly. The first priority then comes in the crafting of peak experience together, of optimal reciprocal engagement. Then the second priority arrives in better serving the networking and outreach needs of each participant. Only then might extrinsic success accrue in terms of whatever desired end results or objectives, then naturally ensuing. Hence: 
    
The conventional choice between, on the one hand, giving up on our dreams and deepest needs, and then one way or another simply making do and towing the line, or else on the other hand, passive retreat into delusional pipedream, remains no choice at all. Instead, what do we want, and what will it take? That is the question! (Well actually, two connected questions...) And then in turn, imagination and at all realistic projections indeed not only of desired eventual outcomes or end results, but actually of whatever qualities of yearned for more immediately ensuing experience: Would indeed ensuing ongoing experience and striving according to projected necessity, become happy or unhappy, uplifting or burdensome? Can foreseeable reality ever be expected to live up to individual fantasy, desire and perhaps somewhat wishful hypothesis? And at what cost? To wit expounded herein, comes the notion that exploration of all such probortunity toward fulfillment and Eudemonia, may all pivot, in turn, upon Positive Psychology and whatever chosen working theory of authentic wellbeing. Indeed, more specifically, as concerning the nature of social and intellectual stimulus struggle and the arousal, stimulation then gratification of intrinsic human needs and appetites. And there's the rub!
    
FoolQuest.com thence persists in desperate outreach together first to explore, better understand and then work the probortunity, all ultimately to in order to address a particular set of uniquely human and vastly underserved intrinsic social and intellectual needs and appetites herein deemed so essential to any capable and autonomy supportive culture of helping; indeed in a word: to Eudemonia. And all in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in the very forefront of bleeding edge happiness science. Including not only evolutionary neuroscience of hideous inbred mutation and engorged human cerebrality under natural selection determined by The Survival of the Sickest, but also the anomalously democratic grand afterthought of generally hierarchical and authoritarian Cultural Anthropology.
     
To wit, flipping the script: That only at last once setting aside ever stifling hierarchically predictive social cognition, no human consciousness can remain woebegone, unappreciated, uninspired, unimpressed, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore all far too scarcely and infrequently in the human condition) under liberating circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals. Indeed, as optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and solution finding. Indeed, for intelligent and sensitive people, the will to power shall be best fulfilled in creative collaboration, brainstorming and solution finding. Indeed, all as according to a specific strategy, an innovative Master Plan. An ongoing creative collaboration among equals in dual endeavor of Entrepreneurship and creative writing.
    
As so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” An uplifting ebullience indeed arising in so uniquely in the experience of convivial collaboration among equals throughout the joyful process of creative solution finding. And never to put cart before horse, there can be no solution finding save first, for framing problem statement out from duly diligent situation analysis. And then no satisfaction save by resolution of whatever discontent. Indeed, nothing can become intelligible without precisely such context, first. Indeed, the very rubric: 'probortunity' derives in portmanteau from the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in extol thereby of how the greatest problems present the most  golden opportunities. As to the probortunity at hand, the problem remains the depressing banality of dullardly petty oppression throughout life. And the solution, any exaltation in whatever feasible liberation. But not to get ahead of ourselves.
   
So famously to quote Edward Bernays: “We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” But not all of them so unsung. Indeed, across the ages, an impressive degree of terrified and phobic creativity has been invested and expended into so oppressively undermining not only individual liberty, but indeed so brutally stifling creativity itself. Even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test for heteronomy and conformity by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from ever rising to influential positions in society. As it turns out, just as from time immemorial, even most extreme and disciplined tolerance for boredom remains ever essential in all well approved subservient heteronomy ever doubling down into conformism.
    
Following in precisely that time honored and malignantly oppressive tradition, so magnanimously bequeathing us all our enduring and unhappy system of formal education and mass indoctrination of heteronomy into conformism, that great and good Captain of Industry, John D. Rockefeller so famously declared: “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” Of Marching Morons, of veritable Borg drones, so happy to comply! And all in the purest ideological holy name of collective efficiency. And what a racket! Efficiency perhaps, but even so, for whom and to what end or priority? There remains no fine line, but indeed a vast gulf, an abyss, between the lucid materialism of scientific rationalism, and the anti-philosophical ideology and value-destruction of soul crushing crass materialism: How Existentially Absurd for each to do our part in even the most tangible and needful collective practical objectives, and yet thereby so poorly to serve the drives of each living and breathing end user.
    
In so vastly hypocritical constructed social reality, a racket, no matter how reputable and ubiquitous, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many. Will there then be no escape from propaganda manipulation forever pandering to ever much the same people pleasing denial? Will there be no shield or relief, from ever popular and toxic willful positivity and blithely legitimized controlling Behavior Modification? From exhortation to gullible delusional wishful thinking and lunatic faith? Any rescue from suffering in quiet desperation and making do? Can there be no better alternative to be had, than simply being had? No succor for us suckers, one born every minute, and ever falling prey to all manner of scams, indeed so many of either, so undeservedly reputable and well esteemed? Anything at all beyond perseverance in sheer Ecclesiastical futility? That is the question!
    
     • The Top 10 Things People Want In Life But Can’t Seem To Get - - “I can't get no...”
 
And so we are each and all exhorted and forever tantalized: Follow your bliss!” Existentially Absurd empty blandishment, hand waving and broken promise all easier said than done, as we are all then summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices, setup for failure and sore travail. Because the program never fails, you fail the program. You gotta pay your dues, right? Bah, humbug!
   
By way of ubiquitous specific illustrative example: To help save the planet, mind your own carbon footprint and sort your own recyclables. After all, the latter the least one can do, and churlish to refuse. But the former an endless, costly and often vague travail, with so little to show. Indeed, all instead of banding together in holding mass polluters to account! A long standing PR diversionary tactic of consensus manipulation and propaganda distraction, whereby any responsibility for systemic failure becomes so deviously transferred onto the shoulders of each hapless lone individual, that's right, you and me. Indeed, disabling misdirection via the very pretense of empowerment. And what cunning mendacity! And similar ideological gambit remains by far even more pervasive: 
   
Indeed, throughout life, there are presented all manner of endless stumbling blocks entirely without nurture. An expectation by whatever osmosis, to glean from whatever conceivable subtext, any inking of whatever requisite skill sets of such legendary rugged self reliance. And even while being force fed whatever subservient curriculum so entirely irrelevant to anything better admired. For even in the veneration of men and women of destiny throughout history, no one is taught how actually to emulate them. If those worthies, in this golden land of opportunity, such undaunted approval seeking eager beavers, without encouragement, overcame not only whatever incidental adversity, but the entire system itself to begin with, in order thus to rise to the top, then what is there to prevent anyone else? Plenty! And all the while, as Edward Snowden so penetratingly observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Indeed, to quote  Senator Elizabeth Warren: Others have said it before me. If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu.”
 
Alas that all so very far from any pursuit of happiness and meaning of life, for all so many, socially constructed conformity upon all whatever known and even howsoever reputable, constrained, defined well traveled readily available but unfulfilling sore travail, institutionalized and prepackaged conventional life and career paths, remains so vastly disappointing, pointlessly arduous, futile and meaningless. In short: Existentially Absurd formal education, employment, religion and every other folly or granfaloon. Indeed all such sore travail, abandoned as we are, each and all, to our own devices, ill equipped and isolated from any true collaboration among equals, and all thereby set up for failure in anything truly meaningful. There remains all therefore, in any alternative so vastly underserved, no less vast and frustrated yearnings of so many, for some or other unparalleled positive experience of any life less ordinary. But instead, only meager consolation to be had in socially approved and inculcated coping methods of oppressively irrelevant Terrible Trivium and unthreatening but interminably vapid small talk.
What better then can be done instead? Let's talk! Yet again to reiterate, let us come together in Dialectical collaboration among equals brainstorming towards creative solution finding. Indeed:
 

   

In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

 
 
 
 
 
The path to action through every pitfall of inaction
A Transactional Analysis of implementation in very principle
Even if all goes well, how fruitful whatever hoped for results of all as in the preceding? What comes next? To quote Frederick Law Olmsted: After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.” Alas, for as Benjamin Disraeli declares: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” Indeed, outside of social and intellectual stimulus struggle and collaborative creativity simply for its own joy intrinsically, the entire extrinsic, instrumental and relevant power and purpose of creative solution finding and feasibility study, one way or another, constituted after all, entirely from communication, deliberation, research and feasibility study together, indeed all talk, can only be thereby to discover and develop options at any point in due course, then at last to begin taking action. Indeed, if all goes well, eventual implementation and success. Indeed, the subsequent organization of whatever sequence of activities: networking, mobilization of resources and capability into an intentional social environment suitable in order to create value for candidate participants, stakeholders and prospective investors all alike.
   
Because as in the words of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” Yes, in endless possibility of beginning even from (pre-)incubation in the most embryonic first concept inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), through recruitment, management team formation, business or project planning and feasibility study, indeed if all goes well, through successive rounds of Venture Capitalization and all the way to successful implementation and marketing. Embarkation thus, proceeding at our own pace, upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. Because, as Aesop tells us: Slow and steady wins the race!
    
All of which, throughout, must entail task interdependency. And task interdependency refers to circumstances wherein any particular tasks must be accomplished first, and in a timely manner at all on schedule, in order for other tasks to even become possible in turn, and then accomplished. And thus opening the way for whatever successive tasks in turn. Indeed, efficiently in any timely manner.  Indeed, a single point failure, is any single thing as typically among many, that needs to happen, to go off without a hitch, or else the entire endeavor fails along with it. And as it turns out, even without rigid time management and efficiency, task and interpersonal interdependency yet obtains all the more in proactive initiative taking shape to meet new challenges.
     
Therefore beyond whatever mere solitary division of labor, participants wisely and in good faith, must embrace responsibility and altruism toward one another reinforced under a culture of helping. Indeed actually providing no less than a five to one ratio in favor of positive experiences, even in the form of frequently exchanging even small positive acts, in order thereby to outweigh and overcome the entirely lucid survival adapted vigilance of negativity bias. Indeed, task interdependency, under paradigm shift of collaboration among equals in in creative solution finding, let alone then together taking action, must require of each participant superordination in their specialty or expertise when ever they need assistance or cooperation, but reciprocally, subordination whenever another participant likewise requires cooperation or assistance. Optimally, the entire venture must revolve around you, every time you need something, face a problem, or recognize an opportunity; and likewise, reciprocally, the entire venture must revolve around each participant in turn, any time at all, they need something, particularly from any other participant including you, in facing a problem or rising to opportunity. Indeed, all too often, task interdependency and single point failure. A work ethic of respectful, trustworthy, capable and gregarious professionalism amid Do-It-Ourselves entrepreneurship for the rest of us. Like The Three Musketeers: “All for one, and one for all!” Or else, all for naught.
   
Alas, not everyone willingly agrees with the above, even as most obvious. All manner of flagrant sophistry abounds. Indeed beware the very antithesis of all such above virtue, devious cross-purpose of malice, friction and folly! Sadly, all such ever untrustworthy ubiquitous malignancy must be completely anticipated in full readiness. Indeed, always, before going any further, perpetually pay heed to the 15 purported signs of actual trustworthiness and creditable Menschlichkeit, remaining ever wary of the 18 Easy Ways to Destroy trust. Then cleave to those who demonstrate the former, while ceasing to depend upon those displaying the latter. Bullying passive hostility, unreliability and betrayal must be expected and prepared for, undefeated and without rancor. In real world drama, there will always be a Mordred or a Judas among us. Don't be discouraged. Only expect them, and just let them disqualify themselves. Then cleave to true friends as the treasure that they can be. Whatever obstacles must be confronted. Issues must be dealt with openly and with maturity. Or else, ways must be found to pick up whatever the slack, without missing a beat. Otherwise, collaboration will fail as participants, discouraged, drift apart. Instead, in order to maintain cohesion, participants in earnest must commiserate and support one another in occasion of crisis and betrayal.
   
Moreover, even entirely barring all such undue ill will and flagrantly excessive poor judgment, alas to quote Robert Burns: “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley.” (Go often awry.) For in the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, noted disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.” -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, true to life dramatic obstacle or complication. And that is why, to quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: “Plans are nothing, planning is everything.” For plans remain static, but the Dialectic exploration of the planning process, of necessity becomes ever more dynamic, connective and informative. And participants together gain far greater scope of insight and rapport building, than any meager wisdom in whatever fixed ideas and even the best work product. Indeed, as widely attributed to Alan Lakein: “Failing to plan, is planning to fail.” For as per summary aggregation of the notoriously alliterative multiple p's: Properly Purposeful Pre-Planning and Prior Preparation Prevents Preemptive Production of Painfully Piss Poor Performance. And disruptive innovation pivots upon new mistakes instead of ever the same old ones. Even despite all due and comprehensive contingency planning for every foreseeable possibility. Indeed rapid fire serial failure until, at last, if ever, success.

   

In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

 
 

 

 

 

 

FoolQuest.com hereby proudly extends actionable public invitation 

              to lively ongoing collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding among equals:
 
 
 
 

 

Join the creative conspiracy: Madness, but method in't!

 

To quote George Orwell: A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing.” Thence lost, ridiculed and silenced opposition message herein ensues, in response to ideology and conduct so commonplace as to escape notice. Indeed, in any practice of controversy and Socratic Dialectic, the welcome and appreciated exchange of criticism among equals, in any ebullient contest of argumentative and free critical thinking, open disagreement presents no obstacle but the entire point. Whereas cagey passive hostile silence and obstruction, even censorship and Relational Bullying outright, remains the Anti-Socratic enemy of expressive Epicurean freedom, friendship and thought. And therefore of autonomy supportive social support in any conceivable culture of helping and of  creativity as human interaction beyond mere individual trait, characteristic or mode of expression.
All therefore, at least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any  bold and radical paradigm shift into liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike taboo forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even building somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: at long last to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. And that is how! Because society is not any entity in its own right, but an ongoing and defining relationship among people. With subtext of tacit coercion, an all too often abusive and terrifying relationship. A restrictive but ultimately malleable and dreamlike constructed and ultimately chimerical social reality or culture, virtually augmented from time immemorial, no maya or samsāra, but merely the society of the spectacle, the real life Matrix
       
And yet again to reiterate, no human being can remain so woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when, alas as all far too  infrequently in the human condition, circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals; indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and creative solution finding. Indeed as in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, an all too infrequent peak experience that the masses, as it turns out, under such oppressive status quo, yet remain so badly starving for. And therefore the FoolQuest.com Master Plan strives explicitly to elicit and engage these specific modes of interaction between participants, in order thereby more readily and immediately, to offer precisely such alas currently all too infrequent peak experience to anyone so inclined. Who, what, where, when, and above all: Why, oh why!
      
And all well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Indeed, entirely feasible within any coalition of the willing, however informal. Indeed, all even in such microcosm so conspiratorially, to render the currently infrequent peak experience of collaboration among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding, henceforth more readily accessible, frequent and routine for anyone so inclined. All epitome whereof, intentionally by social engineering design, as to be  more regularly and abundantly supplied in a genuine ongoing turnkey solution as indeed extolled herein.

Creativity is more than merely any individual trait, characteristic or mode of expression, but rather, as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Therefore creativity must no longer shame and socially isolate creative people. Indeed, not only can and should creativity be social, but creativity ought actually even to make creative people popular, of only, in gloriously subversive and disruptive paradigm shift, one fine day collaboration among equals in creative solution finding ever becomes more widely practiced, public and better appreciated. But in the meantime, let us proudly come together amongst ourselves for precisely that joy.  

Indeed, as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, respectful, trustworthy, capable and happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And there's the rub!), who are sociable, extroverted, known to reach out and thrive, Talk More Seriously, and all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, such a happiness killer! Indeed, happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, and actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And all by meeting the need for capable interaction with responsible others.

Little wonder then, how gifted students, bright, insightful and emotionally sensitive, among their own true gifted peers, mysteriously no longer require that great and good boon of heteronymous socialization, unwelcoming, toxic and sanctioned, that emotional violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination, Behavioral Conditioning or most honestly: brainwash. Indeed, the conventionally submissive and  expected distant and disingenuous willful positivity, patiently keeping everything light and innocuous, all simply in order to escape notice from bullying, by hiding ones light under a bushed and thereby such complacent mediocrity all so blandly merely in order to fit in socially, can be excruciatingly bored and lonely, painful and harmful, for sensitive, intelligent creative people. And so, just perhaps, instead of so brutally dumbing down our best and brightest for your own good, dear! can there be no better alternative? Might it not be so much more noble, productive, happier, and in defiance of the ever pervasive and ubiquitous cult of socialization, better to do exactly the opposite throughout life, and continually immerse even the most ordinary people into such interaction as so characteristic of the gifted? — Indeed, thereby cultivating, welcoming and drawing forth each ones own inner giftedness... And just perhaps, there can be a way. An actual detailed and specific implementation strategy. What then even at all beginning in the fairly short term, can actually be done better and differently, dare say and so to speak: more giftedly, even merely amongst ourselves, I and thou, and thou? Our work cut out for us!
    
Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own. And yet, mere interests and diversions in common, indeed so frequent among misguided criteria of group membership, remain perhaps among the least of determinants of personality profiling and compatibility and all that human beings actually yearn for from one another.

The probortunity at hand: Can it be possible to meet such underserved needs of hideous inbred deformity and freakishly engorged human cerebrality (evolutionary neurology consequent under The Survival of the Sickest), intentionally by social engineering design, by any conceivable readily available turnkey solution? Indeed, a unique and unprecedented new social institution, a place to turn to and join right in for inspired brainy gifted polymath interaction as above extolled, a proposed entirely different kind of intentional community online. Or at least initially and more modestly, smaller intentional social circle, group, club or ongoing sustained interaction.

But with no guiding agenda or vision indeed from intrinsic motivation, there can only be only confusion and resistance. And with no plan of action and no action agenda, there can only be ill conceived, ill prepared and ultimately preemptive false start. Our work cut out for us. Look for the Solution within the Problem!  Indeed, surely there remain as many categories of social dysfunction, which is a relationship after all, as there are kinds of dysfunctional relationships to begin with. And likewise, there may also arise better observable and conceivable alternatives, progress, and even in paradigm shift, corresponding Transactional Antithesis to whatever preceding malaise.
   

    
And so, how would any of this ever actually even work? What to do? Suffice how this very text moves from the general to the specific, and from the declarative to the imperative: First whatever desirable circumstances must be described, and then proposal advanced as to how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, the FoolQuest.com Master Plan explicitly strives to elicit and engage exactly whatever desired salient interaction between participants, indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and creative solution finding, in order thereby to offer that very experience to anyone so inclined. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Indeed, entirely feasible within any coalition of the willing, however informal. But if only we can organize and stop just going with the flow.  
    
Indeed, even online and around the world, Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing via optimal reciprocal engagement together ever heightening eustress, sustainable euphoria and creative tension of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, not by any ever shorter attention endless instant gratification and time-suck of bleeding edge Virtual Reality, but even simply via the time tested electronic low tech and readily accessible power and enduring literacy of asynchronous text communication. Thus affording the leisure to compose one's thoughts, followed up with the hitherto unprecedented quick turn around for timely dialogue in written correspondence. Thus congenial, uplifting and productive alternation between the fulfilling outreach and extroversion of Dialectical collaboration and the introversion and retreat of solitary reflection and inspiration that so refreshes the mind. First whatever desirable circumstances are described, and then proposal is advanced how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, the FoolQuest.com Master Plan explicitly strives to elicit and engage exactly that salient interaction between participants, in order thereby to offer that very experience to anyone so inclined. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Indeed, entirely feasible within any coalition of the willing, however informal. But if only we can organize and stop just going with the flow.
   
And what if I told you that such Eudemonia of Dialectical collaboration in endless possibility of creative solution finding, as herein conceived, must pivot upon dual concurrent endeavor of subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) undertaken concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming?  
      
Indeed the  FoolQuest.com Master Plan strives at nothing less than Eudemonia via immersive heady regimen of collaboration among equals, indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria in endless possibility of creative tension in brainstorming and creative solution finding, specifically in unprecedented asynchronous dual endeavor online, a novel innovative and subversive model of new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation and collaboration among equals, derived from drama and the and the hitherto largely solitary discipline of the writing craft: subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) undertaken concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. Thus both format and content for ongoing intensive close Socratic Dialectical collaboration among equals, any two or more people, indeed in brainstorming and creative solution finding. A concrete implementation right here online, complete with tools, guides and directories of challenging unfinished drafts in either field: Or by all means gentle readers, go ahead and pitch your own! Many metaphorical irons in that proverbial fire, figuratively to hammer out, render, expand and perfect together. Because, in the words of  Alain de Botton: “One of the best protections against disappointment is to have a lot going on.” Indeed, a most admirable and sublime capability so much easier praised and recommended than actually cultivated by any individual for themselves, let alone by any concievable social engineering design, systematically provided for the masses. But just perhaps, there is a way:
              
The  FoolQuest.com Master Plan for addressing the probortunity at hand for unprecedented Eudemonia and more optimal reciprocal engagement in social and intellectual stimulus struggle online, pivots upon hitherto so cherished but alas so infrequent collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding. Something so much fun to do together from the beginning, outcome as may, later on. Because, prior to any long deferred extrinsic reward and punishment and, if ever, even tangible material success, cherished but alas so infrequent collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding remains meaningful intrinsic stimulus appetite, trigger and arousal of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, being: the perpetual striving of any human consciousness to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual of stimulation and arousal from the enfolding social environment. All such joy of peak experience so very elusive. The gap to be filled, the vastly unmet need that participation here on FoolQuest.com seeks to address.      
 

 

Expanding upon the principal numbered foci of proposed concurrent creative endeavor
as herein comprising the FoolQuest.com Master Plan
 
But how and why particularly, and of all things, new venture creation (various business startup) concurrently with serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming? Answer: By optimal reciprocal engagement. By Epicurean freedom, friendship and thought. Via profound and immersive close Socratic Dialectical collaboration among equals in endless possibility, in heady, convivial and freewheeling creative process even for novice aspirant and experienced old pro together, consisting in ongoing exploration, criticism/critique, attack and defense, exploration, modification, variation, elaboration, expansion and improvement, continually in vociferous and ebullient Dialectic, back and forth. And all as well facilitated with comprehensive tools and guides, in dual concurrent endeavor together fleshing out both fiction ideas and new venture first concepts alike. Post to the forum for others to weigh in, or email if it's private. What follows then, are the three principal numbered foci of proposed concurrent creative endeavor, a novel innovative and subversive model for new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation and collaboration among equals, derived from drama and the hitherto largely solitary discipline of the writing craft, plus an initiative of social engineering design thinking  

1) On the one hand, in entrepreneurship for the rest of us, and for disruptive innovation which is applied creativity, creativity and the will to power brought to bear in open collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding, a wide ranging short compendium is featured, of embryonic and wildly subversive and disruptive entrepreneurial new venture first concept proposals: New ideas for business startups to address underserved needs and fill market gaps. Proposals for the organization and inception of original game changing new businesses and other projects. Indeed, disruptively innovative new venture creation (business startups) herein shall be taken to include both profit and nonprofit, indeed Social Entrepreneurship, doing well by doing good, and even adventures into grassroots politics and activism. Or by all means, go ahead and pitch your own ideas! Might any of that become productive? Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? Can we talk?

2) And in synergy concurrently, on the other hand, for pure creativity, art for its own joy, sweeping drama and unfettered Science Fiction speculation, a sellect vibrant anthology is featured, of sample highly original unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations for an open ongoing genuine and intensive writer's bull session online. But also as an initial self-sufficient team-building exercise. Or by all means, go ahead and pitch your own ideas! Does any of that sound like fun? Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? Can we talk?
All important question: But precisely why such specific dual endeavor of collaboration among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding, as above delineated? How and for that matter, why , in such endless possibility, a model for new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation and collaboration among equals, derived from drama and the and the hitherto largely solitary discipline of the writing craft?

The reason then that purely creative serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming presents such an excellent management team building exercise towards the applied creativity called: disruptive innovation of new venture creation (various business startup), remains because of how business or project planning, case/feasibility study endures as only another application of narrative, another persuasive mode of story telling, to reiterate: applied creativity called: disruptive innovation, endless possibility yet exceeding and transcending the mere willing suspension of disbelief (barring the outright surreal) ever remaining so essential for motivated drama, grifting or propaganda.

Because whereas any good story or ripping yarn only needs to seem plausible, any business or project plan rigorous prediction, feasibility study and exploration of future outcomes from proposed intentional action. An exiting and informative presentation all thereof. Indeed of sweeping drama, bold conjecture, tantalizing futuring scenario, thorough research and laboriously task interdependent and objective real world feasibility study, all beginning from most embryonic first concept "kitchen table" stage or phase. Indeed first in recruitment of collaboration partner candidates on spec, management team formation, and then in due course, and if all goes well, prospective rounds of Venture Capitalization bringing all into readiness for implementation and marketing, with the devil in the details. Such remaining probortunity at hand, the more dire, the more propitious, of Do-It-Ourselves entrepreneurship for the rest of us.

Now, as promised, desirable circumstances are described, and proposal advanced how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, the FoolQuest.com Master Plan explicitly strives to elicit and engage exactly that very salient interaction between participants, in order thereby to offer that experience to anyone so inclined. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Indeed, entirely feasible within any coalition of the willing, however informal. But if only we can organize and stop just going with the flow.  

Indeed, all in the very least of ever relevant demonstration of one salient criteria and likely story or conjecture, prediction first of all to persuade candidate recruits on spec, and then later on prospective investors, to share whatever vision: That any mere idea even to whatever greater purpose or motivating aspiration, might even ever possibly bear not only realistically feasible profit potential but pleasurably engaged fulfillment and meaning along the way. And therefore sustainability and traction, throughout nothing less than the real life Hero's Journey into whatever proposed organization and implementation. But of course, speaking of story telling, indeed of spinning tall tales, beware grifters! Not to digress, however.

And whether for stories or business/project plans or anything else, writing is rewriting, continual research and hard work, never a waste of time. Indeed, in the words of Henry Ford: Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason so few engage in it.” Actually, writing, not unlike friendship, is often struggle for expression, difficult and complicated. Alas then, that especially as entrenched in willfully positive cheerful attitudes and platitudes, many never find the motivation for anything much more than utter denial, both too serious and yet, not serious enough. Because writing is easy to do, but difficult to do well. And all of that is why there will never be found any shortage in malagenda of determinedly co-validating clueless unaware incompetence as that of delusional half assed gawdawful group badfic online, any more than in no less willfully positive and ever cheerful upbeat business pipedreams, hand waving and scams, bereft of all skeptical credulity.

Moreover, in boldest paradigm shift flouting shopworn taboo, and pending any future advent of extremely sophisticated and widespread advanced automated Sociometry (again, not to digress), in the interim to fill the gap, some other innovatively congenial, capable, empowering and effective process is needed in order to improve for individual participants, interpersonal outreach, extended networking, more optimal social embedment, autonomy supportive social support, widest access to resources, contacts and the cultivation of quality relationships of every kind and for any human purpose. Indeed, all envisaged as an additional beneficial side effect for participants, of purposeful interaction and substantive communication in the course of ongoing collaboration, brainstorming and creative solution finding in dual concurrent endeavor as herein extolled. Because this too figures within the agenda of FoolQuest.com First whatever desirable circumstances are described, and then proposal is advanced how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.
     
All therefore, in the smallest most modest conceivable and yet still dangerous initial sweat equity investment, to risk those most tangible beginning first baby steps upon Laozi's fabled Journey of a Thousand Miles: let us commence even simply by together testing the very hypothesis, that at all to begin with, even merely the inception of sustained Socratic Dialectical full engagement in analytic yet strategic conversation to the following proposed agenda, realistic yet undaunted, will quickly discover true hope and already begin lifting spirits in convivial will to power. And thus indeed already doing things differently, even initially just amongst ourselves. And never fear! Because, notwithstanding how those reactionary conservative zealots, so faithless to democracy, tend so to value all stability, even at any cost, over any progress at all, nevertheless the proverbial boat, or ship of state, will never so easily capsize when so gently rocked as simply by at all talking things over! At least not unless it really so very badly needs to be! And no mere words shall bring madness except to those already quite mad! Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.
    
Alas, to quote Robert Burns: “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley.” (Go often awry.) For in the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, noted disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.” -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, true to life dramatic obstacle or complication. And that is why, to quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: Plans are nothing, planning is everything.” For plans remain static, but the Dialectic exploration of the planning process, of necessity becomes ever more dynamic, connective and informative. And participants together gain far greater scope of insight and rapport building, than any meager wisdom in whatever fixed ideas and even the best work product. Indeed, as per summary aggregation of the notoriously aliterative multiple p's: Properly Purposeful Pre-Planning and Prior Preparation Prevents Preemptive Production of Painfully Piss Poor Performance. Indeed, as widely attributed to Alan Lakein: Failing to plan, is planning to fail. And disruptive innovation pivots upon new mistakes instead of ever the same old ones. Rapid fire serial failure until, at last, if ever, success.
3) Optionally, an introduction to the  FoolQuest.com design exercise extolling a proposed innovative and pioneering new subversive social engineering design brainstorming and creative solution finding process beginning by the investigation of unique individual triggers, arousal and stimulus appetites, satisfactions so often frustrated and underserved intrinsic social needs so essential to authentic wellbeing. All better to inform the previous above detailed dual concurrent endeavor and deliberation. Indeed, whatever most preferred personal interaction, relationship and communication individually most highly valued and that therefore best elevate individual emotional state. The very opposite of relentlessly manipulative Behavioral Modification ever so conniving and desperate to press the individual into conforming and fitting in. Instead, nothing less than personally tailored optimization of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, indeed, quantitatively and qualitatively optimal investment and exchange of time and attention together that we all so crave, in synergy so crucial to authentic well being. And all thereby rewriting ones own story in the veritable orchestration of your happiness! Because this too figures within the agenda and discourse under the FoolQuest.com Master Plan. First whatever desirable circumstances must be discovered, and then proposal advanced how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.
    
For the term: "social engineering" hyperlinks indeed to a brief entry upon social engineering. And probortunty ensues regarding the social engineering by design of  stimulus struggle. For in accord with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, the expression: "stimulus struggle" endures as the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in the human zoo October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And yes, social and intellectual stimulus struggle specifically, remains uniquely probortunity at hand of the human condition and consciousness as addressed all herein. And the term: "stimuli" hyperlinks internally to crucial and salient disambiguation of present usage. It's a fine point that matters. And the term: "arousal" hyperlinks externally to a brief text upon arousal. All highly relevant in the never ending strife and striving against ongoing pandemic boredom from lonely under stimulation and therefore under arousal. And the term: "design" hyperlinks to an exposition (to put it without false modesty!) upon an innovative and pioneering new social engineering design process proposed indeed towards nothing less than the veritable individually unique orchestration of your happiness by actual design of uniquely individual gratification, via embedment indeed of tailored social and intellectual stimuli into intentional social environment.
    
Dual endeavor as indeed expounded and extolled herein, remaining after all, only one possible strategy. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As Empirically observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.        
Along with if any whatever findings from such as the above social engineering design process if and as undertaken, problematic content on both above lists are presented as vibrant interstitial beginnings and brainstorming point of departure for further open creative collaboration among equals and capable team building therein. Or by all means gentle reader, also go ahead and pitch your own ideas, venture and/or fiction, for further development together in convivial collaboration! To reiterate, a heady and freewheeling creative process consisting in ongoing exploration, criticism/critique, attack and defense, exploration, modification, variation, elaboration, expansion and improvement, continually in vociferous and ebullient Dialectic, back and forth, fleshing out both fiction ideas and new venture proposals alike. In fundamental paradigm shift and subversion of hierarchy, a perpetual hotbed in barest beginning, for ongoing disruptive game changing innovation. An invigorating life changing experience together. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Got a better idea? Do tell! And even for any given better idea, even so, what better conceivable (pre-) incubator?
 

    In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

 

 

                                                                                 

 What if creativity could be sociable, engaging and appealing,
                                            instead of just intellectually dry, nerdy and awkward?                
 
A very personal outreach agenda

According to the Dead Internet Theory, the Internet is by now little more than an endless vast charade perpetrated by legions of 'bots teaming across the cyberspace, a deceptive pervading simulation co-opting all living perception and isolating everyone from one another amid an all consuming noise drowning out all genuine live signal. But I for one, remain so obviously flesh and blood. Debacle as of my existence just can't be simulated! Therefore, as my own boss, I have fired myself for utter failure and gross incompetence in the sore travail of life! In my own defense however, the responsibility remains daunting. Tautologically, there can be no self-help, no reliable solitary rugged self-reliant unilateral self-made bootstrap "well-formed plan" for interaction among more than one individual. As the saying goes: It takes two to tango. Nor any secret sycophantic magic of facile socially skilled fineness and interminably empty and banal small talk either, ubiquitously oppressive, impractical and uncongenial social expectations all be forever damned. In the face of entrenched pervasive institutional indifference, how can anyone fare any better? That's the rub to set the present agenda. But does agenda remain ever abstract, or indeed, ultimately, mustn't agenda become personal? For those for whom salient agenda only becomes intelligible in relatable real life motivated characterization, see me, hear me, here I stand, warts and all.

Radical power is never solitary. And in the words of Mark R. J. Lavoie: Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him. Alas, no one ever cooperates with me, no matter what the stakes. Not love, money or life and death! No exaggeration. I cannot save myself, much less anyone I care for. But no one should be held accountable to responsibility beyond ones power in an indifferent universe, the Existentially Absurd real world of banal evil and folly from which the hapless individual remains ever inextricable. As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. And indeed, throughout the Dead Internet, such pretense may take the form of short attention manipulative Totalitarian Interactivity, hypertext clickbait that scarcely diverges before rapidly converging, seemingly personalized comprehensive webforms and questionnaires with only only one true intention, all illusion of choice while being lead safely about by the proverbial nose. And under any and all such devious oppression and propaganda, the salient moral yet practical questions remain those of how to organize, engage and conspire in subversive action and to what end. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Life is a test of autonomy. There can  be no reliance upon spontaneous propinquity.

In the bold interrogative irony of one time Vice Presidential candidate Admiral James Bond Stockdale: Who am I, why am I here? 

Obviously, and in case anyone cares, I myself am no such celebrated public figure or reputable expert. Quite the contrary, I am just another failure, stuck in a rut, a maladroit wanna-be with a cable modem, ever mouthing off online.
 
And so, more importantly, why then am I here? To what purpose here on FoolQuest.com? In answer: Like so many, I yearn to become an artist and Entrepreneur, in short a persistent serial failure, perseverant until at last ever meeting at all with success. For such of course, endures well renowned, as the way of the often solitary Entrepreneur. Failure is not an option. Repeated failure is inevitable. And such adversity is said to promote character growth.
  
But as so often affirmed, success, far from enduring in stifling isolation and solitude, comes as a product of teamwork, indeed life long learning together at our own pace. Because I don't much care for the protracted betrayal of being endlessly stalled, nor should I cravenly remain silent while being "boot camp" hurried and dubiously hustled, either. For as Aesop tells us: Slow and steady wins the race! But I can't go it alone, nor would I wish to! 
  
In the words of Arthur H. Vandenberg:  It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity. Alas, therein remains a serious gap to be filled, thwarted outreach, a dire need to be addressed. For I find myself isolated and forever frustrated by the scarcity and unavailability of access to participation in trustworthy collaboration among equals in creative solution finding and innovation as expounded anon.
     
And not only so scarce, but typically unsustainable, unserious, unreliable and of overall poor quality. My own greatly preferred modes of ongoing  creative endeavor together, as yet remain by and large out of reach for me without better support in playing to my own self perceived strengths, also potentially most useful to others and better appreciated.
For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. As it turns out, inner freedom by itself alone, is no freedom at all.

Philosophers, writers, artists, even scientists, not only need encouragement and an audience, they need constant stimulation from other people. It is almost impossible to think without talking. If Defoe had really lived on a desert island, he could not have written Robinson Crusoe, nor would he have wanted to. Take away freedom of speech, and the creative faculties dry up.”

  — Conversation with a Pacifist by George Orwell

   
Perhaps then human connection may be best cemented through high ambition, endless possibility and great doings. On the one hand, power, capability and freedom towards success through applied creativity, innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, interstitial concurrent synergy, on the other hand, with unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, art for its own joy. Therefore, let us together test the prediction that even so complicated, arduous and daunting the task, our work so well cut out for us, nevertheless, even in merely the most preliminary sustained ongoing honest and serious analytic yet strategic conversation and feasibility study, will already become more uplifting that any ultimately debilitating bogus motivational grift or soul crushing manipulative Behavioral Modification. Because capability, important close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging attachments of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct even of  in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. This remains the challenge and probortunity of motivated characterization propelling any Hero's Journey in real life, forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together, no less than in compelling drama, and certainly here on FoolQuest.com  
Indeed, as according to the Arousal Theory of Motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo' October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. In short, social and intellectual stimulus struggle remains the endless struggle with loneliness and boredom. And because happy people whom we might all do well to emulate, are Empirically observed extrovertedly to reach out, Talking More Seriously, fully engaged in purposeful interaction and substantive communication, and make less small talk, exerting effort in order to actively make things happen, attentively pursuing new understanding. All, however, so much easier said than done. Nevertheless, it remains that the all to infrequent peak experience of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding, makes people ebulliently happy for the duration of such interaction, and thereafter desire to repeat it more often. Hence the social engineering design challenge, the probortunity at hand, of Intentional community or initially and more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation, for suitable ongoing endeavor and collaboration among equals in endless possibility of creative solution finding; and more specifically, applied creativity, innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, interstitial concurrent synergy, on the other hand, with unprecedented  ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, art for its own joy.
At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate:  at long last to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants.
       
Gentle reader, can you relate? If so, then let's talk!
 

    Post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

 
 
 
 
 
Paradigm Shift
in flagrant subversion of hierarchy

The probortunity at hand indeed stands revealed in tantalizing glimpse of an ideal or optimal situation or circumstance arising in accordance with the anomalously democratic grand afterthought to the generally hierarchical and authoritarian paradigm of Cultural Anthropology: For, lo it shall come to pass, in whatever special circumstances at the judgment of whatever great and good powers that be, that even the lowly rank and file, perhaps corporate employees or students in formal education, shall be enlisted and tasked with collaborative solution finding for any particular probortunity of the moment, crisis or windfall as ever arising. For such will ever be those those rare, exceptional and special times of probortune collaboration in creative solution finding, necessarily and characteristically egalitarian in nature. Because routine heteronomy systematically and intrinsically stifles all such human brilliance so uplifting in freedom, power, productivity, progress and elation, and therefore must be only carefully suspended, lest the masses, enjoying ourselves too much, then rise up in permanent liberation. But to begin with, why so privileged, or else otherwise for most so scarce and infrequent and event? And must it ever be so?

       
Because, what if there was truly a strategy in very antithesis, utter reversal, indeed sheer Peripeteia of all heteronomy to hierarchical dominance? Indeed, an actionable plan for flouting taboo, actually for open and productive, non-zero-sum fully engaged uplifting and egalitarian low hierarchical distance of collaborative creative solution finding, somehow perhaps one day even going viral, in order become instituted as the ongoing default, and whatever kind of responsible authority the special case, a fall back position reserved for and resorted to only as and when the need whereof ever actually arising? And no longer merely, as all too often, any transitory event of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding, such as any one time assigned task afterwards abandoned, or any sort of short term scheduled workshop, contest or seminar, typically concluding and vanishing entirety without any trace. Indeed even any sort of frantic and intensive "boot camp" ending in exhaustion with no debrief, no path any further, nor any follow up at all. There is a vastly underserved need for any long term ongoing alternative. Success never comes quick or easily. And therefore, the effort had better be be gratifying in and of itself, with relative ease of entry. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! To quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest.”
 
   
Imagine then therein, a new social contract and social order, a fundamental paradigm shift into collaboration among equals in brainstorming and solution finding as the ongoing default, and whatever kind of responsible authority, even however ad hoc, the special case, a fall back position reserved for and resorted to only as and when the need whereof ever actually arising. Thus an end to routine status quo of hierarchical dominance, that allows so poignantly and fondly remembered collaboration under low hierarchical distance (near equality) in creative solution finding, only ever at all, temporarily and all too  infrequently, when deemed absolutely necessary to transient crisis or opportunity. Or workshops and such that end with no continuity or follow up. What is needed the instead, is new and lasting and ongoing institution and paradigm shift, perhaps even such as herein delineated. First whatever desirable circumstances such as above, are described, and now proposal is advanced how to bring such desirable circumstance about, intentionally. Indeed, the FoolQuest.com Master Plan explicitly strives to elicit and engage exactly that salient interaction between participants, in order thereby to offer that very experience to anyone so inclined. Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.  
     
After all, a notable key tenet of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of inventive solution finding, remains in the observation of how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important, fertile and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines. And such also must remain friendly and egalitarian, in order to prevent competing experts from jockeying for power instead of learning and cooperating. It has even been inferred from the much celebrated discovery of the wisdom of crowds, that human reasoning evolved along with the human brain and society, for deliberation together, comparing individual reasons. Even only if, as to quote C.S. Lewis: “Two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible, but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction.” Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.”  And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. Alas that both hopeful entrepreneurs and aspiring fiction writers much alike, are often and notoriously self-reliant and solitary, indeed especially in their respective vocations, if not, also, to begin with, in personality or character. Because individual creativity, indeed so often bullied, shunned and persecuted, remains so bereft of autonomy supportive social support towards capability, under prevailing heteronomy.
  
  
Which is such a shame. Because in either endeavor, new venture creation (various business startup), fiction writing, and so much greater endless possibility, most arousing and stimulating to creativity and productivity, again according to prediction from Empirical observation of the very latest cutting edge science in rediscovery of truest wisdom from the greatest sages of old, there shall be notable uplifting ebullience in scarce opportune occasion of collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding together socially. And so, not withstanding all social awkwardness and marginalization in conventionally constructed social reality, why can't all we wanna-be creators and prime movers intentionally together partake even online, in such productive free exchange in which we so excel, more regularly and more often? Why dare we never seize command of our own values and socialization? Such remains the present subversive disruptive social engineering design objective and the vastly underserved probortunity at hand.
     
Why then do the masses,We the Sheeple, so abjectly fail to coordinate and rise to responsible initiative together, indeed intentionally, merely for the joy of brainstorming in Dialectical collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding more frequently and regularly? To begin with, why not I and thou, gentle reader(s)? And precisely how to go about it? By what presence of mind or proactive wherewithal? And by what outreach in a world of such festering social isolation? Indeed, again in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. How then, even most proximately, to break isolation by coming together via social engineering design, into intentional community or at least initially, more modestly, smaller intentional social circle or group, in order to institute drastic paradigm shift: As herein proposed, the very antithesis, utter reversal, indeed sheer Peripeteia of all heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. For heteronomy to hierarchical dominance remains situation such wherein egalitarian collaboration in creative solution finding occurs if at all, only as all too infrequent fun and fondly remembered rare exception. But in imagined antithesis, Peripeteia, utter reversal indeed sheer Peripeteia of all norms of prevailing heteronomy to hierarchical dominance, instead egalitarian collaboration in creative solution finding becomes predominant as the invigorating new norm, with any appeal or resort to whatever responsible authority arising only as need ever actually arising. And how better for team building, than by ongoing and vibrant dual endeavor of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the one hand, in concurrent synergy interstitial with, on the other hand, pure creativity, art for its own joy, in unprecedented ongoing highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming? Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.
      
It may bear mention at this juncture how the very term: 'Individualism,' was only coined as a pejorative in disparagement towards a perceived trend of retreat from civic-virtue, favoring instead whatever responsibility merely to each ones own more proximate relationship networks. But what reason for such a trend? Perhaps what is more capable and operant, less superficial and more mature and genuinely happy, is actually to be found in Emotional Intelligence, the vulnerable empathy of  to one another first, I and thou, one to one, before even worrying about finer points and challenges of group dynamics, let alone whatever Social Intelligence and social skills or aptitudes in such desperate and toadying sycophantic quest of broader approval and social integration with every coveted reward of status, power and better more preferential access to vital resources in society. For that matter, here on FoolQuest.com, CliqueBusters TM advocates unique organized nonviolent resistance against even the most quasi-legislative bullying, such civil disobedience likewise unthinkable unspeakable indoctrinated crimestop taboo subversion of such hierarchy as so deplorably advocating and instituting, for all intents and purposes, knee-jerk dysfunctional submission and legitimization of whatever jumped up authority as imposed by bullying, indeed by any bullies at all under any circumstances whatsoever. For the cronyism and quasi-legislative power of bullying amounts to the ability of bullying cliques for all intents and purposes to fabricate, rationalize and to enact rules and expectations even quite without any sort of legal or constitutional legitimacy, indeed hypocritically self-serving, self-righteous and blithely immoral intimidation and abuse in disregard of individual rights, endangerment and harm to the targets of bullying and to whatever community at large.
    
In the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” And to quote Sir Isaac Newton: “You have to make the rules, not follow them.” Therefore: What then if instead failed conventionality of heteronymous priorities and hierarchically predictive social cognition could be completely flipped in radical social contract revision, and in paradigm shift, utter subversion of hierarchy,  permanently turned upon their head? Indeed, only imagine in utter reversal, indeed sheer Peripeteia, of all conventional heteronymous priority and domineering hierarchically predictive social cognition so familiar within the generally authoritarian paradigm of Cultural Anthropology. Only imagine instead setting collaboration in creative solution finding, hitherto the highly infrequent more democratic sensibility and special exemption, hence forth, as the new default, the new norm. With recourse beyond merely  rule and domination, to intervention of legitimate responsible authority, rational and accountable, true leadership in service, even however ad hoc. And most importantly, only as fall back position reserved for and resorted to only howsoever as and when real need whereof in due course ever actually arising.
    
Even with no need of steady and authoritative ongoing control so long as informal and friendly collaboration among equals runs smoothly on its own most of the time, even add hoc formal moderation may be called upon however occasionally for guidance in resolution of persistent deadlock, or for maintaining order in the face of intractable disruption, as in cases of hostile flaming and bullying. But better still Transactional Antithesis. After all, hostility is rightly ruled out of bounds in the practice of controversy, so vital to to brainstorming free exchange in solution finding and collaboration among equals. Controversy is just such Dialectical fun! For the Socratic Dialectic, the even vociferous practice of controversy, remains the welcome and appreciated exchange of criticism and rebuttal, conjecture and refutation. Because for together choosing the best ideas, controversy, the welcome and appreciated free exchange of genuine criticism, remains nothing to fear, nothing threatening or hostile. Because criticism remains inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. And that is how even people who disagree even however strongly, but entirely without acrimony, are often the best at cooperation even quite without needless ongoing hierarchical dominance so oppressively quelling all dissent, honesty and creativity. For the latter remains maximal authority simply for keeping everyone in line as mindless drones. By contrast, among the cherished values of democracy, first and foremost remains freedom under only most minimal authority and coercion. For as the wise and venerable old saying goes: No question is too stupid to ask, and no answer too wise to be given.
    
To reiterate: In better alternative in the first place to present heteronymous status quo, so very clearly, paradigm shift towards autonomy supportive social support in a culture of helping, Epicurean freedom, friendship and thought! Accept no substitute. Indeed, paradigm shift favoring rather than routine and perhaps even fairly benign well meaning exercise of authority, let alone worse, instead ongoing Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding. Indeed, reserving recourse to whatever mode of authority as the even somewhat rare exception, as ever need actually arising. Because ongoing Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding, continues to be discovered as most conducive not only primarily to Eudemonia, to authentic wellbeing, of such paramount intrinsic value and fulfillment, but thereby indeed also excellence called: aręte. Indeed perhaps even extrinsic value of networking and material success, but actually through doing what you love. And all because Eudemonia, capability, important close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry, evokes Eros which is not so much co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, as as just the opposite, collusion and transport of liberating union with alien difference. And thus the forging of attachments of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! After all, psychological asymmetry simply means that we are not so odd, but only strangers. And so we wallow each in our own pervasive and inexhaustible reservoirs of secret anxiety and vulnerability, never suspecting much the same of others beneath ever crumbling facade of exterior presentation.
   
Of course, any such notion of routine and ongoing collaboration among equals as characteristic of open societies, all in such flagrant subversion of hierarchy, remains strictly taboo, completely unspeakable, utterly unthinkable, under the restrictions of heteronomy and closed society. Although many taboos, none the least of which including all manner of subversion of hierarchy, feature special exemptions and occasions that across the ages may become forgotten. So many taboos have at their very root, the taboo under heteronomy, upon subversion of hierarchy. Indeed, to begin with of course, most ancient, most universal, and most appalling of all known taboo, remains that of incest, the first subversion of the first hierarchy from which all other hierarchy evolves, namely that of family. Can it be that dread of incest remains deep dark secret inspiration for knee-jerk awe even towards even the most petty, inept and ginned-up trappings of authority? Or is that just too Freudian?
     
But for timidity and reservation in the face of taboo, hawking such a cherished dream of scarce satisfaction, of blazing a trail to freedom in an unfree world, should be like peddling dopamine! Indeed, the marketing gurus all concur that in order to persuade, it remains vitally necessary to appeal to desire. And far be it from me to dispute them. Despite that responsibly thinking for oneself about such proposals as the one at hand, also prompts as larger question as to whatever desires: What then becomes the objective? Is it feasible? How so? And what action shall be required of oneself? Therefore, who are you, gentle reader, what do you love to do and why?
  
Desire and endless possibility, motivation so often leveraged in career marketing appeal, remains high ambition and the will to power, intrinsic creative fulfillment and aręte or: excellence. Many yearn for the individual freedom and independence to become entrepreneurs, in challenge of applied creativity called, to innovate and strive at new venture creation (new business startup). Indeed ventures of every kind even conceivable, profit or nonprofit, traditional, Social Entrepreneurship or even just perhaps, grassroots politics and activism. And then again, many aspire to pure creativity, art for its own joy, as in becoming artists and authors, indeed fiction writers of evocative high drama and brilliantly speculative Science Fiction. But why be limited? Why go it alone? Why choose? Why not reach for it all, and together leverage dual endeavor bringing to bear the entire full range of each our interests, passions and life long learning?
  
 
 
For whom, why and wherefore, FoolQuest.com
No less vivid and passionate than any rising emotion, emerging belief at any moment, though truth ever uncertain, should not appear as any comforting choice and mechanism of denial, but as an often uncomfortable compulsion of inescapable reasoning dawning in the face of unfolding Empirical reality. Alas then that instead, whatever one believes may often result from whatever one has repeatedly been told, even to the point of irrationally doubting the evidence of ones own senses and experience, let alone that of barring any pure intellectual autonomy. Indeed especially such extreme autonomy as essential in due investigation and rational consideration of whatever even seemingly outrageous and bizarre dissident views as perhaps even somewhat hyperbolically expounded herein.
     
Suffice then that indeed as herein, dashing all conventional strategy and hope of ever breaking profound isolation and alienation of often secret and shameful loneliness, may be found quite rightly upsetting. Especially for normal folks as so typical amid the anxious masses. Those ever bent upon continuing to do precisely as one has always been accustomed. Indeed, societally approved to establish identity and membership in such eager and Quixotic desperation to belong, called: heteronomy. In short, we all find ourselves betrayed by such prevailing perniciously misanthropic nonsense! As the old joke goes: We must be a mushrooms, because we are kept in the dark a fed such bullshit! Hence all the more, philosophy and habits of clear thinking remain essential to capable sensemaking at all. Because there remain worse dangers quite conversely from paralysis by analysis, which is actually ambivalence (inner conflict), anyhow. As is said: Who hesitates is lost, nevertheless, look before you leap!
 
Behold now in all things, in universal application, greater efficiency ever extolled! In powerful utilization of Scientific Method, division of labor leveraging for each whatever their own most capable forte, and tracking the results. Increase all such interaction as to enhance value, and decrease such as remaining only wasteful or actually detrimental. What principles could ever become more widely applicable? Inflicting upon us all our unhappy system of formal education and indoctrination into heteronomy, all under the guise of efficiency, that captain of industry, John D. Rockefeller so famously declared: “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” A tragic and cretin superficial efficiency to this day so formative to all modern Existentially Absurd and oppressive Behaviorist failed conventionality.
     
Extending then beyond historically initial and sensible context of corporate productivity, with such enthusiasm into every walk of life, and indeed into maximizing any actual ongoing benefit for any individual person, what due calculus of greater efficiency then actually obtains in striving to precisely what end value? Indeed, in  due salient analysis bearing in mind individual happiness, does all idle hedonism and reflection only remain so profligate and effete? So worthy only of Moralistic scorn on the part of our betters?
     
In the immortal observations of George Carlin: Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit." After all, to quote Anthony Marra: Work isn’t meaningful just because you spend your life doing it.” Indeed, in the words of J. M. Barrie: “Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.” And to quote: Maxim Gorky: “When work is pleasure, life is joy! When work is a duty, life is slavery.” And in the words of George Orwell: “The main motive for 'nonattachment' is a desire to escape from the pain of living, and above all from love, which, sexual or non-sexual is hard work.” ( ...said the little red hen...)
The most obvious objection then, to any plan of action that after all can only add to the workload, will be either that it cannot achieve results, or else that it remains unnecessary. And the most obvious rebuttal comes, if whatever is already and routinely being done indeed does not achieve desired results, and needs to be discontinued. And this in turn will be resisted by faith in order to stay the course. Either with every effort, or just by lip service. Indeed by utter denial, willful malignant optimism, and even by taking blame for interim failure. It's only natural to cleave to the tried and true. To value tradition. As most commonly attributed to Burt Lance: If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Alas then that we have all been lied to, and need to become better informed.
   
For whom then, why and wherefore, FoolQuest.com? Who then shall be the target audience of FoolQuest.com Who might be interested, and why? The relevance of demographics herein, becomes dubious. Actual human motivation remains key. Indeed, in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. And so famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” FoolQuest.com then, remains fervent outreach to prospective unreasonably thoughtful and committed citizens. Because FoolQuest.com remains an invitation for serious people to engage in extensive feasibility study: The very question, realistically, of whatever schemes and dreams: How much of our precious effort and attention, gentle reader, will any of such engagement actually require? And would such intensity of engagement seem actually uplifting or merely oppressive, gentle reader? And there's the rub! Not judging, just asking.

And so, indeed therefore, in all due gratitude, rises the fervent hope that nothing herein shall actually become more extreme, more dangerous, difficult and complicated than as entirely due, reasonably to be expected, and consequent from all manner of worthwhile but daunting lofty ambition replete with extensive information resources gathered herein. Indeed for all manner of subversive expression and disruptive first concepts. And more, anon. Indeed, ever at all most interesting and appealing to site visitors, and most importantly, to desperately sought for unmet friends and allies for the author, yours truly. Again, all whereof, defining for whom, why and wherefore, FoolQuest.com, the invitation for serious people to ongoing feasibility study together: The very question, realistically, of whatever schemes and dreams: How much of our precious effort and attention, gentle reader, would likely be required? And would such intensity of engagement seem actually uplifting or merely oppressive, gentle reader? And there's the rub! Not judging, just asking.

In the words then, of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” And as per Sir Isaac Newton: “You have to make the rules, not follow them.” Because we each and all find ourselves situated in an overstressed attention economy, attention ever spread so very thin. Indeed to quote Herbert Simon: What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it. And alas, in the words of Jean Boudrillard: “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.But at least level of engagement remains under ones own personal control. Or does it? Indeed, is pleasurable and meaningful engagement a personal choice, or a matter of efficiency and priorities, or actually stimulus and arousal in the elicitation of response, indeed the trigger of a compulsion? For to quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest. And as one might hope, not merely of casual interest or idle curiosity, but of abiding individual value and importance, indeed of true fulfillment. Effort and attention comprise the added value contributed in the course of individual engagement, attachment and involvement. Anything less remains perfunctory and robotic. All therefore, thank you kindly, most gracious gentle reader. Because nowadays more than ever, in the immortal words of Simone Weil: Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.

How then actually, is attention and effort most commonly allocated? One dramatic and psychological answer, as John Steinbeck writes in ‘East of Eden:’ “People are only interested in themselves. If a story is not about the hearer he will not listen…a great and lasting story is about everyone or it will not last. The strange and foreign is not interesting—only the deeply personal and familiar.” (Actually, in contrast with traditional drama, persuasive and intelligent depiction of the wondrously different and unfamiliar, is the most compelling  accomplishment of true Science Fiction writing. Not to digress, however.) Indeed, it has frequently been observed how people, often so self-centered, tend to become most interested in themselves and their own best interests, not to mention: Existential Validation and self justification. Alas as so long well known and understood, precisely such effort and attention so focused into the intrapsychic regulation of inner state and emotion, often serves to divert effort and attention away from any prospect of dangerous and anxiety provoking relevant action out in the world. And that is how, paradoxically, even affirmation so often deviously functions as negation.

Of course, for the author, it will always be gratifying, indeed perhaps even at all validating, whenever anyone for whatever their own good reasons and personal situation, discovers value of their own, in content here on this very website, FoolQuest.com Astonishingly, such uncommon paragons among readers never complain of finding the prose or composition herein unclear. They may, even without derision or allegation of pretension, sans irony whatsoever, even praise all whereof indeed others might cringe and complain, as resonant and evocative writing style and tone. Because they so deeply relate. As it happens, over the years, exactly such has been the most favorable response to a specific section of FoolQuest.com, titled: CliqueBusters TM. And more, presently. Why, they never even notice all admittedly awful webdesign! Indeed, the denseness of these comprehensive hypertexts even deemed a positive feature, by those so fully engrossed and pouring over the information compiled, for whatever reasons, so interesting and important to them. However well, or even at all, any of that converges with any of the actual motivating concerns, objectives and desires in the agenda of the author, yours truly, webmaster of FoolQuest.com including CliqueBusters T M. All whereof, so plainly, not many do at all relate. Therefore: We shall not overcome. And there's the rub!

Alas then all such craven and oppressive slave mentality motivated by such unquestioned knee-jerk sycophantic conflict aversion, being; the timid people-pleasing adamantly defenseless inhibition of someone constitutionally unable to stand up for themselves, much less anyone else, ever at all to push back when pushed, never rising up. The sort of blithely high-minded cowardice and irresponsible moral pretense, that confers upon even the most courageous Pacifism, such unjustly ill repute.

Again to quote George Orwell: A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing.” Because: News Is What Somebody Does Not Want You To Print. All the Rest Is Advertising. And as per the Yiddish Proverb: “A half truth is a whole lie.” Indeed alas, to make matters worse for unfashionable opinions, fearful taboo unspoken, may yet lurk behind the most genuine enthusiastic praise notwithstanding and in stubborn blithe disregard. Indeed, as Dr. Chen Yehezkely observes, precisely such conservative subterfuge of half truth, is common in the study of formal education, as a method to lionize yet deviously eviscerate all revolution. Just such taboo, in very principle, even as against bridging from lofty abstract principle into anything more concrete, specific and practical. Let alone ever actually taking action.

Taboo indeed, just for case study example, against ever fighting back, even however nonviolently and covertly, in the face of bullying, indeed as according to a new protocol as expounded in CliqueBusters T M, the most radical and militant known anti-bullying page online, right here on FoolQuest.com Now with brand new even more objectionable content and violation of ever squeamish taboo! Guaranteed vice-signaling, something to offend everyone! Not to digress. And yes, I do suspect that there might have been educators, among those who so love all the passion and insight, indeed everything about CliqueBusters T M, except the entire point of strategic resistance which they so determinedly refuse to address. So propagates oppression amongst the oppressed. All begging the question: What will be required of us all, for safety and freedom from pandemic well organized organized serial bullying? And are we actually up for it? For whatever reasons, many, clearly, are not.

Especially not those craven enablers of bullying, those conflict averse slippery appeasers and their bogus support groups, punishment and reward system for "marshmallowing" pacification via soothing sympathy and validation to the enforced exclusion of any effective active response whatsoever, indeed anything beyond emotional support only. Because, those are the rules! A restriction which may make any sense as a guideline only in order to focus upon any actually insightful and cathartic group therapy beyond merely emotional support of consensual validation. But not otherwise. Because, what happens if instead of complacent engineered consensus of empty sympathy, righteous indignation, dissident practicality and true good will shall ensue? What if anyone actually wants to help, realistically? Or seeks real tangible options, support and assistance? Worse, what if they ever dare criticize? And then they wont take a hint and back down? Answer: Online censorship, scorn and exclusion. Indeed, particularly toxic victim blaming against vulnerable and defenseless people, targets of bullying actually subject to hostility and risk, among others who need a whole lot more than just sympathy and understanding, crocodile tears of well organized and adamantly controlling passive hypocritically apathetic bystanders.

And beware! For there are even more blatant and conniving false flag operations, ostensible support for the bullied, but actually retraumatization traps, online communities and forums that turn out actually to be run by well organized covert serial bullies! Not even further to digress.

 

 

 

 

 

Who then shall come forth and emerge as the star first follower or ally for FoolQuest.com,
the true leader by example, how to follow and participate in collaboration
 
 

There were always people present who believed in you and there in lies the key. I am no great personality. But every time I did do something remotely spectacular, I always had someone besides me, next in line, ready to help me out if I needed assistance. And as much of a lunatic I am, I have been a lucky person when it comes to such occasions (and) first followers.
    

      

And lo, the star first follower or ally, first to publicly recognize by fully engaging and interacting with the hitherto misunderstood and isolated lone nut dissident innovator, shall be the true leader and influencer blazing the trail, bridging abstract and concrete, teaching by subversive example, demonstrating for others how to participate, rôle models showing us all how best to relate. If all goes well, more will then follow suit and join in. And even three is a crowd, and a crowd garners attention. You might be mine, or I might be yours.  Or instead we possibly might instead even come together via lifestyle reciprocal peer or group coaching, a curious prospect! One way or another, for any lonesome frustrated desire and outreach tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, desperately sought for unmet friends. What follows then is comprehensive aggregation upon the much deliberated notion, indeed famously gone viral, with application to endeavor at hand:

Who then shall be first to stand before all others, and enter into any aspect of the inception of ongoing and vibrant dual endeavor and deliberation, in endless possibility, of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the one hand, in concurrent synergy interstitial with, on the other hand, pure creativity, art for its own joy, in unprecedented ongoing highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, an open ongoing writers bull session online?  

Or for that matter, among all several mad schemes and dreams, if need be, fully engaged Dialectical conversational adequacy in collaborative miscommunication repair, with Active Reading and Listening striving towards the achievement of Intersubjectivity being: the closer correspondence of message as received and understood, to content as actually intended by the sender. Because new ideas are often confusing. And only shopworn and well familiar old ideas are certain always to come across effortlessly. Not to digress. But fair warning: Here may be, for the unfamilliar, a particularly difficult intellectual practice to embrace, much less actually to rôle model.  

Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Got a better idea? Do tell!
    In response, post to the for others to weigh in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's private.

A movement or idea must become public so that more than just the leader remains visible. For any movement to gain momentum, perhaps even shattering whatever squeamish and naughty taboo, and reach a tipping point, current followers must remain visible because new followers emulate or rôle model existing followers and not the leader directly. Fpr such remains informational social influence or: social "proof." And more anon. Then, as more new participants join right in, it need no longer feel so risky finally to get down off from the proverbial fence. They won’t stand out, they won’t be ridiculed, and they can become part of the in-crowd if they hurry not to be left out. But it's more than merely a matter of mob psychology manipulation and domino effect, even however benign. Indeed, everything begins in action of defiance against convention. Because, rather than sweeping the world out of nowhere, even subversion of hierarchy, collaboration among equals, indeed collaborative brainstorming and solution finding, necessarily begins in microcosm, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things so differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.

Indeed, when theory by itself, however sound, yet remains less than compelling promotionally out in the wild, the live demonstration online, public electronic conversation, the brilliance on display, of ongoing work product from collaboration, published to the Web, may yet the more effectively entice and recruit others at long last to participate and join in. For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, outreach for unmet friends. Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally! Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare can take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently.

And so: Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just perhaps, change the world! And because, when theory by itself, however sound, yet remains less than compelling promotionally out in the wild, the live demonstration online, public electronic conversation, the brilliance on display, of ongoing work product from collaboration, published to the Web, may yet the more effectively entice and recruit others at long last to participate and join in. For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, outreach for unmet friends. Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally! Only expect backlash and beware cross-purpose! Not to digress.

The TED Talks lecture in narration of the YouTube video imbedded following, has long gone viral. The importance  of the star first follower or ally is everywhere elaborated and extolled. But to what avail? Anyone is yet to explain precisely how to reproduce the phenomena at will by finding and recruiting the star first follower or ally, thereby to launch a trend and start a movement. Not to mention whatever setting for staging or inciting any such a seemingly spontaneous  publicity stunt. And such remains the probortunity at hand:

  

 

Gentle reader, have you ever bourn witness to potentially valuable ideas squandered from lack of response? Indeed, as the popular saying goes: Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way! I don't want your money or your devotion.  Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no formulaic callow motivational grifter here to tickle your ears, psyche you up,  and then leave you in the lurch! Isn't there quite enough of that already? FoolQuest.com remains my own subversive Message in a Bottle cast upon the cyber seas, agenda of frustrated outreach indeed for thoughtful committed citizens, unreasonable people, desperately sought for collaboration cofounder candidates.
    
Rather than sweeping the world out of nowhere, much like forbidden love, subversion necessarily begins in microcosm, when any two or more individuals must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. For such will be the first germ of interaction perhaps even as proposed herein, within even a small intentional social circle let alone any grander intentional community, amongst ourselves together turning away from the social rat-race, and perhaps even together reaching out in the world at large but even at all actually on our own terms, even just online.
    
Desperately seeking collaboration cofounder candidates for arduous and complicated endeavor entirely on spec. Long effort with no end in sight. Success doubtful but epic, forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. Apply now to join in not merely on the proverbial ground floor, but deep down into the veritably abysmal dank stygian black hole depths of some forgotten subbasement! Desperately seeking the star first follower! And lo, the star first follower or ally blazing the trail, shall herald the true meeting of minds and collaboration among equals in creative solution finding and Eudemonia right here on FoolQuest.com And thus the star first follower or ally shall become the true leader, leading by example, showing others how to relate. Gentle reader, are you ready to become the star first follower or ally? Perhaps leadership as such, might be overrated. Be my wingman/wingchick, a friend to back me up. Indeed, there can be no more noble and better appreciated assertive good example for drawing others in, than CliqueBusters T M and sticking up for the bullied. Not to digress.

Be the star first follower or ally, the true leader, and start a movement! Be my star first follower or ally. Or just maybe or also, I might step in to become your star first follower or ally! It only seems fair. Because, to reiterate, when theory by itself, however sound, yet remains less than compelling promotionally out in the wild, the live demonstration online, public electronic conversation, the brilliance on display, of ongoing work product from collaboration, published to the Web, may yet the more effectively entice and recruit others at long last to participate and join in. For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, outreach for unmet friends. Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally!

Who then shall be first to stand before all others, and enter into the inception of ongoing and vibrant dual endeavor and deliberation, of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), in endless possibility of entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the one hand, in concurrent synergy interstitial with, on the other hand, unrestrained pure creativity, art for its own joy, in unprecedented ongoing highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, an open ongoing writers bull session online?  Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Indeed, every such interaction as herein extolled, remains well within the power of individuals together, intentionally and persistently. Got a better idea? Do tell!

Because, while it ever remains for the individual visionary to clearly, persuasively and evocatively articulate whatever bold insight greater than oneself, it may come to pass that at first only one singular person shall initially become receptive to whatever the significance thereof. A successful leader in order to recruit the star first follower, must fathom motivation of the star first follower or ally. No one is ever actually in full authority. We all remain ever fallible and answerable. Therefore any successful leader must embrace the star first follower as an equal. The intentional social engineering of informational social influence or: social "proof" produces crucial legitimization for all. Social "proof" eases hesitation and worry, in order help overcome shock, surprise, timid confusion and hesitation. And it can't begin too soon. According to Robert Cialdini, who details the principle of social "proof" in great depth in his ‘Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion’ “we view a behavior as more correct in a given situation to the degree that we see others performing it. So often in situations where we are uncertain about what to do, we would assume that the people around us (experts, celebrities, friends, etc.) have more knowledge about what’s going on and what should be done." And it has always been the courageous initiative of that capable star first follower or ally transforming and dignifying any lone nut with the courage to seem ridiculous, at long last into an actual leader.

But ego and narcissism drawing attention to the leader or specific team members, rather than selflessly onto the followers and the movement itself, inhibit growth of a movement, by limiting focus. And by informing policy, this becomes problematic, given cherished values of individual initiative, creativity and even dissidence. Because controversy remains the welcome and appreciated exchange of criticism and rebuttal. And for together choosing the best ideas, controversy, the welcome and appreciated free exchange of genuine criticism, remains nothing to fear, nothing threatening or hostile. Because criticism remains inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. Ensure then that everyone finds voice, and let them shine. Nurture those who follow in order to breath life into any movement. Indeed, to quote Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. For as any craven and malignant socially isolating Relational Bullies well understand, bereft of that star first follower, there can be no movement. Be More Than an apathetic bystander. Stay alert and never bystand and thereby passively enable Relational Bullying.

And lo, it shall be with that all too often forgotten and underappreciated star first follower or ally, that active conversion of anyone else begins, by example and then imitation and reciprocation. By informational social influence or: social "proof." Therefore let it be a positive example, from initiation thereof and thereby, triggering at last, that coveted domino effect, a cascade, that all so heady veritable snowballing avalanche, in attracting and recruiting more followers each in turn to participate, and by their example likewise to demonstrate and recruit. Indeed, as Derek Sivers further expounds, the second follower makes three. And three's a crowd, and a crowd is news! For indeed, “..and a threefold cord is not quickly broken. (Ecclesiastes 4:12) Because a movement must become public and obvious, even convenient, outsiders must be presented with, and thereby must perceive, more than just any leader, however charismatic, or even the very best and most appealing of new ideas, but indeed a movement as above detailed.

It ain't rocket surgery! The star first follower or ally, supportive and well aligned with the vision of their leader, and generally as a positive influence, enacts the admirable, advantageous and appealing principles of the movement. The virally famous star first follower or ally comes forth engaging with the leader, hitherto just a lone nut, to publicly rôle model for all comers, how likewise to become followers (participants), publicly demonstrating how to follow (participate) indeed as collaboration cofounders. Therefore, let us strategize upon how to conduct outreach, locate and engage our public, enacting conduct as to be modeled and imitated.

Embarkation thus ensues upon the bridge from abstract principle (generally why) into  concrete application (specifically how), in deliberation analytic yet strategic, and the devil in the details, setting agenda and implementation, together taking coherent action. And in those wise words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought. For to quote John Mason Good: “Happiness consists in activity. It is a running stream, not a stagnant pool.” Indeed, as Benjamin Disraeli declares: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.”

Alas however, so very, very far from anything so serious, anything even resembling action and ambition, both capable storytelling (barring the fairytale surreal) and competent planning, will likewise never honestly withstand gaping plot holes and gaps or errors in applicable logic.  Because, when theory by itself, however sound, yet remains less than compelling and persuasive recruitment outreach promotionally out in the wild, the live unfolding demonstration online, public electronic conversation, dazzling creativity, clever promotion, the brilliance on display, of ongoing work product from collaboration, published to the Web, may yet the more effectively entice and recruit others at long last to participate and join in collaboration among equals in creative solution finding. Specifically: Hitherto unprecedented serious ongoing collaborative dramatic Science Fiction fiction writing and brainstorming on the one hand, unrestrained pure creativity for its own joy, concurrently in endless objectively real world possibility, with the applied creativity of innovative new venture creation (various business startup) and (pre-) incubation, on the other hand. And all as beginning from a select short compendium of innovative sample new venture proposals, together with  a vibrant anthology of sample unfinished stories, writing prompts and provocations. Each of either are likewise presented similarly for further collaborative exploration, modification, variation, expansion and improvement, back and forth. Thus, viola: Eudemonia!

Therefore, read and respond, back and forth, as publicly as possible, thereby becoming the star first follower or ally. Or by all means gentle reader, go ahead and pitch your own! Lead and perhaps draw forth as your own star first follower or ally, yours truly. After all, the Golden Rule: Do unto others

 
 
Never otherwise
 
Everything that we have been taught, one way or another, about remaining so staunchly cheerful, agreeable, upbeat and bland — indeed as acceding to that entire gamut of prevailing bad social advice, the great and good boon of heteronymous socialization, and all so desperately in order to gain acceptance — all stands so blatantly exposed and debunked as yet another sad and pernicious tragic big lie!

Indeed, as per dialogue scripted by Bobcat Goldthwait for the fictional character of Lance Clayton as portrayed  by actor Robin Williams in World's Greatest Dad:’ The worst thing in life is to end up with people who make you feel all alone.

In those most famous words of Henry David Thoreau: The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. And indeed psychotherapists generally see two kinds of patients, because with such enviable rare exception, there remain two kinds of people: Those so desperately unhappy, because they just don't fit in socially, and those no less desperately bored, lonely, unknown and dystressed, precisely indeed, because, ever so  chameleonic and closeted, they do fit in so very well, socially. But only under such ego dystonic conditionality and following an even somewhat robotic expected Transactional life script. Because of the masks that must be worn, and constant dedication to peer co-validation and the social rat-race to the exclusion of all else. Phoniness or else social isolation, is no acceptable choice for any human being. Catch-22, the only winning move is not to play! But its the only game in town! Hence the dire need of anything truly new and different, indeed even such as extolled herein.

Actually, upbeat superficial people can indeed become ever more popular and yet remain only even more desperately lonely, when they can never be honest and appropriately grieve. Popularity and relentlessly facile distant social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship, because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, even sometimes intense, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibilityAlas that all too often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And all in a milieu of relentless peer pressure, bullying, intimidation, prevailing anti-intellectualism (hostility and mistrust towards intellect, intellectuals, intellectualism, and deprecation of culture whatsoever) but perhaps more precisely designated as: anti-intraception (a discomfort or opposition in very principle, toward the subjective, the imaginative, the tender minded).

Moreover, to quote Dr. Matthias Mehl: [In experimental Empirical observation of happy people] ...substantive conversation seemed to hold the key to happiness for two main reasons: both because human beings are driven to find and create meaning in their lives, and because we are social animals who want and need to connect with other people." Indeed as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being.” Because capable human relationship, especially true friendship, indeed meaning in the very deepest sense, psychological visibility, Eudemonia, optimal reciprocal engagement, all these and so much more, arise as byproduct indeed of authentic attention, of often tabooed and sometimes emotionally risky purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication. And categorically, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes!

After all, psychological asymmetry simply means that we are not so odd, but only strangers. And so we wallow each in our own pervasive and inexhaustible reservoirs of secret anxiety and vulnerability, never suspecting much the same of others beneath ever crumbling facade of exterior presentation. And therefore, so very far from interminably vapid small talk, instead capable human relationship, especially true friendship, indeed meaning in the very deepest sense, full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry, Eros remaining not so much co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity as instead, quite the opposite, Eudemonia of transport in liberating union with alien difference. Indeed, most especially as into attachments of true friendship. And even, perhaps most frightening of all, nothing so heartless, forcedly cheerful and upbeat, but instead compassion for the appropriateness of grief. All these and so much more, arising only as byproduct of authentically attentive optimal reciprocal engagement in often tabooed and sometimes emotionally risky purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication. And categorically, never otherwise. Therefore, accept no substitutes! And thence the responsibility to help one another in reaching out and talking more seriously in substantive communication setting agenda towards purposeful interaction regarding such probortunity as at hand herein on FoolQuest.com     

At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike taboo forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even building somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. And that is how! Because society is not any entity in its own right, but an ongoing and defining relationship among people.
    
And community is truly strengthened not by any such blithely alienated, distant and fraudulent sycophancy and self censorship so desperately fitting in, but instead by more deeply connecting with one another. Indeed, community is better forged not in any heteronomy so terrified, mindless and idle, but most competent and simply in making plans together and then keeping them. Even to begin with, merely in setting agenda and then initiating and sustaining ongoing discussion. And all because, as it turns out, true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and indeed believe it or not, never otherwise. And this plain truth well puts the big lie to all such toxic craven exhortation so foisted upon us all under the ever pervasive and ubiquitous cult of socialization, to socially skilled popularity and facile social success though superficial harmony, empty headed forced good cheer. And all whilst submissively knowing thy place. A chore and a bore. A sore travail. Bah humbug then, to all such oppressively irrelevant Terrible Trivium and unwholesome travesty of togetherness! Of persistently striving to incrementally improve performance within such a toxic paradigm in the first place. All said them, what then can be done indeed better and differently, even, to reiterate, merely amongst ourselves? An answer at last, The FoolQuest.com Master Plan
    
The most obvious objection to any plan of action, will be either that it cannot work, or else that it remains unnecessary. And the most obvious rebuttal comes, if whatever is already and routinely being done does not achieve desired results. And this in turn will be resisted by faith in order to stay the course. Either with every effort, or just by lip service. Indeed by utter denial, and even by taking blame for interim failure. It's only natural to cleave to the tried and true. To value tradition. As most commonly attributed to Burt Lance: “If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
    
Alas then that we have all been lied to! Propaganda Orwellian rightthink and crimestop have overwhelmed and cast into doubt as quite unthinkable, all individual experience of Empirical reality. Thus, from top to bottom, indeed at every strata and walk of life, to quote Russell Brand: “Society is collapsing and people are starting to recognize that the reason they feel like they’re mentally ill is that they’re living in a system that’s not designed to suit the human spirit.” Alas, in Existentially Absurd social reality, there remains such dystressing Sisyphusian user hostile outcomes gap, wherein instrumentality equals zero, meaning, even causally and deterministically, no relationship between performance and outcome, no real hope, no results no matter what one does, other than mounting frustration and defeat. So much then, it might seem, for individual real world freedom and capability. In every walk of life, in every sphere of endeavor, personal or professional, society is no conduit to success, but a filter of the incompetent and noncompliant alike and without distinction, a crushing and threatening obstacle course to be overcome, an unremitting chore and a bore, each and all abandoned to our own devices and setup for failure. Thus to self-esteem, a proverbial death by a thousand cuts. And any claims to the contrary, are just part of the racket. Indeed, from any end user standpoint, the existing system has remained broken from time immemorial. Alas the masses abide in false hope from blinding propaganda myth. And what a racket! A racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many.
      
To wit: It may be generally accepted that common and even niche interests and passions remain a key factor in building relationships. But in actuality, interests in common may turn out to be the least predicator in interpersonal compatibility. Just another superficial granfaloon chimera of membership identity! Indeed, interests in common need not correlate with shared core values or character, by far more profound. And alas even more shallow and facile, it may be generally accepted that people make friends as a result of chance propinquity and by spending casual time with one another. But don't you believe that either! Alas in truth, given protractedly limited options and endemic emotional distance, folly and superficiality, people often at last just timidly make do, even with toxic relationships, fear and isolation as all under a prevailing extol of lowered expectations and normatively glorified alienation. Don't expect too much! So we are admonished. A sore travail and disappointment.
    
For as it turns out, hobbies, interests, whatever such interests or passions in common stand revealed as the least predicators of interpersonal compatibility. Just another superficial granfaloon chimera of membership identity! Indeed, just such interests in common need not correlate with shared core values or character, by far the more profound.
    
After all, a notable key tenet of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of inventive solution finding, remains in the observation of how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important, fertile and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines. And similarly, Eudemonia, capability, important close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry, evokes Eros which is not so much co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity or casual contact and leisure, as just all the opposite, collusion and transport of liberating union with alien difference. And thus the forging of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And what shall so seldom come about spontaneously and organically by chance propinquity, may yet and more reliably begin intentionally. Because the usual failed conventionality and Terrible Trivium of guarded superficiality, superficial harmony and relentlessly banal small talk, all remain so vastly excruciatingly bored and lonely!
     
Just the opposite, to the very antithesis, indeed as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, respectful, trustworthy, capable and happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And there's the rub!), who are sociable, extroverted, known to reach out and thrive, Talk More Seriously with less small talk. Indeed, happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, even improving their circumstances and situation by freely centering their lives around sharing whatever pleases them most. Indeed, happy people, that minority whom we all may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And there's the rub!), are actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, such a happiness killer!
      
Pending then any future advent of extremely sophisticated and widespread advanced automated Sociometry (not to digress), in the interim to fill the gap, some other innovatively congenial, capable, empowering and effective process is needed in order to improve interpersonal outreach, extended networking, more optimal social embedment, autonomy supportive social support, widest access to resources, contacts and the cultivation of quality relationships of every kind and for any human purpose. Indeed, all envisaged as an additional beneficial side effect for participants, of purposeful interaction and substantive communication in the course of ongoing collaboration, brainstorming and creative solution finding as herein extolled and expounded in such detail. But any such revolution ensues only in paradigm shift by straying outside the box, if need be even flouting shopworn taboo.
Thence growing ever more actionable and specific, indeed most revolutionary of all, in subversion of routine hierarchical dominance, to reiterate: No human being can remain so woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore as all far too  infrequently in the human condition) circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals; indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and creative solution finding. And all in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology. And ultimately consequent from evolutionary neurology of freakishly engorged human cerebrality. Indeed, hideous inbred mutation under nature's witless and merciless trial and error, The Survival of the Sickest Not to digress.
      
Thus knowing now and better understanding full well the desirable change to be brought about, what must be done, and then by whom none other than I and thou, and thou, gentle readers, and even why precisely, the question remains: Just how? By what means? To reiterate: At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike taboo forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even building somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. And that is how! Because society is not any entity in its own right, but an ongoing and defining relationship among people.
   
And beware, for while any well established corporation or the like, might possess the wherewithal to survive all manner of self inflicted wounds and endure the drain and recourses to spare for getting the job done at all, any business startup or other new venture in formation will thereby likely be well nipped in the bud. And this may be one salient reason why all to often, to quote Olmstead: After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.” Even given all the virtues of preventative pessimistic caution, all purpose of evasion or withholdance will not merely reduce efficiency or injure morale, but paralyze and then dash any hopeful project that much more quickly and decisively. For no matter advance in connective communication and information technology, the challenge remains to the in depth quality of human interaction with autonomy and respect. There can be no hope of success in untrustworthy manipulative passive hostility at whatever conceivable cross-purpose or conflict of interests. Beware indeed the irrational bullying passive hostility of devious cross-purpose and betrayal. To quote Augustine, such "Resentment is like taking poison and hoping the other person dies.” But Augustine is mistaken: The self-destructive resentment of one remains toxic for all others involved. Indeed, by contrast, even grifters outright at least might be understood in any terms of one sided rational advantage. Make no mistake: In entrepreneurship for the rest of us, task interdependency and therefore, beyond mere solitary division of labor, actually working together closely in reciprocal support, ever remain crucial. Like The Three Musketeers: “All for one, and one for all!” Or else, all for naught. 

And so, for better or worse, the very hope of self reinvention together, of rewriting our personal stories, all begins as above delineated, in free exchange, in open discussion and deliberation upon dual endeavor precisely as herein expounded and extolled, facilitated herein via subversively interstitial provision of various helpful action  agenda tools and guides thereto, none the least remaining those two lists provided above. And beware: For writing remains easy to do, but difficult to do well. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!   

         
Alas then the cult of socialization, yes: socialization and indoctrination that none dare call: brainwash, and mortal terror so vested all therein. All such panic and mendacity remaining as they do, Terrible Trivium nigh tautologically antithetical to the genuine close involvement ever essential of autonomy, values and true friendship. And these agonizingly inattentive petty small minded evils, even short of serial bullying and worse abuse, include: heteronomy, futility, meaningless mediocrity, craven social skills and hierarchically predictive social cognition of an utter tool, ever facile calculating sycophancy of emotionally distant simple minded popularity and social success. Ever such persists as the vacuous inrush only filling the Existentially Absurdfutile and meaningless void so hatefully bereft of tabooed creative purpose and substance.   

It may be generally accepted that common interests and passions remain a key factor in building relationships. But in actuality, interests in common may turn out to be the least predicator in interpersonal compatibility. Indeed, interests in common need not correlate with shared core values or character, by far more profound. And also, it may be generally accepted that people make friends as a result of chance propinquity by spending casual time with one another. But clearly, this latter precept remains no less erroneous than the former. Alas in truth, given protractedly limited options, people often timidly make do, even with toxic relationships, fear and isolation under lowered expectations. A sore travail.  

And for most, employment, ever mounting anxiety of wage slavery ever less secure, and much like formal education in such submissive disciplined preparation and investment all thereto, and all on ones own time and expense with usurious compounding interest, remains most prevalent among dire options of interminably protracted burden and sore travail of failed conventionality. And ever at all alleviated only by that shabbily travesty of hedonistic play called: recreation, the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from such endless debilitation. By contrast, even wholehearted play enfolds uplifting purpose and substance all of its own.

The reader may therefore forgive and forbear longwinded exposition, because there remain so many distinct begged questions. And the present work is no mere linear document, but branching hypertext with direction freely to choose. Therefore gentle reader, indeed do feel free to return to to the proposal at hand. But first, well may one ask: What purpose actually if any? Might not the proposal at hand constitute yet another typical solution in search of a problem? And why anything so radical? Because too many even among those who so abjectly reject and denounce whatever status quo, often find no clear agenda and see no particular path forward, not even of any coherent discussion towards any serious planning of action in order ever to unite and rise to overcome whatever such dire adversity.

Indeed, as for Eudemonia as herein extolled, indeed close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry, Eros which is less co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, as just the opposite, transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging true friendship in autonomy, precisely why never otherwise than as arising entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication? Why such contrarian rejection and condemnation, such scorn so heaped upon all time tested practice? Are there not already all manner of fairly cut and dry procedures already extensively provided in society, for finding ones way in life without need of proverbially reinventing the metaphorical wheel? For precisely that is indeed what many even somewhat in indignation, actually do tend to believe simply as a matter of course. And yet, everyday, more and more become frustrated, disaffected, disillusioned and just fed up. And especially the suffering targets of serial bullying. Not to digress.
    
Question: As regarding Eudemonia as herein extolled, indeed close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging true friendship in autonomy, precisely why never otherwise than as arising entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication? (Let alone, more specifically, Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming toward creative solution finding. Or even most specifically, via disruptively innovative and subversive new business venture creation, entrepreneurship for the rest of us, and undertaken concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming.)
   
Answer: To reiterate, because popularity and relentlessly facile distant social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship, because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, even sometimes intense, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibilityAlas that all too often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And all in a milieu of relentless peer pressure, bullying, intimidation, prevailing anti-intellectualism (hostility and mistrust towards intellect, intellectuals, intellectualism, and deprecation of culture whatsoever) but perhaps more precisely designated as: anti-intraception (a discomfort or opposition in very principle, toward the subjective, the imaginative, the tender minded).
And that is how purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication are stifled under heteronomy.
   
Indeed, and to further reiterate, Eudemonia, which is important meaningful close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which remains less of co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, as quite the opposite, transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! Because that is why, as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle mode, if only we knew how, talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together engaging in creative endeavor. And all with less small talk, ever so interminably banal. Indeed, beware interminably irksome, obstructive  and pointlessly belabored empty vacant superficial boring small talk, a happiness killer, so often forced and awkward, only leaving one actually the more depleted, empty and discontent, all urgent need of truly important expression still mute and frustrated. That is why people secretly hate small talk.
And rightly so!

After all, a notable key tenet of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of inventive solution finding, remains in the observation of how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important, fertile and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines. And such also must remain friendly and egalitarian, in order to prevent competing experts from jockeying for power instead of learning and cooperating. Because controversy remains the welcome and appreciated exchange of criticism and rebuttal. And for together choosing the best ideas, controversy, the welcome and appreciated free exchange of genuine criticism, remains nothing to fear, nothing threatening or hostile.

Because criticism remains inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. Ensure then that everyone finds voice, and let them shine. Because Eudemonia and autonomy, best in life, remains the best meaningful and wise investment of individual time, attention and even creativity, into optimal reciprocal engagement, straightforward helpful and free flowing non-zero-sum Transaction that consistently accrues the pleasurable highest return in like kind: value maximization in individual time, attention and creativity, for everyone involved and with highest signal to noise ratio.

Alas, superiority, invalidation, thin skinned Anti-Critical Bias and bitter disrespect, only guarantee passive hostility, sabotage, headgames, protracted dysfunction, interminable primate politics, ever more devious cross-purpose and betrayal. Moreover, fragile and ill tempered hostility towards salient criticism only makes for denial of reality and rash action as surely as it does merely bad writing. Therefore the embrace of writing critique creatively cultivates the value of criticism first with only art and discipline at stake.

Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.

It has even been inferred from the much celebrated discovery of the wisdom of crowds, that human reasoning evolved along with the human brain and society, for deliberation together, comparing individual reasons. Even only if, as to quote C.S. Lewis: “Two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible, but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction.”

 
           
     
 
 
Not IDEO, but DIO:
Our Own Private IDEO?
Alas that only a fortunate few ever experience job satisfaction or enthusiasm in learning. For most, employment, ever mounting anxiety of wage slavery ever less secure, and much like formal education in such submissive disciplined preparation and investment all thereto, and all on ones own time and expense with usurious compounding interest, remains interminably protracted burden and sore travail, squandering the better part of time, attention and effort. And ever at all alleviated only by that shabbily travesty of hedonistic play called: recreation, the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from such endless debilitation. The yearning for fulfillment in creative collaboration and solution finding, is the reason why there are so many of us so dearly wishing that instead of whatever present humdrum existence, they could be working at IDEO, the world renowned ultra progressive design work place. However of course, such highly desirable and coveted positions of exaltation in convivially creative employment, remain privileged, in tremendous demand, short supply, extremely qualified, scarce, tantalizing out of reach. Certainly not entry level.
But wait: Can access and supply even conceivably ever be improved? One might even foresee that association within any creative corporate socially supportive culture of helping perhaps at all even in emulation of IDEO or in any situation, perhaps even online, adequately similar, could also greatly enhance social life, more optimal social embedment, interpersonal outreach, extended networking, widest access to resources, contacts and the cultivation of quality relationships of every kind and for any human purpose. All in all, perhaps the best conceivable circumstances pending advances in automated Sociometry, the anticipated next revolution in social technology (not to digress). And such remains the objective in the here and now, of the FoolQuest.com outreach as conceived, Creativity can be Popular, towards better social life by such above criteria for social engineering design, everything falling into place.
    
The answer then, can not be IDEO, but DIO: Do-It-Ourselves. And in difficult striving together even in loftiest ambition, and all from scratch, it will indeed be any sense of intrinsic fulfillment, indeed Eudemonia, that affords any congenial persistence and fighting chance, even from most vastly underserved and neglected embryonic first concept kitchen table stage or phase of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), in endless possibility of entrepreneurship for the rest of us.
     
Entrepreneurship for the rest of us as herein conceived, entails the entire vast scope in endless possibility of disruptive new venture creation (various business startup) undertaken concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. Because of the interstitial synergy between the two creative endeavors: between innovation on the one hand, which is applied creativity, and on the other hand, pure creativity for its own joy. Because business or project planning is only another application of narrative, another mode of story telling, however yet transcending the mere willing suspension of disbelief (barring the outright surreal) ever remaining so essential for motivated drama, grfting or propaganda.
   
Because whereas any good story or ripping yarn only needs to seem plausible, indeed despite how business or project planning only begins from such thrilling unfettered speculation as nurtured in ever metastasizing Science Fiction futuring scenario, Nevertheless innovation must exceed and transcend mere fictive plausibility into objective real world feasibility. Not to get ahead of ourselves, however. The portmanteau: 'probortunity' signifies opportunity as inherent to problems, the more dire, the more propitious. And as ever, to the probortunity at hand: Look for the Solution within the Problem!

The probortunity in particular, indeed of the very human condition, begins in ubiquitous desperate and Existentially Absurd panic stricken mortal terror management strategy of sycophantic socially skilled toadying skilled incompetence and pervasively toxic cutthroat anti-introspective anti-intellectual unrelenting popularity contest for facile and distant social success amidst the Sheeple, ever remaining precisely antithetical to true friendship. Because far from the usual bogus bullshit exhortations to willful positivity and small talk ever keeping things light, quite to the contrary, true friendship is genuine, substantive, intimate, and predicated upon autonomous, free, candid, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Moreover, the Dialectical practice of controversy, which is the open, free and invited exchange of criticism/critique, inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. For such remains Socratic enlightenment by refutation in the crucible of truth, subversive, ever less wrong: hypothetico deductive reasoning wherein, without shame, strife or acrimony, errors are not to be avoided beforehand, but detected and course corrected as arising. Because how else do we learn, grow, progress and ultimately even ever possibly succeed? For: “Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.” - Proverbs 27:17 (KJV) Indeed, friendship among  serious people, Ecclesiastically far superior for purpose of mortal terror management, remains the only effective and ever subversive antidote to loneliness and boredom, even if not mortalityAll therefore, capability, important close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to to penetrate psychological asymmetry, Eros which remains less of co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, than quite the opposite, transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly as into friendship, arises entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. And this explains much. Therefore, accept no substitutes!

After all, psychological asymmetry simply means that we are not so odd, but only strangers. And so we wallow each in our own pervasive and inexhaustible reservoirs of secret anxiety and vulnerability, never suspecting much the same of others beneath ever crumbling facade of exterior presentation. Therefore,  ongoing purposeful and substantive communication, let alone purposeful interaction, is no prize, reward, objective or desired end result of compliance and diligent social skills of good little girls and boys. Rather, substantive communication, let alone purposeful interaction, remains a barest beginning or starting point under autonomy, whence ever at all follows anything much more. Alas instead, so many, remaining ever emotionally invested in false promise of prevailing common sense and heteronomy, amounting only to manipulative empty pandering propaganda for the very status quo monopolizing our lives, good little girls and boys therefore balk at the Empirically obvious, the failure of all the lies that we all have been told, myth stubbornly ignoring objective reality, only forever to soldier on in such abject futility.
   
Even intentional community or at least initially, more modestly, smaller intentional social circle, institution or group project, with clear agenda objective merely of sustaining propinquity through sense of involvement in any specific ongoing interaction, even however arbitrarily, and all simply in order to draw participants together, by itself easily remains at best only partial solution, inadequate without stimulating creativity.
    
Because boring, meaningless and alienating sore travail of mediocrity ever persist in the face of Existentially Absurd mortality. Moreover, by very nature, creative inquiry and expression, so pivotal to Eudemonia as herein extolled, by far exceeds any merely solitary individual trait or characteristic. For again as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, creative expression remains social and intellectual stimulus appetite and arousal. Therefore creativity remains wasted and unfulfilled as any mere lonely individual character trait. And for more optimal gratification in social and intellectual stimulus struggle, creativity, beyond even at last becoming social, should actually become popular, not only valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer nerdy, awkward, bullied and persecuted.
   
And speaking of bullying, alas mean spirit and the decline of civility. Because far better than all such fawning sycophantic social skills, hierarchically predictive social aptitudes and cynical popularity contest, remains any true social grace of honest, trustworthy and creditable Menschlichkeit whereof there remain 15 purported signs. And in the words of George MacDonald: To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved. Therefore beware the 18 Easy Ways to Destroy trust. Indeed, in dedication to lofty consummate dharma and right action of Chivalric values, gaining élan and repute, artfully by saving face for others who stumble, as must we all eventually. A far cry from, so much kinder and more noble, a far, far better thing than any of the usual pointlessly toxic bullying power plays of entrapment and humiliation. And new beginnings in autonomy, freedom and individual will to power over ones own life, become possible, practical and practicable in outreach together intentionally choosing how and why to interact and relate to one another. And no one else need approve.
         
The probortunity of entrepreneurship for the rest of us:
        A matter of prime probortunity in invitation for collaborative brainstorming among equals in creative solution finding.

What needs to be done: Nothing can be too preliminary. No matter how early in whatever process one thinks to begin, one may yet rightly ponder, vex and imagine precisely at all how to get to whatever that ostensible starting position in the first place. Indeed gentle reader(s), how to even get you here reading this! Let alone to respond.

The ever daunting "kitchen table" stage or phase of entrepreneurial new venture creation, business startup all from scratch, refers to the most baffling and vastly underserved tentative and embryonic first concept inception, of aspirant visionaries actually gathering around that proverbial kitchen table. And the aphorism: For the rest of us has long entered into ever more common usage once popularized by the famous Microsoft advertising campaign slogan claiming to fill whatever gap and meet whatever crying need for greater user friendliness and thus wider accessibility for the masses, in marketing their various product and service innovations. Others have summarily followed suit in appropriation and reapplication of the memorable and venerable catch phrase similarly in order to advance promotional claims of  pragmatic demystification and wider access to all manner of hitherto obscure and indeed daunting utility and endeavor.

But entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup), such popular aspiration in endless possibility, of individual self determination and autonomy, nevertheless remain no less daunting and obscure for the masses. Reputable but stifling and entirely unsuitably heteronymous formal education and all manner of indeed quite rightly disreputable bogus and exploitative scam success "opportunities" alike, all notwithstanding. Alas indeed, that currently, there remain virtually no services, recruitment and support for, or even beyond mere mention and barest lip service, whatsoever literature concerning, the most tentative and embryonic first concept inception or "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup).

Instead therefore, only imagine a metaphorical deluxe "kitchen table," an open invitation to come together online. All that, and an open ongoing online creative writing bull session to boot! Outreach in organization and implementation, inclusive to all and free of charge, right here on FoolQuest.com By subversive social engineering design, intentional community or at least initially, more modestly, intentional social circle or group formation; heeding together the call to adventure, embarkation upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. Indeed, all the way through management team formation, business or project planning and feasibility study, indeed if all goes well, through successive rounds of Venture Capitalization and all the way through successful organization and implementation. All so much easier said than done, our work cut out for us. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

To all such lofty ambition, to reiterate, collaborative dramatic Science Fiction fiction writing and brainstorming, may provide for creative people, an excellent inspiration and management team building exercise, towards business planning, in endless objectively real world possibility, for innovative new venture creation (various business startup), for old pro and newbie aspirant alike and together, indeed barest beginning and hotbed of entrepreneurship for the rest of us. Creativity can and Should be Social! Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

Indeed of course the only true and best reason why even bother, gentle reader, all that matters most in the human condition, remains not only in psychology, but Axiology: real life drama, exploration of whatever individual driving motives entirely of one's own uniquely. Indeed, personal interests and priorities interactively to navigate personal path through the present copiously dense hypertext, nonlinear thought given sprawling form. And thence into substantive discussion. And perhaps at long last, even as often frustrating, proverbially like unto herding cats(!) to any meeting of minds on common ground in common cause of true unmet friends. Gentle reader, is FoolQuest.com right for you?  Let's find out.

What must be anticipated and expected in any particular endeavor? As feasibility study reveals, what becomes so discouraging, and indeed just perhaps even rightly so? What remains so very difficult, really and truly just too much trouble? Easier, for example, than the effort and focus of browsing and engaging with this very website, FoolQuest.com and then concerted effort of discussion amongst ourselves? Seriously? Do tell! What easier alternatives, if any? How joyless? Too difficult and too much trouble to what end? What remains important? How important? And how to gain the wherewithal? Success seldom arrives quickly or easily. And therefore, the effort had better be found gratifying in and of itself, and better still, with any at all relative ease at all of entry.

And beware, for while any well established corporation or the like, might possess the wherewithal to survive all manner of self inflicted wounds and endure the drain and recourses to spare for getting the job done at all, any business startup or other new venture in formation will thereby likely be well nipped in the bud. And this may be one salient reason why all to often, to quote Olmstead: “After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.” Even given all the virtues of preventative pessimistic caution, all purpose of evasion or withholdance will not merely reduce efficiency or injure morale, but paralyze and then dash any hopeful project that much more quickly and decisively. For no matter advance in connective communication and information technology, the challenge remains to the in depth quality of human interaction with autonomy and respect. There can be no hope of success in untrustworthy manipulative passive hostility  at whatever conceivable cross-purpose or conflict of interests. Beware indeed the irrational bullying passive hostility of devious cross-purpose and betrayal. To quote Augustine, such "Resentment is like taking poison and hoping the other person dies.” But Augustine is mistaken: The self-destructive resentment of one remains toxic for all others involved. Indeed, by contrast, even grifters outright at least might be understood in any terms of one sided rational advantage. Task interdependency refers to circumstances wherein any particular tasks must be accomplished first, and in a timely manner, in order for other tasks to even become possible in turn, and then accomplished. Indeed, efficiently in any timely manner. Therefore participants become responsible to one another. And make no mistake: In entrepreneurship for the rest of us, task interdependency and therefore, beyond mere solitary division of labor, actually working together closely, ever remain crucial. Like The Three Musketeers: “All for one, and one for all!” Or else, all for naught.   

The possibilities remain endless when Eudemonia accrues through genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for the dignity of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, and making progress every day as indeed, in the iconic parlance of Friedrich Nietzsche, power increases with resistance  overcome. Hence the crying need for capable respectful culture of helping and autonomy supportive social support for entrepreneurship, even for the rest of us neophytes and wannabes, beginning by nurturing the most vulnerable and vastly underserved tentative and embryonic first concept inception or "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), and proceeding steadily at our own pace. And if all goes well, ever further outreach, recruitment, management team formation, all the way through to Venture Capitalization, all to climax finally in implementation and marketing to be followed in turn by whatever dénouement of exit strategy ever as applicable. A steep learning curve together. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! 

 

Neoliberalism

“The very language we use to describe the self-made ideal has these fault lines embedded within it: To “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” is to succeed by dint of your own efforts. But that’s a modern corruption of the phrase’s original meaning. It used to describe a quixotic attempt to achieve an impossibility, not a feat of self-reliance. You can’t pull yourself up by your bootstraps, anymore than you can by your shoelaces. (Try it.) The phrase’s first known usage comes from a sarcastic 1834 account of a crackpot inventor’s attempt to build a perpetual motion machine.”

The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
—  By John Swansburg

The mere act of writing can be solitary. And anyone, even alone, can write. But not everyone writes capably. Writing is like photography: Easy to do but difficult to do well. Writing is rewriting, hard work and never a waste of time. Not everyone masters the disciple of the writing craft, much less the soul of art to beckon the Muse. Not everyone succeeds in whatever objectives of writing in and of itself, let alone criteria of effective communication and persuasion, captivating an audience, let alone whatever career or other aspirations thence. No, not everyone is indeed a writer. By contrast, doing business to begin with, requires reaching accord between multiple parties. And business failure will be costly. Not everyone can capably engage in business at all, much less succeed. There is a learning curve. Therefore: Who can be an entrepreneur, indeed a serial entrepreneur? Who can create new ventures, business or other startups, all from scratch? Indeed some are advantaged with considerable financial resources and connections. Others display great talents. Some have needed both just to get off the ground! But surely not all. And yet, as the saying goes: if just anyone could, everyone would!

In personality psychology, locus of control refers to the degree to which an individual feels a sense of agency in regard to his or her life. Someone with an internal locus of control will tend to believe that the things that happen to them are greatly influenced by their own abilities, actions, or mistakes. And Neoliberalism endorses even somewhat extreme locus of control. Blaming and disparaging the unemployed, laissez faire Social Darwinist Neoliberalism extols willful positivity and self-made individual responsibility for whatever ones own fate, without regard to external circumstances or situation. Neoliberalism so virulently opposes all public support and restriction upon employers; extolling instead the virtues of rugged individualism to accept whatever employment and terms thereof, that the infinite wisdom of  so-called free market, even often somewhat monopolistically dishes out. Moreover, according to the fraudulent propaganda false promise of Neoliberalism, precisely such compliant slave mentality shall be nothing less than the first masterful step upon the golden path of entrepreneurship, riches and success. In truth however, a Neoliberal, unless a submissive dupe, remains vastly over privileged hypocritical textbook example, in the words of  Joseph Conrad, of: "a moralist, who, generally speaking, has no conscience except the one he is at pains to produce for the use of others."   

Rugged self-reliance ever remains so ardently celebrated under the callous and domineering extol of success or failure as entirely just deserts of character and determination and never merely happenstance or situation. Indeed, of happiness and  as merely individual choice. Precisely all such oppressive victim blaming propaganda often serves socially to rationalize and excuse the manner in which we typically each and all find ourselves abandoned to ones own devices. As Edward Snowden so penetratingly observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Only the oppressor extols of the masses never to think, doubt or complain. Alas then that support at all remains typically conditional upon participation within institutions. Support instead for sallying forth on one’s own, following ones bliss, remains so often scarce. Better support could open the way for more people with much to contribute. A vastly wasted human resource! And in realistic and effective solution finding, a congenial solution must suit both the individual and circumstances or situation. Under the capability approach, any current mismatch between individual need or preference and circumstances or situation may be recognized, quite without blame.

Alas to reiterate, that as things stand, there are virtually no services, recruitment and support for, or even beyond mere mention and barest lip service, whatsoever literature concerning, even in endless possibility, the most tentative and embryonic first concept inception or "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup). Because, even as a point of pride in escape velocity from any academic ivory tower of abstraction and glittering generality, the market only caters to the practicality of already successful entrepreneurs who therefore can pay.

Indeed, while there exist actually burgeoning industries of training, services and vast bodies of literature within thriving and productive industries in support indeed of successfully established serial Entrepreneurs who can pay, the rest of us wana-bes, in any field novice and expert alike, remain as each and all ever abandoned to our own devices and thereby set up for failureA Darwinian ordeal of dubiously rugged self reliance and mythic right action in consummate dharma, as ever each and all abandoned once again to ones own devices for anything that actually counts. And we call it: socialization, the proverbial school of hard knocks and experience. All remaining so unfortunate, because in the words of Arthur H. Vandenberg: It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity. A matter of all that the individual may ever more capably bring to bear and contribute, but only first when better served in true autonomy supportive social support. Hence the dire need of forging collaboration community perhaps at all harkening back to the original comfortable and informal student run education of the Renaissance indeed bridging abstract and concrete, before domineering conformist co-opting and stratification at the hands of medieval authorities.
Nevertheless, as in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the ongoing striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. Indeed, quantitatively and qualitatively optimal investment and exchange of time and attention together that we all so crave, in synergy so crucial to authentic well being. And as propounded in the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology in concurrence with evolutionary neuroscience, hideous inbred mutation, engorged human cerebrality, The Survival of the Sickest, no human being can remain so woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore all far too  infrequently) so pleasurably and meaningfully engaged among equals; indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently together sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming towards creative solution finding forging true friendship, Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing in attempting anything really cool together.
 
For yet again, as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, by very nature, creativity by far exceeds any merely solitary individual trait or characteristic. First of all, there is no investigation so concrete as to become penetrable without abstraction and creativity. All science begins with hypothesis, sheer conjecture, only then subject to critical preference, let alone Empirical reality testing. But more to the point, creativity, playful, pleasurably engaged and meaningful creativity as epitomized in collaborative brainstorming and solution finding, ever persists as uniquely gregarious and intelligent human motivating social and intellectual stimulus appetite indeed of hideous inbred mutation, engorged human cerebrality. All indeed as consequent in The Survival of the Sickest. But also concurrent with the the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology.
   
Indeed for building team rapport, inspiration, and to sustain high spirits along the entrepreneurial path of disruptive innovation, what better than the pure creativity of collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming? Because, believe it or not, and as fully expounded anon in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in bleeding edge happiness science, evolutionary neuroscience,  and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology: No one can remain unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated, when so pleasurably and meaningfully engaged, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently together in brainstorming towards creative solution finding. As focus whereof, dual endeavor as herein extolled, remaining so optimal and yet alas taboo for the masses of sorry sad sack ambivalent worker drones. Threatening and exciting, all at once!
   
All as herein premised, even unreconciled in defiance of Existentially Absurdity, upon one flagrantly mad observation in meta-discussion (discussion about discussion). Indeed, the perfectly unreasonable and uncompromising subversively taboo mad hypothesis to test: that even so little as ongoing intentional deliberation together, Dialectic analytic yet strategic, attachment and connection forged together in the creation of meaning, might already begin filling that ever maddening abyss ever gazing   back, of boredom and loneliness. Or else, and speaking of true utter madness! Might one actually prefer to continue languishing within the mad control group of status quo? Pshaw! Never! Discourse upon the present subversive conspiratorial agenda of Eudemonia and the probortunity at hand, and upon the present modest proposal and piecemeal guerilla mad social engineering design initiative. Thus to help sustain ongoing optimal reciprocal full engagement. Any takers? Don't all crowd up at once!
 
“Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.”  Henri-Louis Bergson
 
 
But why all as preceding? And to what end? Answer: Because as propounded even however abstractly in the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology in concurrence with evolutionary neuroscience, no human being can remain so woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore all far too  infrequently) so pleasurably and meaningfully engaged among equals in brainstorming towards creative solution finding forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. For in hope and will to power, solution finding serves to address issues occurring each at any time within the world. The six steps of solution finding begin with problem definition and proceed through problem analysis, development of possible solutions, selecting any solution(s), and finally implementation and then evaluation of whatever outcomes.
  
In such endeavor assembled together and thusly heated by the mythopoetic fire of the mind, the great boon to humanity, elevation and  salvation out from dull witted humdrum triviality. Yes, dazzling fire of the mind stolen at great cost by the benevolent trickster genius Prometheus from the petty and jealous gods keeping us all downtrodden in fated confusion and defeat. Unreconciled to the latter Existentially Absurd situation, optimally and reciprocally ensues transport so ebulliently together sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension. And thence out from cold and grubby darkness, eudemonia and autonomy, best in life, remaining the meaningful and wise investment of individual time and attention, non-zero-sum Transaction. For thence consistently accrues the pleasurable highest return in like kind, in quality and quantity, indeed of individual time and attention. And thus, to reiterate, capability, important close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly deep attachments of true friendship, arising entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes!   
  
The ubiquitous desperate panic stricken terror management via sycophantic socially skilled toadying skilled incompetence and pervasively toxic cutthroat anti-introspective anti-intellectual unrelenting popularity contest for facile and distant social success amidst the Sheeple, ever remains precisely antithetical and inimical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive, intimate, and predicated upon autonomous, free, candid, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. And friendship among  serious people, remains the only effective and ever subversive antidote to loneliness. All wherein ongoing purposeful and substantive communication, let alone purposeful interaction, is no prize, reward, objective or desired end result of compliance, diligent hierarchically predictive social aptitudes and cynical approval seeking popularity contest of good little girls and boys, utter tools all. Indeed, much the latter as all too often renders cagey and distant social success no less desperately lonely, miserably isolated and bored silly, than as from social exclusion and Relational Bullying. For the closed mindset of autonomy remains ever distinct and contrasted from those more enlightened expectations of heteronomy. Because substantive communication, let alone purposeful interaction, remains a barest beginning or starting point under autonomy, whence ever at all follows anything much more.
   
Animals are to be rightly admired, because for furry and feathered social animals, attachment remains ever so simple and pure, and long term bonds so profound. Thus has it ever been! And isn't it just adorable? Only human beings, even among all other primates, have so muddled, perplexed and undermined the unreasoning animal simplicity of love itself, so convolutedly. But such is the price for human complexity and depth. And for such as we human beings, ever romanticized simple minded innocence remains so vastly overrated.
   
And all of that is why, as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle mode, if only we knew how, talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed. Happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, even improving their circumstances by centering their lives around sharing whatever pleases them most. Not surprisingly then, unlike those bogus gurus and posers, happy people are actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And who knows? Maybe they even get laid! 
     
And all with less small talk, ever so interminably banal, a happiness killer, so often forced and awkward, only leaving one actually the more depleted, empty and discontent; all urgent need of truly important expression still mute and frustrated. And that is why people secretly hate small talk. And rightly so! Happiness follows in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs for the dignity of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, making progress every day.
   
Whence all as preceding, emerges the very probortunity of the human condition, the entire point of living as intelligent social animals. Indeed the crucial agenda of FoolQuest.com, objectives to be accomplished. And all because Creativity Can and Should be Social. Indeed, by very nature, creative inquiry and expression, so pivotal to Eudemonia as herein extolled, by far exceeds any merely solitary individual trait or characteristic. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, creative expression remains social and intellectual stimulus appetite and arousal. Therefore creativity remains wasted and unfulfilled as any mere lonely individual character trait. And for more optimal gratification in social and intellectual stimulus struggle, creativity, beyond even at last becoming social, should actually become popular, not only valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer nerdy, awkward, bullied and persecuted.

Who then shall emerge as the star first follower or ally, the true leader by example? And thus providing social "proof," informational social influence over sequential behavior, being the cascade of one action to the next in social context, figuratively getting the proverbial ball metaphorically rolling. Yea verily, first bold recruit among collaboration cofounder candidates, and more than this: steadily forging a steering committee coalescing in deliberation upon the priorities and order of business, managing the general course of successive pending operations across the long haul of uplifting and engaging trial and error, of inspired perseverant serial failure unto eventual success.

Who then shall be first to stand before all others, and subversively enter into the inception of ongoing and vibrant dual endeavor and deliberation, in endlesss possibility, of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the one hand, in concurrent synergy interstitial with, on the other hand, pure creativity, art for its own joy, in unprecedented ongoing highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, an open ongoing writers bull session online?  Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!  Got a better idea? Do tell!

 

 
Daunting challenge
Who are you? What do you want? Where are you going? But who do you serve, and who do you trust? Don't you know? Then I will go with you. 
    
— ‘Babylon 5: Crusade (paraphrase)
   
Alas then how it might just seem that even browsing and deliberation together upon the content of this very website FoolQuest.com, much less helping to question and improve anything remaining howsoever unclear, in short, when things get strange and complicated, the meticulous practice and application of philosophical habits of clear thinking, even towards beta reading or copy/language editing, all shall be deemed entirely too much bother! And dangerous besides! But as compared to what else? And to what end? The devil is in the details. Nothing is easy. Anything  purportedly simple, easier and popularly tailored to the convenience of short attention therefore often remains somewhat dubious, if at all only superficially friendly, and by contrast anything else at all more serious, indeed conscientious and and caring, tends so quickly to become therefore by far more arduous, involved and complicated. And where to begin?
     
For serious people, nothing can be too preliminary. No matter how early in whatever process one thinks to begin, one may yet rightly ponder, vex and imagine precisely at all how to get to whatever that ostensible starting position in the first place. Indeed gentle reader(s), how to even get you here reading this! Let alone to respond. And relevantly, please. And so, how even when it all feels like burial alive, figuratively to get in on the proverbial ground floor, by metaphorically digging up from whatever metaphorically abysmal subbasement strata? And can we work together? No one has to agree, but since I've given this any thought, then so can you! Let us together have respect. Let us eschew cocksurety and embrace Socratic Wisdom: In any event of tantalizing desires and dauntingly challenge of unknown feasibility and difficult effort in whatever prospective endeavor, some despair and just give up, while others lapse into denial and pipedream. All only triggered and exacerbated even by any prospect of serious and realistic deliberation.
   
Therefore, I am not cajoling anyone into anything. And anyone who pretends otherwise, probably is. But even without spending so much as a dime, anyone at all autonomous and responsible, needs to reach any sort of projected personal feasibility and estimate of expected and required sweat equity investment in any proposed undertaking or even into mere deliberation, as necessary towards whatever desired end result or even simply whatever desired experience just in the doing. And then all of that needs to be compared to whatever level of interest, risk tolerance, effort and difficulty, all as ever may seem comfortable.
   
Hence to distinguish FoolQuest.com from all the rest: I might not have what you want gentle reader, but dare we seek for it together? The entire range of cut and dry conventional ready options or paths in life may often by so many of us only be found aggravating, unsatisfactory, daunting and expensive. And all guarantees are evaporating. Even doing as expected, like good little girls and boys, only becomes ever more uncertain and costly. If then risk we must, whence then any life howsoever grander, less ordinary, better egosyntonic, and less vexing of integrity in core values? Even setting aside the most flagrant cult scam and pipedream for self selection only by the most desperately gullible and generally delusional, the internet teems with all manner of ideology, movement, experts, gurus or hucksters, dubious or reputable, yet all to such little avail. Indeed there seems ever no end of discourse, grand design and recommendation, often ancient, recycled and repetitive, upon the meaning of life, Eudemonia, path to happiness, wellbeing, any conceivable values and desires, and even material success, obstacles any thereto, and various causes of unhappiness and/or failure. Inclusive also of, and in remedy of human suffering, whatever conceivable condition or situation of intrinsic fulfillment and authenticity, path and obstacles thereto. Indeed exhortation to truest friendship, autonomy, and whatever at all conceivable very opposite or antithesis to boredom and loneliness.
   
Lo and behold then, the very latest peer reviewed bleeding edge Empirical happiness science arriving at rediscovery of the most enduring wisdom from the greatest sages of old. And yet here on FoolQuest.com, precisely thence emerges anything quite original, unprecedented, fun and surprising that the reader will never already discover elsewhere so many times before: Endless possibility, new initiative and innovation analytic yet strategic, agenda and bold plan of action and interaction in detail submitted to agenda for open discussion and deliberation, analytic yet strategic, with invitation and solicitation free of charge and open to all: Eudemonia in getting serious about collaboration among equals in brainstorming, creative solution finding and innovation together, along the path of disruptively innovative and subversive new venture creation (various business startup) concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. But how and why those two particular endeavors, specifically? Because as shall be seen, they together neatly embody a compelling dream of even actually systematic fulfillment in vibrant shared creativity. If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done. Indeed, as Polonius asides of Hamlet: Though this be madness, yet there is method in't.
 
 

What then emerges as most sound and worthy personal investment of precious time and attention?

What and how much might one personally invest, simply in order to achieve better gratifying and more fulfilling human connection? And what would one not? And how to work out  more optimal investment strategy? Increase all such interaction as to enhance value, and decrease such as remains only wasteful or actually detrimental. To begin with, quite simply, people could just be a lot more friendly! If only we dared! If only we knew whom to trust.

To reiterate: Eudemonia and autonomy, best in life, remains the meaningful and wise investment of individual time, attention and even creativity, into optimal reciprocal engagement, straightforward helpful and free flowing non-zero-sum Transaction that consistently accrues the pleasurable highest return in like kind: Specifically, value maximization in time, effort, attention and even creativity, for everyone involved and with highest signal to noise ratio. Indeed, the very opposite of boredom and loneliness. Hence the most sound investment of precious attention in one another.

But how? In answer, to quote Dr. Matthias Mehl: [In experimental Empirical observation of happy people] “...substantive conversation seemed to hold the key to happiness for two main reasons: both because human beings are driven to find and create meaning in their lives, and because we are social animals who want and need to connect with other people." Indeed as Socrates so famously declares: “An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being.” Because capable human relationship, especially true friendship, indeed meaning in the very deepest sense, psychological visibility, Eudemonia, optimal reciprocal engagement, all these and so much more, arise as byproduct indeed of authentic attention, of often tabooed and sometimes emotionally risky purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication. And categorically, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes!

This holds true as manifest and self-evident. And all because of certain lamentable hallmarks definitional of the cult of socialization and mortal terror so vested therein. All  such panic and mendacity remaining as they do, nigh tautologically antithetical to the genuine close involvement ever essential of autonomy, values and true friendship. And these agonizingly inattentive petty small minded evils include: heteronomy, futility, meaningless mediocrity, craven social skills and hierarchically predictive social cognition, ever facile calculating sycophancy of emotionally distant simple minded popularity and social success. Ever such persists as the inrush only filling the void so hatefully bereft of tabooed purpose and substance. Plain dysfunction obfuscated by unquestioned social expectation under the spell of dull witted propaganda. All in a milieu of prevailing anti-intellectualism (hostility and mistrust towards intellect, intellectuals, intellectualism, and deprecation of culture whatsoever) but perhaps more precisely designated as: anti-intraception (a discomfort or opposition in very principle, toward the subjective, the imaginative, the tender minded). Nattering and folly all whereof, or so we must resolve, that those who matter pay no mind, and those who do mind, don't matter.

Under autonomy, there may be less resistance to change as such, than resistance to being changed by coercion and manipulation. Everyone compares themselves to others, whatever ones own situation to that of others, even merely as any sort of a bench mark. But who might best serve as the most salutary subject for such comparison? Precisely whom might one most productively compare oneself with?

Rôle modeling happy people?So much easier said than done!By contrast with average ordinary nebbish mopes the likes of I and thou, Empirically, cutting edge experimental observation reveals that trustworthy and respectful happy people whom we would all do so very well to emulate, if only we knew how somehow to function that much more capably. But can even these happy people themselves explain it?
   
Perhaps. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed happy people have been Empirically discovered to talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed. Individual, opinionated, together Dialectically engaging in creative endeavor, prioritizing all that brings them greatest happiness. And as according to painstaking objective experimental measurement, all with significantly less small talk. Clearly. such happy people are indeed canny investors of time and attention together. Subversive tantalization all thereby, of true paradigm shift perhaps one day even going viral:

Because everything as above that has been learned about the doings of such happy people, so flagrantly flies in the face of prevailing common wisdom in expectations towards chameleonic braindead superficial popularity and social success. Clearly, popularity and social success are actually so profoundly bored, lonely, alienated and unfulfilled, even when behaviorally operant on their own cretin terms. Indeed, by and large, psychotherapists see two kinds of patients: Those who remain unhappy because they just don't fit in, and those who are so unhappy because of the ego dystonic price that they must pay in order to fit in. All so onerously that they must attend to, and all so dear that they must foreswear.

Therefore, to quote W. W. Jacobs: “Be careful what you wish for, you may receive it.” For as Terry Pratchett ads: “You never know who will be listening.” Or in the words of Yasmin Mogahed: “Be careful about wanting what others have. There is always a price. Perhaps God didn’t give it to you, because He knew you wouldn’t be able to pay it.” Indeed as Laurie Halse Anderson cautions: “There's always a catch.” Moreover, as Colin Cunningham further cautions: “Be even more careful what you work for because you will get it even more quickly.” And make no mistake, indeed superficial harmony remains alienating Ecclesiastical vanity and sore travail! And so, to continue in quest of better and less dire investment of time and attention, instead more congenial towards authentic wellbeing:

In organization and implementation, collective endeavors of intentional community, or indeed initially any more modestly, intentional social circles or groups, can be socially engineered, organized and designed even into paradigm shift, so as to foster whatever most desired interaction between participants, perhaps one day even going viral. That is, first of all, as we have just seen, in so far as such cherished values will be known and decided. Alas, all too often mythologized and blithely assumed. Thence a tragic history of dogmatic lunatic ideology, doctrine, faith, dedicatedly persistent error and colossal failure. And indeed there's the rub! And ubiquitously desperate truism of social success and popularity be damned.
   
For in such prevailing ignorance of ever mysterious Eudemonia and the inestimable fine fortune and right action of those aforementioned happy people, such remains the calamity, as Socrates so famously declares, of the unexamined life, not worth the living for a human being. Because even the barest due diligence at systematic doubt, criticality, research and thinking things through, makes every difference on so many levels. Indeed, as it turns out, and believe it or not, in accordance indeed with such ancient wisdom from the greatest sages of old, all as rediscovered by bleeding edge happiness science, thinking converges upon one salient point: And to Hell with all knee-jerk heteronomy to the cult of socialization! For as it turns out, most heady and best in life, may well be such vibrant autonomy as uniquely expressed in Dialectic of collaborative brainstorming among equals towards creative solution finding. Actually, its a blast! And surely the more so, embracing the values of drama, endless possibility and disruptive innovation. Thus in particular application to new venture creation (various business startup) undertaken concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing. All as according to hypothesis and social engineering proposal herein advanced to the agenda. Any takers?
 
Hypothesis of greatest probortunity

Why do we serve one another so poorly, if we don't like it? Why in such Absurd Existential futility must we cast about for connection in the great wide world, when here we are, I and thou? To quote Ralph Waldo Emerson: “The only way to have a friend is to be one.” Purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication are intentional and can't be faked by going through the motions or by any counterfeit of conditional strokes, because purposeful interaction and substantive communication are intrinsically motivated by meaningfully engaged attention. Because we live in such a tightly strained attention economy. And hence, the probortunity at hand: The problem most dire, therefore presenting the opportunity most propitious. And thank you, gentler reader. Because now more than ever, in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.”

People may hunger for sympathetic supportive community and even guidance. But not all such is the same, and often amounts to very little and pointless. Therefore, for anything different and better than what we have already known, let us then together test the very hypothesis that even full engagement in analytic yet strategic deliberation together as proposed herein, will already begin to lift thriving spirits. Because Eudemonia and autonomy, best in life, remains the meaningful and wise investment of individual time, attention and even creativity, into optimal reciprocal engagement, straightforward helpful and free flowing non-zero-sum Transaction that consistently accrues the pleasurable highest return in like kind: Specifically, value maximization in time, effort, attention and even creativity, for everyone involved and with highest signal to noise ratio. Indeed, the very opposite of boredom and loneliness. Hence the most sound investment of precious attention in one another. A true paradigm shift perhaps one day even going viral.  And because moreover, philosophical pure creativity of story telling expands the mind, while subversive innovation, which is applied creativity of disruptive entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup), directly complicates and advances the sprawling plot of real life drama throughout our world. But even all such heady exaltation alone, private inner freedom and adventure of lofty original thought, soon pales to emptiness, with no one with whom to share the adventure of implementation in reality, embarkation upon the all too uncertain real life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship in endless possibility of attempting anything really cool together.
   
But whereas fiction writing, remaining entirely hypothetical and imaginary, only needs to seem valid (plausible and logically consistency to premise, an Epistemological Methodological criteria of critical preference in Scientific Method), innovation, plan of action or futuring scenario, bridging abstract principle (generally why) and concrete application (specifically how), in deliberation analytic yet strategic, all further turn upon rigorous feasibility study in Empirical objective reality. Because validity alone, defined as logical inner self consistency of proposition, can never become transitive to truth, truth being defined by Sir Karl Popper as correspondence to reality in assertions. And as G. E. Moore contends: “You can't get an 'is' from an 'ought.'” And yet, it remains a sly trope of manipulative and deceptive propaganda, to fob of evocative illustration and rationalization, as though evidentiary as practical demonstration. But as Lau Tzu observes, beautiful but pernicious lies and myths become more persuasive than ugly truth. Nevertheless, even if vivid narrative depiction seems to make appealing sense, it still might not actually be so. Pollyanna willful positivity be damned! Pleasure Principle and wishful thinking must be governed by Reality Principle. And after critical preference, comes reality testing, indeed planning and feasibility study.
    
Because well before any prayer of responsible Capitalization, outreach in any such a vibrant project proposal must inspire and help recruit a varied range of trustworthy capable talent, knowledge and skill sets, in mutual respect, to join in and participate on spec and all from scratch. Yes, even from the most embryonic first concept inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase, through management team formation, business or project planning and feasibility study, indeed if all goes well, through Capitalization and all the way to successful implementation and expansion. To be followed by whatever dénouement of exit strategy ever as applicable. A steep learning curve together. Thus genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for the dignity of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others and thereby together changing our story. Hence entrepreneurial serial failure, trial and error unto success. All perseverant bold and unreconciled before even the most Postmodern Existential Absurdity.

The cult charlatanry of Pollyanna willful positivity and thin skinned Anti-Critical Bias, are by no means constrained to aspiring entrepreneurship and life coaching. Indeed, precisely such willful malignant optimism remains of course the magical mainstay of all religion. But especially online, there exist also what amount to bogus support groups of unflagging encouragement for fiction writers, a travesty wherein salient critique is vehemently deplored and actively discouraged, indeed even actually forbidden and penalized. Ever` strident malagenda: Utter denial, both too serious and yet, not serious enough. Fortunately, there are also many fine serious fiction writers' groups, wherein those aforementioned serious albeit ever self-reliant and solitary writers ever so studiously break isolation in order indeed to exchange critique and advance their venerable art, the discipline of the writing craft. But while there has been an impressive flowering online, of even encyclopedic collaborative World Building, shared setting and background for individual fiction writing, otherwise there appear to be precious few if any communities for hitherto unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing actually as such. No open ongoing genuine and intensive writer's bull session online as herein proposed anon, let alone likewise any brainstorming the more ambitious and directly consequential. Only those insular co-validating ninnies who have together afflicted collaborative fiction writing with such a poor reputation among those aforementioned notoriously solitary and self-reliant serious fiction writers. And serious people generally, will only find ourselves one way or another, all the more isolated amid membership of those thin skinned wishy-washy conformist consensus communities, granfalloons of the unserious, the cult of socialization, no matter whatever shared interest or in any field of endeavor. Thus does resistance so readily become helpless, so eagerly co-opted by culture of oppression, dull witless dishonesty, cruelty and weakness.

The possibilities remain endless! Concurrently with highly original serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, entrepreneurship for the rest of us as envisaged and proposed herein, the outreach agenda of new venture creation (various business startup) and (pre) incubation, pertains to the heady ambitious and complex multitask interdependent interdisciplinary process of developing and transforming whatever new idea, innovation or technology, into a business of whatever kind (profit or nonprofit, traditional, Social Entrepreneurship or even just perhaps grassroots politics and activism), indeed even at long last, filling the yawning gap in support for entrepreneurship for the rest of us neophytes and wannabes at our own pace, that can even conceivably succeed, and therefore just might ever possibly attract trustworthy capable talent, let along ever investment of Venture Capital.

For to quote Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.”  Indeed, not just the wish, but the will, in deliberation analytic yet strategic all in accordance with ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old as rediscovered in bleeding edge happiness science, FoolQuest.com stands in staunch advocacy of authentic wellbeing as to be purposefully brought about via interstitial social engineering design. Actually as pursuant to overarching agenda of considered and intentional human interaction. Indeed, of peak experience achievable via open Dialectical collaboration among equals in brainstorming toward creative solution finding. And thus
Eudemonia of optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle.
   
For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, by very nature, creativity by far exceeds any merely solitary individual trait or characteristic. First of all, there is no investigation so concrete as to become penetrable without abstraction and creativity. All science begins with unjustified hypothesis, sheer unfounded conjecture, only then subject to critical preference, let alone then Empirical reality testing. But more to the point, creativity, playful, pleasurably engaged and meaningful creativity as epitomized in collaborative brainstorming and solution finding, ever persists as uniquely gregarious and intelligent human motivating social and intellectual stimulus appetite of hideous inbred mutation, engorged human cerebrality. (All as consequent in The Survival of the Sickest. Not to digress.)
    
Because, as in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the ongoing striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. Indeed, quantitatively and qualitatively optimal investment and exchange of time and attention together that we all so crave, in synergy so crucial to authentic well being. And as propounded in the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology in concurrence with evolutionary neuroscience, no human being can remain so woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as all so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore far too  infrequently) so pleasurably and meaningfully engaged among equals; indeed, optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently together sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming towards creative solution finding forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together.
      
    
Imagine then therein, a new social contract and social order, a fundamental paradigm shift in such flagrant subversion of hierarchy into as collaboration among equals in brainstorming and solution finding as the ongoing default, and whatever kind of responsible authority, even however ad hoc, the special case, a fall back position reserved for and resorted to only as and when the need whereof ever actually arising. Thus an end to routine status quo of hierarchical dominance, that allows so poignantly and fondly remembered collaboration under low hierarchical distance (near equality) in creative solution finding, only ever at all, temporarily and all too  infrequently, when deemed absolutely necessary to transient crisis or opportunity. Or workshops and such that end with no continuity or follow up. What is needed the instead, is new and lasting and ongoing institution and paradigm shift, perhaps even such as herein delineated.
 
Eudemonia pivots upon expression
In the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” Indeed, Eudemonia, which is important meaningful close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging attachments of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. And that is why, even so contrary to all blithely prevailing calamitous social expectations to keep conversation light, and yet as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, the distinct truth remains that: Happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we knew how, talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together engaging in creative endeavor. And all with less small talk. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! We can take action. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
     
For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, outreach for unmet friends. Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally to lead by example! Yea verily, first bold recruit among collaboration cofounders, steadily forging a steering committee coalescing in deliberation upon the priorities and order of business, managing the general course of successive pending operations across the long haul.
    
So famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change our world! For in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Hence in any more ambitious and intentional paradigm shift away from status quo and into Eudemonia, capability and greater expectations of ourselves and of one another will become most desirable. Thus better investment of time and attention together. In short, freely and responsibly to relate to one another, instead of fitting in socially to all manner of repressive, isolating and toxic expectations.
       
Such palpably urgent need of anything so radical and divergent as Eudemonia expounded herein, if anyone pays attention, arises from the inherent failure so typical of heteronomy to such a hoary host of flagrantly well refuted conventional expectations, ideology and propaganda. One way or another, Hell is other people. But so is bored and lonely isolation. What must be done? Existential Absurdity, futility, real life drama and suffering, all obtain not only from existence in a dangerously indifferent universe, but perhaps even worse, from the hapless folly and cruelty of human nature. And whereas our tangible existence remains predicated in Ontological objective physical reality, by contrast social reality is only an aggregate of relationship interaction among individuals, all as continually reinforced, reshaped and redefined therein. Social reality is entirely made up by us, decided by us, in the course of interaction. And thus collectively maintained or modified, subtly or blatantly, minute by minute. And even to begin wresting back control of our lives, complacency must be overcome. Otherwise, we're all just fucked! And not in the nice way
    
A person is a conscious entity. Corporations and zygotes are not people! No matter, indeed as per the famous admonition of Voltaire, how compellingly believed absurdities and thence committed atrocities, the truth will out! Alas, whenever the most evident and valid objective reality is evaded and discounted or even dismissed as mere opinion, while mere convention is so abjectly surrendered to as if concrete and real. For such remains the baffling antinationalism of banal and ubiquitous authoritarianism. As for prime example, in the treatment of obesity and complications, when any long unjustly and imprudently unapproved though well demonstratedly safe and effective experimental option shall be blithely dismissed as unrealistic, while remaining conventional options, however obviously dubious, remain accepted uncritically. And this should come as little surprise from Medical Doctors who have actually been taught that they are not scientists! Fortunately, at least some disbelieve. Or else we'd have no medical researchers. Alas the taboo against bridging abstract and concrete. Thus dubious practicality bereft of abstract principle, and ivory tower abstraction uninformed by Empirical practicality. Thus politics so ignorant of science and out of touch with reality.
 
Rational skepticism pivots upon creativity
In the words of Albert Einstein: “Any fool can know. The point is to understand.” Knowledge after all, remains merely awareness of truth. And as Karl Popper contends, truth is correspondence to external objective reality in an assertion, declarative statement or Ontological claim. As distinct from validity, which only means internal logical consistency therein, fundamental to plausibility. Indeed, beware: For even the most elating and vivid propaganda illustration, is no demonstration of objective reality. Even if, to quote Sir Francis Bacon: “Truth is so hard to tell, it sometimes needs fiction to make it plausible.” Because, to render blatant the sly irony of the celebrated poet John Keats, beauty is not truth, nor truth, beauty. Not even when art and beauty, as manifest in some breathtaking Grecian urn on display, outlives long lost historical truth. Indeed, even when, as Lau Tzu observes, beautiful but pernicious lies and myths become more persuasive than ugly truth. And yet, even subjective pattern recognition begins with pattern creation only then for Empirical testing against external objective reality. For as Karl Popper contends, all hypothesis begins from unfounded and unjustified conjecture, indeed unfettered speculation as characteristic of the wildest Science Fiction, yes: utter fiction, only then subject to critical preference, let alone scientific method, reality testing, prediction, strategy and feasibility study, but only given, to begin with, the very desire.
  
Because there is no certainty or firm foundation and bedrock of science, no verification or justified knowledge. And we can never learn from mistakes by seeking to avoid or prevent error a priori (before hand), let alone contriving to conceal mistakes, but only a posteriori (afterwards) by the fallible honesty of continual error detection and ongoing course correction. By Dialectic of Socrates and enlightenment by refutation, the process of elimination continually setting aside unviable hypotheses, progressively clearing the field of all but any handful of remaining viable hypotheses, ever less wrong. By the Dialectical practice of controversy being the welcome and invited exchange of criticism/critique which is inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? Gentle reader, I am counting on you! You are all invited! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
    
Indeed, for fanciful story crafting, analysis and sound strategic deliberation alike, indeed planning and feasibility study, writing is rewriting, and never a waste of time. But for either different application of narrative creativity, even from suitability of whatever initial premise, the criteria of critical preference crucially differ: Mere hypothetical plausibility for pure creativity in fiction writing, but intensive feasibility study for innovation in business or project planning. Thus the same brainstorming principle of fertile conjecture transcends mere drama and creativity for its own joy, Epistemologically and Methodologically into any range of creative solution finding and collaboration among equals, bridging abstract principle (generally why) and concrete application (specifically how), in deliberation analytic yet strategic, even into the real world, along the Backwards Ladder of Abstraction. For the Backwards Ladder of Abstraction remains the steady retreat from fiction, fantasy and willing suspension of disbelief, gradually into ever more defensible bastion of real purpose and barest possibility: Innovative new venture creation (various business startup). Power, capability, autonomy, practical and tangible liberation, hope of success and the achievement of freedom in an unfree world; the probortinity at hand. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!  Because the possibilities remain endless.
   
 
Liberation into social creativity
Creativity Can and Should be Social. Indeed, by very nature, creative inquiry and expression, so pivotal to Eudemonia as herein extolled, by far exceeds any merely solitary individual trait or characteristic. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, creative expression remains social and intellectual stimulus appetite and arousal. Therefore creativity remains wasted and unfulfilled as any mere lonely individual character trait. And for more optimal gratification in social and intellectual stimulus struggle, creativity, beyond even at last becoming social, should actually become popular, not only valued, but charming, engaging and attractive, duly celebrated and no longer nerdy, awkward, bullied and persecuted.
     
Alas that collaboration among equals, so essential to creative solution finding, remains literally inconceivable under the mindset of heteronomy to authoritarianism, because mind numbing uniformity of ubiquitous consensus manipulation and coercion, remains so blithely and unquestioningly accepted as indispensable for cooperation at all. And such hallowed consensus of course, as the indispensable benefit of actually addictive submission to undisputed leadership lifting all terrified burden of freedom and responsibility. Indeed, a status quo to which freewheeling creative solution finding, requiring temporary relaxation of rigid hierarchical inequality, poses such looming threat of joyous and ebullient uprising, and therefore ever must remain so poignantly  infrequent. Indeed, free interaction so tightly rationed by whatever dour and stern great and good powers that be, insubordination ever risked only as and when creative solution finding and innovation shall be deemed completely indispensable to whatever rare special circumstances as howsoever fortuitous or threatening to prevailing interests of whatever stifling Borg collective. 
    
Of course as Empirically observable, quite without whatever such rigid oppression, people who disagree even most vociferously, in ever so many matters, do indeed cooperate only all of the time! And we can, too!
   
Science and democracy would never become possible otherwise. And art becomes agreeable and bland! There can be no rationality without the value of dissent and the Dialectical practice of controversy being the welcome and invited exchange of criticism/critique which is inherently friendly, valuable, an expression of abiding respect in autonomy supportive social support in any culture of helping, Epicurean freedom, friendship and thought! It only requires any modicum of mature and  sportsmanlike collegial fair play and good will, and not any slavish consensus, in order to forestall bitter enmity. Indeed, under autonomy and the mind set of democracy, justifying utility of authority remains pragmatic, exceptional and situational, not constant, terrified, perpetual, unremitting and routine maintenance of order ever holding whatever dreaded strife and chaos at bay. All therefore any subversive preference towards genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for the dignity of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. Because true innovation and major success never comes so quick or easy. And therefore, in the interim, the effort had better remain maximally creative, truly productive, joyous and gratifying in and of itself, and better still, with any improved ease of entry.

As Edward Snowden so penetratingly observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Only the oppressor extols of the masses never to think, doubt or complain. And it remains the scoundrel who demands the impossible and the unnecessary, only in order to excuse withholding from the masses every dishonest broken promise of facile propaganda. Alas, the dire implication endures, of craven fascist fairytale and false dichotomy, that if one shall not tow the line, then one had better become self reliant, thence successful, a self-made person of destiny, an ubermensch philosopher king. Indeed, such remains the penchant of dronelike formal education so slavishly to admire, but never actually to teach and emulate, the lofty greatness of leadership on the part of lionized exceptional men and women of destiny, so lonely at the top. Therefore, in each our own yearnings and frustration we are all left to struggle with much the same general question: What must I do? The wrong question and just inoperant. Despite how as so iconically ponders Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” Because, In the celebrated poetry of John Donne: "No man is an island." Indeed tautologically, there can be no self-help, no reliable solitary rugged self-reliant unilateral self-made bootstrap DIY (Do-It-Yourself) "well-formed plan" for interaction among more than one individual typically abandoned, as are we all, each to our own devices and thereby set up for failure in anything truly meaningful.

And that is precisely why happiness in the experience of favorable situation, accrues, no, not in any any Nietzschean impossibly rugged individualism, and certainly not or else in compliance to heteronymous peer pressure, but through genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for the dignity of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, and making progress every day as indeed power increases with resistance  overcome. Not just another dull witted and inconsequential membership granfalloon! No thin skinned wishy-washy conformist consensus community.

The better operant question therefore remains: How best and most happily might we interact? For such remains the probortunity at hand. And more ann. For the portmanteau: 'probortunity' signifies opportunity as inherent to problems, and the more dire, the more propitious. For unless turning to one another, we shall only find ourselves each and all once again abandoned to our own devices and thereby set up for failure, bored, lonely and ineffectual. Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.

Ever in ardent supplication for acceptance and approval from those better advantaged, ever endures the cult of socialization striving for inclusion and access up the social ladder with popular kids who don't actually need more hangers on. In the alternative, what may more truly impress serious people, remains how well others function in robust cooperation among equals, indeed even beyond routine and constructive emotional support group interaction, simple commiseration and validation forever licking our wounds of rejection and failure. Bridging then the abstract and the concrete, surely more noble value to inspire more practical objective. Many derive validation when one agrees with them. But for others, one must go further: One must amplify and expand upon all that they say. And yet, surely the truest and most honest and genuine though difficult and dangerous full validation remains actually to take pertinent action together effectively, as dependable friends and allies. Alas, it remains obvious and easy to understand why instead so many balk and struggle to make do, keeping at arms length. And thence enduring motive, ancient and yet ever new, for the vast industry of simmering paranoia, mistrust, nonattachment and toadying sycophantic short attention.

Although it seems only fair enough to wonder, perhaps here the author only so deplores and finds so baffling and distasteful some or other perfectly ordinary modes of human interaction that said author simply isn't very good at and with which said author has become extremely frustrated and embittered. And what an arrogant luzer! In my own preemptive defense then, in anticipation of any such even the most temptingly invited Ad Hominem, it should hardly come as any surprise to discover that anyone might ever prefer instead to play to whatever their own self perceived strengths in any imaginable setting, milieu or situation in any way at all more conducive all thereto.

So famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Therefore, change our conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change our world! And as unreasonably thoughtful and committed citizens, let's all talk more seriously!

 
 

 

 

 

      

 FoolQuest.com rising to the ever angst ridden
probortunity of Existential Absurdity:

Indeed to begin with, Why in our sick sad world, well may one insist, of all things, innovation in disruptive new venture creation (various business startup) undertaken concurrently with serious collaborative fiction writing? For what rhyme or reason? What conceivable purpose might be served by a novel innovative and subversive model for new venture creation (various business startup) (pre-)incubation and collaboration among equals, derived from drama and the hitherto largely solitary discipline of the writing craft, plus an initiative of social engineering design thinking? For as Simon Sinek contends, compelling branding that truly differentiates, begins not with what or even how, but why? Yes: From amongst all of Kipling's Six Honest Serving Men, not last or least but first and foremost: Why, oh why?

Alas, perhaps for purpose of outreach and collaboration cofounder recruitment, endeavor at all, towards rational persuasion or even in emotional appeal, only amounts figuratively to barking up the proverbially wrong tree. For those amenable, are already persuaded, and those not, so timid and yet so adamant, never will be. For in the wry assessment of Jonathan Swift: Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired. Or in the biting wit of Dorothy Parker: “You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think.

And yet, perhaps such dismissal remains at all somewhat unfair. Because, in truth, there ever remains indeed sound reason for despair. But crying out to God only remains futile. Because there can be no good answer, no justice or benevolent purpose in the inevitability of needless suffering and vicissitude, frustration so famously condemned by pioneering Existentialist Albert Camus as: The Absurd. For Existential Absurdity remains manifest, not only in the dangerously indifferent universe, not merely from ill fortune and Entropy, but perhaps worse, in human folly, confusion and cruelty. All nevertheless, again to quote Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” And Camus would agree, but perhaps for different reason. Because whereas Disraeli remains ever courageous and hopeful of happiness from positive results and success in life, Camus only motivated by mortal terror management, simply wants to get in any fun before death. For Camus, in condemnation of comforting of religious delusion, never imagined credible scientific and technological Emortalism. Nor indeed of Cryonics alas so Absurdly thwarted, not in any objectively real scientific or engineering feasibility beyond all capacity of creative solution finding, but because of needless and Absurd human incompetence and perversity quite aside from and additionally to the Existential Absurdity of objectively real mortality. Indeed, such blithely disorganized clueless hand waving within the beleaguered community and neglected field of Cryonics: rank and hapless denial, ineptitude in confronting passive-hostile obstruction, persecution, institutional non cooperation and virulent taboo in constructed social reality. Quelle Absurd!

How then, indeed so long and howsoever as we shall live, to undertake any conceivably worthy rôle or even grand gesture in creation of meaning even unreconciled in defiance of mortal terror and Existentially Absurd futility? How best to optimize social and intellectual stimulus struggle? Which is to say: How to wrest any redeeming control of ongoing interaction and experience thereof along the way, in the proverbial journey of life? And let alone whatever figurative destination short of annihilation: results and hoped for success that can never be guaranteed. Not even by Emortality, indefinite longevity, assured survival, and all the time in the world, if only such a thing can ever at last be had. And yet, surely the ultimate probortunity!

Who wants to live forever? What, don't we all? Self loathing mortals, too ashamed to go on living? What can there be more Existentially Absurd than that?!

Seriously, too abstract? Except for survival itself, what can there be more important and concrete that Eudemonia?! Where is the Nietzscheian will to power? Just what is our slavishly paralytic major malfunction and defeatism, if not quite simply mortal terror in the face of the Existentially Absurd? Why else do the masses so fail to rise to responsible initiative together, specifically in order quite simply to brainstorm in Dialectical collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding, more frequently and regularly? —Indeed  most heady and alas currently all too infrequent collaborative brainstorming as perhaps best facilitated via such most conducive, productive and enduring dual creative foci as herein extolled. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

In the near future, emphatically no, not Existentially Absurd futility of Bio-Psychiatry in quest of bio-happiness, not ever more adept and precise psychopharmacology in mortally terrified and fraudulent treatment of mythically endogenous neuro-chemical imbalance, but instead something entirely different and indeed life affirming: Advanced automated Sociometry, Artificially Intelligent and sophisticated personality profiling and matching for optimal compatibility, an innovative and disruptive new social technology subversively infiltrating every walk of life and endeavor, may bring about radical improvement of interpersonal connectivity and interaction. Moreover, improved social embedment, will assure for each individual access to every human and material resource of the wider social network. Thus: In the future, everyone will be influential! Or so the theory goes. Indeed, a likely story, conjecture to persuade candidate recruits on spec and prospective investors alike, of glowing profit potential. But don't all crowd up at once!

However, remaining in the here and now, Eudemonia, which is important meaningful close human relationship with full complicity in psychological visibility in order to penetrate psychological asymmetry, Eros which remains less of co-validation in whatever even superficial similarity, than quite the opposite, transport in liberating union with alien difference, thus forging attachments of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. Therefore, acept no substitutes!

After all, psychological asymmetry simply means that we are not so odd, but only strangers. And so we wallow each in our own pervasive and inexhaustible reservoirs of secret anxiety and vulnerability, never suspecting much the same of others beneath ever crumbling facade of exterior presentation.

How Absurd then, all such ubiquitously clueless disposition to hobble and thwart most cherished value! And how Absurd all the more, so clearly the greatest good so blithely squandered! Wake up, Sheeple! Indeed, anything less than Eudemonia as above propounded, all shabby and Existentially Absurd subterfuge as so routinely foisted upon us all,We the Sheeple, the labor pool of mindless worker drones, remains nothing more or less than a classic blithe propaganda big lie, a surreal fucking fairytale! Indeed, an insult to the intelligence, futile and Existentially Absurd. And that's not your fault! In the alternative, a better theory, indeed a far more likely story or conjecture towards better investment of time and attention: crucial peak experience of Eudemonia, bonding in a life of meaning, through engrossingly purposeful interaction together, convivially substantive communication and even playful psychological visibility, all are elicited nigh unavoidably in the course of heady collaboration among equals, brainstorming in creative solution finding. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! 

And yes, to reiterate: an imperative, a recommendation, even though in any part couched in assertion, which is to say: declarative statement, Ontological claim, salient Empirical observation. So, if all of this still doesn't seem so urgent, then perhaps it simply isn't a priority for you, gentle reader. Seriously: Have you a better option? Then take it! And honestly, how's that been working for you? And thus, no need for picayune peeves and stylistic nit pick. And so, forgive me then, for wasting your precious time and short attention. Otherwise indeed: Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

Gentle reader(s), does then the probortunity at hand appeal and indeed merit as proposed, submission and ratification to agenda for ongoing discussion, deliberation, research, evaluation and feasibility study in collaboration together? Does any moral or ethical quandary present? What other practical real life dramatic obstacles or complications? What are other competing values and serious priorities, perhaps as yet unconsidered? Indeed in all such Dialectic together, bridging abstract and concrete, steadily forging a steering committee coalescing in deliberation upon the priorities and order of business, managing the general course of successive pending operations across the long haul. Explicitly: Let's do some true adulting! Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! 
Make no mistake indeed as regards reading comprehension herein: Too abstract?No, not at all!!Because, explicitly, all sound practical consideration resorts to abstract principle of subject being, just as all sound abstract reasoning must remain ever informed by Empirical practicality actively. Indeed, precisely such is the nature of collaborative brainstorming and solution finding: That abstract thinking yields practical options, after concrete challenges are analyzed abstractly. And so, nothing as preceding remains merely abstract, but a message of vision couched in reasoned persuasion. A call to active collaboration. Sans Inductivist obfuscation, an agenda for deliberation  and planning. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Dare we together take action? 
As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
   
At any risk then of oversimplification: Eudemonia attained through the wonders of brainstorming together, denotes not only that somebody at least conceivably brainstormed their way into Eudemonia together, but in context, clear enough recommendation at least to consider following suit. And thus an imperative, a course of action, may be clearly expressed grammatically, not necessarily in an active verb, but instead via impersonal pseudo-passive (or: prepositional passive) observation, in a declarative statement such as typically employing any near enough synonyms of the verb: 'to be' (herein such as: 'exists,' 'remains,' 'endures,' or: 'becomes'), which is to say: a declarative statement, assertion  or Ontological claim. Therefore: The passive voice is Not to be Feared!
    
For in the wisdom of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.” For anything less becomes senseless and arbitrary. Or does indeed all such glowing exposition as herein proffered, truly remain too abstract, as actually to confuse and obscure the intended imperative, urging and outreach towards action together all thereupon? For in the celebrated words of Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” And famously to quote George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”  Therefore: Change our conversation, reset our agenda, and just maybe, change our world! And all beginning with the star first follower or ally, leading by example. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
 
The rationale: The Capability Approach begins from as herein taken as general bold major premise, the principle that individual substantive freedom to lead a life one has ones own reasons to value, is both the primary end objective and the principle means towards a good life with autonomy and respect. And all depending upon accessibility of whatever needed resources, and will be attainable when human beings are free to chose in actual practice and not merely in theory, indeed really able to attain that which they have reasons to consider important to do or to be or become. For such is the will to power. And we all crave power and agency. 
Alas, so very far from any such uplifting capability. pandemic mass alienation in our time, remains an insular and escalating vicious cycle, a perpetual crisis ever in defense against itself. In the words of Russell Brand: “Society is collapsing and people are starting to recognize that the reason they feel like they’re mentally ill is that they’re living in a system that’s not designed to suit the human spirit.” And this concerns you, gentle reader. So pay attention and stay sharp.
   
Indeed more specifically, to quote from ‘Dancing at Armageddon: Survivalism and Chaos in Modern Times’ by Richard G. Mitchell Jr.: Contemporary life encourages obscurity, makes messengers of many. Words and works pass through us, but are not marked by us. We redirect information, goods and services. We do not create them. We ladle out the textbook content, bolt on the replacement parts, assemble the units manufactured elsewhere, dispense someone else's pills, enforce rules not of our own making on peoples not of our choosing. And repeat other's words. We do not construct culture. At best we maintain it (212)
   
And the not so secretly prayed for collapse of technological civilization, of comfortably oppressive modern infrastructure, must herald a great leap backward. Indeed, all those doomsday preppers, artisans gone off-grid, are not merely gun nuts, but diehard nostalgic Luddites.
   
However, no true recovery of meaning and agency shall ever be found in regressive pipedream. No, not at all. For when we envisage any Heaven on Earth, we do not picture ourselves churning butter or weaving linen in any unsanitary aftermath of global ruin without flush toilets! Not any more than field stripping semiautomatics whilst forever singing hosannas. Fuck no! Our idols of success despite and not because of all worldly direction, rugged nonconformists only tolerated after proving themselves and attaining such hard won authority, and ever so lonely at the top. Indeed such richly deserving latter-day philosopher kings and self-realized Ubermenschen to be admired but never emulated by the masses, those exalted few elite in command of their own destinies and fulfillment, remain the innovators, celebrated creators in artistic imagination or even prime movers in real world organized implementation. They who by their very existence, having paid their dues, demonstrate the very possibility, overcoming and thereby vindicating and redeeming authoritarian heteronomy. Bah, humbug!
     
To say the least, daunting aspiration all so much easier said than done. And there's the rub! So many hit TV shows pander and mock us, serving up vicarious experience not merely of stimulation, adventure and discovery, but in some context of true friendship, profoundly close relationships or situations that so many of us are so very badly missing. Indeed, It is the simulated freedom, challenge, power and achievement in mastery and competence, together with social connection, that explains the addictiveness of multiplayer videogames for so many. And all such realization should be received as a call to action for urgent actual lifestyle changes. True life drama must either advance or falter. After all, how would our heroic avatars, our cherished and celebrated rôle models, rise to the challenge?  
   
Indeed, just perhaps, even for the sorry likes of I and thou and thou, gentle readers, there yet might be an unprecedentedly reciprocal, autonomy supportive and more realistic true path to real salvation. A principled method together at all even even to begin any such vaunted interaction, even at entry level: The FoolQuest.com Master Plan of Do-It-Ourselves entrepreneurship for the rest of us and optimal reciprocal full engagement of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding.
Because as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, respectful, trustworthy, capable and happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And indeed there's the rub!), who are sociable, extroverted, known to reach out and thrive, Talk More Seriously, and all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, such a happiness killer! Indeed, happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, and actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And all by meeting the need for capable interaction, even however ambitious, with responsible others, and not via any chimerical half-baked shared lunatic ideological membership, any more than in mediocre conformity and heteronomy.
   
And no human being can remain woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when, alas as so routinely oppressed  (alas as all so routinely and systematically oppressed and therefore far too  infrequently in the human condition) under liberating circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals. Indeed, as optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and solution finding. And for which the collaborative power and innovation of subversively capable and disruptive dual endeavor as herein extolled, remains precisely so ideal. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” 
Look for the Solution within the Problem! The probortunity at hand, our minor premise, and the problem to be embraced as such a golden opportunity for enhanced individual power and capability as above delineated, ensues: For the probortunity at hand arises in perpetually languishing under such rigid and oppressive heteronomy to hierarchical dominance, that most of the time, routinely and systematically undermines every arising prospect of free and equal collaboration, let alone creative solution finding together.
   
And therefore, with few privileged, fortunate, well situated and happy exceptions, the suffering masses of humanity all present with the same cultural anthropological and evolutionary neurological human condition: Indeed, nothing less than that of ongoing and perpetual pandemic deficiency, malnourishment and withdrawal, from infrequent and meager engagement in collaboration among equals in creative solution finding.
   
Of what moment then, well may one ask, can be such obscure malaise? - an effete whimper of real world anticlimax in Absurd anti-drama and disappointment, and not, to reiterate, any not so secretly longed for dramatically apocalyptic bang... Answer: As shall be seen, nothing trivial. Indeed, because of in the human condition, collaboration among equals in creative solution finding remaining arguably the entire emergent and deeply meaningful point of life as intelligent social animals. Indeed, nothing less than an innate intrinsic capacity and value as manifest from human consciousness giving rise to social and intellectual stimulus struggle. And prevailing frustration whereof presenting predictably with inevitable symptoms of bored and lonely alienation, unfulfilled and futile. Therefore a stifling bane so dire and so helpless, comparable only to that of ever impending mortality itself, the worm at the core of the human condition [William James], thence consequently terror management syndrome and even Deathism. Not to digress.
      
Because in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, the term: social and intellectual stimulus struggle names herein, so long as we shall live, the ongoing perpetual and all too often Quixotic and Absurd yet nevertheless life affirming  striving of all human consciousness, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from the enfolding social environment. Therefore, for unmet friends, the following novel Positive Psychology prescription for authentic wellbeing:  
      
Because to reiterate, no human being can remain so debilitatingly woebegone, powerless, frustrated, unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated when (alas as so routinely oppressed and all far too scarcely and infrequently in the human condition) under liberating circumstances or situation, pleasurably and meaningfully engaged and fulfilled together among equals. Indeed, as optimally and reciprocally so ebulliently sharing eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in brainstorming and solution finding. And for which, as shall be seen as follows, the collaborative power and innovation of subversively capable and disruptive dual endeavor as herein extolled, remains so ideal. Indeed, such lively focus for optimal reciprocal engagement in collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding. Arguably the  most relevant, constructive and compassionate alternative terror management strategy, of course short actually of Emortalism. Again, not to digress.
    
And all because at least pending breakthrough advances in sophisticated automation of Sociometry, the forging of attachments of true friendship in autonomy, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and believe it or not, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve. After all, purposeful interaction and substantive communication are the very essence of of true interpersonal connection, in contrast with debilitatingly insubstantial and meaninglessly vapid emotional junk food and distraction so pivotal in the ceaseless manipulation of pandemic bored and lonely alienation. Anything less than purposeful interaction and substantive communication, rapidly devolves into approval seeking and interminably banal small talk, inevitably cultivating the empty malaise of sycophantic travesty and pandemic serial bullying.
  
Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own. And yet, mere interests and diversions in common, indeed so frequent among misguided criteria of group membership, remain perhaps among the least of determinants of personality profiling and compatibility and all that human beings actually yearn for from one another. Little wonder then, how gifted students, bright, insightful and emotionally sensitive, among their own true gifted peers, mysteriously no longer require that great and good boon of heteronymous socialization, unwelcoming, mediocre, toxic and sanctioned, that emotional violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination, Behavioral Conditioning or most honestly: brainwash. And so, just perhaps, instead of so brutally dumbing down our best and brightest for your own good, dear! can there be no better alternative? Might it not be so much more noble, productive, happier, and in defiance of the ever pervasive and ubiquitous cult of socialization, better to do exactly the opposite throughout life, and continually immerse even the most ordinary people into such interaction as so characteristic of the gifted? — Indeed, thereby cultivating, welcoming and drawing forth each ones own inner giftedness... But of course, all ever remaining so much easier said than done. And all hence The FoolQuest.com Master Plan.
   
Because as Empirically observed in scientific experiments, respectful, trustworthy, capable and happy people, whom we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we could ever fathom precisely how (And there's the rub!), who are sociable, extroverted, known to reach out and thrive, Talk More Seriously, and all with so much less of all that inane, incessant, boring and superficial small talk, such a happiness killer! Indeed, happy people remain more likely to choose creative activities, seek new achievements, and thereby uplift their own thoughts and emotions, and actually known to achieve greater success and even to make more money. And all by meeting the need for capable interaction with responsible others. But of course, all ever remaining so much easier said than done. And all hence The FoolQuest.com Master Plan.

 

 

 

Probortunity at hand: A world of pervasive alienation.
 
Alas that  all so very far, far away from any pursuit of happiness and meaning of life, for all so many, conformity upon all whatever known and howsoever reputable, well traveled and readily available, institutionalized and prepackaged conventional life and career paths, remains so disappointing, pointlessly arduous, futile and meaningless. In short: Existentially Absurd, and a sore travail! Indeed probortunity, dire problem presenting golden opportunity.
    
And it will be perhaps thence, that there remains so vastly underserved, such a vast and popular yearning for unparalleled positive experience of any life less ordinary. For power, self determination, capability, dignity, freedom, acceptance among peers with shared core values. And therefore in the words of Arthur H. Vandenberg: “It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity.” Opportunity afforded one another, by honest and interested effort at collaboration among equals.
   
In such ardent quest then for any such alternative opportunity, all entirely applicable due and realistic fair warning is extended in the above alarmingly bleak solicitation. And all as regarding the downside to all such call to adventure off from the beaten path, indeed at cost of whatever kind of individual personal effort and resource. And even all quite aside from all additional extra heartbreak from nigh inevitable and eventual betrayal, dishonest untrustworthy folly or mendacity. Beware then the 18 Easy Ways to Destroy trust. But not to digress.
    
Perhaps what remains so glamorously elusive and yearned for, are some imagined lives of power, opportunity, challenge, ambition and creativity amid some vibrant new cabal of aspiring artists, wannabe entrepreneurs and perpetually excitable mad inventors! Because Americans after all, are each ascendant undiscovered genii, temporarily bankrupted billionaires, rightful Masters of the Universe. And we are all Americans at heart.
   
     • The Top 10 Things People Want In Life But Can’t Seem To Get - - “I can't get no...”
    
And so, we are each and all exhorted and tantalized: Follow your bliss!” Existentially Absurd empty blandishment, hand waving and broken promise all easier said than done, as we are all then summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices, setup for failure and sore travail. But now, gentle reader, at last we have found one another, and no dream must remain solitary. Therefore let every joy become shared and doubled, no burden shouldered alone, but shared and halved.

As Edward Snowden so penetratingly observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Indeed, to quote  Senator Elizabeth Warren: Others have said it before me. If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu.” Why then must it continue to register as any shock to so many, the very idea that there may remain not only whatever personal human imperfection, various defects, flaws and foibles of individual personality and character, great and small, but also the most intractably severe and pervasive systemic problems and stumbling blocks out there in society at large? As if the very notion of such stock iconoclasm, where actually anything new!

Why then must the masses,We the Sheeple, the supposed end users of democracy in the free market of ideas, so abjectly fail to coordinate and rise to responsible initiative together, even firstly simply just to imagine better? In the words of Stanley Kubrick: “However vast the darkness, we must bring our own light.” Because given heteronomy remains ever dark and futile, all pretense aside, shedding no light whatsoever. In the words of Fyodor Dostoevsky: “The best way to keep a prisoner from escaping is to make sure he never knows he's in prison.” -Or indeed, any sort of social institution at all, formal or informal, rather than the obvious unquestioned natural way of human nature and circumstances or situation.

And when only sly and manipulative oppression keeping us all in the dark, has been the only binding shared experience at all, and then the bitter truth of it comes to light, how then shall one ever thence be set free except into crushing boredom and loneliness? Who then shall dare the escape? And what example to all others thus shall thereby be set? Indeed, in any alternative, how instead, gentle reader(s) might we rise together? Without task interdependent teamwork rediscovered and reinvented together, what solitary jailbreak can there be, from the prison of lonely isolation? As ever, we shall only find ourselves summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices. And typically in one fashionable guise or another, to ever the same Mystical mendacity and cowardly bogus lonely tough love of the Zen. To making do and fading away alone, stiff upper lip and troubling no one else. Bah, humbug!

And so, as my own boss, more confident in my ideas than my capability, I have fired myself for utter failure and gross incompetence in the sore travail of life! To quote Carl Gustav Jung: "Loneliness does not come from having no people about one, but from being unable to communicate to others the things that seem important to oneself, or from holding certain views which others find inadmissible . . . If a man knows more than others, he becomes lonely." Indeed, in the words of Anton Chekhov “People who lead a lonely existence always have something on their minds that they are eager to talk about.” And I'm no different. Nevertheless, why should the present long winded mass of verbiage from an unemployable maladroit nebbish with a cable modem the likes of yours truly, ever be of any interest to anyone? To answer such an unkind and snobbish question to begin with (and for shame!), with another by far more salient question and cautionary: If anyone doesn't want you to talk with me, gentle reader, then what don't they want anyone the likes of me to tell anyone else indeed the likes of you? Plenty, as it turns out!  We really should compare notes. Indeed, to quote from ‘The Devil's Dictionary’ by Ambrose Bierce: Friendless. Having no favors to bestow. Destitute of fortune. Addicted to utterance of truth and common sense.”

A parable: Imagine a seminar upon of all things, and strained metaphor just for contrivance of illustration, how to form a regulation Bedrock barefoot bowling team. The great regulation bowling team formation guru, perhaps none other than The Dude Lebowski, regales the acolytes enthralled, with great purls of wisdom! And the attendees assembled together share all manner of sensitive personal disclosure, reciprocally sworn to silence once the seminar adjourns. Because what happens and all that is said at the regulation bowling team formation seminar, stays at the regulation bowling team formation seminar. So solemnly vow do they all. And from the regulation bowling team organizing guru, no less than The Dude Lebowski, they all learn the purportedly foolproof secrets towards each their similar objectives. Afterwards, eyes henceforth forever averted, they all quietly disperse, each once again alone, filing out into the dark night of the soul, never to interact again, each having girded their loins for the solitary and arduous networking and recruitment outreach at hand. Yes, once again so blithely led about by the nose, flagrantly manipulated and then finding ourselves summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices.

 
And nobody at all even seems to have noticed that there were exactly enough people in the room right then and there, for the formation of a regulation bowling team! Easier said than done of course, but then, what isn't? Superficially committed to such manic pep rallies encouraging one another, yet in subtext only inflicting such reciprocal contempt, what succor will ever rally and penetrate such abysmal defeat and indolent covert masochism?  Yaba-daba-don't!
The moral of the story? First of all, most superficially, the clever maxim:

But more profoundly, beyond any such glib infotainment sound bite clickbait, there ever remains forWe the Sheeple, the more dire predicament of the masses: How we are each and all exhorted and tantalized: Follow your bliss!” Empty blandishment and lip service, hand waving and broken promise all easier said than done, as dazed, confused and quite understandably even actually consumed with mistrust at the mercy of every random cult scam, busy work, (Anti)Social Media distraction, dissipation, and pacifying bogus support group ethos, all as even however reputable, we all then find ourselves once again summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices (In more ways than one!) and blithely setup for failure, particularly in anything individually meaningful. Nothing works! Not only the most hapless and broken, and knaves and fools especially, or even the most ordinary and average, but especially our best and brightest, so often meet only with such desperate failure and frustration. And yet, the system never fails: You fail the system! Or so it is said. Bah, humbug!

Alas, as so many people complain, when they reach out for connection, others do not seem equally interested. Typical social life remains a lonely chore and a bore of mindless conformity and approval seeking. There remains an outcomes gap! Meaning that it makes such little difference whatever one tries to do. And yet, many even who suffer the most, continue to profess conformism, commitment to normative  challenge, and undying faith in status quo. But some are more serious than others. There are some that walk the talk, and most who don't. Some rigorous and actively systematic, and the rest only wrapped up in lip service and passive pretense. Either way, they all balk at facing the the same crushing reality. And only unflinching situation analysis as undertaken herein, might possibly reveal any proportion and necessity of going so far a field as herein proposed, presently. Or first of all, even simply discussing the matter seriously!

TicTok, TicTok, Worse Than You Thought! As Marshall McLuhan would have it: The medium is the message For characteristics of whatever medium constitute message in their own right, the implication whereof so easily overlooked, at least at first. And yet, it may often come to pass, that as in the words of Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr: “plus ça change, plus c’est la męme chose – the more things change, the more they remain the same… Indeed, never forget that Facebook only began as the IT (Information Technology) for the worst venial and Narcissistic aspects of the most braindead collegiate life. A culture taking the lead from insecure conniving bullies like unto wounded and bleeding piranhas, ever ready to turn upon one another in the blink of an eye.

Indeed, isolating and unfulfilling short attention (Anti)Social Media could never become so seductive and unwholesome, without the long preceding heteronomy to anti-intellectual anti-intraceptive susceptibility under lifelong prevailing hierarchical dominance. And therefore as shall become abundantly clear, and technology notwithstanding, they who suffer so, are not punished for their superficiality, but by their own short attention superficiality. Indeed, in such blithe incongruity: Even while like John Milton, indeed lamenting such loneliness they endure, as “the first thing that God's eye nam'd not good,” just indeed the very worst no good awful thing! yet so staunchly do they cleave to the toxic and toadying First Commandment of the ubiquitous cult of socialization: Being that interminably vapid small talk, empty and polite conversation drifting upon unimportant or uncontroversial matters, not even very entertaining, ever keeping it light and willfully cheerful, ever remains key to life, popularity and social success. The suffering of the multitudes is scorned and dismissed with the bullying admonition to lighten up! And those poor dolts embrace and take to heart such cruel and callous invalidation as greatest purl of wisdom. Be seeing you, Number 6. They have joined the enemy against themselves.

Under so many guises of ideology, from anciently clichéd Zen Mystical tripe of sublime apathy in non attachment, to the latest word in malignant Behavior Modification into Fascist exaltation and even the smug would-be Machiavellian but covertly Masochistic indolence of (Anti)Social Media culture, only the same oppressor of so many faces, cajoles us all never so shamefully to feel, think or complain and rock the boat. And that is why, in those most famous words of Henry David Thoreau: The mass of men lead lives of [such] quiet desperation. Or at the very least when griping, never actually mean any of it! So, smile when you call out the the bullies, just to show that we're all still Facebook friends! One fine day, quite effort free and without strife or good trouble, without any challenging need of character and strength or moral fiber, advanced and sophisticated Automated Sociometry will have long superseded all such rotten travesty of society and the human condition as do we all endure. But in the meantime, here and now, the true thorny path at long last, to CyberUtopian salvation, is yet to emerge from the most technologically convenient path of least social resistance. And certainly not via short attention manipulative Totalitarian Interactivity. Wake up, Sheeple! Because any true key to life must pivot upon struggle and only the awakening of integrity from unique individually motivating core values:  

 

 

 

    
                 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Desperately seeking prospective collaboration cofounder candidates
The various uplifting psychosocial and strategic benefits to authentic wellbeing and human flourishing
as projected from implementation of the present proposal
 
 
Would the  FoolQuest.com online (pre)incubation collaboratory and Action Salon be right for you?
  Then let us build it together! But what would that take? And what shall be required of participants? And why even bother?
 
Three compelling questions of relatable drama, as in life, ever endure:
   Save us all from the banality and sore travail of conventional expectations! Who needs the grief? When all else fails, what has actually been desired all along?
 
 
But why must such intensive creativity actually become so crucial? Indeed, many will regard creativity in very principle, as entirely superfluous and distracting, at best merely ornamental. Indeed, it may bear mention how sometimes espoused in remedial Behavior Modification and rehab, is the recommendation merely of consistent participation in ongoing long term projects even at all much more arbitrarily, and with precious little challenge to much creativity. Indeed somewhat philistine and cretin, yet entirely cut-and-dry and feasible though banal and boring drudgery. Such as, for example: community gardening, providing behavioral structure of regularly scheduled activity and association sustaining propinquity while also producing any ongoing interaction and sense of involvement to draw participants together. Such much. A travesty of the rôle of gardening in the ideal and intentional community of Epicurus. And yet, the somewhat uninspiring recommendation nevertheless does point halfway towards what is actually so sorely needed, in focus therein upon active ongoing cooperation. To bad it's all so tedious and onerous, boring to tears, unless indeed one so adores gardening! But its easy to see why anything so readily accessible and straightforward may be deemed more simple and feasible for Sheeple such as We. Because The devil is in the details, Eudemonia, anything more ambitious and uplifting, forging true friendship attempting  anything really cool together, demands greater initiative and responsibility and therefore must require such meticulous perseverance and autonomy, polymath multipotential cross discipline. And no one foresees aręte, excellence, from underachieving losers reaching out for help. They forget how our best and brightest frequently underachieve. They ignore the crying needs not only of the gifted, but of fulfillment in universal human inner giftedness in the human condition for us all.
  
At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants. But well may one ask: Why go to such lengths? Why so rashly together embark upon such arduous and complicated real life Hero's Journey? Why pine for life less ordinary? Why not just chill and go with  flow? Why needlessly raise expectations of forging true friendship attempting  anything really cool together? Why even dignify outlandish notions with serious deliberation together?

We are all such proverbial square pegs: The customer is always wrong! The program never fails, you fail the program. Cut the foot to fit the shoe! Bah, humbug! In truth, to quote Anthony Marra: “Work isn’t meaningful just because you spend your life doing it.” Indeed, in the immortal observations of George Carlin: "Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit.” And lately, the masses are just up and quitting! By contrast, our designated rôle models in every conventional option in life, exemplars of approval seeking sycophantic predictive social cognition under heteronomy to hierarchical dominance, the star student under formal education, ideal employee, perfect disciple or model prisoner alike, are all so consummately well adapted, ever so heteronymously characterized as they remain, beyond mere responsive obedience and passivity otherwise, not only by every obsessive-compulsive eager beaver sore travail, but boundlessly committed initiative in anticipation of their superior's desires, paying one's dues life long, excelling without complaint or resistance, never demanding attention by requesting explanation or assistance.

And why can't we all just submissively follow their shining example and be more like them? Because, just as George Carlin implies, we all so chafe at the bit! Recalcitrant in such sore travail, obstinately uncooperative toward mind numbing routine as imposed by ever coercive and manipulative self-servingly moralizing authority, all too many typically succumb to ambivalence expressed in resentful and reluctant obedience together with covert passive hostile sabotage, instead of actually choosing between either dignified and whole hearted active compliance on the one hand, or else free and open fully effective proletariat uprising on the other hand. And such remains damaged human nature not by innate disposition, but as triggered in suffering and humiliated response to norms of sore travail, deviously guilt tripping tyranny psychologically internalized. In short: inner conflicted ambivalence and headgames of slave Moralism.

A parable: Imagine a seminar on how to form a regulation bowling team. The great regulation bowling team formation guru, perhaps none other than The Dude Lebowski, regales the acolytes enthralled, with great purls of wisdom! And the attendees assembled together share all manner of sensitive personal disclosure, reciprocally sworn to silence once the seminar adjourns. Because what happens and all that is said at the regulation bowling team formation seminar, stays at the regulation bowling team formation seminar. So solemnly vow do they all. And from the regulation bowling team organizing guru they learn the purportedly foolproof secrets towards each their similar objectives. Afterwards, eyes henceforth forever averted, they all quietly disperse, each once again alone, out into the dark night of the soul, never to interact again, each having girded their loins for the solitary and arduous networking and recruitment outreach at hand.

And nobody at all even seems to have noticed that there were exactly enough people in the room right then and there, for the formation of a regulation bowling team! Easier said than done of course, but then, what isn't? Any notion of organizing, of intentional group formation, if not utterly ignored, is typically oversimplified so that the weak effort, stillborn, only drifts apart, entirely forgotten. Any serious innovation of intentional interaction by design, of tailor made social contract, remains unheard of. A paradox: The weird ineffectual alienated paradigm and etiquette as so pervasively appropriated from bogus support group culture, remains almost like unto a sort of one night stand, though even as a regular event. In truth, there persists a temerity and imperative of nonattachment, born from a lack of trust amongst the very strangers and the very anonymity so relied upon for the secret intimacy of safe disclosure, somehow risk free, and without personal investment.

And the moral of the story? Only begging the question: In order to remedy loneliness, shall each of us do better to strive alone in the world at large, or to turn to one another? Do lonely people require access and inclusion up the social ladder with better socially graceful and situated peers? Or perhaps in order ever to remedy loneliness, do lonely people first require to find inclusion and access merely with one another, even actual assistance and partnership, true friendship in imperfection, even just amongst ourselves? The cult of socialization, ever striving for inclusion and access up the social ladder with popular kids who don't actually need more hangers on, remains the ardent supplication for acceptance and approval from those better advantaged. Whereas instead, so often overlooked in the mad dash for social skills and correct performance in heteronomy to hierarchically predictive social aptitudes, there remains an obvious alternative being: endeavor at inclusion and access for lonely people, simply with one another, even merely as an outreach just perhaps not only for solace and commiseration, but maybe even for highly functional cooperation in any similar common struggle.

But as Aesop tells us: "A man is known by the company he keeps.“ And even aside from malicious gossip and the social risk of ill repute by association, the actual psychological danger remains of toxic Ulterior Transactions or: headgames, and only playing upon one another's flaws, thereby exacerbating dysfunction and holding one another back, thus indeed only reflecting poorly upon one another.

Which strategy then must best take precedence? In answer: Trustworthy capable individuals value the same in others. And likewise, callow popular kids ever committed to the social rat-race, are impressed by outwards exhibition of community and popularity. All hence, the demonstration of capable and competent cooperation, even amongst similarly downtrodden and forgotten peers, must afford a first upward step in assimilation with anyone else better off and presumably more useful. Indeed the first trustworthy step of creditable Menschlichkeit in order favorably impress allay the responsible caution of the wealthy, powerful and influential, in order thereby to gain access to their resources and connections, remains the salient demonstration to candidate recruits and prospective investors alike, of capable collaboration among equals. Alas that lonely isolated people can only strategize in terms of lone striving. However, true probortunity remains, never merely of individual wherewithal, but of teamwork, and of how then might we more congenially, productively and effectively cooperate; friendship arising entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in substantive communication towards purposeful interaction, and nothing less. And no one else need approve! 

Cynically manipulative social advice online typically ranges from the domineering to the sycophantic. But always unilateral, never touching upon any notion of cooperation. Alas however, tautologically, there can be no unilateral solitary lonely DIY self-help or self-improvement of relationship, of human interaction as by definition involving more than one person. Thus ordinary conformity so often remains such a monumental waste of time. Heteronymous conventional distant, Existentially Absurd and oppressively empty superficial social life and short attention all remain, as with rare exception, no less desperately alienated than typical situation of formal education and employment whereby sensibility even off the clock, is most prevalently and markedly informed. And all becoming similarly another chore and a bore, just crushingly dull. And all of that so completely fails the masses of humanity because quite simply, and yet again, social success remains irrelevant to actually staving off loneliness. To reiterate, capability, important close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arises entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. And no one else need approve! Therefore, accept no substitutes!  

After all, popularity and ever facile and distant social success, ever remain antithetical to true friendship, because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Alas that all too often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And if as we have all been so frequently and blithely admonished, indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, cagey, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectually subservient path of popularity and social success, remains antithetical to true friendship which by contrast must remain ever open, genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated after all, upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Indeed, increasing distance, bullying and and mounting social exclusion, is all well known precursor to betrayal, never at all any glistening hallmark of secure social embedment.

The begged question then remains: Precisely how is genuine friendship ever supposed to emerge from such prevalent, well known and understood social expectations of typical paranoid distance and facile triviality and interminably banal small talk? In truth, that can never happen! And it's not your fault! Indeed, this is by design, alienation baked in, a sore travail! Indeed, even most anciently in the repressively totalitarian curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test and filter in favor of heteronomy and conformity by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society.

Indeed, as the consummate authoritarian Plato's beloved free thinking mentor Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being.  Because ongoing purposeful and substantive communication is no reward, objective or desired end result of compliance and diligent social skills of good little girls and boys, but a barest beginning in autonomy for serious individuals. And yet instead, so many, remaining ever emotionally invested in false promise of prevailing common sense and heteronomy, amounting only to manipulative empty pandering propaganda for status quo, good little girls and boys therefore balk at the Empirically obvious, stubbornly ignoring objective reality, only forever to soldier on in such abject futility.  

And there can be no call to mince words on that score, because I am no motivational grifter here to tickle your ears, psych you up, and then leave you in the lurch. As the Yiddish saying goes: “If hard work was so wonderful, the rich would keep it all for themselves.” After all, in the words of J. M. Barrie: “Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.” Or to quote: Maxim Gorky: “When work is pleasure, life is joy! When work is a duty, life is slavery. The agenda at hand remains a difficult lifestyle proposition for sober deliberation together. And the learning curve even of the most initial and cursory feasibility study remains so arduous and dauntingly steep and never simple, The devil in the details. Imagine then: Would it be any fun?

Subjective happiness, beyond individual disposition alone, remains a reactive state variable of inner life, responsive to favorable external circumstances as arising, situation in objective reality amenable to investigation, strategy and feasibility study. But defeatism balks at ambition and difficulty. In perhaps the most famous and celebrated words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” FoolQuest.com remains my own subversive Message in a Bottle cast upon the cyber seas, frustrated outreach indeed for thoughtful committed citizens, unreasonable people, desperately sought for collaboration cofounder candidates, heroes, allies setting forth upon the true to life Hero's Journey, forging true friendship attempting  anything really cool together. For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done. Important close human interaction, relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arises entirely as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. And no one else need approve! Therefore, accept no substitutes!
 
The aphorism remains variously accredited: The Secret of Getting Ahead Is Getting Started. And the barest beginning remains the initiation of serious sustained ongoing strategic yet analytical discussion: Presented then herein for open discussion to the agenda for any and all interested parties, what follows in ever more wordy presentation, remains nothing less than outreach in standing solicitation. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! Apply now to join right in, at least in preliminary deliberation as proposed to agenda.
 
Because, in the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” Because status quo grows ever more profoundly untenable and impractical. Because of the obvious and well known great appeal to so many, in both or either aforesaid liberating creative endeavors. And towards implementation, any realistic better idea would still remain subject to project planning and feasibility study, interesting, challenging and worth the effort together. Or else failing that, might still at least serve as pleasurably meaningful and engaging premise for unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, even just for fun. And because of ever mounting frustration, futility, setup for failure, user hostile outcomes gap, sore travail of pandemic alienation, boredom and loneliness in perpetual struggle to meet conventional expectations in an ever changing world. Because heteronomy to conventional socialization falls so far behind real motivating intrinsic human fulfillment. Important close relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arise entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and truly never otherwise. And no one else need approve! Therefore, accept no substitutes! Because everything that we've been taught about how to get along, remains nothing more than a manipulative classic big lie. And the defect remains fundamental such that there can be no quick fix or workaround.
 
 
 
 
Probortunity begins in bold unflinching
situation analysis and problem statement
 

FoolQuest.com is not yet another short attention website for manipulative Totalitarian Interactivity perpetually leading the casual website visitor safely about by the nose. Only whatever most remarkable self directed unique individual motivation howsoever piquing whatever lively yet comforting vested self-interest, Existential Validation or relatable concern, gravitas or whimsy, has ever delivered intelligible purpose and context for the present densely verbose hypertext asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what no one else offers. As a rule, others neither so urgently solicit nor offer partnership in ambitious endeavor. At least, not seriously. And yet, such must be the inception of any true to life Hero's Journey asking what no one else does, and daring to offer in return, what no one else offers, and whereof, leave us admit, we each and all, however benumbed, secretly await the mythic call to adventure. For such is the human condition of perpetual stimulus struggle. Of course, intellectual adventure of reading and discussion, free exploration into the world of ideas, does seem perhaps the least perilous of transaction. What can it hurt? Surely there will be greater risks in life.

Indeed, as according to Aristotle, happiness has an agenda, an agenda remaining contingent upon the exercise but also the communication of the meaningful values of imagination, free will, personal choice, independence, competence and achievement, together with connection, self awareness and conscience informed by rationality. Moreover, happiness is not merely and actively experienced, but interactive expression and response, affiliation and shared enthusiasm. And that is why even the journey of ongoing strategic discourse in earnest seeking happiness, can already be so involving and uplifting. Alas however, even so little as any substantive communication much less purposeful interaction, despite remaining as ever crucial, can never be compelled. One can but extend invitation. And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation, gentle reader, asking of others what no one else does, and offering in return, what no one else offers.

Indeed, in the biting whit of Dorothy Parker: “You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think." In such frequent demonstration of quantity over quality, online discussion predominantly remains ever repetitive and redundant, meager signal ever drowning out amid the din and clamor of all that empty noise. FoolQuest.com, instead undertaking various neglected discourse, anything less effete and dissipated, thereby ever blunders upon no end of fresh new taboo for the squeamish so studiously to ignore. Nevertheless, in order to advocate for change, in order to demonstrate the urgency, it remains necessary to expose the normalization of deviance and the worst of all that has become so routine.

Again to quote Russell Brand: “Society is collapsing and people are starting to recognize that the reason they feel like they’re mentally ill is that they’re living in a system that’s not designed to suit the human spirit.”  Indeed by design discovered to scientific investigation, qualitatively domineering and oppressive, systematically crushing of human spirit. Because from very premise, Cultural Anthropology studies human relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, all predicated upon competencies and aptitudes of hierarchically predictive social cognition by which to anticipate the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships and prediction of future behavior and in order to know what one is expected to do and how to behave. After all, from prehistory and up to the present day, every hierarchical structure has evolved from that of the clan or extended family. And there's the rub!

Gentle reader, only look around you: Society is not your friend. Society is the enemy. Society is the oppressor. Society is not nurturing. Society remains user hostile. Catch-22, a classic double bind, a no-win setup for failure and suffering, one way or the other: damned if you do, damned if you don't! We are all slowly bored to death, unseen and and interminably lonely. Alas, the prospects instead for better fulfillment remain dismal for designated worker drones slaving under the perpetual grinding sore travail of heteronomy to behavioral conditioning, all cogs in the machine, formal education and typical corporate culture of employment, fostering admiration, but never emulation, of those lionized men and women of destiny rising only actually despite the system, overcoming adversity, and then effectively quarantined and lonely at the top. And for wretches such as we, there must be no ready escape at all from the only dull and sorry game in town! For such remains the banal rank hypocrisy of glowing lip service to independence while fostering helplessness and dependency of befuddled masses yearning to breath free! What then is liberty, freedom so alluring yet forbidden, taboo, that nevertheless all people so yearn and strive for? Freedom whether in creative expression or effective action. Freedom of association, self esteem and more. How is freedom actually experienced? By what values? And most importantly, what must we do, I and thou, gentle reader, to win our freedom, liberty to pursue happiness? Can we organize? Should we? And how so?

Thus, from top to bottom, indeed at every strata and walk of life, again to quote Russell Brand: “Society is collapsing and people are starting to recognize that the reason they feel like they’re mentally ill is that they’re living in a system that’s not designed to suit the human spirit.” Alas, in Existentially Absurd social reality, there remains such dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, wherein instrumentality equals zero, meaning, even causally and deterministically, no relationship between performance and outcome, no real hope, no results no matter what one does, other than mounting frustration and defeat. So much then, it might seem, for individual real world freedom and capability. In every walk of life, in every sphere of endeavor, personal or professional, society is no conduit to success, but a filter of the incompetent and noncompliant alike and without distinction, a crushing and threatening obstacle course to be overcome, an unremitting chore and a bore, setup for failure; thus to self-esteem, a proverbial death by a thousand cuts. And any claims to the contrary, are just part of the racket. Indeed, from any end user standpoint, the existing system has remained broken from time immemorial. Alas the masses abide in false hope from blinding propaganda myth. And what a racket! A racket, no matter how repitable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many.

 

 

We are all exhorted and tantalized: Follow your bliss! Empty blandishment and broken promise easier said than done, as we are all then summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices, so bereft of respectful autonomy supportive social support and thereby capability, thus setup for failure. And so, whilst pragmatically making do and fitting in, we each and all meanwhile secretly await the call to some yearned for true to life Hero's Journey. For such remains the human condition of perpetual stimulus struggle against lonely boredom, secretly and shamefully miserable and unhappy, even amid affluence and secure civil society. And lone individual emulation of whatever success rôle model as per the formulae of various success gurus, so often meets with inertia and frustration in isolation, because human interaction fails to progress, change or improve. Because tautologically, there can be no self-help, no solitary rugged self-reliant unilateral self-made bootstrap "well-formed plan," for interaction among more than one individual. As the saying goes: It takes two to tango. But one alone, wanders ever searching like Diogenes, a sore travail.
 
Alas that so many nevertheless balk, remaining so clueless and bereft of any proverbial grain of salt, too desperate to let go of various fraudulent false hopes and propaganda so foisted upon us all. For such are the dynamics of conditionality, meaning conditional love, buttressed by systematic indoctrination, brainwash, denial and crimestop. Nevertheless, what to do, if all such dynamics remain anything more prevalent than merely some strange malignancy of whatever marginal bizarre cults? What if cults only reflect anything howsoever actually somewhat common, normalization of deviance ever prevalent? Where then does that leave any of us?

In the much beloved fairytale parable and metaphor authored by Hans Christian Anderson, 'The Emperor's New Suit,' the titular Emperor desired only to be ever fashionable and well dressed. One day he came under the sway of his new tailors, actually swindlers who persuaded the Emperor to don new vestments of an amazing gossamer light new fabric, visible only to the worthy, so that the unworthy, thereby exposed, ferreted out and failing the test, may be well banished, once and for all.

But in actuality, the  Emperor only stood stark naked, just daring anyone to remark! As ever, many so lowly and loyal among Sheeple, ever most faithful and exploited among the masses, surely believed without hesitation, simpletons, useful innocents  ever embracing flagrant delusion wholeheartedly. Although, in truth, various sly cynical privileged courtiers and hypocritical cronies, ever motivated in well considered vested interest, with comfort and survival at stake for the families they support and protect, as ever remaining circumspect, proverbially pivoting into whatever figurative direction the allegorical wind metaphorically blows, adult and responsible, so vigorously went along with the gag and staunchly conformed.

Under such an oppressively corrupt reward and punishment system, a mad world of blind folly and cynical mendacity, inevitably any honest person, by disposition stripped of all such protective armor of distasteful denial, shall only then find themselves metaphorically naked and exposed before the Existentially Absurd, all alone and railing against the inequity and therefore excluded, indeed forever banished. Because truth to power in subversion of hierarchy, threatens status quo.

To quote Nazi Reich Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels: Propaganda becomes ineffective, the moment we become aware of it. To whit: what if in all too many ways, the general and indistinct common wisdom of mainstream social reality and order, with only a modicum of perspective in autonomy, stands so shockingly denuded, in effect, as after all, merely yet another weird cult granfalloon membership and practice? - Indeed the pervasive and reputable short attention memplex sometimes designated as: the cult of socialization.

For while empathy is by nature ever receptive, by contrast that great and good boon from our ever gracious betters, socialization, that which none dare call: indoctrination, Behavioral Conditioning or brainwash, remains ever dull and unreceptive, rejecting, dishonest, manipulative and coercive. After all, propaganda can be unintentional. Not all propaganda is deliberate influence. Indeed, unthinking tradition and propaganda are everywhere. For the organization of methods to persuade people to think and behave in a certain way, have themselves long become entirely spontaneous and endemic to social order. And indeed, such is complacent heteronomy, oppression propagating among the oppressed. Shall anyone thus growing ever more desperately entrenched in heteronomy, ever finally arrive at Positive Disintegration?
  
Alas that under heteronomy, there may ever arise indeed significant danger motivating interminable caginess: Before daring even to begin any interaction, always heed the cautionary lesson of the ever more exhausting callow (anti)social media mass distraction and the empty illusion of social life: Will, not only as in (anti)social media participation, but in the social rat-race most generally, extra effort and involvement actually derive extra value and purpose, or only become ever more squandered? That is the question!
  
In the latter calculation, then there will be no reason for concern. Safest always just to walk away, even to refuse the quest and leave the Hero's Journey stillborn. Nothing ventured, nothing lost. In that case, then grumbling can only arise from doubt and remorse, so frequently triggered, manipulated and exploited. Remorse, ever so dramatic, as ever accrues from disappointment, beaten defeat and failure to rise to occasion as life passes by. Nothing ventured, therefore nothing gained but enduring regret. Everything turns upon evaluation of probortunity in transaction, all turning upon the importance of vastly neglected intrinsic human appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle.

Existentially Absurd: Popular or unpopular alike, we all remain so ill equipped, each and all abandoned to our own devices, setup for failure, futility, user hostile outcomes gap, sore travail, pandemic boredom and loneliness. The only winning move is not to play! But for so many of us, it's the only game in town! And precisely hence such urgent need of implementation towards any new and better alternatives. But with creativity and innovation, looms danger and uncertainty. Hence prevailing resistance. Indeed, even successful innovation, so hard won, readily transitions into new orthodoxy resistant to further change. Because popularity and unpopularity alike, are only different situations of individual isolation and oppression, the isolation and even sheer abuse of unpopularity and social exclusion being more overt, and the exploitation of popularity within the social rat-race being by far the more devious. And such is the status quo of pandemic serial bullying, escape wherefrom propelling the true to life Hero's Journey.

 
In the words of Neil Gabler: “American society is a society in which individuals have learned to prize social skills that permit them, like actors, to assume whatever rôle the occasion demands and to "perform" their lives rather than just live them. And forced cheerful willful positivity and interminably vapid small talk notwithstanding, a morbidly serious matter. Nothing could ever be less playful. Competent or incompetent, whether in true hardnosed practicality or in sheer aimless and empty actingout of mimesis, many all the same remain no less consumed with the burning question of how to perform as expected and to fit in: How best to placate The Great Faceless They, thereby to obtain the key to life.
  
For such remains the heteronymous slave mentality of Homo Domesticus, the domesticated human being. And so,We the Sheeple, ever desperate and terrified of loneliness and exclusion, remain ever vested in endless sacrifice of authenticity upon that Moloch alter of social acceptance. For anything less remains the height of blasphemy! Or so one might expect. And yet all rebuke herein must come as no surprise, nothing new, all such clichéd iconoclasm having so long dissipated all shock value and element of surprise. That is, until the point will be driven home, to reiterate,, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, that relationship and particularly friendship, arise entirely as a byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise.  And no one else need approve! The only thing to sacrifice, shall be sacrifice itself.

 

And lo, the star first follower or ally, first to publicly recognize by fully interacting with the hitherto misunderstood and isolated lone dissident innovator, shall be the true leader and influencer blazing the trail, teaching by subversive example, demonstrating for others how to participate, rôle models showing everyone how to relate, bridging abstract and concrete. For any lonesome frustrated desire and outreach tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, desperately sought for unmet friends. Therefore: Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and change the world!  And because, when theory by itself, however sound, yet remains less than compelling promotionally out in the wild, the live demonstration online, public electronic conversation,  the brilliance on display, of ongoing work product from collaboration, published to the Web, may yet the more effectively entice and recruit others at long last to participate and join in. For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, outreach for unmet friends. Desperately seeking all therefore, the star first follower or ally!

Desperately seeking: first of all, persistent and open minded conversationalists upon the agenda at hand. Who out there might actually be prevailed upon with the requisite wherewithal? Indeed, should you, gentle reader, then yet at all decide indeed for whatever your own good reasons, to persevere and continue navigation of FoolQuest.com, then never simmer in deadlock and frustration. Because as the saying goes, no question is too foolish to ask, and no answer too wise to be given. Therefore question freely in case of incomprehension. Because even incomprehension is nothing so dreadful or awkward, no menace to be so assiduously avoided, no dire impasse at all, not the end, but actually a beginning. For communication is struggle. After all, writing is rewriting and never a waste of time. But there is method toward the achievement of Intersubjectivity, whereof intrinsic motivation and Active Reading remain ever crucial. And thank you, gentle reader, unmet friend. Because we live in an attention economy. And in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. Therefore in the immortal words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.And to quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest.”     

Desperately seeking: responsible trustworthy partners for innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us. For the possibilities remain endless!

And desperately seeking: earnest participants in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing. Because, as to be expounded and detailed anon, rising to the challenge before us, may very much depend upon a subversive and hitherto unprecedented interstitial synergy concurrently between pure creativity, art for art's sake as embodied in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing, and disruptive innovation, applied creativity as of new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us. Because intelligence squandered, must no longer isolate: Creativity can and Should be Social! Indeed, Creativity Can and Should be Popular! 

Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire. Indeed, only beware cross-purpose!     

Desperately seeking: cofounder candidates, in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, in true subversive Epicurean cultivation of freedom, friendship and thought, relationship in new paradigm via Intentional community or just intentional social circle by social engineering design; for better optimized social and intellectual stimulus struggle via ongoing collaboration among equals, pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement intrinsic to fulfillment, authentic wellbeing and human flourishing; all as characteristic and Empirically observed of honest, responsible, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people who thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together intentionally and purposefully engaging in creative endeavor, often hard work evidently so unclear to many. At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals begin interacting and taking initiative must finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants.             

Desperately seeking: Volunteer advisors/mentors simply regarding outreach, how even to initiate/ignite entirely from scratch and then to sustain, in quality and process, open ongoing public discussion online upon the present agenda. How might even that most modest initial objective somehow to initiate or to trigger sustained open ongoing public discussion online at all, upon the present agenda, ever be achieved? With the help and advice that we each need, it may become possible to break isolation toward even collaboration in exploration and feasibility study of whatever the kind of probortunities that one finds interesting. Alas, I have no ready and trite simple answer to all manner of complex problems that plague us all. Sustained substantive communication and purposeful interaction, successful team work, can be hard work undertaken by serious people. Nevertheless, relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arise in autonomy and entirely as a byproduct of full engagement in in quality and process of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and as shall be seen, never otherwise. Therefore, accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve. That remains what shall be at stake, throughout. For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.  So I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no formulaic callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch! Isn't there quite enough of that already?

As the saying goes, life is the journey, the ongoing experience, and not just deferred gratification in the destination or desired result in hoped for success. And no one should be abandoned to wander and stumble blindly their heart's true path in life all alone, destitute and bereft of all succor, a sore travail. Alas, even anyone so fortunate with anyone to turn to, yet shall their work be found well cut out for them. And as shall be expounded throughout, there remains nothing herein less at stake than literally the most important intrinsic social and intellectual human needs and stimulus appetites, so vastly and catastrophically underserved in life, indeed all as accordance with the ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old, as rediscovered under the very cutting edge of modern science:

In perhaps the most famous and celebrated words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” 

And lo, the star first follower, first to publicly recognize by fully interacting with the hither to misunderstood and isolated lone dissident innovator, shall be the true leader and influencer blazing the trail, teaching by example, demonstrating for others how to participate, showing everyone how to relate! For any lonesome frustrated desire and outreach tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies, desperately sought for unmet friends. Therefore: Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and change the world! Alas, one can but extend invitation. And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation, gentle reader. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

All therefore desperately seeking: "unreasonable" thoughtful collaboration cofounder candidates, indeed perhaps beginning with any star first follower. Indeed, outreach and organization, remain nigh tautologically integral to all group collaboration from scratch such as proposed herein
.
And so, indeed, the possibilities remain endless, and just perhaps, we can be heroes!Hence at the risk of anything Utopian in the pejorative of remaining vastly impractical and impossibly ideal, FoolQuest.com advances in solution, because Creativity can and Should be Social, a social engineering vision, if all goes well, of welcome and trustworthy collaboration among equals, serious people, fully engaged in substantive communication, purposeful interaction and creative solution finding in innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us interstitial concurrent synergy with unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing, 1) respectful and responsible capable group endeavor on our own terms taking small reversible steps steadily at our own pace in a culture of helping and creative solution finding, 2) indeed reciprocity helpful and ever mindful of task interdependencies, asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what no one else offers, wherein, 3) beyond mere solitary division of labor, effective performance toward success without corporate or institutional authority and support (at least at first), 4) will require value maximization of participating human resource, 5) wherein each participant taking initiative multipotential cross discipline, by calling upon other participants for whatever timely and whole hearted assistance and follow up required, and reciprocating when likewise called upon by any other participant similarly as needed. Such as per the concept of relationship redefined in new paradigm, new social reality via Intentional community or smaller intentional social circle by social engineering design. All in order as to foster recognition in action, a higher level of social support from one another, a gratifying sense of power and abiding respect. Moreover, pursuant outreach may also well conceivably be cultivated, highly effective in connection to resources and networking better meeting individual social needs. Thus, effectively, reciprocally, each participant taking command in whatever their own specialized capable niche, while reciprocally each remaining subordinate, socially supportive and helpful to one another as detailed. Like the Three Musketeers: One for all, and all for one! For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. For to reiterate:  Eudemonia, capable relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially true friendship, will accrue only for serious people, arising as byproduct of full engagement in in quality and process of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! Indeed, no one else need approve! And all as would be heightened in the above fulfilling situation scenario. Only beware cross-purpose!
Congratulations then, gentle reader, for you have discovered FoolQuest.com, my outreach and your invitation, advancing an agenda for open ongoing substantive discussion and deliberation. And it is hoped that substantive deliberation might even as alas all too seldom, culminate in novel ongoing close collaboration, taking purposeful interaction together, gentle readers and yours truly. What follows is novel and plausible problem statement as to widely prevailing circumstances of unhappiness and such oppressive veritable human captivity, even amid such historically unprecedented technological affluence. Then will be proposed novel and feasible solutions, interaction for even a small intentional social circle let alone any grander intentional community, together. Hence the present endeavor at collaboration cofounder recruitment. Because, yes, as shall be proffered anon, liberating intrinsic fulfillment, socially and intellectually, might, as advanced herein, actually consist of endeavor at entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), on the one hand, in unprecedented interstitial concurrent synergy with, on the other hand, unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. For the possibilities remain endless!  
 
For indeed Eudemonia, capable relationship and particularly friendship, will result never by any rat race of extrinsic societal reward and punishment throughout or in the course of interminable exhausting and stultifying inane small talk, uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, fearfully conflict avoidant and debilitating headgames of toxic social skill and sycophantic toadying skilled incompetence, nor in recreation, so-called, that shabbily travesty of playful honest hedonism, replete with soul crushing fake fun passing for any wholehearted pleasure seeking; instead only the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from endless debilitation from oppression under heteronomy to conventional options in life, but ever only for serious people as byproduct of full engagement in in quality and process of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! Indeed, no one else need approve! And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation, gentle reader.
 
As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him.

Rather than sweeping the world out of nowhere, subversion necessarily begins in microcosm, when any two or more individuals interacting and talking initiative, must finally finally innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. For such will be the first germ of interaction perhaps even as proposed herein, within even a small intentional social circle let alone any grander intentional community, amongst ourselves together turning away from the social rat-race, and perhaps even together reaching out in the world at large but even at all actually on our own terms.

Because power remains a function of capable relationship on ones own terms, interaction with responsible others. Am I then your unmet friend? Can you even see me? Will you make yourself known to me? Can we talk? Expert or layperson in whatever fields, old pro or neophyte aspirant, we each and all bring to the table whatever ones own insights, questions, answers, knowledge, talent, ideas, perspective, experience and connections. -Alas, hard work all too often so vastly unappreciated and blithely squandered. Befuddled masses yearning to breath free! What then is liberty, freedom so alluring yet forbidden, taboo, that nevertheless all people so yearn and strive for? Freedom whether in creative expression or effective action. Freedom of association, self esteem and more. How is freedom actually experienced? By what values? And most importantly, what must we do, I and thou, gentle reader, to win our freedom, liberty to pursue happiness? Can we organize? Should we? And how so?

 

 

 

The true life Hero's Journey, for the rest of us...

 

An outcry rings forth in the wilderness, for an unloved quest. Who is the target audience? The target audience remains unknown. Does anybody even care? Such is the tribulation of the prophet lost and unheeded. The Hero's Journey, in order to begin, must break the isolation of solitary quest by forging profound alliance against adversity and devious cross-purpose, instead with trustworthy objectives in common. So too, for the solitary aspirant in any endeavor. Indeed, like unto the mythic Hero's Journey, real collaboration among equals, creative solution finding to whatever purpose or intention, can only begin with some or other fateful meeting or recruitment, and all hinging upon overcoming taboo, illusion and dishonesty, into new and greater self-understanding of who one needs to be and to do together.

But stirring myth notwithstanding, does realism quite simply demand surrender and making do? Is even sheer stimulus struggle doomed only to lonely boredom? Barring the most unrealistic rugged self sufficiency, for social beings as are we all, options ever remain limited in isolation, abandoned as we find ourselves, each and all to ones own devices. And that is why, in order ever to succeed, individuals must seek one another out, others each different and one brings to whatever quest, and band together. For in the words of Henry Ford: Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success. But devious cross-purpose, accrues only such abject failure. Better far, open honest disagreement. For so goes the proverb: The devil is in the details. And the learning curve remains steep. But only therein will be found salvation from ever more frenetic emptiness and Existentially Absurd sore travail in the Brave New World of ever escalating soft-core zombie apocalypse that is (anti)social media culture and the empty illusion of social life.     

Gentle reader(s), will you heed the call? Am I then your unmet friend? Let's work the probortunity together: The same ever applicable fundamentals of due diligence, feasibility study, project planning, outreach, recruitment, organization and implementation, all obtain. As does the power of narrative, because planning remains another mode of storytelling, crafting futuring scenario learning and teaching the tale of intention unfolding.  

Ambivalence guaranteed: Desperately seeking collaboration cofounder candidates for difficult, protracted, immersively laborious and necessarily innovative risk-tolerant undertaking. Gruelingly extensive deliberation and research throughout (pre-)incubation. On spec, no wages upfront, bitter despair in unknown daunting obstacles at every turn, progress therefore doubtful, fame and fortune in case of success, doing well by doing good, all in quest of fulfillment together along the way.

New venture creation (various business startup) for the rest of us: What does it really take, forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together? Beyond fiction merely howsoever as diverting stimulus or even as historically as protopsychology, drama, hailed by Socrates as most philosophical among the arts, provides deep exploration of dharma, character motivation, human frailty and growth even into right action, learning from mistakes. Hence the proposal, Creativity can and Should be Social, as conceived, consisting of entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), on the one hand, unprecedented interstitial concurrent synergy with, on the other hand, unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. Business or project planning after all, is but another mode of narrative, another kind of storytelling, a method beyond mere plausibility as in fiction, of realistic feasibility study towards implementation. Thus, as do we all, aspiring writers and wanna-be entrepreneurs alike, can relate to the archetypical hero, however vaguely dissatisfied, who at first refuses the call to adventure and peril. Because change is frightening and difficult. And probortunity is often complicated. But If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done.

  

Even heeding the call, like unto the mythic protagonist, aspiring writers and wanna-be entrepreneurs alike, inevitably confront setbacks, challenges and temptations, doubts and even feelings of resentment in perception or nagging suspicion of having been drawn in and duped into onerous commitments, all merely even in undertaking preparation and initiation. After all, only bad decisions make good stories. Indeed, everything so dramatic for fiction, entails suffering in reality.

The protagonist called to adventure upon the path of the Hero's Journey, is often someone different from and misunderstood by their peers. Of course, that might also describe a knave, a fool or a crank! Cranks are falsely distinguished and characterized by bad ideas. However, often knaves and false prophets can have extremely good ideas, but they ruin them! And they betray those to whom to turn for help. And so, beware malignant headgames and devious cross-purpose! But then again, wisdom and good intention frequently go unrecognized. Such dystressing uncertain dilemma and ambiguity of unknown trustworthuness, brings dramatic tension and suspense to the Hero's Journey in reality no less than in fiction.  
 
As Carl Gustav Jung wrote: “Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate.Indeed, because the Hero’s Journey inevitably undertakes such profound transformation of consciousness, the Hero’s Journey remains also largely internal. The common story arc of the Hero's Journey, follows a protagonist, motivated to ever mounting ambivalence, in leading a stable and even comfortable yet stiflingly unfulfilling life, and then even unexpectedly embarking upon a journey, literal or figurative, full of peril, numerous challenges, lessons, growth, character development, transformation and even atonement (as ever applicable to genuine pathos), dramatic obstacle, plot complication and adventure of one kind or another.
 
Because even amid ordinary status quo, much like real people, relatable characters begin gaining limited awareness of unfamiliar probortunity. Thus awareness of need for change ever increases. Hence fear and resistance to change to be overcome before committing to change and crossing the threshold into adventure and experimentation with new situations in preparing for major change, even seemingly life and death, indeed  ordeal with the Dark Night of the Soul and acceptance of consequences of new change and rededication. Final attempts at denial ensue in order to resist. At last, denial fails, and Positive Disintegration ensues, opening the way new mastery, capable  power and autonomy.
 
Fears may be entirely quite rational and evidenced however, and trust must be earned. Indeed, the most discouraging malicious gossip need not persuade, but only engender hesitation. As must we all, the hero finally confronts their inner demons and whatever has been sabotaging life, forever holding them back. By finding allies and getting help, the protagonist becomes able to cross the threshold into danger and adventure, draw up plans and undertake feasibility study, work out hard decisions, face trial and tribulation, and even defeat enemies, struggle and overcome.
 
The Hero's Journey thus culminates in one great conclusive challenge, the dramatic climax, of an experience leaving the protagonist forever changed, even as normal life returns and resumes. And dénouement of normalcy regained, so badly missed, may be welcomed. Or else, the protagonist forever changed, will no longer be satisfied. And so instead, trauma comes to light, and an extended dénouement of anguish and healing ensues, dubbed by Maureen Murdock as: The Heroine's Journey, the reconciliation of "masculine" toughness with "feminine" vulnerability.
 
And exactly this universal mythic story structure of the Hero's Journey, is indeed reflected in the call to collaboration among equals, in endless possibility, the vision and even in the reality of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), disruptive entrepreneurship for the rest of us, and even in the yearning of art for its own joy in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. All so appealing to power and "masculine" toughness so crucial to autonomy and capability, yet trust so threatening to human vulnerability, indeed "feminine" tenderness ever crucial to attachment, bonding and team building.
 
Again, the rubric: 'probortunity,' is coined by way of portmanteau from the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in optimistic denotation of how problems might be embraced as opportunity for innovative solution finding, planning, feasibility study and implementation. Indeed, entrepreneurship addresses probortunity on two fronts: Externally relevant entrepreneurship must strive to discover and to meet some or other market gap, whatever underserved needs of any target consumers, our fellow human beings. Unless it's all just another grift and a sham! Because the true to life Hero's Journey remains ever fraught with deceit, detour and dead ends. For Entrepreneurship also endeavors to satisfy frustrated yearnings and authentic personal integrity in life, of aspiring entrepreneurs themselves. Much as writing motivated by frustrated self-expression, must therefore also seek to relate to any receptive audience. Unless it's all some sham of banal hack, sycophantic empty manipulation and pandering propaganda.
 
 
 
                      Collaboration among equals in creative solution finding,
threatens taboo subversion of hierarchical dominance                       
                          Why there has always been such resistance to true liberation                
Subversion of hierarchy means whatever even conceivable causality, action or situation which as consequence negates, moderates, diminishes or undermines hierarchical dominance and sycophantic predictive social cognition, in any system or organization, formal or informal. Subversion of hierarchy promotes the deconstruction and relaxation of coercion and dominance generally. Hierarchy or "pecking order" is oppressive social regulation whereby people, groups or institutions, find themselves effectively classified, ranked or graded, indeed thereby empowered and disempowered, into different levels or priorities of authority according to status or social standing. Whereas, power and autonomy, free from submission to heteronomy, remains ever an objective of functional relationship on ones own terms, capable interaction with responsible others, throughout any true to life Hero's Journey.
 
Subversion of hierarchy, a hallmark of autonomy, remains ever taboo under heteronomy. Alas, at very worst, hierarchy, especially when all too fragile and easily threatened, all too often promotes hostility and even serial bullying. In knee-jerk reaction, authoritarian flunkies become so easily threatened, terrified and even lash out, at any prospect at all of subversion of hierarchy, indeed any egalitarian concept whatsoever. But so do even the most lowly, insecure and codependently submissive of sheeple. Whereas, actually at all more significant authority figures may tend to remain at all better educated and equipped, civil, canny, secure in their own threat levels, subtle and scheming, choosing their battles.
 
And yet so many balk at this simple truth, among all other conceivable points of view upon any range of subject matter ever cogitated in sublime equanimity. Tell them instead, that the Earth is flat and that alien lizards deceive us. Declare that  that nothing is real anyhow, because actually, we all live in the Matrix. Yes, that most ancient and interminable canard of clichéd Zen Mystical tripe, still hailed as great profundity and ever new. But can there be indeed any manner of hoax convincing us all that our dreams are inherently false? The fantastical premise or Solipsistic metaphor of the maya is popularized for the cinema in the Matrix movie franchise. But actually the maya remains anything less than actually supernatural. Rather the maya, like samsāra, remains metaphor merely for our Existential conundrum of hapless bumbling involvement as the offish hard luck chumps, losers and utter schlimazels that we are. Only explain the metaphor, indeed that the real true to life Matrix has always been that tenacious chimera, that toxic will-o'-the-wisp and Absurd Existential hangover, which is nothing more or less in sore travail, than constructed mass delusion in action called: social reality, poignant investment wherein we are all so brazenly extorted. Well then, that will be another matter entirely! And quite unthinkable. For again, as George Orwell observes: “A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing.
 
 
Surmounting the Absurd?
 
It has been advanced that Existentialism arose in order to blunt the despair of Nihilism. Indeed, life is Existentially Absurd and therefore often condemned as a lost cause. And hence the extol of life as a grand gesture, even however futile, as the best and most meaningful feasible quest. In 'The Deconstruction of Reality:' What Modernism and Postmodernism Say About Surface and Depth,' author Ken Sanes expounds:

Some of these theories of postmodernism then take an additional step, arguing that since life (or much of life) is a fiction or since fiction is all we can know, we should join in the drama ourselves and live a life of play. In effect, they recommend that we treat life as a symbolic arena for the acting out of fantasies. In place of merely discovering that reality is a construction, they would have us consciously take over the process of creating it, inventing selves, subcultures and alternative "realities," as forms of social experimentation.

However, even in such optimistic pessimism of self reinvention and creative redemption, telling a story is one thing, and beyond gambits of Absurdly dishonest soul-destroying "Fake It Till You Make it," competently living ones aspirational story quite another. After all, the Hero's Journey begins first in refusal of the call to adventure, and therein frequently remains stillborn. Dare indeed one abandon all hope of becoming more effective and effectual, and forswear all endeavor more vibrantly to live out fantasy? Are unambitious lowered expectations surrendering and making do, truly best in life? Whereas short of the surreal, any capable fiction must at least seem plausible, by contrast responsibility of real capable and responsible endeavor demands at all actual feasibility, easier said than done.

Alas as things stand, actually by such longstanding and cunning design, employment and formal education typically exhaust such vast proportion of individual time and effort, only setup for failure. Because only a fortunate few experience job satisfaction or enthusiasm in learning. For most, employment, ever mounting anxiety of wage slavery ever less secure, and much like formal education in such submissive disciplined preparation and investment all thereto, and all on ones own time and expense with usurious compounding interest, remains interminably protracted burden and sore travail. And ever at all alleviated only by that shabbily travesty of hedonistic play called: recreation, the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from such endless debilitation.

Indeed like unto fiction, business or project planning remaining ever provisional, conjectural, speculative, therefore, for Sir Karl Popper, became his model for faliblism, nonjustificationist science and politics. We are all fallible. Danger and misfortune abound. Risk can never be eliminated. There can only be risk management. In order then to embrace progress and make life more worth living, Popper rejects and condemns the despair and delusion of demanding impossible certainty and safety. Perfectionism is the enemy. In his philosophy of science, Epistemological Methodology underpinning any valid Scientific Method, Karl Popper, the favorite philosopher of scientists, strove to clarify and simplify Metaphysics into a field more amenable to scientific honesty and hence any hope of intelligibility.   

According to defunct yet enduring long standing tradition of verification or justification, scientific certainty ever builds upon firm foundation of verified or justified knowledge. But such is unachievable perfectionism, impossible standards leading only to despair, only exacerbating the Absurd. Indeed, according to Popper, there can be no certainty of even firm foundation, verification or justification. In practice, all good science and uplifting discovery begins from sheer speculation, unfounded conjecture, only then subject first to critical preference (such criteria as internal logical consistency and theoretical elegance) and only thereafter to ongoing Empirical reality testing, evidentiary support subject to refutation. Such is a process of elimination, narrowing the field of viable hypotheses, ever less wrong; ongoing practice of controversy, Dialectical Socratic enlightenment by refutation, wherein, without shame, strife or acrimony, errors are not to be avoided beforehand, but detected and course corrected as arising. Because how else do we learn and progress?    

Business or project planning, not unlike drama extolled by Socrates as most philosophical among the arts, remains yet another heady application of narrative extrapolation, exploration, conjecture and speculation. Business or project planning after all, is only a different kind of storytelling and plotting, even dramatic futuring scenario climaxing toward whatever hoped for outcomes; an idea to be pitched, a tale to be told, towards applied creativity, disruptive innovation, rigorously detailing any projected path to success and desired results. All factors ever so crucial to such success as Empirically observed of trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people who talk more seriously with less small talk, thriving upon creative interaction. And for modern Socratic Sir Karl Popper, investigation of reality begins only in creative hypothesis.     

The difference yet obtaining, in the distinction between innovation, the name given to applied creativity, distinct from pure creativity of art for art's sake: To wit, that in innovative business or project planning, far from sublime apathy and surrender to Absurd uncertainty, actual feasibility will be at stake, and not just narrative plausibility as in story crafting. Because capable business or project planning proceeds in wherewithal of research to test reality beyond merely internal self consistency as in story background and World Building, setting the scene. Indeed, whereas fiction writers only need imagine sympathetic, interesting and at all capable characters just barely adequate to rise, ever in such mounting suspense, to ever worsening challenges contrived in any plot-driven tale, the real world drama of management team formation, no less harrowing, shall require so much more: Indeed real world dramatic outcomes in doubt regarding endeavor at management team formation, frequently turn not only upon intensive strategy, research and feasibility study, but upon successful outreach, actual search and recruitment, on spec, of any range of participants qualified in different expertise, capability and suitable temperament, including risk tolerance, work towards success in whatever hoped for future outcomes or results. Yes, just perhaps, we can be heroes! In the words of Henry Ford: Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success. Anything less remains only all the more needless Existential Absurdity, abject failure. And yet, there will be no need to impose consensus. People who disagree cooperate only everyday! Whereas dogmatically erroneous consensus remains ever futile.  

Alas nevertheless, that even given shared values and objectives, strategy and action may yet meet with rejection, only fizzling out in real world anticlimax of Absurd anti-drama and disappointment. Indeed as for examples  recounted here, and here. Indeed, even given as aforesaid, such ignition of intensely motivated individualized focus, and not merely short attention, aggravation, boredom, flaccid Zen behaviorally conditioned resignation and apathy, shall we even then ever find common ground in any plan of action, agenda at hand presently? For in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.”   

And alas also, that endeavor set in stone without prior deliberation, due diligence, research, exploration and planning, typically remains ever doomed to obsession, delusion, hand waving and pipedream with neither clarity nor flexibility, and hence chimerically hopeless, Existentially Absurd, illusory, unachievably vanishing prospect of endurance, much less success. To quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: “Plans are nothing, planning is everything. Because in the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, noted disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: "No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy." -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, true to life dramatic obstacle or complication.  

And yet, even though, to quote Robert Burns: “The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft a-gley.” (Go often awry.) -nevertheless, as Eisenhower so well understood, the intensive discourse and research of planning, brings preparation and rapport building. And into all deliberation shall be wherein enters the salient value of unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, indeed the speculative element and exploration of Science Fiction, ever new, yet all mindful of the ancient and venerated discipline of the writing craft.     

For in constraint of endless possibility, all such enfold the exchange of hardnosed critique, a fancy French word for criticism and the Socratic Dialectical practice of controversy which is the invited, welcome and appreciated free exchange of criticism, remains essential to error detection and ongoing course correction, not to mention happiness together even in such deliberation. Hence collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming bears such untapped subversive potential, so instructive as a bonding and team building exercise toward unprecedented and subversive collaboration among equals in disruptive innovative new venture creation (various business startup).           

All hence does entrepreneurship, in any alterative, tantalize with any prospect instead, in quest of liberation from bondage to employment working to enrich others, all in such poignant hope of ever finding freedom in an unfree world. And all easier said than done! Indeed, to quote Frederick Law Olmsted: "After all is said and done, much is said and little is done."

Moreover, not only psychology but philosophy and meaning in the deepest sense, ever remain relevant to inform all endless possibility of entrepreneurship no less then as in application to anything else in life. This is because successful new venture creation (various business startup), indeed entrepreneurship for the rest of us, must struggle and innovate, imaginatively addressing unhappiness of prevailing frustrated unmet or underserved needs and desires. But profound desires are often repressed and denied, going unrecognized and scorned in heteronymous religious or ideological shame and anti-intellectualism, as ever the same desperate panic stricken sycophantic socially skilled toadying skilled incompetence and crimestop ever striving to purge an unwanted self in order to gain extrinsic rewards of social acceptance. Thus all too often, the greater the value, perhaps too abstract, the harder to sell, bridging abstract principle into appealing concrete strategy. 

Case in point: As shall be expounded throughout, and Orwellian anti-intellectual righthink taboo notwithstanding, there remains no less universally vested interest herein at stake only given any the wit to see, than literally the most important intrinsic social and intellectual human needs and stimulus appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, so vastly and catastrophically underserved in every walk of life as we have known it. Indeed all as in accordance with the ancient wisdom of the greatest sages of old, as rediscovered under the very cutting edge of modern science. Indeed as entirely consistent with evolutionary neuroscience and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology. For according to Martin Seligman's celebrated happiness formula of Positive Psychology, so abstract: Pleasure + engagement + meaning = intrinsic fulfillment. Indeed, bridging abstraction more concretely: Creativity can and Should be Social.

And thank you gentle reader. Because we all live in such a tightly strained attention economy, in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. All hence, all the more, in the immortal words of Simone Weil: Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” Better still, optimal reciprocal engagement, indeed substantive communication towards purposeful interaction, and never otherwise. And no one else need approve! Therefore, accept no substitutes! All wherein, truly generous investment of precious attention, never squandered, ever accrues the highest return in like kind, fully engaged attention. Your Impossible Mission, gentle reader, should you choose to accept it! Because we live in an attention economy, often indeed so distant, frugal and miserable. A culture especially online, of alienated short attention and minimal transitory engagement. And indignant stock rebuff is undeniably so highly economical. But who and what are we all saving ourselves for? Pay attention to me, damn it! Because realistically, high ambition and short attention remain functionally antithetical. So be interested, be interesting. Stay interested. Include me. Because, to reiterate with emphasis, optimal reciprocal engagement remains the reciprocal investment and exchange of attention that accrues highest return in like kind. And ya gotta spend it in order to get any in return!

And freely question whatever is not understood and articulate every nagging ambiguity. For as the saying goes: No question is too stupid to ask, and no answer too wise to be given. Even sheer incomprehension is a beginning and no dire impasse or cause for alarm. The readiness to speak up, question, point out and discuss communication errors and failures, remains crucial to communication at all, and sometimes even actually a matter of life and death. Mistakes are the Essence towards Intersubjectivity via fully engaged Dialectical conversational adequacy in collaborative miscommunication repai, with Active Reading and Listening striving towards the achievement of Intersubjectivity being: the closer correspondence of message as received and understood, to content as actually intended by the sender. New ideas are often confusing. Only shopworn and well familiar old ideas are certain always to come across effortlessly.

 

 

Attempting anything really cool together: What does it really take?
new venture creation (various business startup) for the rest of us: Rising in endless possibility of the true to life Hero's Journey

In the progress of any group, there will be an initial shake down of who stays the course and who fades back and drops out, who can be counted on and who not, leaving only anyone who was ever truly serious to begin with. Indeed, in order to prevent group de-cohesion and dissolution, there must ever remain procedure and protocol in commitment toward recovery and even beginning anew. -figuratively back to the proverbial drawing board. Specifically, should anyone no matter how expert and having built themselves up as seemingly indispensable, indeed taking a leadership position, figuratively pulls the proverbial rug metaphorically out from under, by actingout in passive aggression, undermining all progress, effectively just going on strike while howsoever pretending otherwise, indeed even by such sabotage wresting defeat out from the very jaws of victory, then, in such case, what must be done? Answer: together we must remain brave, undiscouraged, agile, adapt and find another way, even outreach recruiting other more reliable partners in collaboration. Indeed, the offender may even be prevailed upon to help recruit their own replacement, if they just don't want to do their own job. Instead of such helpless and stunned dependency, there must be fall back plans in case of such defection, no matter how seemingly catastrophic. Anyone simply losing interest must be set free, their obligations written of as a bad debt. There is always another way, even if seemingly howsoever at all less advantageous. When such controlling passive aggression no longer paralyzes and destroys the group, by such Transactional Antithesis the Ulterior Transaction or: headgame will quickly lose its appeal, and the offender may even decide to mend their ways instead of simply finding themselves alone and left out not by howsoever actually being excluded, but simply by their own inaction and nonparticipation as the others just move on together.

In crucial reiteration: Trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people Empirically observed talking more seriously and making less small talk, thrive together intentionally and purposefully engaging together in creative endeavor. Indeed, close relationship, Eros which is liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arises for serious people of integrity, in autonomy, subversively and disruptively flouting taboo, entirely as a byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and as to be expounded anon, never otherwise. Moreover, no one else need approve! After all: Popularity and ever facile and distant social success, ever remain antithetical to true friendship, because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon free, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility.

For in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

The possibilities remain endless! Because Creativity can and Should be Social, therefore even at the risk of anything Utopian in the pejorative of remaining vastly impractical and impossibly ideal, a social engineering vision esues, if all goes well, of welcome and trustworthy collaboration among equals, serious people, fully engaged in substantive communication, purposeful interaction and creative solution finding in innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us interstitial concurrent synergy with unprecidented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing, 1) respectful and responsible capable group endeavor on our own terms taking small reversible steps steadily at our own pace in a culture of helping and creative solution finding, 2) indeed reciprocity helpful and ever mindful of task interdependencies, asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what no one else offers, wherein, 3) beyond mere solitary division of labor, effective performance toward success without corporate or institutional authority and support (at least at first), 4) will require value maximization of participating human resource, 5) wherein each participant taking initiative cross discipline, by calling upon other participants for whatever timely and whole hearted assistance and follow up required, and reciprocating when likewise called upon by any other participant similarly as needed. Reciprocally supportive, each participant would thus both lead and follow. Like the Three Musketeers: “One for all, and all for one!” And in the words of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.”

Creativity can and Should be Social, unlike, not only, for example in the next section: community gardening, or for that matter, such prevailing institutional structure as formal education and traditional employment, will always remain the more demanding of perseverant individual responsibility. If any one packs up their gardening tools and turns their back on that benighted community garden, well then life goes on for the others. But new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, and for that matter, even serious collaborative fiction writing, will always remain the more fraught with, and vulnerable to, disruption by personality conflict, passive hostility and betrayal. Such nigh inevitable tribulation will ever remain the test of adult responsibility, resilience and perseverance. After all, successful entrepreneurship eventually results only from rapid serial failure together. hard work: Try, try, try again! Again, in the words of Henry Ford: “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” And devious cross-purpose, accrues only such abject failure. And alas, never open honest disagreement.

Along with Creativity can and Should be Social, also included is an ancillary subversive notion of outreach, Creativity Can and Should be Popular, individual outreach under legitimizing context of collective outreach, all as conceived to better facilitate individual networking, social embedment and social stimulus struggle, metaphorical tail figuratively wagging proverbial dog, ulterior objective taking priority over ostensible ongoing recruitment to Creativity can and Should be Social.

Alas however, that the greater masses of humanity, cretins and philistines all, so ill equipped and bereft of all philosophy and scientifically ignorant, remain ever so blithely oblivious to and unmoved by the crucial importance of the probortunity at hand. Alas, anti-intellectual short attention prevails. So bereft of autonomy, many remain all too easily distracted and discouraged by even the slightest difficulty, let alone serious effort, and even from persistence in thinking too deeply. Let alone from Active Reading and research, much less substantive communication even contemplating ambitiously purposeful interaction. Because, ultimately, in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” Alas however, deep thinking and planning for well considered action, remain so unpopular because reality can be so painful and discouraging. Understandably, even benumbed escapism remains far more appealing for mass marketing. But when the going gets tough, nerds work the problem! Indispensable to meaning and purpose, Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing, eustress and sustainable euphoria of inherent creative tension stems from the inadequacy all that one is, in striving and ambition in latency of all that one yearns to become, excellence called: aręte. And so gentle reader, is FoolQuest.com right for you?

Alas, no matter what might be at stake, that so many people just cannot fathom any responsible suggestion of, for whatever good reasons, doing anything differently than as has become accustomed. Neither in any liberating shock of the new, nor simply in appeal to competency as embodied even in most ancient and venerated tradition as for example, of serious writing, drama and the discipline of the writing craft. And not even simply in open-mindedness to enjoy the speculative element and exploration of Science Fiction.

Alas, all too often, promising connections and opportunity so ignominiously die stillborn amid tragic hesitation. And all manner of promising innovation in attempting  anything really cool together is scuttled by the same old headgames, consensus manipulation, and even bullying outright. And then there is what has been dubbed: The Cult of the Amateur, a popular anti-intellectual movement online in such scornful cretin philistine rejection of expertise, art and proficiency, in very principle. As in recent history, from the very beginning, when all various qualified experts were effectively driven off from Wikipedia, in “a kind of reverse snobbery that seeks to excuse mediocrity.” [Wikipedia talk:Anti-elitism] And there can be by far worse malagenda of heteronomy because of precisely such reverse snobbery but even more extreme, embracing Relativism and Anti-Critical Bias as in the silly aphorism that there is no disputing tastes, indeed taking thereby the implication that there can be no possible standards of quality whatsoever in any context at all. And often thereby extolling not even mere mediocrity, but actually glorifying even the most trenchant denial as manifest in antirational ideology; travesty of cognition and human connection, ever remaining the very font of willfully unaware and socially skilled incompetence sycophantic pipedream and most entrenched production of blithely unironic ghodawful badfic.

Only practice makes perfect. Only writing badly can ever progress into any better writing. Writing is rewriting and never a waste of time. And not merely creative writing, but any endeavor obsessively set in stone without prior deliberation, due diligence, research, exploration and planning, typically remains ever doomed to delusion, hand waving and pipedream with no prospect of success. And here is the lesson of serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, indeed the speculative element and exploration of Science Fiction, ever new, yet all mindful of the ancient and venerated discipline of the writing craft. For all such enfold the exchange of hardnosed critique, a fancy French word for criticism and the Socratic Dialectical practice of controversy. Hence collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming bears such untapped subversive potential, so instructive as a bonding and team building exercise toward unprecedented collaboration among equals in disruptive innovative new venture creation (various business startup). The possibilities remain endless! Therefore, what then does the future hold? In the words of Paul Raven: Science Fiction isn’t dying at all; it’s metastasizing!”

 

 

 

 Overcoming foreseeable resistance to featured key strategic specifics of Creativity can and Should be Social
and innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, interstitial concurrent synergy with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming taboo subversion of heteronomy to authority and hierarchical dominance by social engineering design

 

Many a mythic Hero's Journey turns upon endless riddles, even such as indeed will be exposed as plain and profane, no riddle at all. And along the course of the present true to life Hero's Journey, there will be much attentively to unpack and decompress, in the present densely verbose hypertext paragraphs here on FoolQuest.com

But initial drama along the course of the present true to life Hero's Journey, obtains such and so: That alas, even in shared values and objectives, strategy and action  agenda may yet meet with rejection, only fizzling out in real world anticlimax of anti-drama and disappointment. Indeed as for examples, recounted here, and here. Indeed, even given as aforesaid, even so rarely, ignition of intensely motivated individualized focus, will any common ground towards conceivable plan of action  agenda ever appear? For in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.”

In life as in myth, from the beginning the Hero's Journey is ever imperiled by distraction, diversion and compromise, from the true path. And not all compromise is evil. Meaningful compromise ever challenges dramatic priorities upon the path of individual true to life Hero's Journey. Doctors once recommended for their patients to take up golf,  even just to pass the time, even no matter how senselessly, all in order thereby to improve self esteem by gaining task mastery. All conjuring to mind the demonic Terrible Trivium from 'The Phantom Toll Booth' written by Norton Juster and illustrated by Jules Feiffer. Because indeed, the seductive distraction of endlessly unimportant tasks, easy to do, spare us all from the anxieties of difficult and important challenges. Indeed, as often espoused in remedial Behavior Modification and rehab, is the recommendation of consistent participation in ongoing long term projects even at all arbitrarily. Indeed somewhat off-putting, yet entirely cut-and-dry and feasible though banal and boring drudgery. Such as, for example: community gardening, providing behavioral structure of regularly scheduled activity and association sustaining propinquity while also producing any interaction and sense of involvement to draw participants together. Thus does a travesty of the rôle of gardening in the ideal and Intentional community of Epicurus, rear its ugly head. Such much.

And yet, the uninspiring recommendation points halfway towards what is actually so sorely needed, in focus therein upon active ongoing cooperation. To bad it's so tedious and onerous, unless indeed one so adores gardening! In the alternative, might then anything more interesting and meaningful, turn out actually the more uplifting and successful, than such remedial drudgery as community gardening? The present proposal remains perhaps the most modest and least extreme or Draconian of all conceivable serious life strategies currently advanced in response towards solution finding coming to grips with the probortunity at hand. And yet, many would balk. Will there then be anything more important or interesting on your mind, gentle reader? Bear with me:

In the biting whit of Dorothy Parker: “You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make her think." Yet again, as here on FoolQuest.com, one can but extend invitation. Alas, many even who yearn for and advocate, at least in abstract principle, collaboration among equals not just in labor together arbitrarily, but actually creative solution finding, nevertheless may flat-out reject either or even both quintessentially creative pursuits advanced herein, that of going into business together for ourselves, and even that of story crafting together. -Just not their proverbial cup of tea. In that case, then the first brainstorming challenge to the agenda, might be to define and select whatever other at all conceivable challenge in focus of sustainable and appealing creative collaboration and endeavor, once whatever that scarce and fondly remembered exciting and uplifting super fun workplace project, workshop or seminar concludes, without providing follow up whatsoever, leaving all just figuratively standing out there in the proverbial cold, and not to mix metaphors, sitting on our hands, each and all abandoned once again, to our own devices. And that situation so bereft of vital social support, puts to the test, skills and responsibilities of autonomy, so atrophied and undermined under heteronomy. Do then those Behaviorist community gardeners get the last laugh? Wait: Not so fast!

Subversively and disruptively proposed herein, shall be nothing less than indeed to completely reverse traditional paradigm of heteronomy to authoritarianism, in endless possibility all in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, by instead, in liberating value maximization, resetting collaboration among equals in creative solution finding as the new norm and default human condition, then appealing to even ad hoc authority, only occasionally as need actually arising. And the strategy, mechanics and proposed plan of action in implementation thereof, shall be dubbed: Creativity can and Should be Social, in such disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, in such subversive interstitial synergy concurrently with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” But yet again, barring hierarchically dominant power and authority in wherewithal simply to impose implementation of more enlightened policy, one can but extend invitation. And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation, gentle reader. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

No, not anarchy, not at all, merely civil society, informality until whatever formalities are evoked. Actual need of authority can arise in many ways. The need for moderation may arise in order to restore order and resume pertinence of discourse to agenda, let alone to quell or resolve actual conflict and acrimony passing beyond merely enthusiasm of heated exchange and the practice of controversy, and let alone urgently authoritative contravention in order to counter actual abuse and bullying of one kind or another. Authority may also serve to break deadlock and indecision in urgent probortunity.

But any default situation of constant authority, macro and micromanagement all the time, simply as the normal routine, frequently loses purpose, descending into oppressive self-serving, destruction and irrelevance. And the strategy, mechanics and proposed plan of action in implementation of aforesaid new paradigm, shall be dubbed: Creativity can and Should be Social. For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” But yet again, barring hierarchically dominant power and authority in wherewithal simply to impose implementation of more enlightened policy, one can but extend invitation. And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation, gentle reader. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!

Situation analysis: Indeed, the probortunity at hand remains only consistent with that which may be referred to as: the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology: Conventionally and heteronymously, in every walk of life, authority routinely and continually and systematically stifles not only autonomy in general, but most particularly, creative solution finding. That is, except when and as deemed needful or advantageous by whatever powers that be, especially in light of any whatever unusual special circumstances or situation. Only thus ever arises for even the rank and file, such scarce and fondly remembered peak experience of creative collaboration and fulfillment under relaxation of hierarchical dominance, called: low hierarchical distance, meaning: near equality. From the standpoint of heteronomy, collaboration among equals remain quite inconceivable. And yet in all terror of autonomy, heteronomy so hesitantly strives, in very limited success, to tame for heteronomy, the competitively indispensable power of autonomy and even of creative solution finding in close collaboration among equals. But heteronomy can't be tweaked or revamped. Heteronomy can only be brought to give way, at long last, to autonomy, indeed perhaps even in reversal of paradigmatically  heteronymous norms and expectations, Peripeteia as herein so subversively and disruptively conspired.

And then, even in as to any aforementioned howsoever even seemingly arbitrary indifference, even distaste and rejection both of business and of drama, it may then reasonably and responsibly be expected that sustainability of such vastly underserved peak experience of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding, may inevitably entail in any alternative, some other manner of salient and relevant project planning towards effective implementation, not to mention whatever probortunity as focus of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding. Because implementation is key. And creative solution finding, even however innovative, requires some or other clear focus or objective. Indeed, when all else fails, what has actually been desired all along? Hence: As to be expounded anon, bridging abstract and concrete, project planning is but another powerful and synergistic application of narrative, of dramatic futuring scenario and story crafting. Hence the salient relevance of sustained and ongoing culture of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, in short: of open collaboration in business or project planning towards effective implementation. Thus, the relevance of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, by any other name, becomes inescapable to all such proactive initiative beyond the bounds of institutional life. And indulging perhaps also pure creativity, art for art's sake, how better than in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming? Other options aside from collaborative writing, may remain less broadly accessible, readily sustainable, and thereby at al less practical. Moreover, serious collaborative fiction writing promotes appealing cultivation of the liberating power of narrative.

 
 
Problem statement: Whythe  FoolQuest.com invitation to substantive communication towards purposeful interaction herein deemed so indispensable: People should decide each as we see fit, but in clear understanding of what remains ever at stake. Socialize, or social lies? Truth is correspondence to reality in assertions, while social reality remains ever Chimera. And overthrow of adverse social reality and poison consensus, in defiance of oppression, begins by living in truth, by refusing to repeat, to transmit, to follow, or to continue living by whatever the big lie. The big lie is in timidity and giving way to bullies. The toxic big lie is in always wearing a socially acceptable mask, maintaining distance and keeping things light, while starving for any true connection, because such terrorized and ever intimidated charade, utter travesty, remains key to social success! Or soWe the Sheeple, glorified pack mammals all, have always been taught.
 
Indeed all such above complaint, to reiterate, remains well known, tropic, even somewhat cliché iconoclasm. Whereas in corollary, alas the truth, plain and profane, so widely unacknowledged, remains that close relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arise for serious people, in autonomy, subversively flouting taboo, and entirely as a byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and as shall be seen, never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Mark my words: All else remains fraud, folly and futility, Existentially Absurd and ultimately irredeemable multiple flavors of entirely diversionary grade A snake oil! Purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication remains our only hope, essential towards psychological visibility, intrinsic fulfillment and authentic wellbeing in more optimal social and intellectual so indispensable. But what to do? Abstract principle must bridge into concrete strategy expressed in active verbs:
 
And towards such indispensable substantive communication, towards purposeful interaction, is proposed ongoing collaboration among equals, pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement, more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, intrinsic to fulfillment, authentic wellbeing and human flourishing; all as characteristic and Empirically observed of honest, responsible, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people (indeed flouting taboo and conventional recommendations towards popularity and social success) talking more seriously and making less small talk, and who thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together intentionally and purposefully engaging in creative endeavor. -indeed for serious people, substantive communication towards purposeful interaction, eschewing bland triviality. And strategically, who else, what other kind of person, leading what other kind of life, best should be emulated together in autonomy and pursuit of happiness? To reiterate: All else, any other vastly unsuitable rôle models, remain fools, nigh cultist cronies, sycophants and grifters, purveyors and consumers of pure grade A snake oil! For such remains the essential nature of heteronomy. And heteronomy can't be tweaked or revamped. Heteronomy can only be brought to give way, at long last, to autonomy.
 
 
Glossary of crucial terminology and concepts
 
FoolQuest.com therefore advances first of all, simply to agenda for substantive ongoing discussion, extending open standing invitation, an actual plan of action for purposeful interaction in true subversive cultivation of freedom, friendship and thought. The objective whereof shall be the ignition of relationship, attachment, bonding and psychological visibility in new paradigm via Intentional community or just intentional social circle, by social engineering design. And all towards Eudemonia, fulfillment and the overthrow of pandemic boredom and loneliness; bridging the abstract into the concrete, beginning in a theoretical basis from evolutionary neuroscience, stimulus struggle and what can be called the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, among other key concepts.  
 
Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire. At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must at long last innovate: to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants.
 
Evolutionary neurology, the subject in study of evolutionary neuroscience, underpins the unique intrinsic motivation and human needs and stimulus appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, psychological visibility so thwarted by heteronomy to our legacy as Sheeple, glorified pack mammals. Indeed, the competencies and aptitudes that are subject of Cultural Anthropology, all that is necessary and adequate in order to know what to expect, and what is expected, include hierarchically predictive social cognition by which to anticipate the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships and prediction of future behavior, all distinctly and uncomfortably heteronymous, authoritarian and non-egalitarian.
 
And the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, remains in observation of how, nevertheless, near egalitarian low hierarchical distance in creative solution finding as need arising in the eyes of decision makers, remains that rare taste of freedom, the one cautiously infrequent respite from boredom and sore travail, fleeting clemency at the whim of our various jailors, guardians all, of status quo, whatever oppressive powers that be, tribal chieftains, corporate overlords, or the stifling authority of professional educators.

But, in the most flagrantly taboo subversion, what if the norm could become subject to Peripeteia, figuratively turned on its head, in maximization of value and freedom, so that instead of controlling authoritarianism routinely stifling curiosity and creativity, convivial creativity became the normal default, day to day, and deference to commanding authority, even however ad hock, the infrequent exception in contingency only as need ever actually arising.

Psychological visibility: Beyond the interminable shallow Machiavellian popularity contest or marshmallow throwing bogus support, the highly evolved human social intelligence is an appetite returned and fulfilled by the care and personal investment in others of authentic intellectual, emotional, purposeful and imaginative participation in the ongoing and unexpected discovery and progress of human character and relations over time in cultures of participation offering challenge and support for risk taking, deprivation resulting in frustration, emptiness, inadequacy, sadness, malaise, discontent, boredom, anxiety, alienation and anomie. Without psychological visibility, one can only suffer lonely, misunderstood, unappreciated, obscure and unknown. Hence the intrinsic need of psychological visibility, and why the pretence that typically buttresses popularity and social success, so antithetical to friendship, remains ever miserable and no less alien than unpopularity and more overt isolation.

Because popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Alas that all too often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And if indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, cagey, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectually subservient path of popularity and social success, remains antithetical to true friendship which by contrast must remain ever open, genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated after all, upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility.

The begged question then remains: Precisely how is genuine friendship ever supposed to emerge from such prevalent, well known and understood social expectations of typical paranoid distance and facile triviality and interminably banal small talk? In truth, that can never happen! And it's not your fault! Indeed, this is by design, alienation baked in. Indeed, even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test for heteronomy and conformity by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society.

The begged question ever remains: Precisely how is genuine friendship ever supposed to emerge from typical paranoid distance, facile triviality and interminably banal small talk? In truth, that can never happen! And that's not your fault!

As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors of every stripe, who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Indeed, this is by design, alienation baked in. For even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy,

Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

But Eudemonia, capable close relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially true friendship, will accrue only for serious people, arising as byproduct of full engagement in f purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Alas, one can but extend invitation, indeed even under such oppression. And FoolQuest.com remains your golden invitation of probortunity, gentle reader, asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what no one else offers.

For stimulus struggle, what every living thing is doing all the time, is no more or less than the perpetual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And this includes uniquely human social and intellectual stimulus struggle and even psychological visibility, indeed every crucial social stimulus provided by anyone triggering and eliciting response from anyone else within the same social environment or situation, a process so desperately undermined and subverted under heteronomy in the perpetual rat race out in the endless emotional and intellectual wastelands of the social minefield.

In summation then to reiterate: In open standing invitation, the proposed plan of action Creativity can and Should be Social details the groundbreaking new concept by social engineering design, relationship in new paradigm via Intentional community or just intentional social circle, an unprecedented ongoing collaboration among equals, as proposed, to consist in vibrant new interstitial synergy concurrently between parallel endeavors of innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us on the one hand, and on the other hand pure creativity, art for art's sake, in unprecedented ongoing serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming.
 
And to reiterate: Also included is an ancillary subversive notion of outreach, Creativity Can and Should be Popular, individual outreach under legalizing context of collective outreach, all as conceived to better facilitate individual networking, social embedment and social stimulus struggle, metaphorical tail figuratively wagging proverbial dog, ulterior objective taking priority over ostensible ongoing recruitment to Creativity can and Should be Social.

Subversion refers to any even deliberate process, for good or ill, whereby the values and principles of any system in operation may be undermined, contradicted or reversed throughout endeavor even most proximately, to transform whatever homogenous established social order under whatever authoritarian frameworks of power, heteronomy, authority, hierarchy, and especially social norms. And such transgressive subversion will be motivated by some or other abiding discontent. Because no one likes to feel insignificant and abandoned under whatever status quo. Everyone needs to be wanted and special, close knit part of anything deemed important and underserved. Indeed something malevolently subverted by pandemic and heteronymously authoritarian serial Relational Bullying and social isolation. For not all subversion must be heroic or benevolent. Not to digress.
 
As the saying goes: "Old ways won't open new doors." Dare we imagine different? Life doesn't have to always be the way that it has always been. However: Rather than sweeping across the world out of nowhere, subversion necessarily begins in microcosm, via the even secret intimacy of collusion, wherein any two or more defiant souls initiate and persist together through interaction howsoever different, even taboo. Indeed perhaps actually most taboo of all, instead of just going with the flow, setting against the grain and violating expectation by acting purposefully, worse doing so not just individually but in concert, co-validating. Because even such little can become profoundly subversive, one step forward in any yearning for a life at all less conventional, bored and lonely. So often even in sly defiance of conformism and pandemic serial bullying. And what can there be more important? 
 
For in our deepest heart of hearts, like Hamlet's everyman "slave to passion," everyone individually fashions in their very own most secret most transgressive thoughts, true Eros and yearning for understanding, for psychological visibility, indeed some even barest subversive social engineering design fantasy even hypothetically of whatever fulfilling situation might conceivably best fill that gap, especially if whatever one yearns for does not even seem already manifest and existent, much less readily accessible to all. And here is a rousing tale untold, a seed perhaps ever at last finding fertile soil in the ready minds and shared core motivation so characteristic of countless others, desperately sought for unmet friends.
 
Rather than sweeping the world out of nowhere, much like unto forbidden love, subversion necessarily begins in microcosm, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative, must finally innovate: to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist. For such will be the first germ of interaction perhaps even as proposed herein, within even a small intentional social circle let alone any grander intentional community, amongst ourselves together, leaderless subversion of hierarchy, turning away from the social rat-race, and perhaps even together reaching out in the world at large but even at all actually on our own terms.
 
 

Freedom and the human condition

First of all, freedom in Eudemonia for human beings must be defined in terms of human nature, evolutionary neurology. For time bound human consciousness, prior experience, memory of the past, informing anticipation of the future, remains never content as are other animals, to live simply in the moment as according ancient dictates and exhortations of Zen Mysticism and the like. Therefore, among all other values socially, what all too often frustrated impulses, what specific defining intrinsic stimulus appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, are so uniquely characteristic to evolutionary neurology of the human condition and any slim ever frustrated prospect of fulfillment therein? That is the question. Therein lies probortunity. And there's the rub! For the rubric: probortunity, is coined by way of portmanteau from the words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in hopeful denotation of how, and flaccid Zen resignation and apathy be damned, indeed in accordance with evolutionary neurology and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, solution finding in all to scarce and fondly remembered experience of collaboration among equals, present socially to the intellect, true freedom, gratifying challenge and opportunity. Desperately seeking...

And in accordance with the present agenda, the very purpose of FoolQuest.com, and bridging philosophical and psychological generality into application and practicality of planning and specific strategic action, indeed comprehensive social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle by social engineering design, compelling argument shall be advanced anon, that an appealingly ideal strategic vehicle of precisely such liberating intrinsic fulfillment, socially and intellectually, might, as advanced herein, actually consist of endeavor at entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) on the one hand, in unprecedented synergy concurrently and interstitial with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing, on the other hand.

For such remains the FoolQuest.com social engineering design protocol, named: Creativity can and Should be Social. Because purposeful interaction and substantive communication, prosper from pleasurably meaningful, sustainable and fully engaged ongoing creative endeavor, and also in order to bring participants, human beings, social animals as we are, continually back into uplifting contact, thereby forging ever stronger attachments. So goes the proverb: The devil is in the details. But more anon.

For it has been opined that for social success in any social life, putting it idiomatically: in order to be more interesting and impressive to others, to get a social life, first get a life: An imperative to engage into any fuller or more interesting situation, because such, presumably, will be hoped to occasion and inform propinquity in ongoing networking, social connection and interaction. Creativity Can and Should be Popular, not strange and socially awkward, interesting but oddball and unconventional, thus often actually injurious to social standing.

However, in the most flagrantly taboo subversion, what if the norm could become subject to Peripeteia, figuratively turned on its head? The outreach proposal: Creativity Can and Should be Popular, advances by design, a concept of the intentional social engineering of informational social influence or: social "proof" towards legitimization and maximization of the draw and appeal of Creativity can and Should be Social as proposed, actually in order to aid, abet, and  socially support participating individuals in thereby becoming more interesting and impressive to others, thereby improving individual social life, standing, networking and connection, with ongoing recruitment and expansion of Creativity can and Should be Social, as actually a secondary priority. Desperately seeking: The proverbial tail figuratively wagging the metaphorical dog!

Such an outcome as above described, would be so highly desirable, because as things stand, so very many indeed continue suffering such sore travail of subjugation and heteronomy, just going through the Existentially Absurd motions of any dull and dystressfully unhappy existence or situation, merely in order to remain connected at all. But many instead who fail or who resist, not only the most flagrantly damaged wretched refuse of humanity sp flagrantly unable to cope, but even the most unassuming and at least seemingly well adjusted ordinary of folk, and indeed so many of our best and brightest, however highly competent, nevertheless will fall by the wayside, forgotten, abandoned, bored and lonely. Catch-22, a classic double bind, no-win setup for failure and suffering, one way or the other: damned if you do, damned if you don't! Alas, in Existentially Absurd social reality, there remains such dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, wherein instrumentality equals zero, meaning, even causally and deterministically, no relationship between performance and outcome, no real hope, no results no matter what one does, other than mounting frustration and defeat. So much then, it might seem, for individual real world freedom and capability.

Indeed, from any end user standpoint, the existing system has remained broken from time immemorial. Alas the masses abide in blinding propaganda myth. And what a racket! A racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality, indeed, a myth, scam or fraud of heteronomy, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many.

As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. And the inculcation of social skills and skilled incompetence, remains an important aspect of just such ubiquitous fraud and sheer Existential Absurdity. And the only wining move is not to play, alas what all too often seems, however wretched, the only game in town. If you’re not winning because you don’t know the rules, then by all means, why not just learn the rules? But if for whatever perfectly good reason, one knows the rules yet remains adamant and unwilling to follow whatever rules imposed, there must be either something wrong with the game or with the participant playing. But if the game is rigged so you just can’t win, find another game or let's invent and begin playing one of our own precious autonomy.

Because Creativity can and Should be Social! Intentional community or intentional social circle and therein relationship in new paradigm by social engineering design, towards more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, whatever form that might take, perhaps even clearing some hither to unavailable path to success. In accordance with evolutionary neurology and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, FoolQuest.com advances agenda of comprehensive social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle by design, an appealingly ideal strategic vehicle of precisely such liberating intrinsic fulfillment, socially and intellectually, as advanced herein, actually consisting of endeavor at entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) on the one hand, in unprecedented interstitial synergy concurrently with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing, on the other hand. Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and change the world!

Alas there as yet exists no alternative of clear, ready, trustworthy and transparent social support system for the liberation of capable individual endeavor and outreach. Moreover, popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Alas that all to often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And if indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, cagey, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectually subservient path of popularity and social success, remains antithetical to true friendship which by contrast must remain ever open, genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated after all, upon free and unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility.

And such remains the probortunity at hand. For the rubric: probortunity, is coined by way of portmanteau from the words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in hopeful denotation of how problems present to the intellect, true freedom and opportunity, any transformational prospect of adaptation and change for the better. Creative solution finding: Look for the Solution within the Problem. Are relationships shaped by social context indeed under heteronymous alienation, or is society merely the aggregate network of all constituent autonomous relationships? And if both are true, which paradigm shall take precedence? What "game" shall we play? Which opens any path solution finding? And indeed, what then truly constitutes fuller more interesting existence? And what to do? What freedom remains actually feasible in such a closed and inhospitable society? What are the options?

Answer: Neither by somehow, like unto the very hand of God, entirely reshaping the playing field of the world all in one fell swoop, world conquest and salvation wholesale, nor therefore, in any false binary of ideologically fanatical black and white thinking. And neither, instead, by accommodation in mystical quest for futility, sublime apathy and cynical resignation to our fates. Nor by uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, and magic. Nor by interminable exhausting and stultifying inane small talk and whatever pointless and irrelevant exchange of biographical information. Nor by lone isolated and rugged self-sufficiency, but by autonomy and Individualism in proximate relationship, social circles, formal or informal, often known, for better or worse, to normalize whatever their own even deviant social contracts amongst themselves, even perhaps howsoever flagrantly superseding and taking precedence over prevailing expectations of society at large, whenever together in close interaction.

Thus even dramatic change in proximate situation, even without overwhelming power to impose their transformative will upon society at large. Indeed, as further expounded anon, hence any at all feasible prospect actually of tailor made culture in test case microcosm, any practice of freedom together, as via intentional community or intentional social circle and therein relationship in new paradigm by social engineering design, towards more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, whatever form that might take. FoolQuest.com remains, so desperately seeking, my outreach and your invitation, gentle reader, to deliberation upon such as above prospects for taking action together. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more individuals interacting and taking initiative must finally  innovate: at long last to begin doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants.

After all, society is the enemy! Society, heteronomy, oppression, rigid incompetence, imposition, victim blaming and sheer indifference. Leviathan in which er each and all play our part. Thus, in the in the famous aphorism of Walt Kelly's beloved Pogo Possum: We have met the enemy, and he is us! For indeed, the correct indefinite pronoun denoting society is never 'it' but 'We.' Therefore: "why isn't it... ?" may generally be the wrong question. The interesting and responsible question remains: "Why don't/can't We... ?" And what else matters? How as compliant members, we each participate in the whole. Unless we won't. Unless we resist! Yes: We. I and thou. Who else? We are all one way or another, willing or unwilling, part of any problem and also conceivably just perhaps any part of whatever kind of solution finding and responsible experimentation.

 

 

Relevant substantive communication and human interaction

"Big talk" may mean, if not anything boastful, bragging or posturing, then whatever unrealistic overreach. In other words, ambitions for whatever reason, disparaged and just perhaps underestimated in overwhelming terror of seeming pretentious or presumtious. However, by much the same token,  big talk may denote whatever opposite of intermionably dreary and vapid small talk. Big talk or: heavy conversation, may simply mean anything deeper, more interesting, and less superficial and trivial, analytical, strategic, substantive conversation as pertaining to intellectual exploration, discovery, or even to purposeful interaction.

Alas, if one needs someone to talk to, the search engines assume with staunch and blither conviction, that one merely seeks someone to listen, and not much actually in the way of real conversation. And  further more, that the reason must be for psychotherapy, emotional support, or suicide prevention. Not to disparage any of the latter life saving interaction. But when in any typical bogus support group, actively trying to render for one another, any practical advice or assistance, will actually be penalized, then "marshmallowing" emotional support functions only as manipulative Behavioral Modification to sooth and pacify those who suffer ever more helplessly for it. Alas however, and so blithely, no other agenda save for psychotherapy, emotional support, or suicide prevention, is acknowledged or considered as any reason to talk. Indeed, again according to the search engines, substantive conversation is only something that teachers strive to inflict upon students in formal education. No other context or situation ever seemingly comes to mind. Except here on FoolQuest.com:

Because as the search engines also inform us, happy people whom indeed we may all do best to emulate, to rôle model, if only we knew how! talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together engaging in creative endeavor. And all with less small talk. But nowhere rises any call to action from such subversive insight, mere observation, save again as here on FoolQuest.com And moreover, surely those for whom the answer for every challenge, is the implementation of that which they call "a platform," are just barking up the wrong tree. Such "platforms" are frustratingly rigid and laborious webforms, epitomizing Totalitarian Interactivity leading us all about by the nose. Rather, truly important and relevant, remains the process and quality of human interaction. For as per the writings of Aristotle: “Man is by nature a social animal.” Tautologically, no one, none of us, can interact alone. That said, lucid problem statement, so often thwarted by taboo and crimestop, remains integral to solution finding and any responsible plan of action together. And the probortunity at hand, remains not just quantity but quality of nurturing and gratifying social interaction, indeed creative social interactions towards more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, as recommended in outreach herein, whatever form that might take.

But never by any rat race of extrinsic societal reward and punishment in the course of interminable exhausting and stultifying inane small talk, uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, fearfully conflict avoidant and debilitating headgames of toxic social skill and sycophantic toadying skilled incompetence,, nor in recreation, so-called, that shabbily travesty of playful honest hedonism, replete with soul crushing fake fun passing for any wholehearted pleasure seeking; instead only the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from sheer Existential Absurdity, from endless debilitation from oppression under heteronomy to conventional options in life alienated from all purpose and sensemaking, but ever only for serious people as byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Only the oppressor demands of us all never to think. Philosophical habits of clear thinking thereby become subversive and even thoughtcrime entirely taboo.

Conversation of deeper cognition, indeed Socratic Dialectic, remains ever integral to purposeful interaction. Philosophical Dialectical honest and skeptical sweet reason, leverages good will and habits of clear thinking, by fearlessly open and fruitful investigation and deliberation together, unfolding in at all responsible due diligence, the practice of controversy consisting in the welcome and invited exchange of criticism, and thereby ongoing error detection and course correction. For criticism remains inherently friendly, an expression of abiding respect

Substantive conversation exceeds lecture and short-answer formats for transition of information. Full engagement in substantive conversation and even into the practice of controversy consisting in the welcome and invited exchange of criticism, involves people more profoundly with one another. Whereas, and all in such trepidation to avoid disagreement at all cost, conventionally expected vapid small talk, deliberately insubstantial and distant conversation and pervading anti-intellectualism, the conviction that disagreement is tantamount to strife, thwarts attachment, bonding and relationship, particularly friendship, thereby starving social and intellectual stimulus appetites, thereby inflicting a crushing oppression of protracted loneliness and boredom.

And yet the indefatigable enemies of freedom and the open society, imbeciles, tyrants and scoundrels, adamantly insist, in trenchant denial simply ignoring all sound reasoning supported by Empirical evidence entirely to the contrary, that cooperation is impossible save by fairly complete agreement and compliance. And thus, under the worldview of heteronomy, collaboration among equals, though in truth eventually indispensable, remains entirely inconceivable!

And therefore, one way or another, in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, near egalitarian low hierarchical distance in creative solution finding as need arising in the eyes of decision makers, remains that rare taste of freedom, the one cautiously infrequent respite from boredom and sore travail, fleeting clemency at the whim of our various jailors, guardians all, of status quo, whatever oppressive powers that be, tribal chieftains, corporate overlords, or the stifling authority of professional educators.

But, in the most flagrantly taboo subversion, what if the norm could become subject to Peripeteia, figuratively turned on its head, in maximization of value and freedom, so that instead of controlling authoritarianism routinely stifling curiosity and creativity, convivial creativity became the normal default, day to day, and deference to commanding authority, even however ad hock, the infrequent exception, moderation only in contingency as need ever actually arising?

Because, strategically, precisely such as above real life Peripeteia, remains the least daunting, entirely feasible and completely actionable for us, gentle readers, just amongst ourselves, ever should we come together and set agenda, even however taboo,  for ongoing deliberation. Because honest, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people who thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together intentionally and purposefully engaging in creative endeavor, begin, first of all, simply by talking more seriously. And any two or more people can do likewise, on purpose, in defiance of all prevailing anti-intellectual social pressure to habitually interminable small talk, vapidly uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony in ever keeping it light and avoiding all social risk. And such the latter existence or situation can only be stifling indeed, for intelligent and sensitive individuals. Here then, in the alternative, is something that only sounds lofty and abstract, yet remaining in actuality, conduct entirely practical and concrete for any two or more, an objective according to plan.

Gentle reader, do you ever long for some other less conventional option in the game of life, anything less irksome and oppressive, different and more fulfilling, an unconventional life of freedom together in expressive convivially creative interaction? Because as to be fully expounded anon, precisely such consuming ambition remains in so many ways ever crucial. And there is nothing less at stake in the present proposal. So many burn with the ambition of forging true friendship attempting  anything really cool together with others at all likeminded. Hence the need, so poorly understood and vastly underserved, for any sort of open and effective (pre-) incubator to foster all such connection and deliberation into actionable planning that will already by itself uplift spirits. Indeed, perhaps even endeavor of entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) on the one hand, in unprecedented interstitial synergy concurrently with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing, on the other hand. Because Creativity can and Should be Social! For as John Cleese expounds: Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” To reiterate, merely inception of ongoing deliberation, even just to talk it over. A modest beginning, the indispensable first step, entirely feasible and completely actionable for any of us, amongst ourselves, should we together so decide, gentle readers. That little remains within the power of any two or more, come what may. If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done.

FoolQuest.com undertakes a new and different transparently accessible more joyfully subversive approach. Egalitarian collaboration in storytelling and business or project planning remain similar and related applications in the dynamic power of narrative. Business or project planning after all, is only a different kind of storytelling and plotting, even dramatic futuring scenario climaxing toward whatever hoped for outcomes; an idea to be pitched, a tale to be told, towards applied creativity, disruptive innovation, rigorously detailing any projected path to success and desired results. As a powerful bonding exercise, unprecidented serious and capable collaborative fiction brainstorming enfolds important lessons in creativity and solution finding, very much applicable in the true to life drama of new venture creation (various business startup) and entrepreneurship for the rest of us, endless possibility of forging true friendship attempting anything really cool together. Let's! Can we talk?

Practical freedom in objectively real application beyond the merely theoretical, consists not only in autonomy in the abstract, but also in practical capability. And yet, as sapient social beings, the will to power is fulfilled not merely in solitary task mastery, even however practically or materially fruitful, nor even in elicitation thereby of conditional strokes, but only in genuine autonomy meeting ones needs for capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, indeed as epitomized in collaboration among equals. Otherwise, we all remain merely setup for failure. Indeed, in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience, purposeful interaction, substantive communication, creative solution finding and brainstorming, remain key to Eudemonia. For such remains the human condition.

And as it turns out, the very key to serous and capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, in  fulfillment thereby of the will to power, may be found by following example neither of the facile and conniving popular kids nor of those phony success gurus, but instead in emulation of honest, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people who talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together intentionally and purposefully engaging in creative endeavor. In other words, intentionally to do likewise together, to talk more seriously, together intentionally, purposefully engaging in creative endeavor, specially as  proposed, collaboration among equals in an unprecedentedly innovative dynamic interstitial synergy concurrently between unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing on the one hand, and endless objectively real world possibly as explored in business or project planning in new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the other hand, all as per the present outreach of FoolQuest.com. Thereby to discover, just perhaps, if likewise to thrive in autonomy as a result. Because pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement remains key to better optimized ongoing social and intellectual stimulus struggle against ever looming boredom and loneliness

For Eudemonia will result never by any rat race of extrinsic societal reward and punishment in the course of interminable exhausting and stultifying inane small talk, uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, fearfully conflict avoidant and debilitating headgames of toxic social skill and sycophantic toadying skilled incompetence,, nor in recreation, so-called, that shabbily travesty of playful honest hedonism, replete with soul crushing fake fun passing for any wholehearted pleasure seeking; instead only the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from endless debilitation from oppression under heteronomy to conventional options in life, but ever only for serious people as byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done.

Substantive conversation, indeed Socratic Dialectic, remains ever integral to purposeful interaction. Philosophical Dialectical honest and skeptical sweet reason, leverages good will and habits of clear thinking, by fearlessly open and fruitful investigation and deliberation together, unfolding in at all responsible due diligence, the practice of controversy consisting in the welcome and invited exchange of criticism, and thereby ongoing error detection and course correction. For criticism remains inherently friendly, an expression of abiding respect

For in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression. As it turns out, inner freedom by itself alone, is no freedom at all.

Philosophers, writers, artists, even scientists, not only need encouragement and an audience, they need constant stimulation from other people. It is almost impossible to think without talking. If Defoe had really lived on a desert island, he could not have written Robinson Crusoe, nor would he have wanted to. Take away freedom of speech, and the creative faculties dry up.”

  — 'Conversation with a Pacifist' by George Orwell

Therefore, woe betide us all should anyone imagine the Socratic Dialectic as an objective or mere intent. It's not. For thought worthy dialogue remains no objective or desired end result, but the barest indispensable beginning and the very backbone of all thinking endeavor. In outreach asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what no one else offers, only FoolQuest.com openly advances agenda for discussion, as to proffer or attempt any such endeavor as hereto expounded. And as to be fully expounded anon, such remains crucial to the pursuit of happiness, meaning towards whatever one wishes to do, to accomplish, or to become. Here then is proffered your open invitation to discuss the prospect at hand, or even join right in. As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! And freely question whatever remains unclear. In facilitation of creative solution finding and brainstorming collaboration among equals as proposed, along with a selection of disruptively innovative startup proposals are listed under new venture creation (various business startup), a curetted selection of notions, provocations and unfinished stories and prompts, along with extensive tools and guides to creativity, drama and the discipline of the writing craft, are provided here on FoolQuest.com, Or pitch your own story ideas and business first concepts! Again: Post to the message posting forums for others to weigh in, or via email if its private. And I promise to reply.
 FoolQuest.com remains an outreach for "unreasonable" thoughtful cofounders in collaboration among equals, unprecedentedly innovative interstitial dynamic synergy  concurrently between hitherto unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing on the one hand, and business or project planning in new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the other hand, all as per the present outreach of FoolQuest.com. Thereby to discover, just perhaps, if likewise to thrive in autonomy as a result. Because pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement remains key to the social engineering of better optimized ongoing social and intellectual stimulus struggle against ever looming boredom and loneliness
 
 
 
 
 
Three basic questions of relatable drama as in life, ever endure:
     When all else fails, what has actually been desired all along?
 
Believable developed motivated characters in competent fiction writing, relatably represent real humanity, and thus must believably, coherently and consistently work out such questions each in their own way, in order actually to move the audience, and not just the sentimental author. 
 
In the bold interrogative irony of one time Vice Presidential candidate Admiral James Stockdale: "Who am I, why am I here?" In answer, setting present mission statement in perhaps the most famous words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” -indeed, unreasonably intelligent, kind and helpful... Moreover, to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Beginning with the celebrated star first follower who shall be the true leader and influencer, teaching by example, showing others how to participate and relate, blazing the trail of welcome! No, I might not have what you want.  But dare we seek for it together? For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies.
Who are you? What do you want? Where are you going? But who do you serve, and who do you trust? Don't you know? Then I will go with you.  — 'Babylon 5: Crusade' (paraphrase)
 
FoolQuest.com ever strives at outreach toward collaboration cofounder recruitment of "unreasonable" thoughtful citizens in capable collaboration among equals, beginning first of all, merely in striving together to initiate and to sustain ongoing public discourse upon the agenda at hand.
Bridging the abstract and the concrete, FoolQuest.com  pursues a relevant fulfillment of literally the most important intrinsic human needs and stimulus appetites according to the greatest sages of antiquity as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science. What then could ever possibly be more interesting and important?

Indeed, outreach and organization, remain tautologically integral to all group collaboration from scratch such as proposed. Like any prospecting or networking for new social connection, whatever such outreach should be joy instead of, as all to often, such a daunting ordeal and exercise in futility. And that is why, as to be fully expounded anon, in unprecidented innovation, FoolQuest.com takes a specifically different, joyfully subversive and more fulfilling approach to organization and outreach. Alas, the conventional outreach methods of common wisdom remain so woefully cumbersome and inadequate. Indeed, the typical online cofounde recruitment, or entrepreneur matching, communities for aspiring entrepreneurs to connect and together undertake new venture creation (various business startup), leave much to be desired.

As it turns out, entrepreneur matching as currently practiced, can be a lot like online dating, but worse: In an endless catalogue of often frustratingly cagey strangers, of dauntingly meaningless user profiles, how are people supposed to even perceive one another, much less find one another and connect? Even worse, the pitches for their ideas may be somewhat banal and cursory. But to reiterate the observation by George Orwell, even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.

Alas that game changing sophisticated automated Sociometry yet remains in its infancy. As a new and better less haphazard means of social interaction, highly advance and sophisticated Artificial Intelligent Expert Systems for automated Sociometry, will not only interact, but continually foster and observe human interaction, gather data and learn, before continually offering new and precisely determined recommendations and matches, both one to one and for groups and social circles, among other things. Profound advancements in automated Sociometry, anticipated as the next revolution in social technology, will, as envisaged, personality profile, match and thus more readily bring together for all purposes and among others, the compatibly likeminded, thereby improving social embedment and personal access to resources of society. In the future, everyone will be influential! Not to digress.

And however, the point remaining, how making do in the here and now with available wherewithal, for the perseverant reader, herein presented remains nothing less than just perhaps any howsoever less miraculous and convenient lower tech actionable proposal, blueprint and plan of action, towards new and unprecedented more optimal situation by social engineering design, of ongoing capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, and thereby the constant social and intellectual stimulation from other people whereof Orwell speaks, and thereby, Eudemonia of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle. Indeed, not merely as a matter of teamwork so crucial to howsoever extrinsic deferred gratification from whatever hoped for eventual success, but a vital experience of respectful human interaction in and of itself immediately intrinsic to secure and authentic wellbeing.

And to reiterate, all something that, tautologically, no one can execute alone and unassisted, but well within the power of I and thou, that is to say: among willing participants: capable collaboration among equals. Because optimal reciprocal engagement accrues the highest return in like kind, for truly generous investment of precious attention whereof extolled by Simone Wei. At least in theory. After all, it's only a matter of how well folks together relate and conduct ourselves towards one another, though often easier said than done. And there's the rub! Can you be trustworthy and responsible? And will anybody else reciprocate? Am I your unmet friend?

 
 
 
 
Capable collaborative fiction brainstorming
Beware malagenda: The unrecognized need for more serious collaborative fiction brainstorming online

There already exist online, all manner of ongoing projects in shared collaborative World Building of copious, meticulous and sometimes even most rigorous background in excruciating detail, that often then no one really seems to fathom quite what to do with. There is high powered collaboration in video and even feature movie production online, frequently with no attention to scripting. Atrocious and thuddingly inept scripts are often imposed arbitrarily and in advance, in the arrogance of the clueless unaware incompetence, ever putting the cart before the horse! For such remains the heteronomy and irrelevance of excessive socialization, desperate conformity, unit cohesion, superficial harmony, and fitting in for its own sake, pointlessly and at any cost. Alas, joint authorship in fiction online, has been abandoned to the mercies of various internet communities of grandiose delusionally malagendaed willfully amateurish pipedreaming dilettantery that give fanfic such a bad name.

Now, whereas yet endure such plethora of what amount to worthlessly thin-skinned and Anti-Critically Biased online bogus support groups or forums also for supposed writers, there remain also plenty of excellent and longstanding serious writers groups online for the exchange of genuine critique, which is a pretentious French word for criticism of writing, even such feedback of the very highest caliber, in order to nurture and cultivate talent and improve in fiction writing rigor and competence in the discipline of the writing craft. But for some reason, unlike the aforementioned snot-nosed blockheads, serious writers are only rarely seen to collaborate and only with close associates in writing, never strangers en mass. This leaves a considerable gap in any readily available and valuable creative social experience and resource of informed and capable productive joint authorship in fiction writing. Serious writers regulate their exposure and keep distance from unaware incompetence, too serious yet not serious enough, with no regard for the discipline of the writing craft. Many such, in their fantasy of being writers, even together actually concoct actual process virtually guaranteeing the most ghodawful badfic!  For such as they remain convinced that there is no disputing taste, and therefore no possibility of criteria of esthetics, skill, quality or learning, good or bad, in any art, indeed such as fiction writing.

Only by somehow sustaining engagement in whatever salient human interaction will any kind of entry level ever ensue, into whatever so coveted experience. For example, writing: Only seriously writing will make one any sort of a writer. Alas however, writing is typically solitary, isolated and unknown to the world. Serious fiction writers break solitude, struggle and grow by exchanging hardnosed critique. And while there exist fine writers groups for otherwise solitary writers to break isolation via the exchange of critique, there is a distinct lack of indeed unprecidented serious collaborative fiction writing, both underserved and underappreciated. This is because except by the exchange of critique, serious writers so often tend to remain solitary, working alone, while existing collaborative fiction, one way or another, is seldom of the any caliber, ranging from awful to perfunctory, in one format or another. An ongoing genuine intensive writer's bull session online, is nowhere to be found. High caliber fiction writing collaboration remains obscure, misunderstood and underserved.

Alas then that all serious writing traditionally long remains solitary. What a waste! What squandered social and imaginative opportunity! For sheer creativity, more egalitarian, problem-centered rather than ego-centered, the unique first key complementary agenda of FoolQuest.com is to meet the poorly understood, blithely despised, and vastly underserved need, and at long last fill the gap of unprecedented serious writing joint authorship even from scratch, by bringing together aspiring fiction writers of every skill level, not only for the exchange of hardnosed critique, but full participation in an ongoing writers bull session online, collaborative brainstorming of new fiction writing projects as emerge, not only for intensity of peak experience of shared creativity and growth in the discipline of the writing craft, but an actual high standard of genuine and intensely innovative and surprising new quality output in dramatic  fiction writing and Science Fiction. In outreach asking of others what no one else asks, and offering in return, what only FoolQuest.com offers.  

 
 
 
Realistic professionalism: The  FoolQuest.com work ethic in action
FoolQuest.com extends your invitation, gentle reader, to collaboration among equals in an unprecedentedly innovative interstitial dynamic synergy concurrently between serious collaborative fiction writing on the one hand, and business or project planning in new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us, on the other hand; filling the gap of poorly understood and vastly underserved needs of entrepreneurship made more accessible for the rest of us; all as beginning in the utterly neglected very earliest path of concerted effort over time, discussion, research and networking even from the most vastly underserved embryonic inception or: "kitchen table" phase or stage of new venture creation (various business startup), into planning, research, due diligence, feasibility study and organization, problem-centered rather than ego-centered, with the productive ambition of even world changing new venture creation (various business startup) and expansion all from scratch, undertaking beyond the resource or wherewithal of any one lone individual; all hence actually seeking out and bringing together aspiring entrepreneurs and activists for brainstorming new ideas and following up in every due diligence developing all manner of promising notions and endless possibility into realization, from comprehensive feasibility study and (pre-) incubation of embryonic first concepts, through research, comprehensive feasibility study, business planning and qualified Management Team recruitment, all the way to Capitalization, implementation and expansion.  Then followed by whatever dénouement of exit strategy ever as applicable. A steep learning curve together. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! For the possibilities remain endless.
 
Obviously, funding must remain ever crucial in new venture creation (various business startup). And we have entered a revolutionary new age of ever more accessible new vehicles of investment and Capitalization, ever more commonly accessible, indeed: for the rest of us. But popular participation amid unprecedented liberation from traditional privileged exclusivity, has eroded away all concomitant protective filters of, to put it vulgar and colloquially: shit from Shinola! And therefore prospecting for Capitalization may often remain somewhat premature, for wont of necessary preceding preparation and due diligence, support thereof all ever remaining as exclusive as ever, so vastly and dauntingly underserved for the likes of us clueless hoi polloi, and mysterious or worse: often halfcocked and half-baked pipedream, incompetent or even actually dishonest folly and knavery. So goes the proverb: The devil is in the details. Sun Tzu said: Every battle is won or lost before it is ever fought. First indeed must be shared whatever vivid fantasy of compelling frustrated yearning, but fit groundwork must then ensue. It remains foolhardy to just wing it. As per summary aggregation of the notoriously alliterative multiple p's:  Properly Purposeful Pre-Planning and Prior Preparation Prevents Preemptive Production of Painfully Piss Poor Performance.
 
 Neither high pressure facile flimflam of hurried hustle and deceptive manipulation, nor passive hostile stalling and foot-dragging proverbially pulling out the figurative rug metaphorically out from under, but responsibly proceeding in true collaboration among equals steadily at our own pace in small reversible steps, business or project planning together, creative solution finding, and capable management team formation, business or project planning together, a steep learning curve creative solution finding, and capable management team formation. Gentle reader, can you be trustworthy and responsible? And will anybody else reciprocate? Am I your unmet friend?
The FoolQuest.com vision of entrepreneurship for the rest of us, capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, remains entirely different from anything less. It is therefore respectfully submitted herein, that the true key remains in the actual process, the human interaction, of business or project planning together, creative solution finding, and management team formation, in true collaboration among equals steadily at our own pace, beyond mere lip service. And that the indispensable and effective starting point remains to be found in initiation and quality of open and responsible sustained discourse and deliberation in critical thinking, outreach and research. And in specific new and unprecedented innovation as to be fully expounded anon, in the concurrent interstitial dynamic synergy to be cultivated between unprecidented serious collaborative fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) for the rest of us. Because Creativity can and Should be Social, beginning with the celebrated star first follower who shall be the true leader and influencer, showing others how to participate and relate, blazing the trail of welcome! No, I might not have what you want.  But dare we seek for it together? For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies.
 
Setup for failure:
"Follow your bliss!" rings hollow that shopworn platitude whereby we are each and all extolled, then each and all, so ill equipped, summarily abandoned entirely to ones own devices, set up for inertia, failure and disappointment. commitment falls short, even in lunatic faith that, alas, does not actually move mountains, in commitment even such as never wanes, yet fails to carry the freight, manipulatively 'Bright Sided' as we have been, by exhortation to willful positivity and rabid GREENLANTERNism! For urging and enthusiasm of hope that springs eternal and endures, is not a strategy. All that cheering and encouragement at the starting line, quickly fades away into into the distance. No one cares. Because all Pollyanna willfully optimistic blandishment and facile lip service notwithstanding, in ugly truth of banal hypocrisy, individual fulfillment remains at best a distant societal priority, if not actually undermined as a subversive dire threat to status quo. And therefore, rudderless and setup for failure without relevant social support, direction or resources, far from any idealism of subversive and committedly "unreasonable" disruptive civic heroism, many so discouraged then hesitate, become lost and despair, finally to conform and make do or just fall by the wayside.
 
But what is to be done? Well, it's complicated. I have no ready and trite simple answer to complex problems. And I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no formulaic callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch! Isn't there quite enough of that already? And so, in the face of entrenched pervasive institutional indifference, how can anyone fare any better?
 
The masses have tolerated much, only given bygone prosperity. But boom is long gone to bust. And nowadays in the United States, even baring any misfortune of protracted unemployment, the dilemma remains between entry directly into the workforce, and thence failure and poverty, in doing without higher education, on the one hand, and crushing lifelong compounding debt from the burgeoning expense of higher education, even if career pursuit all goes according to plan without a hitch. One way or another, many end up going into business for themselves, less by preference, then when all else has failed. And whatever pragmatic compromise turns out no less difficult, than whatever lofty aspirations therefore sacrificed.

We are all such proverbial square pegs: The customer is always wrong! The program never fails, you fail the program. In  the immortal observations of George Carlin: "Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit. By contrast, our designated rôle models in every conventional option in life, the star student under formal education, ideal employee , perfect disciple or model prisoner alike, are all so consummately well adapted, ever so heteronymously characterized as they remain, beyond mere responsive obedience and passivity otherwise, not only by every obsessive-compulsive eager beaver sore travail, but boundlessly committed initiative in anticipation of their superior's desires, "paying one's dues" life long, excelling without complaint or resistance, never seeking attention by requesting explanation or assistance.

And why can't we all follow their example and be more like them? Because, just as Carlin implies, we all so chafe at the bit! Recalcitrant in such sore travail, obstinately uncooperative toward mind numbing routine as imposed by ever coercive and manipulative self-servingly moralizing authority, all too many typically succumb to ambivalence expressed in resentful and reluctant obedience together with covert passive hostile sabotage, instead of actually choosing between either dignified and whole hearted compliant individual cooperation on the one hand, or else free and open fully effective proletariat uprising on the other hand. And such remains damaged human nature not by innate disposition, but as triggered in suffering and humiliated response to norms of sore travail, deviously guilt tripping tyranny psychologically internalized, in short, of slave morality.

And yet, exactly such adaptation on the part of the aforementioned rôle model, of broken in and enthusiastic approval seeking, will still be so blithely held up as exemplary in order to vindicate systemic failure and disappointment in most every walk of life. And under extrinsic punishment and reward systems by hierarchical design, indeed such provides the benchmark by which for better or worse, most of us will come short and fall by the wayside, make do, for each to learn their place. And hence the burning motivation, the poignant yearning and sheer redeeming Existential disgust, of "unreasonable people," instead to find one another in order committedly together to strive and change and forge anew the world, better to their liking.

 
Not fitting in remains an often debilitating sore travail. But leave us face it: the compromises in fitting are typically even more deranged, impotent, pointlessly laborious, soul destroying, senseless, Existentially Absurd, and over all, egodystonic and shockingly irrelevant to all core values. Alas that capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, is not simply given, and cannot be won by jumping through any hoops set before us. Fortunate are the few truly ever exposed thereto and included therein. But for most of us, capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, remains elusive. And anything less than capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, amounts to an isolation from power, bored, anxious, helpless, oppressed and alone, a frustrating sore travail. Outreach remains random and daunting at best. But what individual recourse can be available?
 
And so, as my own boss, more confident in my ideas than my capability, I have fired myself for utter failure and gross incompetence in the sore travail of life! Tautologically, there can be no self-help, no solitary rugged self-reliant unilateral self-made bootstrap "well-formed plan," for interaction among more than one individual. And no secret magic of fineness, either. Because power remains a function of capable relationship on ones own terms. Am I then your unmet friend? Expert or layperson in whatever fields, old pro or neophyte aspirant, we each and all bring to the table whatever ones own insights, questions, answers, knowledge, talent, ideas, perspective, experience and connections. -Alas, hard work all too often so vastly unappreciated and blithely squandered...
 
Toxic social reality of cohesive alienation:
 
Not that purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, or even creativity, via whatever strategy, and all however crucial, remain by any means the only creditable core values of relationship, especially friendship. And yet, nevertheless, purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication remain the only doorway, the only path of connection, so Absurdly slammed shut, to all other desires. The formation of social circles remains so crucial socially, because personal friends remaining unacquainted with one another, are unlikely to invite or include one socially. All thus little more effective than lingering ever friendless.
 
But what manner of social inclusion in precisely what type of interaction? Does it even make any difference? Yes. It matters a great deal. Because Creativity can and Should be Social. Indeed, it should come as no surprise how superficial and pointless distance and suspicion as manifest in purposelessness and triviality (entirely ruling out purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication), the conventional mind dulling panic stricken knee-jerk anti-intellectualism to which we are all held hostage, that, rather than protecting, reassuring or even much amusing anyone, only thwarts human connection and attachment. For such is the Existential Absurdity of that which is called: recreation, that shabbily travesty of playful honest hedonism, soul crushing fake fun passing for any wholehearted pleasure seeking; instead only the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from the continual debilitation of oppression under heteronomy to conventional options in life. Indeed, unlike bogus recreation, even genuine play enfolds substance and creative purpose all its own. Therefore, accept no substitute for purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication! Recreation, so ironically named, so empty, mindless, pointless, superficial and militantly trivial, remains the desperate effort and struggle to recover, on ones own time and expense, from the debilitating learned helpless sheer exhaustion, fear and loathing of every debilitating sore travail inflicted in the course of any oppressive conventional options in life.

Alas there as yet exists no clear, ready and transparent social support system for individual endeavor and outreach. And because popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility. Alas that all too often, substance and purpose remain actually shameful, awkward, nerdy, uncool, socially unacceptable and so taboo. And if indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectual path of popularity and social success, indeed remains antithetical to true friendship.

To reiterate, gentle reader, bonding and attachments of true friendship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference with reciprocal psychological visibility, arise not by any rat race of extrinsic societal reward and punishment in the course of inane small talk, uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, fearfully conflict avoidant and debilitating headgames of social skill and sycophantic toadying skilled incompetence, but ever only for serious people as byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve!

Because, if indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectual path of popularity and social success, indeed remains antithetical to true friendship, because it remains in the very taboo nature of friendship, that friendship must be open, genuine and fully engaged. Indeed, that's Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own.

But even nigh tautologically, how can alienation ever actually predicate social cohesion? It can and it does. Read on: The much admired and ever cagy social skill of unperturbed patience in tediously hanging around innocuously killing time, is by very nature distant, facile and quite literally, by tactical nature even if not by intention or objective, even somewhat predatory, in that it’s actually all about stalking but without seeming to. Here is the social minefield, an obstacle course, a social filter. But a filter selecting what manner of conformist personality type, other than the very characteristics of the least genuine of cronies and sycophants? For toadying social cognition makes sycophants of us all! And what a racket! Why does no one understand, first of all, how social expectation of such cagey demonstration of endurance of boredom and loneliness, and thereby of submission to conformity and heteronomy, remain the very antithesis of welcome and friendliness, and also such a dangerous criteria for trust?

For in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

It remains in the very taboo nature of friendship, that friendship must ever remain open, genuine and fully engaged. And by exploding all such destructive myths of fraudulent social reality, even just between ourselves, and then by collaborative brainstorming and solution finding, of small scale social engineering design, might together set agenda in planning and then doing anything better, for implementation deliberately and intentionally, of purposeful interaction and substantive communication. And such remains the objective of Creativity can and Should be Social. Purposeful interaction and substantive communication for serious people, remains so immediately indispensable to human connection and crucial to fulfillment and authentic wellbeing. Because, given how teamwork remains so crucial to hoped for eventual success, extrinsic deferred gratification, the immediate will to power is fulfilled in openly meeting intrinsic needs for capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, influencing one another, and in a manner even salutary and validating.

Purposeful interaction generally (and all the more so specifically such as entrepreneurship for the rest of us, disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) interstitial  concurrent synergy with unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing) involves people more profoundly with one another, uplifting mood and altering consciousness by together confronting questions in reflection upon individual purpose. Substantive conversation, indeed Socratic Dialectic, remains ever integral to purposeful interaction. Philosophical Dialectical honest and skeptical sweet reason, leverages good will and habits of clear thinking, by fearlessly open and fruitful investigation and deliberation together, unfolding in at all responsible due diligence, the practice of controversy consisting in the welcome and invited exchange of criticism, and thereby ongoing error detection and course correction. Gentle reader, search your soul: Does any of this speak to you?  

 

Dialectic and the open society:

The indefatigable enemies of the open society, imbeciles, tyrants and scoundrels, adamantly insist, in trenchant denial simply ignoring all sound reasoning supported by Empirical evidence entirely to the contrary, that cooperation is impossible save by fairly complete agreement and compliance. And thus, under the worldview of heteronomy, collaboration among equals remains entirely inconceivable! But responsible people who disagree actually do cooperate productively only all the time! In the words of John Storrs Hall: Ideas should compete, bodies should cooperate.  Scientist in perpetual disagreement on one point or another, challenge one another to discover Empirical truth by experiment and Scientific Method, and those ever more scarce functional policy makers in good faith, are actually ever known to reach reasonable compromise. And all entirely without consensus. Whereas with no place for dissent, consensus groups remain merely do nothing pep rallies. That is, unless they are scams, in which case whatever the scam's ulterior agenda may indeed be accomplished, whatever good that comes of it. Indeed, wars have been lost by clueless military hierarchies lacking due protocol for the airing of dissent among junior officers, dismissively silenced when they foresaw disaster.

In our deliberations together, let us all then strive for full engagement with neither distance nor acrimony: For should anyone ever openly disagree, then so much the better, affording as disagreement does, every opportunity for Dialectical controversy, the welcomed free exchange of criticism. And criticism is not only productive, but inherently friendly. Indeed, as a matter of Empirical observation, people who disagree are still seen to cooperate all the time, and more meaningfully, freely and authentically in autonomy, than those who together merely submit to uniform heteronomy. Or if anything herein remains unclear, then, gentle reader, please do not be alarmed: Those who only dummy up paralyticly whenever they don't understand are just helpless and insufferably neurotic and frustrating to deal with. Those who will never delve into anything not yet understood, will never surpass all that they already understand as well familiar. For such as they, indeed there will be no new thing under the sun! For such is an arrested intellectual development. We only learn from mistakes, our own or those of others. Mistakes should not be punished. Some procedure of discourse is necessary for bringing comprehension out from incomprehension. Please: Speak up whenever anything remains unclear! And in return, I can be counted upon to do likewise for others. Let us always diligently engage in Miscommunication Competent Dialectical miscommunication repair, with Active Reading and Listening striving towards the achievement of Intersubjectivity being the closer correspondence of message as received and understood, to content as actually intended by the sender. After all, writing is rewriting and never a waste of time. And this obtains no less for collaboration than for solitary composition, and no less for  business or project planning towards new venture creation (various business startup), no less than for fiction writing, all central and crucial to the present proposal.  

In those wise words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought." Alas that in such reciprocal contempt, thinking and doing remain all too often segregated in our institutional mentality. The result is a great deal of thought gone to no practical avail, and a great deal of ill considered action so blithely undertaken. To quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: “Plans are nothing, planning is everything.” And let no one imagine that planning, action or happiness are ever improved by pressure to choose between conformity or social isolation. In the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” It remains, however, that self-help/improvement and social skills remediation are all nothing but delusion and denial of Existential Absurdity. You are not in control of your life, any more than I am in control of mine. We all find ourselves completely at the whim of uncooperative others in every facet of our lives. And everyone within reach to seek help from, is simply too insecure even to fight for their very lives, much less to stand up for one another. Put more simply then, and in complete good faith, powerlessness, the impotent helplessness of the human condition is terminally demeaning. And even beyond direct action, our influence upon others may often be even the more misguided and deluded. Gentle reader, unmet friend: Where is there to be found, any beginning of collaboration among equals? Thinking in terms of action, in order to act more thoughtfully, there remains only one precious beginning, immediately, over which we, I and thou, may indeed together take responsibility and share any control at all: And that is interaction between ourselves, specifically just discussion at all to begin with, and setting an agenda thereto. Because. in the words of Janine Garner, “Failing to engage is engaging with failure.” And indeed, all heteronomy is but craven and futile pseudo-engagement.

Sharing ideas, never completely scripted or controlled, sanguine to the risk of disagreement, substantive conversation deals in concepts, themes and problems in whatever discipline employing higher order thinking, making distinctions, applying ideas, forming generalization, and raising questions. And not just the reporting of experiences, information, definitions, or procedures, even collaboration among equals in brainstorming and creative solution finding. Participants respond directly to one another, by explaining themselves or asking questions in order to clarify one another’s statements. Such dialogue builds upon participants’ statements thereby promoting coherent shared understanding of concepts, themes or problems.

Indeed actually as so well epitomized in unprecedented serious collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, but by no means limited thereto, sustained substantive conversations integrates the contributions of all participants sharing coherent understanding. complex and coherent clarifications, explanations and arguments beyond mere concise statement. Substantive conversation exceeds lecture and short-answer formats for transition of information. Full engagement in substantive conversation, involves people more profoundly with one another. Whereas, and all in such trepidation to avoid disagreement at all cost, conventionally expected vapid small talk, deliberately insubstantial and distant conversation and pervading anti-intellectualism, the conviction that disagreement is tantamount to strife, thwarts attachment, bonding and relationship, particularly friendship, thereby starving social and intellectual stimulus appetites, thereby inflicting protracted loneliness and boredom. For such is the human condition.

Individual power in practice and not just in theory, requires the discovery of actionable practical options in the pursuit of happiness, meaning towards whatever one wishes to do, to accomplish, or to become. Alas, in Existentially Absurd social reality, there remain such dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, meaning inherent contradiction and setup for failure with no results no matter what one does. Indeed, in the world as it is, the will to power is all too often frustrated by even actually hostile and arbitrary intractable social challenges, even regardless of whatever solitary individual ability and worthiness. Whereas people disposed to the characteristic motivation of responsibility, thereby obtain a capacity to interact by appeals to responsibility, to sound reasoning and autonomy. But only in dealing with others at all compatibly likewise so disposed. Hence, it may even be broadly asserted that the will to power is fulfilled via genuine autonomy  meeting ones needs for capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, influencing one another, and in a manner even salutary and validating. But all alone ever deeper out in the wilderness, can there be found any clear path to that great good?

The difficulty remains quite simply that to establish a life of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, yet remains ever elusive for so many of us. Certainly for yours truly! As beloved standup comedian Rodney Dangerfield used so hilariously to complain: "I don't get no respect, no respect at all!" But then, who does? Capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, is by no means average or the norm, but clearly exceptional, even for that matter, among the most exalted leadership, let alone amid the hapless hoi polloi. Indeed, capable interaction with even adequately responsible others is even celebrated as greatness, yet all but discouraged in widest practice. For the worker drones under heteronomy to behavioral conditioning, all cogs in the machine, formal education and typical corporate culture of employment, foster admiration, but never emulation, of those lionized men and women of destiny rising only actually despite the system, overcoming adversity, effectively quarantined and lonely at the top. But for wretches such as we, there must be no ready escape at all from the only wretched game in town! For such remains the banal rank hypocrisy of glowing lip service to independence while fostering helplessness and dependency.

Alas, to reiterate, that more sophisticated automated Sociometry, anticipated as the next revolution in social technology, yet remains in its infancy. Since time immemorial, and not withstanding the rise of modern democracy and communications, the tools of social technology, even well intentioned let alone not so much, remain methods of coercion, intimidation, deception and manipulation, whereby to make tools of us all. Hence the inspiration for "unreasonable" frustrated yearning committedly to strive together and change our world better to our liking, likewise continuing from antiquity. We band of buggered! Alas, as  for all such commendable glittering generality, to quote Frederick Law Olmsted: "After all is said and done, much is said and little is done." Though so much is done to us all. And as Edward Snowden observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent.
 
 
Intentional group formation
 
Intentional community must begin somewhere on any smaller scale of intentional social circle or group.  At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more interacting and taking initiative, at long last must innovate: to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants. Any questions? Any objections? Any takers? You are all invited! Gentle reader, I am counting on you! Dare we together take action? As observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously!
    
In any intentional group or social circle amongst ourselves together turning away from the social rat-race, and perhaps even together reaching out in the world at large but even at all actually on our own terms. What then is revealed as the actual nature of true success? What is the will to power? Can we be winners? What does it mean to be a winner, larger than life? What else but the attainment and sharing of trustworthy, capable and respectful autonomy support? What but the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others? What but the participatory realization of innovation and creativity individually and interpersonally? And what better epitome all thereof, save for unprecidented serious collaborative fiction writing and the subversive disruptively innovation of new venture creation (various business startup) under entrepreneurship for the rest of us? Or if anything else instead, then by what better sustainable means or vehicle thereto, profit, non profit or Social Entrepreneurship? What better path of aręte? For aręte remains the quest for the right way of living ones best, called: virtue, courage (as in: moral fortitude), and outstanding excellence with no pretense of fitting in. In any frustrated desire, there always remains a story that might as well be sweepingly dramatic and intriguingly speculative, and that needs a solid plan, a business or project plan calling out for allies together forging a management team and via the cultivation of strategic partnerships. What better and more relevant agenda? Is none of the aforesaid indeed so unworthy of fully engaged serious and in depth conversation, bridging from general principle into feasibility study of explicit and specific action  agenda? Or at the moment are we all even thinking about anything truly more interesting and important?
 
To quote Charles B Forbes: “Large-scale success today is spelled -Teamwork.” Indeed, in the words of Henry Ford: Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success." For in the celebrated poetry of John Donne: “No man an island:” And there can be no "well-formed plan," however stalwart and inventive, no adaptive self-help/improvement, no self-made bootstrap unilateral solution at all, to shortcomings and  deficiencies of social interaction, cooperation and access all thereto. Any frustrated desire tells a story for all that will hear it, needs a plan in the world, and calls out for allies. Effective and capable collaboration partners of integrity, must remain responsive and responsible to one another. In the endeavor at hand, eventually each participant must stand ready to lead in whatever their capacity or expertise, while at the same rime remaining subordinate in likewise reciprocally abetting one another, ever mindful of task interdependency, giving and getting needed cooperation and assistance in a friendly, competent and timely manner. Does any of this appeal, gentle reader? For such remains the objective of the present outreach. Although, to start with, prospective collaboration partners need only begin by each holding up our end of ongoing conversation towards every due diligence. So share your own ideas. As a handy starting point, find here on FoolQuest.com, a selection of unfinished stories to prompt collaborative fiction writing, as well as a range of subversive and disruptively innovative proposals for business planning and feasibility study towards new venture creation (various business startup). Collaborative fiction writing as conceived, is intended serve as an ongoing bonding and team building exercise for collaborative solution finding, business planning, management team formation and subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) that may include not only for profit enterprise, but activism and Social Entrepreneurship. For the possibilities remain endless!
 
The subversive struggle of organizing for change all so much easier said than done: Many people imagine leading happier and more meaningful lives. Many therefore strive to improve themselves and struggle to purge and cast off an unwanted self. But in such flagrant aberration from every timid norm, others more bold yearn instead to change their situation, the very lives that they lead, and even improve the world  in which we find ourselves. Any frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. In the famous words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”  As Hans Selye put it: “‘Realistic people’ who pursue ‘practical aims’ are rarely as realistic or practical, in the long run of life, as the dreamers who pursue their dreams.” FoolQuest.com attempts outreach toward the formation of just such a core group of unreasonable people applying ourselves even to the most daunting problems besetting us. Indeed, to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” All that will be required for the endeavor at hand, would be the recruitment of even just a small group or social circle fully engaged in ongoing Dialectical endeavor and eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative solution finding, indeed such as entailed in collaborative fiction writing together with subversive and disruptively innovate new venture creation (various business startup).
 
An outreach herein is further proposed, called: Creativity can be Popular, under the premise that if participation in an intentional creative group or social circle as herein proposed, Creativity can and Should be Social, indeed comes to be perceived by any wider public to produce more gratifying social interaction, then others will be attracted to join in and participate. The question of Creativity can be Popular then will be: how best to leverage Creativity can and Should be Social not only for recruitment, but more importantly in order to improve for participants, individual interpersonal networking and new relationships.
   
Liberation under a new paradigm:
 
We all struggle for personal power, so often in vein. So what is the secret? The open secret remains only in how we have all been overwhelmingly coerced, blithely manipulated, endlessly propagandized, shamelessly lied to, and how, as shall be expounded in full, the simple truth, plain and profane, remains exactly opposite to all that we have always been told. To begin with, genuine success in life will be a product of teamwork with no hurried flimflam and high pressure hustle, and no treachery of interminable procrastination and broken promise, either. To reiterate, the will to power is fulfilled in genuine autonomy meeting ones needs for capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. Because any ongoing outreach for cofounder candidates into collaboration among equals in a working group, any unapologetically genuine teamwork with no exploitative ulterior deception or manipulation, no unquestioned myths and ideology, no far fetched pipedream, no puerile headgames of toadying social skill and skilled incompetence, begins philosophically, Dialectically, into the valuable and lucid moral dimensions of friendship and Eudemonia called: Menschlichkeit.
 
How so? By honest and skeptical sweet reason, good will and habits of clear thinking, all quite socially awkward, utterly taboo and reviled under heteronomy! By fearlessly open and fruitful investigation and deliberation together, unfolding in at all responsible due diligence, welcome and invited exchange of criticism, and thereby ongoing error detection and course correction, advancing into the implementation of any serious credible plans of action, even however wildly ambitious, watertight yet flexible under ever changing conditions, in steady small reversible steps steadily at our own pace. For as Aesop teaches us, slow and steady wins the race! 
 
And such, in antithesis to every conventional path of heteronomy, remains the Dialectic of aręte and values of autonomy. And not merely in even howsoever extrinsic deferred gratification in hopes for eventual success, but as a vital human interaction in and of itself immediately intrinsic to secure and authentic wellbeing under true abiding respect. Indeed, hence might accrue most optimally fulfilling ongoing Dialectical investment of attention for return in like kind: substantive communication toward purposeful interaction. And woe betide us all should anyone imagine the Dialectic as an objective. It's not. For thought worthy dialogue remains no objective or end result, but the barest indispensable beginning.
 
Because bonding and attachments of true friendship with psychological visibility, arises not by any rat race of extrinsic societal reward and punishment in the course of inane small talk, uncritical willful positivity, superficial harmony, fearfully conflict avoidant and debilitating headgames of social skill and sycophantic toadying skilled incompetence, but ever only for serious people as byproduct of full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Because, if indeed interminable emotionally and intellectually distant, unwelcoming and disingenuous small talk ever keeping it light, remains key to popularity and social success, then such do-nothing busywork dronelike Orwellian anti-intellectual path of popularity and social success, remains antithetical to true friendship, because it remains in the very taboo nature of friendship, that friendship must be open, genuine and fully engaged. Indeed, that's Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own.

The  FoolQuest.com subversive proposal submitted to the agenda: Creativity can and Should be Social together with the concomitant outreach concept as proposed dubbed: Creativity can and Should be Popular, is to strive in the social engineering and design of a better way of life, more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, via intentional community of friendship and wellbeing, wherein the individual may remain more genuine and at ease. Indeed, creativity is found most productively to flourish by continual alternation flowing between creativity in lone contemplative solitude and vibrant expressive creative interaction together.

On the one hand, group dynamics often remain unimaginatively hidebound to prior socialization, however toxic and dysfunctional, or else to the other extreme, abandoning all propriety, group dynamics often co-validate and normalize any conceivable deviance no matter how senseless and destructive. Alas, both extremes remain depressingly common. Indeed, elements of both may often coexist and manifest in the group dynamics of the self same social circle. For there may often be found no more staunch conservatives and conformists than the most flagrant deviants, and no deeper deviance and conviction than such blithely Absurd hypocrisy in desperate mimesis of all that one can never truly be. Indeed, such remains true to life Comedy of Manners. But for those most fortunate few, there can also be at all more functional and congenial social circles characterized, perhaps some day soon, also for any of the rest of us, even intentionally and by design, guided by whatever more congenial, productive and laudable values in action, networking for one another first and foremost for each our own best interests and delight, but never for anything more devious, manipulative, ulterior, strange, dangerous and exploitative.

 At least initially, rather than sweeping the world out from left field, any bold, liberating and empowering subversion of hierarchy, not unlike forbidden love, necessarily nurtures in microcosm. Indeed even somewhat covertly and conspiratorially, when any two or more interacting and taking initiative, at long last must innovate: to begin significantly doing things differently and howsoever more capably together and persist.  And then collective endeavors of intentional community can be organized and designed so as to foster most desired interaction between participants. Indeed, in more functional alternative to conventional Absurd alienation and futility of bankrupt social expectations, an intentional social circle or group, remains free to experiment in deliberate paradigm shift, such flagrant subversion of hierarchy, turning accustomed priorities on their head. Obviously, if only any two or more individuals can imagine different, then relationship ensues, a new more proximate experimental superseding closer social reality, taking precedence. Indeed, smaller social circles or relationships of two or more individuals, are well known to forge their own unique social contracts and expectations amongst themselves. By social engineering design of intentional community online, Creativity can and Should be Social.

We are all seeking not only pleasure but meaning and fulfillment, perpetually engaged as are we all, in social and intellectual stimulus struggle against boredom and loneliness. For  as in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, stimulus struggle is the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo,' for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. For such remains the endless struggle with loneliness and boredom. Everything that we do is in order to modify subjective experience thereby altering consciousness. For in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, such remains the human condition. All hence, as to be expounded in full, the social engineering of social and intellectual stimulus struggle would contrive the deliberate introduction of specific social stimuli and social interaction, into an intentional social environment, in order better to optimize social and intellectual stimulus struggle

And so, gentle readers, are you with me? And lo, the star first follower shall become the true leader and influencer, showing others how participate and to relate, blazing the trail! But how might social engineering as proposed, of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle via purposeful interaction and substantive communication of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) interstitial concurrent synergy with collaborative fiction writing, possibly ever be rendered feasible? Is it even truly desirable?

Be a mensch! In the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” And yet, thoughtless action is reckless.  Therefore to quote Henri-Louis Bergson: Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought." And in the words of  C. S. Lewis: “Two heads are better than one, not because either is infallible, but because they are unlikely to go wrong in the same direction.” For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. Indeed therein, by the Dialectical crafting of narrative imagination, by planning and outreach, obtains the method in the madness, if only...  For as John Cleese expounds: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Indeed, Creativity can and Should be Social! And so, gentle readers, are you with me? And lo, the star first follower shall become the true leader and influencer, showing others how to participate and to relate, blazing the trail! 

In accordance with the happiness formula of Positive Psychology, Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing remain attainable via pleasurable engagement in meaningful collaboration among equals. And such accrues from eustress and sustainable euphoria of creative tension in solution finding together, of substantive communication into purposeful interaction and thereby friendship in authentic wellbeing, achievable by social engineering design of intentional community online. All following in in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology. Because pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement remains key to better optimized ongoing social and intellectual stimulus struggle against ever looming  boredom and loneliness. For such is the human condition.

Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire.

And, bridging the general and abstract theoretical at last into the concrete, practical and specific, Eudemonia in more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, remains best to be attained upon the subversive path of disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) interstitial concurrent synergy with collaborative fiction writing. -all as herein expounded. For disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) interstitial concurrent synergy with collaborative fiction writing, remains the most readily empowering creative outlet enfolding purposeful interaction and substantive communication indispensable to human connection and crucial to fulfillment and authentic wellbeing. For the possibilities remain endless! 

A call to action: Gentle reader,you are all invited  to join in and together attempt emulation neither of the facile and conniving popular kids nor of those phony success gurus, but rather the fulfillment in welcome pleasurable engagement in meaningful serious conversation and creative interaction as Empirically and repeatably observable of happy people who talk more seriously and with less small talk, fully involved together in creative endeavor. Because  Creativity must be acknowledged as a phenomena exceeding mere lone individual character and disposition, as John Cleese expounds: “not a talent: it's a way of operating.” indeed, wherein creativity is found most productively to flourish by continual alternation flowing between creativity in lone contemplative solitude and vibrant expressive creative interaction together. For to quote Michel Eyquem De Montaigne: “There is no pleasure to me without communication: there is not so much as a sprightly thought comes into my mind that it does not grieve me to have produced alone, and that I have no one to tell it to.”

Philosophers, writers, artists, even scientists, not only need encouragement and an audience, they need constant stimulation from other people. It is almost impossible to think without talking. If Defoe had really lived on a desert island, he could not have written Robinson Crusoe, nor would he have wanted to. Take away freedom of speech, and the creative faculties dry up.”

  'Conversation with a Pacifist' by George Orwell

Indeed, Creativity can and Should be Social. For in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” Indeed, in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  Therefore  let us each bring our own considered ideas to share, explore, criticize and modify together. Because, all in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience and the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, such is Eudemonia.

Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire.

Because, as it turns out, work or play, exactly that creative process together, is what truly makes people happy. Therefore let us proactively plan an ongoing intentional and purposeful exercise of precisely such human interaction, instead of only waiting, so helplessly, for such lamentably infrequent occasion of human thriving in creative solution finding at long last again to arise at the whim of whatever powers that be.

And the crucial first step towards close collaboration among equals and thereby Eudemonia as herein advanced, before undertaking anything more, will be simply to initiate and to sustain pertinent ongoing discussion, analytic yet strategic, in subversive deliberation online upon the agenda at hand. To reiterate: It will be predicted and recommended herein that fulfillment, authentic wellbeing and human flourishing in collaboration among equals remains most optimally achievable via dual application of the dynamic power of narrative: Specifically, in serious collaborative fiction writing in audaciously unprecedented dynamitic interstitial synergy concurrently with disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), entrepreneurship for the rest of us. For the possibilities remain endless!

Paradoxical as that may seem, even as an entirely practical matter, there can be no escaping philosophy. For in the words of Aristotle: “All things in life are philosophical.“ Because philosophical examination is the application of reason in setting consistent principles and values to guide decisions in life. And that is why, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. Because every solution, bridging abstract principle into concrete application, even as to the very meaning of life, first requires cogent problem statement indeed even as herein, of the human condition itself:  For even the celebrated constitutional right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, can proffer no guarantees of success in any such striving. Alas, mere mortal pursuit of happiness frequent only reaps Ecclesiastical vanity and futility. Indeed, as Epicurus most anciently observes, nebbish human beings are by and large so frequently inept at achieving happiness or for that matter, even acting in ones own self interests and survival, let alone towards any altruistic greater values. We often tend to find ourselves figuratively barking up that proverbially wrong metaphorical tree. Self destruction ambivalence and headgames however actually motivated psychologically and emotionally, every toxic flavor of prevailing misguided and even irrational inoperant behavior does seemingly correspond also cognitively with all manner of notable false premise and expectations as to the means and causes of happiness. To wit: 

Indeed, one way or another, a common theme of Existential Absurdity, remains the constant diversionary allure of extrinsic reward and punishment, and thereby away from true fulfillment of relevant intrinsic motivation. Therefore, unless the Enlightenment age of sweet reason was all naught more than a poignantly wishful fever dream, indeed if we truly remain free agents at all, at all in command of own individual faculties, indeed autonomously as in accord with Positive Disintegration, actuated by profoundly individual values all of our own, then before ever just taking the bait even one more time, let us first reflect each upon our own scarce, unique and prized moments of joy. And then, let us reason together. And woe betide us all should anyone imagine the Dialectic as an objective. It's not. For thought worthy dialogue remains no objective or end result, but the barest beginning and indispensable.

In fear and loathing, in ever mounting anxiety and depression, in the most toxic of extrinsic motivation and coercion, punishment and reward, social life often depressingly resembles formal education. Toxic lessons are propagated and enacted in every theater of life. Social success, much like good grades, remains predicated upon remaining silent and conditioning to behaving as expected. Critical thinking, challenge and thereby growth, must be assiduously avoided.

Life is senseless suffering. But must we suffer so? And why, oh why, Dear Lord? Answer: Actually not by any caprice of divine wrath and judgment, but  from Frankensteins of our own making, institutions entirely of human creation. Because conventional paths in life for meeting social expectation, sore travail so rightly and roundly condemned and rejected here on FoolQuest.com, offer no escape from an Existentially Absurd social reality of dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, meaning such vastly inherent contradiction and setup for failure with no results no matter what one does.

And everything that we've been told to the contrary, remains nothing more than yet another appalling big lie. Social failure and isolation may come as no surprise, in consideration of our most blatantly damaged specimens of humanity, most plainly awkward and even actually deficient in personal hygiene, let alone subtleties of social skill, all thereby so woefully inadequate to heteronymous expectations of conformity. But abject social failure and isolation is also the wretched fate, not only all too often also of the most harmlessly innocuous and ordinary of people, and all to frequently, even of our best and brightest, sensitive and well spoken. The Elephant in the Room, the taboo begged question, yet remains: Why must it require such nigh dharmic consummate social skill, simply in order to function even adequately and get along in society? As it turns out, according to  journalist and science correspondent Shankar Vedantam, interviewed on on NPR, population studies have revealed that that social skills make practically no difference for adults when it comes to social connections. Indeed, lonely people actually exhibit superior social intelligence and acuity.

So why not, as only behooves flourishing democracy, any kind of system more direct and transparent? Some therefore even dare suggest that beyond whatever individual deficiency or maladaptation, there exist even the most dire systemic problems and dysfunction. That society itself, in aggregate, might be said to display and may even be said to suffer from any manner of actually entrenched pervasive developmental disorders. And the only winning move is not to play. But is there any alternative to what seems the only game in town? Answer: Yes, but only if we get serious together, in order to stop playing such toxic headgames. And never just by metaphorically going with the allegorical flow, indeed  ever figuratively circling that proverbial drain. Because failing to plan is planning to fail. Because when the going gets tough, nerds, gifted peers, work the problem. To wit:

Life is suffering. And all that We the Sheeple have so flagrantly bought into and desperately sold out for, is an irredeemable stifling toxic big lie! The truth is that both popularity, social success, on the one hand, and failure, social isolation in rejection by society on the other hand, only make most everyone lonely and miserable but only in slightly different ways. One cannot serve two masters, love, signifying intrinsic value, and mammon denoting any kind of  extrinsic reward and thereby false or dubious object of reverence and devotion. Balance is chimera, will o' the wisp. Either love or mammon must assert guiding priority over the other. And again, both out comes make most everyone miserable. Either mammon, the all consuming, grinding and oppressive social rat race for popularity and social success endures, in poignant and secret hope that love sacrificed will somehow materialize from the either, despite every true to life dramatic obstacle thereby set in its path, or love defiant, as manifest in the quest for relationship and endeavor informed by intrinsic value and autonomy, persists towards ever more difficult practical fruition.

Alas there as yet exists no clear, ready and transparent social support system for individual endeavor and outreach. And because popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. Because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, while popularity and social success depend upon purpose defeatingly facile superficiality ever keeping distance, keeping conversation light and innocuous, endlessly perpetuating pretence of fake fun. Such is the enactment of prevailing mythology enshrined in regressive social expectation and world view. But by exploding all such destructive myths of fraudulent social reality, even just between ourselves, and then by collaborative brainstorming and solution finding, of small scale social engineering design, might together set agenda in planning and then doing anything better, for implementation deliberately and intentionally, of purposeful interaction and substantive communication. And such remains the objective of Creativity can and Should be Social.

Because there can be no objectives of unilateral "well-formed plan" except for solitary endeavor within the meager constraints of lone individual recourse. Indeed, all unilateral social skills advice for the individual is tautologically inoperant, simply because free social interaction requires more than one consenting participant. Indeed, as it turns out, not everyone has been copied on exactly the same benighted social contract. And whatever might be deemed implicit to one, may be dismissed as blatantly obtuse by another. There is no real consensus, only such blithely concealment of controversy by sly oppressive means of intimidation and suppression of dissidence. In truth, one size fits all unilateral social skills advice online for the individual, indeed similar myth much as typically arising in casual conversation anyhow, tends implicitly toward frustratingly over simplistic and even attachment disordered mindblind dehumanizing unreliable prediction regarding the interaction and responses of others, very different people, indeed even complete strangers under very different situations. Such is socialization, behavioral conditioning that none dare call indoctrination or: brainwash. Such are the most dangerous myths of fraudulent social reality, so urgently in need of exploding. Follow your bliss! remains the shopworn motto whereby we are each and all extolled, before being summarily abandoned each and all to our own devices.

Change our conversation, reset the agenda, and change the world!
And lo, the star first follower shall become the true leader and influencer, showing others how to participate and to relate, blazing the trail of welcome!
For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies
 
Surely, candid and open yet realistic serious conversation, hopefully upon such an important, interesting and uplifting topic, and barring unmanageable trepidation of decidophobia, remains the very minimum initial and tentative commitment to any purpose. It might even be fun! Of course, there can be no guarantees. But if even that little will be just too much bother, just too much to ask, nerdy, socially awkward, taboo and timidly dismissed out of hand, then pray do tell: Precisely what permitted measures are there so much more easy and effective, and to what end? And so, gentle reader, which among opposing inclinations do you intend to feed?
 
Let us then together test the very hypothesis, that even full engagement in analytic yet strategic conversation as proposed, will reveal true hope and already lift spirits, entirely free from any of the usual self manipulative motivational chicanery of bogus willful positivity, dangerous and destructive myth so interminably foisted and inflicted upon the unwitting hapless masses.

Question: Does philosophy any longer strive for aręte, or merely investigate in the abstract? Answer: Towards Eudemonia, practical philosophical investigation must bridge abstract and concrete, sharing and cultivating habits of clear thinking and expression crucial to effective action in welcome of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding as in, as proposed, the sustained exercise of the pure creativity in collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, in liberating interstitial synergy concurrently with subversive and disruptively innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup), purposeful interaction all requiring substantive communication and psychological visibility,.

Gentle reader, do you long for an unconventional life? Then where to begin? And what is of essence? Stimulus struggle, what every living thing is doing all of the time, remains no more or less than the perpetual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And in accordance with evolutionary neuroscience, for human consciousness, stimulus struggle uniquely demands the gratification of crucial social and intellectual stimulus needs and appetites, to which, in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, the unique and fully engaged Dialectic ebullience of collaboration among equals in creative solution finding and brainstorming remains key, and for which as proposed, Creativity can and Should be Social, the dual and synergistic and dynamic applications of the power of narrative, collaborative fiction writing and Entrepreneurial disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), remain so ideal. Indeed, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people talk more seriously and thrive in autonomy, prosper and succeed, together engaging in creative endeavor. And all with less small talk. There will be far more important and interesting agenda at hand: Indeed, such happiness embodies the very antithesis of all ever toxic and sanctioned expectations enacted in antisocial and distant insubstantive superficial) to which so many have become accustomed and socialized into.

For even such prospect merely of Dialectic engagement, even most anciently demonstrates promise of escape from the Existentially Absurd perpetual bait-and-switch dilemma between blatant lonely isolation and unhappiness inflicted from not fitting in, or else more devious lonely isolation, indeed the painfully lonely boredom of inauthentic conditionality of fitting in, often such an all consuming full time occupation. Heteronomy, conformism and the endless dance of popularity frequently become Orwellian, all consuming, draining and tremendously costly, undermining not only autonomy, independent thinking and ambition, but even the human capacity to genuinely relate to one another, to form relationship and friendship. Indeed, that's Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds invest their precious time, not in the extensive and complicated dance of popularity, but cultivating genuine interests and values of their own. But in fundamental paradigm shift, can creativity conceivably become actually go viral and popular? After all, creativity is found most productively to flourish by continual alternation flowing between creativity in lone contemplative solitude and vibrant expressive creative interaction together.

Yes: Creativity can and Should be Popular!

FoolQuest.com advances the unique analytically strategic and subversive agenda of Creativity can and Should be Social, a specific and relevant purposeful human interaction of  pure creativity in collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, in liberating interstitial synergy concurrently with subversive and disruptively innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup), purposeful interaction all requiring substantive communication and psychological visibility, and all via specific intentional formation of a more welcoming and open minded yet skeptical immediate social circle or group. Clubs that meet regularly, are known thereby to provide for propinquity. Although, with a little outgoing initiative and persistence, and given the opportunity, so can the telephone, if only the other party is receptive. It's nice to be needed! Not to digress. In particular, cooperation on group projects, even somewhat arbitrarily, has been observed to bring people together and promote friendship, But any sense of arbitrary meaningless and pointlessness thereby remaining Existentially Absurd, may instead backfire, aimlessly risking needless peril of bored and lonely dystress of ever increasing alienation and futility, far from friendship and attachment.
Be all that as it may, one possible and applicable strategic explanation of the greater efficacy in social outreach of groups working together in social situations, over the lone efforts of any single individual, might be found, at least in any part, in the phenomena of informational social influence or: social "proof" wherein individuals are informed and then imitate the behavior of others around them. After all, that fabled star first follower or ally, transforms a lone nut into a leader. And: "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." But as to any deliberate strategy in purposeful application of informational social influence or: social "proof," indeed such as striving to appear popular by being seen in public together with others, all of this presents a catch-22, a double bind, unless one is already blessed with the requisite social support, networking connections and resources.
 
Because secure and effective social embedment is also important to wellbeing. Does then social success remain elusive without social success already? An outreach herein is further proposed, called: Creativity can and Should be Popular, under the premise that if participation in an intentional creative group or social circle as herein proposed, Creativity can and Should be Social might naturally come to exert informational social influence or: social "proof." when desirable experience and/or salutary results for participants in  Creativity can and Should be Social readily becomes Empirically observable to others and then word spreads. The outreach probortunity then of Creativity can and Should be Popular will be not only how best to leverage Creativity can and Should be Social not only for ongoing recruitment, but as actually the greater priority, in order to facilitate and improve for participants, individual interpersonal networking and forging and improving relationships. Creativity can and Should be Popular: a concept of making you the PR priority!

Indeed, if only any two or more individuals can imagine different, then relationship ensues, a new more proximate experimental superseding closer social reality. Smaller social circles or relationships of two or more individuals, are well known to forge their own unique social contracts and expectations amongst themselves. On the one hand, group dynamics may remain unimaginatively bound to prior socialization, or else on the other hand abandoning all propriety, they may co validate and normalize any conceivable deviance no matter how senseless and destructive. Both extremes remain depressingly common. Indeed, elements of both may often coexist and manifest in the group dynamics of the self same social circle. For there may often be found no more staunch conformists than the most flagrant deviants, and no deeper deviance and conviction than such blithely Absurd hypocrisy in desperate mimesis of all that one can never truly be. Indeed, such is true to life Comedy of Manners.

But for those most fortunate among us, there can also be at all more functional and congenial social circles characterized, perhaps even intentionally and by design, guided by whatever more congenial, productive and laudable values in action, networking for one another first and foremost for each our own best interests and delight, but never for anything more devious, manipulative, ulterior, strange, dangerous and exploitative.

After all, whereas immutable physical reality neither seeks nor requires approval or consent, social reality, sore travail even as all to often no less Absurd, remains a direct product of human acquiescence and participation, even as all to often, quite dysfunctional. For such is the dynamic power of narrative and the stories we buy into or not. And hence the ambition of Transactional Analysis, instead to live out happier stories, via Antithesis, a cunning repertoire of stock radically honest curve ball responses, in order to derail toxic Ulterior Transactions or: headgames. And thus intentionally enacting better narratives of our own invention, and even by researching, investigating and rôle modeling from more trustworthy happier people, rather than blindly following the most toxic of prevailing norms, insipid myths and misguided social expectations. Indeed, even by the social engineering design of more optimally fulfilling social and intellectual stimulus struggle.

Creativity can and Should be Social is a proposed ongoing endeavor of pure creativity in collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, in liberating interstitial synergy concurrently with subversive and disruptively innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup). Because collaboration in storytelling and business or project planning remain similar and related applications in the dynamic power of narrative and therein of creative solution finding. A business or project plan is a kind of story, an even dramatic futuring scenario rigorously detailing a projected path to success. But whereas, at least barring the outright surreal, any good story or ripping yarn only needs to seem plausible, a viable plan must be rendered rigorously feasible. And yet both remain excellent means to pleasurable and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement, most important among intrinsic social and intellectual human stimulus appetites, congenial and indeed fully engaged path to social support, mastery and success. For any lonesome frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. Gentle reader, I do not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? We might succeed dare we try! 
But what if generally cares neither for storytelling nor business? Or for that matter, what if one simply mistrusts philosophy, after all a discipline of such long and widespread ill repute? Of course, everyone is different. But no good sense making comes from simply ignoring philosophy in grappling with any plainly philosophical questions. Indeed, to quote Aristotle, and indeed as Axiological dimensions of the very probortunity at hand must well attest: “All things in life are philosophical.“ Because philosophical examination is the application of reason in setting consistent principles and values to guide decisions in life. Hence as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. And no human skill is automatic or self evident, much less the digestion and evaluation of ideas, philosophy and habits of clear thinking.

Alas many condemn philosophy as completely abstract and thereby entirely impractical. Because philosophy indeed deals in the most broadly applicable abstraction. And all too true, abstract principle not informed by objective reality and practically, remains no less deranged than supposedly practical consideration devoid of thoughtful guiding abstract principle. Therefore philosophy indeed becomes effete except by bridging the gap and maintaining the connection between generality of abstraction on the one hand, and Empirical practicality on the other hand. Said compartmentalization between the abstract and the concrete, remains a prevalent and highly effective memeplex, undermining both Empirical science and transfer from scientific discovery to practical strategy. Again to quote Ernest Hemingway: Never confuse movement with action. Indeed, as Thomas Carlyle put it: “Nothing is more terrible than activity without insight.

There also remains the lamentable common misconception that disagreement equals strife. Therefore many condemn philosophy as judgmental and miserable. Nevertheless  the disputants in Plato's Dialogues do seem to be enjoying themselves. And so should we all. Anti-intellectualism condemn philosophy as agitation, whereas people should remain blithely content, endure and conform, just by second nature. Indeed, those who won't just take a hint, may even find themselves certified as blithely intensive, behaviorally inoperant, psychiatrically disturbed, generally loony and obdurate. But in truth, philosophy merely helps to articulate and perhaps even ever howsoever to combat, all manner of objectively real existing causes and matters of morally sincere and perfectly honest, legitimate and entirely reactive discontent.

To wit: If and when we come together, shall indeed we be richer for it? What is most crucial to that fabled opposite of loneliness and boredom, that most favorable social situation of authentic individual wellbeing? To begin with, there will be more myths to be exploded: Firstly, successful social cohesion can be no value in and of itself, because even social cohesion alone can actually be so tremendously unhappy, profoundly dysfunctional and outright malignant. Therefore oppressively arbitrary social cohesion is to be avoided like the very plague that it has always been. As George Orwell so clearly understood, the alienation of individuals from one another, remains too high a cost for the typical brutality of heteronymous social cohesion. Empirically, even such factors as typical granfalloon membership in group identity and even interests in common, remain empty and unfulfilling distraction at best, and actually remain quite ineffective in bringing about interpersonal bonding and attachment. Indeed, like group identity or membership, shared interests in common are perhaps among the least predicators of interpersonal compatibility.

Alas to make matters worse, that entrepreneurs, not unlike like writers, are often characterized as solitary self reliant loners, with such difficulty just getting out of their own way, even notoriously incapable of delegating. The struggle for individual freedom and capable power as expressed in the the ambition of Entrepreneurship and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), so often remains solitary in no small part because the wannabe Entrepreneur much like the aspiring writer, sallies forth alone without the corporate resources of employment. Anyone aspiring and yearning to experience creative fulfillment in Entrepreneurial success, in new venture creation (various business startup), has surely become well cognizant of the most embryonic first-concept inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), following from the metaphor of aspiring cofounders gathered round the proverbial kitchen table, out from endless possibility, concretizing their vision. And those will be so fondly remembered as the happiest days of friendship. Creativity can and Should be Social, beyond mere individual character and disposition. Indeed, creativity is found most productively to flourish by continual alternation flowing between creativity in lone contemplative solitude and vibrant expressive creative interaction together and endless possibility.

 
And yet, all fond enthusiasm notwithstanding, as yet there remains virtually no readily accessible community, support for, or even literature, regarding the most embryonic first-concept "kitchen table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), let alone outreach and recruitment thereto. Perhaps this is because the learning curve, the challenge, let alone the magnitude of solution finding, in endless possibility only boggles the mind, and the sheer volume of labor rightly anticipated will be so daunting. Or because the lone aspirant with no comrades in life struggle, or at any rate, no one trustworthy, will be summarily dismissed, deemed such lost and lonely souls, unpopular beyond any bother of salvation. Or perhaps the probortunity arises merely in response to the penchant of dronelike formal education to so slavishly admire, but never actually to teach and emulate, the lofty greatness of leadership on the part of exceptional men and women of destiny, so lonely at the top. Or perhaps, actually, this is all simply because there is just no money to be made in catering to the actual capability needs of those who are not as yet actually already showing any profit as serial Entrepreneurs, not withstanding the importance of serial failure until at last reaching first success, leveraging the learning curve towards first overcoming all manner of inertia. As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Because for wretches such as we, there must be no ready escape at all from the only wretched game in town! For such remains the banal rank hypocrisy of glowing lip service to independence while fostering helplessness and dependency.
 
But true capability accrues in the accessibility of whatever needed resources as individually perceived, attainable in freedom to chose in actual practice and not merely in theory. Alas,  to reiterate, the market only caters to successful serial Entrepreneurs already making money in business, who can and will pay. And meanwhile, desperate wannabes are ever scammed with no end of dazzling but dubious offers and so-called opportunities. In better alternative, social support is so often deemed the single greatest predicator of success. Alas then, that not everyone is ever availed of likeminded social support, even to  muddle haphazardly in efforts at new venture creation (various business startup) and entrepreneurship for the rest of us. Creativity can and Should be Social is conceived to at all fill that gap with a more welcoming new kind of community.

However, as Alistair Miller contends, common Psychological models such as embraced even by Positive Psychology, might be criticized philosophically, as often remaining premised upon a number of highly questionable assertions: First, that life can be conceived in terms of the setting and achieving of objectives, whatever motivating lofty goals ever set forth, second, that whichever traits, dispositions, emotions, feelings, desires, beliefs and values that together comprise a person’s attitudes, indeed ones very personality, and which psychodynamic psychology embraces in causal explanation of human behavior, can be consciously managed or even controlled; third, that people can broadly be categorized as pessimistic or optimistic with the ability to persevere, achieve their objectives, whatever motivating lofty goals ever set forth, and thereby attain happiness; and finally, that playing to one’s ‘signature strengths’ or positive traits and virtues in absorbing activities remains key and welcoming to authentic wellbeing

Moreover: Obsessive goal orientation is often discovered as dysfunctional, misguided, irrelevant and unhappy, vastly underserved new values emerging as personal sacrifice and neglect increasingly takes its toll. Indeed, precisely such truism readily finds expression in time honored dramatic trope of character development and growth, of whatever false goals increasingly exposed in the course of plot events, by the gradual emergence of any deeper and truer motivation. Because conscious management of profound emotion only constitutes futile denial all bottled up, lying to oneself. -or one way or another undergoing such forms of for all intents and purposes: Behavior Modification in society as socialization, behavioral conditioning that none dare call: Indoctrination or: brainwash, questioned and overcome in Positive Disintegration..

 

Lastly, optimism remains Existentially Absurd in the face of pessimistic realism, the tendency of pessimists to predict more accurately than optimists. Pessimistic realism is only rational skepticism and systematic doubt, after all. Nevertheless, to be realistic, playing to one’s ‘signature strengths’ or positive traits and virtues in absorbing activities, remains observably and consistently gratifying. It doesn't get old. As Alistair Miller further expounds:

“There is of course nothing new in the idea that one of the keys to a fulfilling life is to find absorbing interests, passions, callings and commitments—indeed, it would be hard to define ‘fulfilling’ in any meaningful sense except in these terms. The special insight of positive psychology is that it is the engagement and expression of a person's' signature strengths’ [as perhaps however questionably differentiated and catalogued by Seligman] that specifically produces the ‘authentic positive emotion’ ”

As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors of every stripe, who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. Indeed, this is by design, alienation baked in. For even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test for heteronomy and conformity and against Indeed, this is by design, alienation baked in. Indeed, even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test and filter for heteronomy and conformity and against autonomy, by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society, by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society.

Quoth the Bard: “Whereof what's past is prologue; what to come, in yours and my discharge.” We all remain well aware of how entire populations so terrified of truth, have been so eagerly duped, one way or another, throughout history. And what if anything like that is still happening even now? Rest assured that this is so. For in the words of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche: “The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.” Indeed, to quote Mark Twain, “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform (or pause and reflect).”  Indeed, much ever so flagrant taboo in outlandish assertion herein, if true, makes propaganda lies and myth of blithely unquestioned consensus, one way or another. What then must be done?

FoolQuest.com all therefore flouts fashionable expectation of dreary convenience and narcotizing fluff. Au contraire, FoolQuest.com remains serious content for serious people. And there will be a lot to unpack throughout navigation into the present vast, detailed and densely written hypertext, no short attention casual read. . If necessary, first get an overview and then break it down. And jotting down notes along the way, may even help spark and organize posting in response, effort most welcome and invited. And for anyone making such effort for me, then in return I will spare no effort for you, unmet friend, in diligent crafting of salient response. Because intelligence and sensitivity, even serious disposition in rejection of triviality, are not a social disease. Do not conform to anti-intellectualism! And such is my own subversive Message in a Bottle, the  FoolQuest.com opportunity for optimal reciprocal engagement and fulfillment in substantive communication towards purposeful interaction, the only effective path to capable relationship and especially friendship, all so essential to hoped for success. Mark my words: All else remains fraud and futility.
Long has the vast majority labored subordinate to make the fortunes and prestige of others. Therefore, even just in the moment, let us together reclaim the will to power. Get out what you put in. Pay attention to detail. Expand our horizons. Reach out! Take a break from braindead small talk, fake fun and recreation, so-called, that shabbily travesty of playful honest hedonism. Just forget antisocial and stimulus impoverished  (anti)social media and the empty illusion of social life. Put down that idiotic smart phone. And bending your whole mind to the task, even just for the moment, use a real desktop computer with a wide screen and sprawling keyboard. Don't you deserve that little? Rise up, sheeple! Browsing with a cell phone, is wearisome and stupefying like surfing the Net through a periscope and navigating with a pair of tweezers! And rest assured, this is not a bug but a feature, and all by Dystopian design.
We exist in a monological world, teeming with glorified pack mammals, bleating sheeple, some quite famous, who only talk and never listen, not even to their own thoughts, much less to one another, to anyone else. Indeed, like unto some absentee God, or Castro to the Cubans, no matter how irate, nevertheless all speaking in the familiar all about "Fidel" as if they ever hung out and chatted with the tyrant personally, the celebrity cult pundits cultivate parasocial one sided false sense of relationship amongst the gullible from whom they shield themselves and ignore. And also such is the enigma of membership in collective identity no less than as with ever sycophantic cult of personality. Munchausen by proxy the likes of Rush Limbaugh may even sink so low as to pander for sympathy amongst the faithful for his adorable poor ailing pet pooch, but there will be no access to be found for any response, no matter how urgent, helpful or sympathetic. -And all for the sake of that poor suffering creature! No mass market charlatan no matter how drunk on the adulation of lost souls, actually ever desires to hear from the hoi polloi. Alas then the disillusion from individually taking such mass distracting scoundrels at their word. 
 
Worse, reaching out to one another instead, has become that much less convenient after Google eliminated forum search, making it that much more difficult simply to filter for anything actually calling for any kind of answer or response. Google even bought out and then eventually shut down DejaNews, the renowned USENET newsgroup archive, for many a last bastion of at all intelligent conversation, in order to stop spammers from harvesting email addresses. And so, instead of reliably connecting strangers, an internet search will still at least lead the user to information. Or else to highly page ranked though largely uninformative content, even however impressive seeming, nevertheless somewhat simplistic, yet another pandering sales pitch to desperation, again with no interest in actually hearing from anyone, or much real help.
But no, it's not all just because of ever expanding vectors forSPAMper se. Not withstanding any alluring futuring scenario of vision of automated Sociometry, in the here and now the Internet, the great revolution in electronic communication, ever gravitates back to the worst and most prolific of traditional one way advertising, until everything just tastes of SPAM. So fear not and rest assured: I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no formulaic callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch!
 
As my father liked to say, the world is divided into the knowers and the seekers, those united behind uniform and monolithic doctrine and  know-it-all perceived monopoly upon manifest truth, and the varied and essentially disparate. seekers of truth and one another, with no such pretence and engineering no such consensus. Because, true tolerance is never contingent upon agreeable silence and compliance. Persuasion, like individual opinion to begin with, remains indispensable and nothing to be ashamed of. But its a two way street. And persuasive rhetoric must enfold logos (logic /sound reasoning) along with pathos (emotional appeal), kairos (timing or occasion) and the insight into the human condition that is drama and the discipline of the writing craft. But fair play, unrestrained conjecture, the speculative element, and even but also the practice of controversy which is the invited and valued fee exchange of criticism, all remain crucial in both application of narrative, creative fiction writing and business or project planning alike. Not adamant conviction however secured or inspired, but open-minded skepticism remains crucial. Sometimes, there can be no more gullible mark than the confidence trickster. And that may seem only fair. But norms of reciprocal manipulation are only a vicious cycle of unmitigated folly and mendacity. Whereas by contrast, in seeking to change minds, honest rational people should no less receptive and no more so, as they would wish others to be when reaching out to them. Because criticism remains nothing to fear, nothing threatening or hostile. There can be no  verified or justified firm foundation. Genuine criticism remains inherently friendly, an expression of esteem. And we are all fallible. Indeed, to quote Dwight David 'Ike' Eisenhower: "Plans are nothing, planning is everything." And in the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: "No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy." -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, true to life dramatic obstacle or complication. All progress then remains a function of ongoing error detection and course correction. Who in their right mind would ever want to read the work of fiction writers who shun critique, much less invest in a business startup from a management team that resents and ignores all criticism of their business plans?

Verificationism/Justificationism is the heteronymous demand, if not for unattainable certainty, then for prior justification, verification or firm foundation before moving forward: Many remain convinced that nothing should ever be subject to serious deliberation until the practicality thereof is well established. And that rules out feasibility study, especially of such wild ambitions as, just for perhaps the most extreme example even conceivable, retrograde time travel. And how outlandish, how foolish! Therefore, never mind any of my own social, emotional and intellectual preference! Really, just who do I think that I am! To quote Aldous Huxley in 'Brave New World:' “...most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution.” So why not just give in to pressure and bullying? Just be what they expect. Give the people what thy want! -That very worst grot bottom of insufferable toxic and futile dilettantery and pipedreaming, the craven antirational exaltation of the mediocre sometimes referred to as the cult of the amateur in rejection of all experts and expertise: All without effort, fiction writing sans critique, business planning without rigorous criticism and due diligence of feasibility study, and meaning in life without struggle, difficulty, integrity, complexity, Philosophy or abstraction, and above all: full time enthusiastic participation in the most interminably vapid, boring and empty small talk, soul crushing loneliness even amid the crowds. Precisely such stinking thinking is what comes of  Verificationism/Justificationism and the irrational terror of uncertainty. In the alternative, Faliblism/ Non-Justification, in the spirit of autonomy, contends rather that we remain ever fallible, that there is no verification, justification or firm foundation from which to proceed, and that in vibrant freethinking without fidelity or commitment, all hypotheses begin as unjustified conjecture, sheer speculation, only afterwards subject to critical preference and reality testing, and never filtered in advance. All of which should raise no alarm nor cause suffering of trepidation.

Alas, with the ever pervasive rise of the willfully positive bogus support group ethos, has come in deplorable like kind, the phony writers group, similarly offering only encouragement and actually forbidding all substance. Such is the fantasy of writing, the ever pipedreaming wish without the will. Nevertheless, it may bear mention at this juncture that as things stand, nevertheless there have long endured many high quality serious writers groups in pursuit of aręte, of excellence in the discipline of the writing craft via the exchange of critique, nevertheless otherwise embracing as inevitable matter of course, the solitude of writing. And alas that thinking makes it so. Indeed, for whatever reason, typical writers groups generally do not practice ongoing collaborative fiction writing. Among serious writers, collaboration in fiction writing is the rare exception. But creativity and innovation are best served in an ongoing alternation between time for private thought and conduct of open free exchange together with others.

Worse,  in contrast to traditional serious writer's groups, the many perfectly awful collaborative fiction writing projects and communities that do exist online, in mindless anal retentive conformity to mediocrity, for the most  part typically hold forth that because there is no disputing tastes as the saying goes, therefore there can be no criteria or technique for quality writing, no point in making the effort, no aspiration to excellence because otherwise no deficiency either. Therefore, as might be expected, the output remains systematically execrable. And again, only imagine any similar attitude when it comes to drafting business plans! To reiterate, who would want want to read a story by writers who spurn critique, much less invest in a business startup from a management team who resent and ignores all criticism? In either mode of narrative, storytelling or business / project planning, writing is rewriting and never a waste of time. Indeed, as Paul Valéry contends, a work of art is never finished, only abandoned. The passage of time affords the writer the opportunity, ever to return to ones text with "fresh eyes." But ongoing feedback in collaboration, affords the "fresh eyes" and minds of others, without delay, speeding the progress of writing and therefore of planning.

Writing is rewriting
,
helpful INVOLVEMENT, ongoing rounds of editing and revision of prose, one's own or for anyone else,
 

Less is more: "Leave out the bits that people just skip ahead."  — Elmore Leonard

 
Come late and leave early. Edit!  In the immortal words of Alfred Hitchcock:  "Drama is life with the dull parts cut out." Therefore an efficient scene should be entered as late in the action as possible, and then transition to the next scene just as soon as everything crucial is revealed or has transpired. Otherwise, there had better be any purpose either in building up before hand or lingering on afterward. Whatever motivation establishing conflict on every level with pathos in fight scenes needs must come before hand and even such crucial exposition and background information as the terrain is best established immediately before a chase sequence, usually lacking dialogue unless it's short and clipped.
 
“I'm sorry. If I’d more time, I would have written a shorter letter.”
  — Marcus T. Cicero

 
But what applies to writing specifically, applies no less to life learning most generally. And more people might at long last begin learning from their mistakes in ongoing revision their own opinions, were only they not so preoccupied in such frantic denial. Or better still, to  learn from the prior mistakes of others. Therefore, avoid old mistakes, and welcome new ones. As most everyone alive today well knows and understands, we only learn from mistakes, from true to life drama of bad decisions that make for good stories. Such remains the positive power of negative thinking! And yet alas that incorrect responses are still penalized from early on in the antiquated sore travail of formal education, the entrenched bastion and fifth column of oppressive heteronomy to conformity even within global democracy. The resultant prevailing flagrantly anti-intellectual Anti-Critical Bias, the anxious, fragile and thin-skinned perception of criticism as hostile and hurtful, remains an unaffordable liability, especially in any serious endeavor, whatever might be at stake. The repudiation of Anti-Critical Bias, thereby upholding the precious freedom and value of criticism, of error detection and course correction, the practice of controversy and of open dissent, remains of crucial relevance to happiness, safety and capability. as is striving to take things in whatever spirit as intended and affording the benefit of the doubt:
 
Imbeciles, tyrants and scoundrels, adamantly insist, simply ignoring all sound reasoning supported by Empirical evidence entirely to the contrary, that cooperation is impossible save by fairly complete consensus and agreeable compliance. And thus, under the worldview of heteronomy, collaboration among equals remains entirely inconceivable! But responsible people who disagree actually do cooperate productively only all the time! In the words of John Storrs Hall: "Ideas should compete, bodies should cooperate." Scientist in perpetual disagreement on one point or another, challenge one another to discover Empirical truth by experiment and Scientific Method, and those ever more scarce functional policy makers in good faith, are actually ever known to reach reasonable compromise. And all entirely without consensus or silence. Whereas with no place for dissent, consensus groups remain merely do nothing pep rallies. That is, unless they are scams, in which case whatever the scam's ulterior agenda may indeed be accomplished, whatever good that comes of it. Indeed, wars have been lost by clueless military hierarchies lacking due protocol for the airing of dissent among junior officers, dismissively silenced when they foresaw disaster.
 
Whereas, in both word and deed, abusive bullies intent upon undermining the precious dignity of others, forever actout with such brazen impunity, by contrast even the most harsh of genuine criticism remains inherently friendly, an expression of esteem. For: “Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.” - Proverbs 27:17 (KJV)  And there can be no solutions first without explicit and ever improving problem statements. After all, an opponent in debate is no more the enemy than a competitor in sports or other competitive play. Fair play unites us not despite but because of discord itself, in Axiological Dialectic upon the many and varied very questions of all what matters most, how so and why, enlightenment by refutation in the Socratic crucible of truth, of not only crucial abstract analysis and meaning in the deepest sense, and beyond mere aspiration, aręte in real practicality and capable effective interaction together. Even sheer incomprehension is a beginning and no dire impasse. There is no cause for alarm. The readiness to speak up, question, point out and discuss  communication errors and failures, remains crucial to communication at all, and sometimes even a matter of life and death. Mistakes are the Essence towards Intersubjectivity via fully engaged Dialectical conversational adequacy in collaborative miscommunication repair.
 
In the words of Albert Einstein: “It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.” After all, the endurance of boredom is a hallmark of compliant conformity and heteronomy. Hence, even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test for heteronomy and conformity by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society. In the mindset of such heteronomy, only individuals of destiny so ruggedly successful in overcoming such daunting barriers and stumbling blocks and rising to leadership, philosopher kings so lonely at the top, strong yet broken and dedicated to the state, will be deemed worthy to institute change by decree, their painful isolation and sacrifice sparing the rest of us contented drones any such terrifying responsibility and the risk of humiliating error. Hence, to this day, typically, in heteronymous formal education, students are encouraged to admire such individuals of destiny, but never equipped in any way to strive at emulation. Anything but! Cheering us all on at the starting line and then immediately and forever vanishing, "Follow your bliss!" is the shopworn motto whereby we are each and all extolled before being summarily abandoned, each and all to our own devices. How then might the barriers be lowered to initiative and disruptive innovation, actually to foster and socially support brilliant original thinking and action for the rest of us?
Clearly, distant, thin skinned, ever terrified, paranoid and disingenuous willful positivity, patiently keeping everything light and innocuous, all simply in order to escape notice "hiding ones light under a bushed" and thereby fitting in, can be excruciatingly bored and lonely, painful and harmful, for sensitive, intelligent creative people. Indeed, to reiterate, the deliberate infliction of boredom is often an intentional test for conformity in conservative society, in order to weed out innovators and preserve social stability in the status quo. Indeed, thus was it so in Plato's Academy, the ancient prototype for enduring, toxic and sanctioned prevailing norms of formal education for the training of compliant drones, and the very antithesis of any optimal situations of authentic wellbeing and human flourishing, thinking capability and even leadership. Because in accordance with the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, added dimensions of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, intrinsic social and intellectual needs and appetites so unique to humanity, remain rooted in the inbred hideous mutation and massively engorged evolutionary neuroscience of human consciousness. As Socrates so famously declares: "An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being." Rather than sallying forth out into the world, struggling to finesse others at random and sucking up for approval, would it not make better sense to simply compare notes candidly here and now?
 
Why then such prevailing anxiety of uncertainty in our culture? Perhaps because in our world and in our time, we remain ever in crisis. Life is suffering. Life has always been Absurdly threatening, complex, tragic and demeaning. What can be done? Figuratively, many seemingly do not even seek proverbially to sell their metaphorical souls, but might be said eagerly to pay ever more dearly, just to be well rid thereof! Many seek to quell their own suffering from within, even by turning to ever more fantastical mysticism and magical religion or ever more brutal Behavior Modification. Many thereby strive to recover certainty of lost innocence, even at whatever cost and falsehood of lying to oneself. But certainty remains impossible, and innocence is vastly overrated, no Biblical pleasant garden of delight, but only a clammy darkness at last illuminated in Positive Disintegration and the Promethean transgression of dawning autonomy.

The desperate struggle for lost innocence amounts to nothing more than the futility of deep denial and terror management, enduring wellspring of lunatic ideology and tyranny. And yet, all is not lost. But what hope and at what cost in time and effort? Nothing can be gained in the mounting dystress of unremitting cognitive dissonance from the abandon of reason and integrity, never truly without qualm. In the alternative, let us undertake both soul searching and reality testing, in feasibility study, together. Life, as it is said, remains the journey, the ongoing experience, and not whatever hoped for destination or results in deferred gratification. So, how far are we each willing go? How actually capable might we become? Gentle reader, have you the wherewithal? What will it actually take to get what you want? What are any of us willing to do, or unwilling? And does the threshold of feasibility at all, let alone whatever threshold of willing action, meet with desired interim experience ("the journey" of life) let alone projected thresholds of whatever desired outcomes ("the destination") in achievement or payoff of deferred gratification? What will be the required human and material resource Capitalization, and how if at all might they be acquired? Let us strive to remain honest with one another and with ourselves, in due diligence and feasibility study of business or project planning. Motivational self manipulation remains bogus and futile. I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch! Because w e all know how that feels, and I don't like it! We are all still sheeple, glorified pack mammals, yearning to breath free. And society is the enemy.

We are all such proverbial square pegs: The customer is always wrong! The program never fails, you fail the program. In  the immortal words of George Carlin: "Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit.” By contrast, our designated rôle models in every conventional option in life, the star student, ideal employee, perfect disciple or model prisoner alike, are all characterized, beyond mere responsive obedience and passivity otherwise, not only by every obsessive-compulsive eager beaver sore travail, but boundlessly committed initiative in anticipation of their superior's desires, "paying one's dues" life long, excelling without complaint or resistance, never seeking attention by requesting explanation or assistance. Exactly such adaptation of enthusiastic approval seeking, still held up as exemplary in order to vindicate systemic failure and disappointment in most every walk of life, remains, punishment and reward systems by hierarchical design, indeed the benchmark that for better or worse, most of us will come short and fall by the wayside, make do, for each to learn their place.
 
But why be so "professional," so dedicated ever following up in such responsible diligence towards every hated sore travail of formal education and employment and in career development generally, yet so helpless and lost in perpetual surrender to random propinquity, so haphazard and cavalier in such poignantly yeaned for personal life? Is this truly freedom? Do such priorities truly reflect our highest values and best interests? Or is this all just some kind of a racket? A racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality a myth, scam or fraud, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many. As Edward Snowden observes, oppressors who restrict our options, then pretend that we consent. And the inculcation of social skills and skilled incompetence, remains an important aspect of just such ubiquitous fraud.
 
Again, all unilateral social skills advice for the individual is by definition inoperant, simply because free social interaction requires more than one consenting participant. One size fits all unilateral social skills advice online for the individual, indeed much as typically arising in casual conversation anyhow, tends implicitly toward frustratingly simplistic and even attachment disordered mindblind dehumanizing unreliable prediction regarding the interaction and responses of others, even complete strangers under very different situations. Such is "socialization," behavioral conditioning that none dare call indoctrination or: brainwash.

For in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  

Alas, tautologically, there can be no unilateral solitary lonely DIY self-help or self-improvement of relationship, of human interaction by definition involving more than one person. And ordinary conformity so often remains such a monumental waste of time. Heteronymous conventional distant, Existentially Absurd and oppressively empty superficial social life and short attention all remain, as with rare exception, no less desperately alienated than typical situation of formal education and employment whereby sensibility even off the clock, is most prevalently and markedly informed. And all becoming similarly another chore and a bore, just crushingly dull. And all of that so completely fails the masses of humanity because quite simply, and yet again to reiterate, capability, important close human relationship with psychological visibility, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and particularly friendship, arise entirely as a byproduct of optimal reciprocal engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve!
 
Therefore FoolQuest.com deigns not to proffer, hype or press the typical and ubiquitous unilateral and often somewhat authoritarian, rigidly conditional, toxic, oppressive and blithely antidemocratic social skills "advice," myth and smug guidance in "realistically" (submissively and manipulatively) coping with oppression for any vastly outnumbered lone individual as are each and us all, abandoned to ones own devices in everything truly important, and all too often thereby vulnerable to bullying and exploitation.
 
 
OH NO!!
Where's my "tribe"?
 
Sorry, the modus vivendi that you ordered,
is currently out of stock, everywhere.
What to do?!

 

Modus vivendi exceeds mere superficial individual material and financial lifestyle. Modus vivendi brings individual principle into action, because Modus vivendi denotes method or manner of living that reflects individual values and according to personal talents. And modus vivendi is attained in solution finding by any feasible interim working arrangement or practical compromise bypassing whatever difficulties, inclusively allowing different people, individually and collectively, even who disagree, freely to abide and interact productively. Is the modus vivendi you ordered, currently out of stock, try as you may, searching high and low, but all to no avail? Perhaps your desired modus vivendi simply does not come off the rack, like, oh I don't know, some pretensions brand name of ridiculous high end underpants for muscle men. Yes, if you are reading this, it may be that the modus vivendi you seek must be such as that of an individual life tailor made. Am I feeling your pain yet? Modus vivendi is social and situational. Thus, tautologically, there can be no solitary lonely DIY self-help or self-improvement with any power of implementation to bring individually tolerable modus vivendi into effect, fostering deep, meaningful engagement. No matter how collectively unhappy, the social environment continues to imposes it's own order, forever frustrating to any desire for life on one's own terms. For such is prevailing heteronomy that inspires such inarticulate and therefore unaccountable contempt and derision for new ideas and truth to power .

"General intelligence, the ability to think and reason, endowed our ancestors with advantages in solving evolutionarily novel problems for which they did not have innate solutions," says Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics and Political Science. "As a result, more intelligent people are more likely to recognize and understand such novel entities and situations than less intelligent people, and some of these entities and situations are preferences, values, and lifestyles."

 

 
FoolQuest.com presents a message of kindness towards forging long-term relationship assisting one another
and to connect in all manner of compelling, unusual, interesting, creative and surprising ways, unreasonably helpful to all.
Together finding direction and building social support concretizing all of our wildly subversive and impractical aspirations in Dialectical exploration towards strategic implementation...
generating interest and enthusiasm in multiple Points of View arising throughout vociferous open deliberation...
Moi? It has come to pass in fleeting occasion for intelligent conversation, that I have even found myself actually impressing women, and without even intending to! Now fancy that. And it should come as no surprise that anyone might prefer to play to whatever their own strengths. Creativity can and Should be Social then, presents my own vision is of a world in which collaborative brainstorming could actually take the place of boring dystressful and lonely vapid sycophantic small talk, for purpose of social life, even networking, career development and path to success. Because, alas that my accomplishments in life correspond not to my high verbal acuity, empathy and occasional charm, but to my weakest social aptitudes. Nevertheless, I remain a very good friend, listener, frank critic, staunch ally and highly creative.

As my own boss, I have fired myself for utter failure and incompetence in the sore travail of life! Perhaps, after all, it may have been the Cuddly Cyborg who framed the best problem statement of mere comparatively mediocre giftedness of a Salieri falling so far short of specific major talent as of a lone genius Mozart, in the following set of graphs from Cuddly Cyborg's now long defunct webpage:

 
 
 

Make no mistake however, that I am no success guru nor is this any bogus support group or brain-dead pep rally.

 FoolQuest.com foists no Totalitarian Interactivity, that manipulative illusion of choice whilst actually leading the website visitor about by the nose. And I make no fantastically authoritative claims of success nor manipulatively seek to pacify sore travail with soothing platitudes. Like anyone else, I'm just like you, and I'm not like you at all. I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch! Rather, let's work whatever the problem together for whatever it might be worth. In the spirit of aspiring Entrepreneurship, I strive to remain honest as a serial failure, and shall remain a failure until ever meeting with success. I'm just another maladroit with a cable modem! Therefore, to quote from ‘The Devil's Dictionary’ by Ambrose Bierce: Friendless. Having no favors to bestow. Destitute of fortune. Addicted to utterance of truth and common sense.” And thus bereft of all standing as I remain, any of my assertions and proposals, must each and all stand or fall upon whatever its own merits. In the words of Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him. Am I your unmet friend? I might not have what you are looking for, gentle reader, but dare we seek for it together? Or are we already thinking about, much less doing, however anything at all more important? Do tell! For in the words of Wolfgang Goethe “Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least.”

   
Breaking every rule
In boldly subversive and taboo reversal of inherent contradiction
To be explicit, gentle reader, let us undertake to do things differently together. But how so? Differently in precisely what manner? Answer, sometimes in one way, and sometimes another. Specifically, sometimes according to vastly unconventional procedure, as for example in the intentional and systematic reversal even just together amongst ourselves, of all manner of toxic social norms and mindless cruelty, and sometimes simply according to any pertinent specialized competence actually reviled by social circles of willful incompetence and delusion. For example of the former, the embrace of the discipline of the writing craft among other core valuable and relevant skill sets and aptitudes. Sometimes in rebellion against evil and stupidity, and sometimes merely in the growth and learning curve of actual competencies to probortunity at hand. And of course, reasoned and responsible deliberation all thereupon. Or for another example, instead of pipedream, relevant feasibility study in aspiring new venture creation (various business startup).
There exist peer groups and social circles of staunch adherence either or both to the most dysfunctional social convention on the one hand, and to willful incompetence in rejection of fundamental expertise on the other. Indeed, often serious and salient expertise and adamantine social convention, may actually clash. For notorious example, medical experts urge the public wearing of face covering during pandemics, while social convention of authoritarianism demands obedience to leadership and tradition actively flouting science and medicine. But there are other examples more longstanding and less blatantly life and death. For example, most generally, criticism and innovation are valued in any competent undertaking,. but resented socially. For example, solitary writers break isolation by coming together for the exchange of critique, while typical participants in collaborative fiction writing socially online, so contemptuous of the discipline of the writing craft, tend to take such offence at all criticism of their execrable badfic. And of course, beware of any kind of investment in the foolhardy and dishonest pipedreams of would be Entrepreneurs who display such unbridled resentment towards criticism and Reality Principle.
 
In the words of John Cleese: “Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” Any frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. And in the words of George Orwell: “The main motive for 'nonattachment' is a desire to escape from the pain of living, and above all from love, which, sexual or non-sexual is hard work.” Quoth the the Bard: "All the world's a stage! Indeed, to quote Neil Gabler: “American society is a society in which individuals have learned to prize social skills that permit them, like actors, to assume whatever rôle the occasion demands and to "perform" their lives rather than just live them.” And forced cheerful willful positivity notwithstanding, a morbidly serious matter. Nothing could ever be less playful. And in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. Competent or incompetent, whether in true hardnosed practicality or in sheer aimless and empty actingout of mimesis, many all the same remain no less consumed with the burning question of how to perform as expected and to fit in: How best to placate The Great Faceless They, thereby to obtain the key to life. For such remains the slave mentality of Homo Domesticus, the domesticated human..
 
However, relationship as it turns out, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially friendship, arises only as a byproduct of immersive full engagement in substantive communication and/or purposeful interaction, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! The probortunity at hand, the gap to be filled in the dire inadequacy of conventional social life. Conventional options in life can so often become so oppressive and unhappy. There is a dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, meaning no results no matter what one does. To begin with, there endures fundamentally inherent contradiction in that popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, while popularity and social success depend upon purpose defeating facile superficiality ever keeping distance keeping up pretence of fake fun. Hence the Existentially Absurd perpetual bait-and-switch dilemma between blatant lonely isolation and unhappiness inflicted from not fitting in, or else more devious lonely isolation, boredom and unhappiness extracted as as the cost for fitting in.
 
So, precisely who are The Great Faceless They? To answer that question with another question, precisely who is it that so urgently requires from you or from me, whatever parameters of behaviors, such as, for examples, ever uncritical willful positivity and interminably light and cheerfully sycophantic small talk? Indeed, there are indeed such hypersensitive and volatile bullies who will consistently fly into a rage, at the merest hint of honest criticism, the practice of controversy, vociferous heated exchange, or even simply take it upon themselves crackdown on the merest hint of serious conversation and dissidence. But surely, such may be somewhat extreme and at all unusual. Indeed, most people will know better than to stand out in such boorishly self appointed authority. Nevertheless, there might remain an understanding, a fearful, enfeebled and alienated consensus of intimidation, oppression propagating among the oppressed, the most banal totalitarianism and control of the mind. For whom then must we bereave ourselves of authenticity? In the in the famous aphorism of Walt Kelly's beloved Pogo Possum: "We have met the enemy, and he is us!" Can it be that we are The Great Faceless They?  Indeed, unless after all we actually like it, why don't we just cut it out already? Obviously there remains then, inherent and irreconcilable contradiction between critical rationalistic autonomy and anti-intellectual heteronomy.
 
In the words of George Orwell: “A genuinely unfashionable opinion is almost never given a fair hearing,” Yet truth ignored or tabooed, does not then go away. To wit: Relationship, as may be readily observed, and especially bonding and attachments of true friendship with psychological visibility, arise ever only as byproduct of immersive full engagement in  purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! For such are the needs of autonomy. And even play has purpose and substance of it's own. Alas then that both substantive communication and/or purposeful interaction, being so genuine and profound, therefore remain subversive, taboo and therefore becoming socially awkward. Alas then that ever the same widespread toxic and destructive message of intimidation remains ever reinforced under heteronomy, to the effect that In order to fit in, one must perpetually remain ever cheerful in willful positivity, maintain distance and always keep conversation light. Thus does the great and good boon to all people that is named: socialization, toxic and sanctioned, that violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination or brainwash, so painfully isolate the individual all the more so when we are together. As it turns out, quite to the contrary of prevailing and oppressively superficial social expectations, trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people talk more seriously with less small talk. Because, as according to the happiness formula of Positive Psychology, ongoing pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing fulfillment.
Therefore, towards the social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, and by design the most audaciously subversive stark reversal of oppressive heteronymous priorities, indeed as remaining entirely feasible even amid the most reactionary of times, and even barring all broadest sweeping change in society, nevertheless even a small group or social circle, striving in the will to power, may capably exercise freedom to chart another course. Exactly as per the present proposal, such pioneers may conceivably even subvert and reverse conventional heteronymous priorities so long assumed, understood and well known to Cultural Anthropology, by actually setting  collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding as default, embracing more democratic values and sensibilities of minimal restriction, hence resorting to whatever sort of even entirely ad hoc and howsoever hierarchical authority, only so long as need ever actually arising, no more and no longer.
And yet, somehow and alarmingly, no explicit or specific recommendation or call to action rings out, except for here on FoolQuest.com in outreach for cofounders in collaborative fiction writing and in subversive and disruptively innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (variuos business startup), in the social engineering and design of more optimal social stimulus struggle meeting the vastly underserved social and intellectual stimulus appetites so unique to the human condition and evolutionary neuroscience. Therefore, to be explicit and specific: Gentle readers, let us henceforth fully engage one another in ongoing serious substantive conversation, both analytical and strategic. Let us talk more seriously together, thusly testing to discover if greater happiness and more authentic connection shall indeed thereby accrue.
 
After all, correlation is not causation. And besides, which is cause, and which is effect?  But then again, what it turns out to be reciprocal? That would make for a virtuous cycle, veritable perpetual engine of happiness! In pursuit of the alleviation of Existentially Absurd human suffering, initial focus herein remains upon sustainable positive experience in haply serious conversation, a Dialectic of collaboration among equals in sound Epistemological Methodology. Brainstorming just willy-nilly entirely from scratch, might not be as serious and productive as actually encouraging participants to bring their own ideas as point of departure. and happily serious conversation aims at true close collaboration among equals that must exceed mere solitary and compartmentalized individual division of labor, in order thereby to yield viable and actionable strategy in fulfillment of intrinsic motivation even in pursuit of the hoped for possibility of success. And hence the aforementioned proposed foci of solution finding and collaboration, specifically fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup).  
 
Reality and the fundamental right to complain
Clear problem statement and the positive power of negative thinking
Conditionality and invalidation can be vastly more lonely and crushing of spirit, than mere solitude untroubled. To be reprimanded for complaining, is the same as the pernicious demand to suffer in silence, and never to bring serious problems to light. And ever such remains the malignant exhortation to willful positivity under the long refuted yet ever popular anti-rational magical thinking of the purported power of positive thinking. In the words of Anthony Jay: "The uncreative mind can spot wrong answers, but it takes a very creative mind to spot wrong questions." To quote Charles F. Kettering: “A problem well stated is a problem half solved.” The positive power of negative thinking obtains in criticality and the inherent friendliness and utility of honest criticism and fault finding, in the necessity of problem explicit statement towards solution finding, in progress that only comes in ongoing error detection and course correction, and indeed even in pessimistic realism, the name given the tendency of greater predictive accuracy in pessimism and pessimistic expectations, than in the danger of optimistic wishful thinking because of optimism, worst as from Pollyanna willful malignant optimism.
 
Whereas Sigmund Freud theorized that Pleasure Principle, the natural impulsive drive for pleasure seeking,  must be held in check by Reality Principle, caution arising from objectivity, passably good judgment of reality and foreseeable consequences, rather, as G. E. Moore contends, pleasure, to begin with, simply is not an end in and of itself. And it bears mention how the same principle applies no less for optimism, peace of mind or any other congenial mental state or emotional condition. Rather, as G. E. Moore contends, pleasure, not to mention optimism, peace of mind or any other howsoever uplifting mental state or emotional condition, is only a relevant second order indicator of value. And likewise, negative emotion of aversion at all remaining relevant, indicates prophylactic value in prevention or avoidance of howsoever dangerous or deleterious circumstances. Pleasure seeking, so called, is understood by G. E. Moore rather as striving for objectively real beneficial value, merely recognized via subjective anticipation and experience of pleasure. And likewise aversion is but a subjective warning to avoid objective danger and harm. Any prospect of pleasure divorced from beneficial real value and likewise aversion quelled without regard for real adversity, should raise every alarm.
 
Indeed, those who suffer certainly do not need to be castigated simply for complaining! That is depraved. Manipulation comes as an adjunct to coercion, under whatever rationalizing benign pretext, deceptively disarming resistance. To this end, the manipulator may blithely assert any variety of mitigating Existential Validation, right, authority, or purported benevolent intention: It's for your own good, dear! Nevertheless, to reject all complaint on any lunatic and relentlessly manipulative imperative of willful positivity, amounts the abrogation not only of all empathy and compassion, but even of Reality Principle to begin with. Indeed, as it turns out, people who suffer do not even want to be reassured so much as they only wish, first of all, to be heard. But obviously, most gratifying to those who suffer, will be capability that anything might actually be done to improve circumstances or situation of suffering. "Science has pretty much established that your circumstances are not very relevant to your happiness." declares Stephen Mills with such blithely nigh solipsistic and unoriginal cocksurety. “He who hath so little knowledge of human nature as to seek happiness by changing anything but his own disposition, will waste his life in fruitless efforts and multiply the grief he proposes to remove.” opines Dr. Samuel Johnson. Bah, humbug! Clearly whatever present circumstances have every bearing upon happiness, indeed whatever issues in the ongoing present, no less so than personality, biography and psychiatric issues from the past.
The very word: 'happy' derives from 'happenstance.' And 'happenstance' refers to prosperity under real external circumstances or situation, even by chance, not affect or disposition as in more modern concept. Indeed, TRUE MEANING of LIFE, remains that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Therefore, in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” and to quote Henri-Louis Bergson, so eloquently bridging abstract principle into concrete application: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought." How effete then the introversion of all such ever popular Zen self-reliance becomes! For as in the celebrated words of John Donne: "No man is an island." It is true of course, that happiness remains quite distinct from mere material success. But it hardly follows therefrom, that happiness is entirely derived from inner life and any simple choice in self-help/improvement of the right thinking along with solitary individual behavior sets or: habits, going it alone. How boring, lonely, alienated and unfulfilling! What is it that is actually missing from our lives? Any compelling vision of happiness and enthusiasm, indeed of Eudemonia, however vastly else any such ideas and expectations vary individually, in one way or another still all consist of activity and human interaction bringing the exchange of social and intellectual stimuli meeting innate intrinsic needs motivating ongoing stimulus struggle and engagement. According to the happiness formula of Positive Psychology, that wisdom of the sages of old as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science, ongoing pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing fulfillment. Not any bored lonely Zen Mystical quest for futility and sublime apathy or behaviorally modified and disengaged euphoria without meaning or external relevance. But more anon. It only remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, all for wont of the wherewithal, the capable channels, means and wherewithal.
 
'Positive Psychology is Not Happy-ology!' Beyond Psychotherapy and treatment for Psychopathology, the compassionate repair of life's inner damage, rather, Positive Psychology is concerned with positive intervention improving even normal life, high talent, indeed even hither to uncultivated genius. Alas that there remains a pernicious trend of conflation of Positive Psychology, being the applicable research into the nature and causes of emotional wellness rather than treatment of Psychopathology, with long refuted yet ever popular magical bogus cult ideology of purported power of positive thinking. Linguistically speaking, the confusion seems hardly surprising, though no less misleading. Nevertheless, Positive Psychology should have no relation with toxic ideology of purported power of positive thinking practice of denial, lying to oneself, indeed actually recognized by Positive Psychology as only resulting in ambivalent dystressful cognitive dissonance entailed in desperate terror management. In the words of Sigmund Freud: “…much will be gained if we succeed in transforming your hysterical misery into common unhappiness. With a mental life that has been restored to health, you will be better armed against that unhappiness.” In the face of all widespread maladaptive private misery, Psychodynamic Psychotherapy seeks to diagnose then treat and even cure, relieve and negate the excruciation of psychopathology and thereby make patients more well and therefore at all by that token, more competent and capable. But precisely what is emotional wellness in the first place, much less pathology of emotional disturbance howsoever deviating therefrom? That is e question of Positive Psychology, seeking to understand and to nurture authentic wellbeing, both psychological and situational, for just about anyone at all, quite regardless of any psychopathology. Because, after all, in any context, healthy living exceeds more treatment of illness.
 
The outreach Again, Positive Psychology and the investigation and pursuit of authentic wellbeing, remain entirely unrelated to the long refuted yet ever popular magical bogus cult ideology of purported power of positive thinking from witless and conniving online gurus. But I am no success guru. I make no fantastically authoritative claims of success. I'm just like you, and I'm not like you at all. I don't want your money or your devotion. Gentle reader, I'd never let you off so easily! ! I am too good a friend for that. And I am certainly no callow motivational grifter here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch!  Isn't there quite enough of that already? Instead, we can work whatever the problem together for whatever it might be worth. In the spirit of aspiring Entrepreneurship, I remain an honest serial failure, and shall remain a failure until I ever meeting with success. And any of my assertions must stand or fall upon whatever its own merits of resonating and evidence. In the words of Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him.” Am I your unmet friend? I do not have what you are looking for, gentle reader, but dare we seek for it together? Or are we already thinking about much less doing anything more important? Do tell! For in the words of Wolfgang Goethe “Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least."
 
Life is suffering of Existential Absurdity in continual frustration of the will to power, simply because nothing works. Is there actually any hope? Or does only abject Nihilism, Ecclesiastical futility and sore travail remain? Is life, no more than shabby subterfuge of superficial and silly collective membership ever entrenched in paralytic terror management fending off confrontation with mortality, as dubbed by William James, the worm at the core.” of the human condition. Is life, that shabby subterfuge ending only in death, then simply to be rejected and condemned, or can life, of any true value after all, ever be made redeemable? Of course, social, technological and  medical advance into practical immortality or: Emortality, remains a noble and worthy objective, so long overdue, and that achievement whereof can bring humanity great peace hither to scarcely imagined, and perhaps with it at long last, lucidity and sweet reason, free from mortal terror, according to terror management theory, experimentally discovered to be the socio-psychological and political trigger of such mass insanity as petty judgmental cruelty and factional hostility.
 
But even the noble and lofty imperative of Emortalism still only heightens every question of, for however long or short, how better truly to live, thereby to help alleviate any morbid yearning for release into death. And so, even in the abstract, what is the cause for suffering of unhappy boredom and discontent? And bridging into the concrete, can therefrom obtain any practical, practicable and actionable implementation towards remedy? Answer: As to be expounded in detail, the exercise together of creativity, and not just isolated lonely individual creativity, functional operant trustworthy, capable, respectful true and capable collaboration, and not jut solitary division of labor, all remain most crucial. Indeed, as shall be established, shared creativity is perhaps even most effective in the gratification of such vastly underserved social and intellectual stimulus struggle, the name given by anthropologist Desmond Morris for what we are each doing all of the time, the perpetual striving to regulate, to engage and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal, from the environment, for staving off boredom. Hence: What in abstract principle is conceivable as the optimum fulfillment in creativity together, and if achievable then by what concrete measures? Social support is so often deemed the single greatest predicator of success, and dearth whereof the specter of ignominious failure. The capability approach of Sen and Martha Nussbaum, is the idea that true freedom is resultant from real and practical empowerment to attain that which one has ones own reasons to value as important to do or to be or become. As Sir Karl Popper held forth, social change is brought about by the forging of lasting institutes. And what more capable institution of creative endeavor, than making open to all, high quality and original collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming together with subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), from the most embryonic first concept "kitchen table" stage or phase, all the way thought from business planning and feasibility study, management team formation, Capitalization and implementation? For such is the vision of FoolQuest.com         
 
There are many long standing recommendations in the pursuit of happiness generally, some better than others. Although perhaps most promising but neglected, remains, at long last, howsoever to investigate and then better address the entire range of long frustrated vastly underserved motivating intrinsic social and intellectual stimulus appetites, indeed by the social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle. -And certainly not by any solitary craven Zen Mystical retreat inward, but by rising together in real courageous action and interaction. For in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” and to quote Henri-Louis Bergson, so eloquently bridging the abstract and the concrete: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought."
 
The above questions and answers remain ever the crux of tailor made agenda for serious discussion at hand upon which capable pursuit of happiness so urgently depends. Such is Philosophy beyond mere mere  investigation in the abstract, indeed bridging into the concrete, tangible implementation from abstract principle and reciprocally, abstraction Empirically informed. All in genuine striving for aręte, being the quest for the right way of living ones best, called virtue, courage (as in: moral fortitude), and excellence. That is how and why, to quote Aristotle: “All things in life are philosophical.” And therefore, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. In the famous words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”   is a subversive outreach toward the formation of just such a core group of unreasonable people applying ourselves even to the most daunting problems besetting us. As Hans Selye put it: “‘Realistic people’ who pursue ‘practical aims’ are rarely as realistic or practical, in the long run of life, as the dreamers who pursue their dreams.” Indeed, to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Indeed, nigh tautologically, there can be no self-made bootstrap "well-formed plan," however stalwart and inventive, no adaptive self-help/improvement, no unilateral solution at all, to shortcomings and  deficiencies of social interaction, cooperation and access all thereto. Any frustrated desire tells a story for all that will hear it, needs a plan in the world, and calls out for allies. Effective and capable collaboration partners of integrity, must remain responsive and responsible to one another. For what is the point of creditable, trustworthy, capable and respectful Menschlichkeit, but genuine autonomy meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others? For such remains the objective of the present outreach for collaboration cofounders.
 
As Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ Eros, so enticing and so threatening, is nothing more or less than profound reciprocal engagement traversing into alien difference. Participants, cofoundes, collaboration partners of every level of proficiency and achievement, can offer important contribution. Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Indeed, a notable key observation of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of invention, is how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and multipotential reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines. Alas that we live in a monologuic world wherein few people even actually much hear themselves think, let alone speak, and by far less one another. Indeed, co validating peer groups are often known to retreat each into their own figurative echo chamber, turning their backs upon reality at all, let alone anyone else's evidence, perceptions, opinions or concerns. Even most anciently, Socrates observed how different specialist experts often then come to believe that therefore they know everything, or at at any rate, everything important. But actually, we are all fallible, only ignorant in different ways. The subversive awareness that this indeed includes even oneself, therefore gauging  the limits of ones own knowledge and capability, is called: Socratic Wisdom, and the lack whereof: unaware incompetence.
 
Philosophical communication altering and expanding human consciousness
Philosophical communication altering and expanding human consciousness remains no hyperbole, but plain and profane, literal and ordinary. And what empty platitude that so often passes for Philosophy, remains ever stupefying to those infected thereby. Therefore, insist on the real thing and accept no substitutes! Indeed, even after all these thousands of years, nothing remains more crucial than the Dialectic, because the simplest first key feature of any social environment remaining easiest to modify and upgrade at will, by any two or more determined individuals, perhaps even such as I and thou, remains whatever parameters of conversation, of communication, of agenda setting and  even tacit rules of order, indeed altering human consciousness. Philosophy is an awakening, habits of clear thought, transformative in opening and sharpening the mind, and the intentional cultivation of such entertainment to be found in thought itself, habits or clear thought, the deeper cognitive abilities so crucial to problem statement and solution finding so adaptive in an ever changing world. But does Philosophy actually any longer strive for aręte, the quest for the right way of living ones best, called virtue, courage (as in: moral fortitude), excellence, or only investigate in the abstract? To quote Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought." In the words of Aristotle: “All things in life are philosophical.” Indeed, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. Begin then, like Socrates, by asking yourself what matters most: When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along?  Change the conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change the world! Because trustworthy, capable and respectful happy people talk more seriously with less small talk. But for that, will be required anyone else likewise suitably open to talk with. Alas, to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him.” Am I your unmet friend? As the saying goes: “A good friend knows all your stories. A best friend helped you create them. What then constitutes desirable agenda in the optimization of social stimulus struggle. expansion of human consciousness, and thereby the best outreach and cultivation of friendship? This then brings us to the psychological and cognitive argument for the aforementioned proposed foci of collaboration. As shall be further expounded, fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) in particular, may serve as powerful Dialectical and strategic tools not only towards subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding, business or project planning, but implementation in the social engineering of more optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle, even tailor made to the individual. Any frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. Gentle reader, what are your own frustrated life satisfactions and corresponding underserved stimulus appetites? And how might said stimuli feature in an intentional social environment?
 
The interdisciplinary intellectual stimulation, Arousal and elicitation of curiosity so unique to the taboo synergy bridging the abstract and the concrete, stands exemplified as between the two modes of narrative, fiction writing and business or project planning. Because both indeed are different synergistic applications of narrative, the pure creativity of fiction writing and the innovation of business/project planning scenario towards new venture creation (various business startup). The difference is in how creative fiction writing and plotting need only strive at dramatic plausibility and any detail towards the willing suspension of disbelief, whereas business planning scenario as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup), must discover and engage realistic feasibility study and solution finding. Fiction writing is pure creativity, art for art's sake, whereas business or project planning as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various
business startup) benefits from innovation which is the name given to purposely applied creativity. Fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) may serve as powerful Dialectical and strategic tools towards subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding and implementation in the social engineering of more optimal stimulus struggle, even tailor made to the individual, bridging the Philosophical and the practical, the abstract and the concrete.
 
Socrates hailed drama as most Philosophical among the arts, and Sir Karl Popper, the favorite philosopher of scientists, discovered in hypothetico-deductive process of business planning, falliblism/non justificationism/non verificationism, Popper's Philosophy of Science and Scientific Method, applied Epistemological Methodology, model for unfettered speculation and conjecture only then subject to the systematic doubt of scientific skepticism, Socratic Dialectical enlightenment by refutation, that also informed his politics. Collaborative fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) remain  so ideal for collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding. The interdisciplinary intellectual stimulation and elicitation of curiosity so unique to the taboo synergy bridging the abstract and the concrete, as between the two modes of narrative, fiction writing and business or project planning. Because both indeed are different synergistic applications of narrative, the pure creativity of fiction writing and the innovation of business/project planning scenario towards new venture creation (various business startup). The difference is in how creative fiction writing and plotting need only strive at dramatic plausibility and any detail towards the willing suspension of disbelief, whereas business or project planning scenario as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup), must discover and engage realistic feasibility study and solution finding. Fiction writing is pure creativity, art for art's sake, whereas business or project planning as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup) benefits from innovation which is the name given to purposely applied creativity. Fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) may serve as powerful Dialectical and strategic tools towards subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding and implementation in the social engineering of more optimal stimulus struggle, even tailor made to the individual, bridging the Philosophical and the practical, the abstract and the concrete. Such may be viewed as benefits inherent to the aforementioned proposed foci of collaboration.'
 
Stranded in our monological milieu
Alas that the opinionated, those subversives among us who do not conform, who will not just tow the line, indeed those with the most to contribute in as above, in Philosophical communication altering and expanding human consciousness, will all to often find themselves so coldly ignored. Indeed, in the words of Andrew Keen: “Those who know most can be persecuted by those who know least.” We all live in an attention economy of ever more short attention, thwarting optimal reciprocal engagement together in any serious purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication. In the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” People don’t actually desire volume of raw information so much as some sense of predictable order in life and control over ones world and destiny. And hence, motivation in all due and appropriate self-interest, ever might one strive to ferret out and research whatever secrets, tips, rules, specifics, hints, laws, and systems that one way or another, bridging Philosophical and practical, abstract and the concrete, thereby any promise of greater order, even simply for the sake of better structured sensemaking, -Indeed, any sustained and coherent problem statement for brainstorming towards creative solution finding. But in the words of Michel Eyquem De Montaigne: “There is no pleasure to me without communication: there is not so much as a sprightly thought comes into my mind that it does not grieve me to have produced alone, and that I have no one to tell it to.”

For in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” And to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him." Indeed, as George Orwell observes in Conversation with a Pacifist,’ even at all thinking clearly, becomes increasingly difficult in bored and lonely isolation without expression.  For to quote George Orwell in 'Conversation with a Pacifist': Philosophers, writers, artists, even scientists, not only need encouragement and an audience, they need constant stimulation from other people. It is almost impossible to think without talking. If Defoe had really lived on a desert island, he could not have written Robinson Crusoe, nor would he have wanted to. Take away freedom of speech, and the creative faculties dry up.” Therefore it can be extremely frustrating seeking to interact with those who stubbornly and habitually only disengage and dummy up so paralytically, whenever they don't understand something, instead of actively seeking clarification, so that readers and writers alike may learn from our mistakes. -After all, the only way we ever actually  do. Indeed, there will be no information overload here for the self directed reader, intensely focused upon whatever their own personal motives and interests. Alas, given such self direction, there can be no guarantee of alignment with the agenda of FoolQuest.com. Gentle reader, anyone finding value herein has required a great deal of personal motive at all even to read this, much less to respond, let alone ever together to take action, to collaborate as equals. But why so? Because of long sentences and high vocabulary? Because of extensive hyperlinks? Because of resentment towards the color scheme? Lazy short attention uperficial bullshit! We live in an attention economy. And in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” The more important motivations for such antipathy as prevails, may be more profound: Everybody needs to be heard, but does anyone actually want to listen? Answer: Often, only if they can intensely relate and identify. And human beings suffer when no one understands or relates, especially as regarding urgent matters of significant import. And for many, FoolQuest.com remains so nerdy, starkly unrelatable and threatening, taboo elicitation only of sheer and utter crimestop. Because FoolQuest.com attacks all accustomed conventional thinking and practice, urging instead, utterly bizarre and unconventional alternatives thereto, and even the very notion of resistance. But is any of that even realistic? And can there truly be found anything new under the sun? Indeed there may yet be discovered method to the madness, but only given any iota of curiosity and patience in order to continue. As Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ Eros, so enticing and so threatening, exactly opposite from consensual validation in relatable similarity of tribulation and thereby membership in collective identity, is instead nothing more or less than profound reciprocal engagement traversing into alien difference. Of course, ever are there are many so enthusiastically promise the shock of the new, that after all the hype, only disappoint, actually only dishing out more of the same old same old. Rest assured however, that FoolQuest.com delivers unpopular ideas.

 
Indeed, returning to consensual validation, not that everyone even seeks consensual validation, or shares the same widely accepted standards of consensual validation. Indeed, when words alone ring hollow, even in the most people pleasing flattery of strident amplification by another of ones own sentiments, then validation so craved must be such as taking form, as the saying goes, in action speaking louder than words, indeed of serious analysis, strategy, planning, feasibility study and finally active cooperation enhancing capability and effectiveness. Unheard of! And yet, returning as we are, to the burning emotional need for consensual validation, that is why support groups focused upon any howsoever troubling specific commonalities, experiences and situation, came into being and continue to flourish and propagate far and wide. And many find great solace and validation. But then came more generic support groups with ever broader and less specific focus, and the reliable supply of such highly particular validation, has come to be replaced instead with the broadest implicit threat of invalidation. This comes about because without common narrow focus, difference emerges, and membership in collective identity comes under threat. And then, in reaction, ensues only heteronomy to knee-jerk  of conformism alas so characteristic of the worst among such prevalent bogus support groups and ubiquitously pervasive support group culture at large, of interminable small talk, stultifying (anti)social media superficiality, compassion burn out, ever shorter attention, and yes, inane support group etiquette blithely and fastidiously adhered to in all conceivable discourse. Insufferably eviscerated bogus support groups interaction remains so cripplingly restricted only to an outlet of woe and the exchange of morale support and blithely effusive sympathy for each in turn whatever ones ongoing tribulations.  And  thus bogus support groups and culture exist only to pacify those who suffer, and thereby only perpetuating timid and helpless exploitation, abuse and bully culture. All in all, a fine case study in toxic ideology. And what a racket! A racket, no matter how reputable, can be any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality a scam or fraud, a deceptive domineering practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for whatever benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many.
 
Indeed, in the bogus support groups, strategic discussion inevitably entailing open disagreement and the practice of controversy, let alone active exchange of concrete assistance, may typically become punishable by mistrust, scorn and ultimately expulsion and social exclusion! - indeed systematic skilled incompetence much like unto employees raising problems or just calling bullshit, therefore getting fired. All the same Behaviorist willful positivity dedicated to the malignant proposition that happiness for all is achieved only by the quelling of all dissent, and no less insufferable to intelligence. For such is quietly desperate resignation of the masses into prevailing expectation to the effect that a "safe space" implicitly requires, if not anonymity, then a certain distance, detachment, segregation and isolation from one another and from outside life. So much then for making new friends! For such is the process of socialization, toxic and sanctioned, that violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination or brainwash, that so painfully isolates the individual all the more so when we are together And also because of knee-jerk liability phobia as implicit in a staunch doctrine that concrete help and advice must only come from legitimate professionals. Laypeople seeking to unite, help or advise one another, the way that surely decent, sensitive and intelligent people are supposed to after all, may therefore be summarily castigated as fake gurus! Any notion of strategy or cooperation may be subject to malign equivalence with the plethora of dubious opportunities and offers of guidance for taking at all concrete action in order to become more happy and successful or howsoever to overcome whatever suffering in life, programs that tend to be so simplistic, fallacious, ineffective, inopperant and futile, if not scams outright. All hence the need for a new and better way of life, one in which, as the motto declares, our differences will make us stronger, if only anyone will ever get beyond interminably vapid bogus support groups culture small talk systematically underling all capacity for autonomy and sense of initiative. And thence comes the very thrust of the present heresy:

 

                                      STOP AIMLESSLY "SHARING"
AND START SETTING Purposeful AGENDA
In the words of Frederick Law Olmsted: "After all is said and done, much is said and little is done." In short, there may exist an heteronymous anti-critical second degree pipedreaming blanket taboo upon even the attempt to ever consider setting any agenda. Whereas passive "sharing" remains ever permissible. For often such remains the ideological propagation of the bogus support groups malagenda of oppressive behavioral structure into benumbing willful positivity. And even in forums online and real life encounter, wherein individuals from rival factions locked in deadly intractable conflict, struggle together in loving communion, yet never advocating new policy. Worst, they actually tend to resent anyone so gauche as to interrupt their effulgent kumbayas with any call to policy agenda. And the most massive apolitical protests shake the world, raise hope, and then subside changing nothing. And all for wont of policy to follow up with action. Such is the wide spread passivity of blithe knee-jerk anti-intellectualism. Even griping was once encouraged, so long as remaining accepted as a matter of course, that nothing is to be done. And in further frustration of ever reaching out at large for anything beyond mere emotional support, such as may be, Websites and WebPages that actually do report upon valuable research and analysis regarding causes and circumstances of happiness, so seldom then actually include any concrete plans or procedures in implementation of whatever such wisdom, nor facilitate contact and cooperation, nor in any way at all further help to promote action. After all, the function of such resource and publication remains merely informational. All thus, like unto some latter day Diogenes in cyberspace, FoolQuest.com remains the only known website bridging the abstract and the concrete, with an explicit agenda of cofounde recruitment into ongoing analytical and strategic discourse towards capable planning and feasibility study into concrete action premised upon the wisdom of those sages of old, as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science, regarding the nature of happiness and success. -Taboo fundamentals of human nature and autonomy ever rejected and ignored in prevailing righthink and common knowledge remaining ever so blithely enmired in heteronomy. And make no mistake that proverbially swimming against the metaphorical current, inevitably remains literal hard work. So it better be fun!
Fairly straightforward questions thereby ensue, as regards any prospect of close collaboration: Do we share at all similar expectations? What do we each want, and what effort are we each willing to undertake? And realistically, can that possibly be enough even as any beginning, and moreover to what purpose? According to the sages of old as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science, we all share similar intrinsic needs and motivations further expounded herein, presently. Suffice for the nonce, that if indeed we want at all the same things, if common ground exists, then this agenda of the present text is intended to raise awareness, stimulate curiosity, engender favorable evaluation, and then penultimately, to achieve persuasion into fully engaged discussion paving the way toward collaboration among equals. Finally, for discussion let alone cooperation to become ongoing, the experience thereof must remain gratifying and fulfilling both in the present and into the future. And that may require relatable personal relevance, one way or another, with autonomy and and readiness to challenge heteronomy and taboo, all even only in order to motivate Active Reading of detailed, analytic and densely written and lengthy text, let alone actual pertinent discussion thereupon. But short attention and crimestop expect and demand short text, small words and familiar ideas. That oft mentioned maximum of three seconds in browsing any given webpage, is only so terrible as cretin enshrined in social norm by such lamentable forgetfulness of ever even hoping to stumble upon anything at all more arresting. Worse, catching attention is not enough. FoolQuest.com  must compete with all other online projects in which people are already vested and even satisfied. And if it ain't broke, why fix it? The present text then, my own proverbial Message in a Bottle, remains subversive outreach for some or other shared motivation of abiding dissatisfaction. Otherwise, why bother?

If, gentle reader, to begin with such probortunity at hand  here on FoolQuest.com for whatever conceivable reason already utterly fails to entice, and only leaves you cold, then in that case, sorry to say, no endeavor of implementation from ongoing solution finding, planning and feasibility study, seems likely ever to garner much interest or enthusiasm, but only howsoever a vague and disquiet memory of aversion and disappointment in some or other prospect of strange and sore travail. It may be less than ideal, but this is not obscurantism: Human beings need to share our ideas and think together. Isolation muddles thinking. A writer struggling at self expression of anything new and different, may require readers at all interested to penetrate the text and make cogent response. Thus has it been since the social evolution of literacy as we have known it.  In the words so often variously attributed either to to Marcus Tullius Cicero or Blaise Pascal: “If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter.” And yes, time invested then saves time later on. For indeed, over time, history condenses and deceives, with direct and concise presentation of long and painstaking generational knowledge work. In truth, the weighty tome online that is FoolQuest.com remains but a barest beginning in ongoing condensation, much les much else, for anyone nevertheless remaining undaunted.

Subversive hypothesis: Ongoing collaborative brainstorming and creative solution finding in and of themselves, are great fun, remaining vastly underserved and crucial to authentic wellbeing. And so, what is to be done? It is predicted herein, that even such ongoing Dialectic will be found uplifting already in and of itself. - optimally reciprocally engagement in more optimal social stimulus struggle, indeed all thereby even consciousness altering. And all vague optimistic recommendation remains implicit from such exuberantly glowing observation, notwithstanding, all of that alone constitutes no strategy or plan of action to flesh out together. First of all, in any true analytic strategic deliberation towards planning to take action, the question remains: What is means to an end, and what is end in and of itself? For example, coding proximity detection into a computer and installing peripherals, constitutes a programming systems integration challenge, and yet however merely a means to an end. Because, as to solution finding as distinct from problem solving, whereas the problem solver will just get to work with sophisticated coding and configuration of the requisite high tech and expensive peripherals, the solution finder will realize, first of all, that the objective in the first place remains merely to know when anyone else approaches on the premises. Hence, a simple door chime will announce the arrival of a guest just as readily, or a bay window looking out upon the pathway, will reveal approaching visitors Empirically. Some visits may even become predictable. The point remaining in the matter at hand, that problem finding crucially differentiates means from ends. But beyond the cut and dry, in important and interesting questions, the very question of which is which, may often remain at all Philosophical, indeed subversively Axiological, a matter of values in transition.

And that is plainly how and why, to quote Aristotle: “All things in life are philosophical.” And therefore, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. For life is suffering, but what precisely is the problem? Aversive emotion internally, or adverse conditions externally? The debates rages from time immemorial. And there can be no solution without first problem statement. And running off halfcocked remains only folly. Indeed, in life, the simplistic and obvious stock answers, no matter how arguably pragmatic, neither crass materiality alone, nor sublime apathy at all, let alone, finally, death, suffice in preference towards addressing motivating intrinsic human needs. But perhaps there can be external and even intentional situation that might conceivably help alleviate suffering via the promotion even of inner wellbeing. This is because, much as latter-day Mystics and crass materialists alike, may staunchly and nigh solipsistically  deny it,  there remains relevant repeatably observable connection between subjectivity of inner life and objective conditions of surrounding external reality called: situation.

To wit, a theme emerges:  As in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, more optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment, was named by anthropologist Desmond Morris:: stimulus struggle. And evolutionary neuroscience dictates additional unique social and intellectual stimulus appetites for the massively engorged human brain and neocortex. Hence: The TRUE MEANING of LIFE, is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Hence, relevance, being any at all meaningful and practical applicability and utility whatsoever, of inner life, external reality and even social reality, each to one another. Otherwise, life becomes arbitrary and alienating, even oppressively surreal. What then are the parameters defining more conducive versus detrimental situation, especially socially, to howsoever more satisfactory or optimal individual social stimulus struggle and wellbeing? And can any such favorable circumstance ever be socially engineered intentionally and by design? Bridging the abstract and the concrete, FoolQuest.com  pursues a relevant agenda of subversive and disruptively innovative collaboration among equals, toward authentic wellbeing in fulfillment of literally the most important intrinsic human needs and stimulus appetites according to the greatest sages of antiquity as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science. Indeed, according to the happiness formula of Positive Psychology, ongoing pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing fulfillment. However, no explicit or specific recommendation or call to action rings out, except for here on FoolQuest.com And it may be even further observed, indeed as per the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, that no one can remain unfulfilled, bored, lonely and alienated, while optimally reciprocally engaged together in the collaboration among equals of brainstorming towards creative solution finding. However, again, no explicit or specific recommendation or call to action rings out, except for here on FoolQuest.com, as follows:  

In proposal herein toward the social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle, two specific areas of creative endeavor are herein advanced as ideal for ongoing collaborative brainstorming creative solution finding: And these are collaborative fiction writing and the subversively disruptive innovation that is new venture creation (variouos business startup). Moreover. therein remain two at all similar specific gaps in human need only waiting to be fulfilled, probortunity to provide something important not yet available, addressing specific voids in the emptiness of life, potential niches of unique probortunity for every skill level from novice to expert: 1) Firstly, there exist many high quality serious writers groups in pursuit of excellence in the discipline of the writing craft via the exchange of critique, nevertheless otherwise embracing as inevitable matter of course, the solitude of writing. And alas that thinking makes it so. Indeed, for whatever reason, typical writers groups simply do not practice ongoing collaborative fiction writing.

Worse, for the most  part, the many perfectly awful collaborative fiction writing projects and communities that do exist online, in contrast with serious writer's groups, in mindless anal retentive conformity to mediocrity, typically hold forth that because there is no disputing tastes as the saying goes, therefore there can be no criteria or technique for quality writing, no point in making the effort, no aspiration to excellence because otherwise no deficiency either. Therefore, as might be expected, the output remains systematically execrable.

And secondly while there exist thriving industries of training and vast bodies of literature within thriving and productive industries in support of established serial Entrepreneurs who can pay, the rest of us wana-bes, novice and expert alike, remain as ever abandoned to our own devices. Frustratingly, there remains virtually no literature or support for the most embryonic inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase of subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) entirely from scratch. And there is actually nowhere suitable to go.

By whatever aptitude or sheer dumb luck, the like minded each and all, are abandoned to our own devices to somehow come together on our own. And to make maters worse,  there do remains no limit to credulity in pipedreaming and hand waving to beguile and confuse the unready, as well as no end of phony outright scam opportunities to ensnare the desperate and the unwary. An inclusive community in ongoing cultivation of wild ideas, then subject to critical scrutiny and feasibility study towards implementation, could make all the difference in meaningful facilitation of true capability for the rest of us.

And so, be then all as way,  precisely what can be done, what subversive action may be taken, in order actually to achieve such fervently desired favorable conditions of optimal reciprocal engagement together in optimal social and intellectual stimulus struggle and wellbeing for ourselves? A barely less daunting strategic alternative to all grueling and likely futile job hunting, might be instead, without inevitable pointless frustration into increasingly lowered expectations, to take initiative and intentionally to organize from scratch, stronger together, collaboration among equals towards the forging of a new group or social circle in ongoing practice of collaboration among equals and creative collaboration in subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding, specifically in collaborative fiction writing and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) and (pre-)incubation. -Our Own Private IDEO, as it were... -If obscurity of the pun may be forgiven. Otherwise, as for typical instances or events as ever arising, of collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding in whatever other particular social context, afterwards it is all over, concluding with no follow up, fading away into the oppressive and mind dulling routine leading nowhere. So much for just going with the flow, aimless and helpless. Indeed, as the saying goes, failing to plan is planning to fail.

Addressing the pandemic chronic dystress and lonely boredom of such vastly underserved stimulus appetites: As in accordance with the arousal Theory of motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo' October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. Everything that we do is in order to modify subjective experience thereby altering consciousness. Hence, as an agenda of question in focus for Dialectic of collaborative brainstorming towards creative solution finding. The subversive probortunity at hand: The TRUE MEANING of LIFE, that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively What then are the parameters defining more conducive or else detrimental situation, especially socially, to howsoever more satisfactory individual stimulus struggle and wellbeing? And can situation of stimulus struggle intentionally become subject to social engineering for intentional improvement? Indeed, the social engineering of social stimulus struggle would subvresively contrive the intentional introduction of specific social stimuli and social interaction, into the social environment, in order hereby to better to optimize social stimulus struggle for meeting even the ever neglected unique underserved intellectual and social stimulus appetites for wellbeing, natural to the massively engorged human brain and neocortex, all as rooted in evolutionary neuroscience. Towards the subversive objective of the present strategic design propos for optimal social stimulus struggle, is advanced an intensive regimen of ongoing collaboration among equals is brainstorming creative solution finding in collaborative fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup). And the many advantages of these particular foci of deliberation, will be addressed each in turn, presently.

There will ever be most subvresively salient Socratic Wisdom in taking into account how social reality, even at its most vivid and compelling, is ever constructed only by participation therein, willing or manipulated and even coerced outright, aware or merely habitual and behaviorally conditioned, benumbed and automatic. Because social prompts are only intelligible at all as shaped by, and subtext of, social expectations to be met by approved conditioned behavior in elicitation of conditional strokes within extrinsic reward and punishment systems of conformity and compliance, approval seeking with everything  at stake for the individual within society. And nevertheless, unlike objective physical reality, the veritable Maya and Samsāra of social reality indeed actually would vanish like unto the fabled will-o'-the-wisp, without ongoing participation on the part of the perceivers. Society is the enemy to be overcome! And yet, paradoxically, resistance may be what even the greatest conformists even however begrudgingly at all respect. Buying into social reality without that proverbial grain of salt, may often amount to solipsistic mind blindingly dysfunctional terror management, a treacherous chimera. To be blunt, social reality controls us only because we it upon one another, ceaselessly. But progress means that social reality need not remain set in stone. Even social reality may be subject to change for the better, even intentionally and by design, via some or other adroit social engineering, or even simply under the efficacy of relationship, indeed by the subversive power of friendship.

Indeed, if only any two or more individuals can imagine different, then relationship ensues, a new more proximate experimental superseding closer social reality. Smaller social circles or relationships of two or more individuals, are well known to forge their own unique social contracts and expectations amongst themselves. On the one hand, group dynamics may remain unimaginatively bound to prior socialization, or else on the other hand abandoning all propriety, they may co validate and normalize any conceivable deviance no matter how senseless and destructive. Both extremes remain depressingly common. Indeed, elements of both may often coexist and manifest in the group dynamics of the self same social circle. For there may often be found no more staunch conformists than the most flagrant deviants, and no deeper conviction than such blithely Absurd hypocrisy in desperate mimesis of all that one can never truly be. Indeed, such is true to life Comedy of Manners. But for those most fortunate among us, there can also be at all more functional and congenial social circles characterized, perhaps even intentionally and by design, guided by whatever more congenial, productive and laudable values in action, networking for one another first and foremost for each our own best interests and delight, but never for anything more manipulative. devious, ulterior, strange, dangerous and exploitative. Hence:

Responsible feasible ambition in piecemeal engineering for the rest of us. Indeed all may be readily accomplished even without the uncommon power and influence to bring about broadest sweeping social change. In the words of Sir Karl Popper: The piecemeal engineer knows, like Socrates, how little he knows. He knows that we can learn only from our mistakes. Accordingly, he will make his way, step by step, carefully comparing the results expected with the results achieved, and always on the look-out for unavoidable unwanted consequences of any reform: and he will avoid undertaking any reform pf a complexity and scope which makes it impossible for him to disentangle causes and effects, and to know what he is really doing.... Holistic or Utopian social engineering, as opposed to piecemeal social engineering...aims at remodeling the 'whole of society' in accordance with a definite plan or blueprint.” To reiterate: Towards better optimization of social and intellectual stimulus struggle, it may even become possible, as that first baby step of piecemeal engineering, just amongst whichever group or social circle indeed such as herein proposed, to achieve subversive reversal of normal priorities so long assumed, understood, consistently observed and well known to Cultural Anthropology, by setting  collaboration among equals towards creative solution finding as our default, and in more democratic values and sensibilities, resorting to whatever sort of minimal even ad hoc authority only so long as need ever actually arising, no more and no longer. After all, the Law of Diminishing Returns only demotes that just because some is good does not signify that proportionally more is necessarily better. And that certainly applies to restrictive authority. Less does more good.

Advancing collaboration among equals from preliminaries and into implementation: Not to get ahead of ourselves, if all goes well in collaboration as proposed, when management team formation and rigorous feasibility study of business/project planning has been accomplished, then when at last new venture creation (variuos business startup) can be ready to proceed entering into any phase of implementation, there must then come yet another crucial paradigm shift before taking action. Happiness comes in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. In any subversive alternative to traditional heteronomy to top down hierarchical dominance and sycophantic social cognition: when close collaboration among equals advances further into implementation of practical details, the proverbial "nuts and bolts," collaboration partners will need to be able to completely rely upon one another without reservation, in a culture of helping and social support. Of necessity, true close collaboration among equals extends beyond mere solitary division of labor. trustworthy and respectful true close collaboration among equals will eventually require reciprocal command and compliance, cheerfully attentive guidance, support and respect. In other words: You're the boss when you need me, and I'm the boss when I need you. It's just give and take. For example, successful product development and engineering must be informed by marketing considerations, while effective marketing must at all be informed by familiarity with whatever product or service and it's design of intended function. Any arrogant disconnect in working and thinking will likely result in painfully protracted and costly spiral into failure. And this happens all the time! Isn't this obvious: A good working relationship between different knowledge and skill sets, remains ever crucial. People willing to relate to one another as adults, will never need to be ruled over like insecure recalcitrant children. Such are responsible core values of autonomy. As Eve Tushnet expounds in ‘Eros and Education,’ Eros, so enticing and so threatening, is nothing more or less than deep reciprocal engagement traversing into alien difference. Accordingly, reciprocity in close collaboration among equals should offer a non zero-sum valued and enriching ongoing positive experience. But working at cross purpose will always be toxic. After all, entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup) is by nature intensely interdisciplinary. For some that is precisely what renders such endeavor so fascinating and mind expanding, while for others, alas, only becoming increasingly uncomfortable and even threatening to solitary ego and mastery. Alas that such untrusting and  controlling people may often tend to prefer all of nothing to part of something. But in trying anything new, engagement with the unfamiliar remains unavoidable. And mistrustful avoidant people often become increasingly ambivalent, dishonest and troublesome. But there can be no room for distance, compartmentalization, foot dragging, passive hostility or bullying and evolutionary neurosciencetic manipulative invalidation of any kind. It will always be important to know where one stands before becoming increasingly vested. Task interdependency is when tasks must be completed in sequence, often by different people with different knowledge, connections, resources and skill sets, and in any timely manner according to sequence. As the saying goes, honesty is indeed the best policy. Resentment should never be left to fester. Grievances and reservations must be dealt with openly and immediately. Criticism is inherently friendly, an expression of esteem. And the practice of controversy which is the invited free exchange of candid criticism, remains ever crucial both intrinsically to Eudemonia and also to hoped for success.
Utopian? Perhaps such an intentional, operant and highly functional ethos as above so fervently extolled, in reality remains Utopian in the sense of embodying impossibly ideal conditions especially of social organization, indeed such as as even possibly smacks of Moralism being the failed doctrine of improving society by correcting individual motivating character, and therefore much to ask of human imperfection. -indeed notwithstanding all faliblistic ongoing error detection and course correction in piecemeal engineering, which are all distinctly non Utopian. Naturally, for the most heteronymous, collaboration among equals remains absurd, inconceivable, despite that it happens only everyday throughout the world.. And  given the desire, the prize is great and the undertaking inspiring. Some friendly people are indeed willing and capable to behave at all rationally. And that is the kind of people that the most talented are always looking to work together with. Gentle reader, is any of this for you? It's not for everyone. Some soul searching may be in order.
 
But why in the first place, and well may one ask, such particular focus upon:
high quality and wildly original serious collaborative fiction writing together with entrepreneurship for the rest of us, objectively real world endless possibility in new venture creation (various business startup)?

In subversive proposal toward the social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle, two specific areas of creative endeavor are herein advanced as ideal for ongoing collaborative brainstorming creative solution finding: And these are collaborative fiction writing and subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup). Moreover. therein remain two at all similar specific gaps in human need only waiting to be fulfilled, probortunity to provide something important not yet available, dressing specific voids in the emptiness of life, potential niches of unique probortunity for every skill level from novice to expert: 1) Firstly, there exist many high quality serious writers groups in pursuit of excellence in writing, via the exchange of critique, nevertheless otherwise embracing as inevitable matter of course, the solitude of writing. And alas that thinking makes it so. Indeed, for whatever reason, typical writers groups simply do not practice ongoing collaborative fiction writing. Worse, for the most  part, the many perfectly awful collaborative fiction writing projects and communities that do exist online, in contrast with serious writer's groups, in mindless anal retentive conformity to mediocrity, typically hold forth that because there is no disputing tastes as the saying goes, therefore there can be no criteria or technique for quality writing, no point in making the effort, no aspiration to excellence and otherwise no deficiency either. Therefore, as might be expected, the output remains systematically execrable. 2) And secondly while there exist vast bodies of literature within thriving and productive industries in support of established serial Entrepreneurs who can pay, the rest of us wana-bes each and all remain as ever abandoned to our own devices. Frustratingly, there remains virtually no literature or support for the most embryonic inception or: "kitchen table" stage or phase in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup) entirely from scratch. And there is actually nowhere suitable to go. By whatever aptitude or sheer dumb luck, the like minded each and all, remain as ever abandoned to our own devices to somehow come together on our own. And to make maters worse,  there do remain no end of danger from pipedreaming and phony scam opportunities to ensnare the unwary. An inclusive community in ongoing cultivation of wild ideas, then subject to critical scrutiny and feasibility study towards implementation, could make all the difference in facilitating true capability.

How then might these two specific and neglected fields of endeavor be found most fulfilling and advantageous to the uplifting and optimally reciprocally engaging experience and desired outcomes of collaborative solution finding? In answer, what might be called: the strategic argument will  constitute assertion that because even though the ongoing team building exercise of collaborative fiction writing and the discipline of the writing craft, may pleasurably sustain immediate ongoing creative challenge, on spec without wages upfront, new venture creation (various business startup) innovatively also perseveres towards hoped for success and a big payday. Another reason is the hypothesized interstitial synergy between pure creativity, art for art's sake, of collaborative fiction writing, and the innovation, which is the name given to applied creativity, together with new venture creation (various business startup), as foci towards collaboration among equals in meaningful intrin+sically motivated pleasurably engaged fulfillment derived in creative solution finding together, and just perhaps on a path to hoped for success. Both fiction writing and business/project planning remain different applications of narrative. A plan is a scenario, an hypothesis of unfolding results from proposed action to be taken. The difference remains in how creative fiction writing and plotting need only strive at dramatic plausibility and any detail towards the willing suspension of disbelief, whereas business or project planning scenario as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (variouus business startup), must discover and engage realistic feasibility study and solution finding. Fiction writing is pure creativity for art's sake, whereas business or project planning as towards Entrepreneurship and new venture creation (various business startup) benefits from innovation which is the name given to purposely applied creativity. Fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) may serve as powerful Dialectical and strategic tools towards subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding and implementation in the social engineering of more optimal stimulus struggle, even tailor made to the individual, bridging the Philosophical and the practical, the abstract and the concrete. All remaining entirely feasible and achievable. even without the power and influence to decree sweeping social change. Only an intentional though initially by far smaller group or dedicated social circle of collaboration cofounders is required, towards a bold new vision and learning curve of activist entrepreneurship for the rest of usAnd it all depends upon simply staying interested, upon optimal reciprocal engagement, meaningfully engaged strategic brainstorming and solution finding in pursuit of happiness, already constituting the inception of pleasurable and fulfilling collaboration among equals. But even so minute the very germ of autonomy already violates heteronymous and unquestioningly paralytic taboo that triggers crimestop, against the very notion of unfettered speculation and rigorous feasibility study even before the most unconventional and even unlikely probortunity. Of course, risk can never be eliminated, at best only evaluated and managed honestly and responsibly. There can never be any guarantee of success, but there can often be guarantee of futility in the production and consumption of mendacious irresponsible guarantees. We are all fallible

However: Relationship as it turns out, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially friendship, arises only as a byproduct of immersive full engagement in substantive communication and/or purposeful interaction, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Indeed all this brings us to perhaps the social argument for the aforementioned proposed foci of collaboration, as pertaining to another related probortunity at hand, to wit: the gap to be filled in the dire inadequacy of conventional social life. Conventional options in life can so often become so oppressive and unhappy. There is a dystressing user hostile outcomes gap, meaning no results no matter what one does. To begin with, popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, while popularity and social success depend upon purpose defeatingly facile superficiality ever keeping distance keeping up pretence of fake fun. Hence the Existentially Absurd perpetual bait-and-switch dilemma between blatant lonely isolation and unhappiness inflicted from not fitting in, or else more devious lonely isolation, boredom and unhappiness extracted as as the cost for fitting in. And in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.
After all, the endurance of boredom is a hallmark of compliant conformity and heteronomy. Hence, even most anciently in the curriculum of Plato's Academy, boredom was deliberately inflicted upon students as a conservative measure to test for heteronomy and conformity by weeding out boredom prone original thinkers and innovators, purveyors of dangerous novelty, from rising to influential positions in society. In the mindset of such heteronomy, only individuals of destiny so ruggedly successful in overcoming such daunting barriers and stumbling blocks and rising to leadership, philosopher kings so lonely at the top, will be deemed worthy to institute change by decree, sparing the rest of us any such terrifying responsibility and the risk of humiliating error. Hence, to this day, typically, in heteronymous formal education, students are encouraged to admire such individuals of destiny, but never equipped in any way to strive at emulation. Anything but! In the words of Albert Einstein: “It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.” In an alternative of more respectful and enlightened social support life long, perhaps there can be implementation of the present concept: a vision of freedom in a new and more gratifying mode of ongoing interpersonal interaction predicated upon creativity and attentive candor rather than the desperation of facile and timid conformity, lonely boredom and distance. Beyond merely a solitary feature of individual character, Creativity can and Should be Social!

Relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially bonding and attachments of true friendship with psychological visibility, arise ever only as byproduct of immersive full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. And no one else need approve! Accept no substitutes! Alas then, that purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication are each/both so often subject to anti-intellectual taboo, becoming increasingly awkward and even sometimes actually deemed impolite. But in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. The full potential of authentically gregarious, liberating, convivial, fully operant and actually competent creativity and initiative, especially socially, is more often than not, so vastly and blithely squandered in our dysfunctional, suspicious, humdrum, dull, repressed and repressive existence. Indeed, perhaps the great clue to probortunity of life in the matter at hand, remains to be be gleaned in the observation of how, as it turns out, that gifted students, bright, insightful and emotionally sensitive, among their own true gifted peers, mysteriously no longer require that great and good boon of socialization: toxic and sanctioned, that violence and neglect which none dare call indoctrination, behavioral conditioning or brainwash. And so, instead of so brutally dumbing down our best and brightest "for your own good, dear!" might it not be so much more noble, happier and better to do exactly the opposite throughout life, and immerse even the most ordinary people into such interaction as so characteristic of the gifted, thereby cultivating and bringing forth each ones own inner giftedness? In the present proposal is expounded a way to happiness in talking more seriously, changing how we perceive our world,  and to embrace gifted interaction, via ongoing collaboration in original high quality fiction writing together with subversive and disruptively innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup). Such is the vision of FoolQuest.com, of endless possibility a Virtual (pre-)Incubator, an intentionally creative culture

Not everything is possible, not everything is impossible, and not everything possible necessarily amounts only to giving up and making do. For in rigorous feasibility study, there ever remains that challenging germ of hope, that bold premise of meager conspiratorial leverage for toppling the sheer mass of mediocrity, all in the simplest collusion in the smallest of rebellion. Society is the enemy to be overcome! And yet. we are not absolutely slaves to that drab destiny of heteronymous mediocrity, because on any given occasion, no two (or more) people can always actually be compelled to interact so shabbily. And that is the only reason anything ever works out at all. But against the weight of systematic status quo, the dearth of clear opportunity, and the sheer random inefficiency, ever remain so daunting. And hence the need in most proximate relationship and interaction to turn prevailing social interaction on its head, by putting egalitarian low hierarchical distance of immersive fully engaged collaborative solution finding first, and in more democratic values and sensibilities, falling back upon hierarchical authority only rarely and sparingly as ever the need might actually arise.

Gentle reader, know thyself: By a stimulus is meant not merely any random ongoing Empirical input, but specifically an incident suddenly altering experience of the surrounding environment, a momentary event in any way arousing attention and interest, even thence triggering response. A stimulus so instantly draws attention to itself by such stark contrast with just prior conditions. The sensation, literal or figurative, is immediately different. Stimulus struggle then, what we are all doing all the time, is the perpetual striving to regulate, to engage and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal, from the environment, for staving off boredom. And social Stimulus struggle is the ongoing striving to regulate, to engage and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social stimulation and arousal, from the social environment, for staving off loneliness. In the words of Aristotle: “All things in life are philosophical.”  Indeed, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. Begin then, like Socrates, by asking yourself what matters most: When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? Gentle reader, what are your own frustrated life satisfactions and corresponding underserved social stimulus appetites? And how might said stimuli, even tailored to the individual, feature in an intentional social environment by design? These are no idle question, but salient criteria for the crafting of relevant narrative towards implementation in pursuit of happiness, the narrative at the core of planning and implementation in disruptive entrepreneurship, of subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup), of the ever daunting outreach of FoolQuest.com. Any frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies. And it all begins simply by sustaining serious conversation, bridging the abstract and the concrete, brining to bear bold and lofty new ideas nevertheless informed by reality.

Setting agenda: What then shall we discus, and how best to go about it? To address such vastly underserved and challenging human social needs as before us in the present discourse, is proposed a subversive two pronged regimen of engagement and experience consisting firstly of an ongoing bonding exercise of art for art's sake in the pure creativity of collaborative fiction writing, and secondly of applied creativity, creative solution finding, in the innovation of new venture creation (various business startup) together, that can include not only for profit enterprise, but Activism and Social Entrepreneurship. Business or project planning after all, is but another mode of narrative, another kind of storytelling, a method beyond mere plausibility as in fiction, of realistic feasibility study towards implementation. FoolQuest.com promotes a vision of heady interstitial synergy concurrently between the above two different yet related applications of the uplifting power of narrative creativity. And as shall be seen, creativity is our salvation. Moreover, both collaborative endeavors remaining ever predicated upon the practice of controversy which is the the ever welcome, invited and valued exchange of criticism. Relationship, as it turns out, remains hard work so taboo from those dreary prevailing norms of heteronomy and interminably keeping it light in order to become accepted and popular. Indeed, the latter entails no end of arduous struggle behind a facade of cavalier and indifferent social grace, a lot of hard work so motivated by such desperate dread of seriousness and the risk of hard work!

Power, for good or evil, constructively, destructively or even at ll conceivably both or neither, begins from the process of influence upon one another that actually reshapes the surrounding social environment and even the world. Alas, dronelike compliant social participation seldom actually solicits or grants desired input or influence into collective decision making, no matter what sort of group or activity one joins into. And this often renders the exercise meaningless and alienating. Unilateral action is largely powerless, drastically limited in scope and impact upon individual life much less society at large. And slavish submission to alienating social institutions tends to be senseless, debilitating and Absurd in every way. Transactional Analysis begins to recognize that only improvement in the manner in which anyone relates to one another has any bearing. FoolQuest.com explores broader agenda for collaboration among equals in autonomy, deemed inconceivable under prevailing heteronomy so terrified and abhorrent of chaos and discord, to be averted by even slavish acquiescence to firm guidance and confident leadership in order to prevent error and assure success. Under formal education we are all encouraged to admire figures of great accomplishment and leadership, persons of destiny, but never in such audacity, in any way equipped to emulate them. Rather, the individual in society pressed into compliance in order to fit in. The alternative granted may be only the pursuit of isolated rugged Individualism and self-sufficiency in order to get by alone. And there's the rub!

The socially isolated in this world, the original thinkers, find ourselves exposed to danger, more readily bullied and victimized that befriended and assisted. That is why social exclusion, obstruction from human connection, remains so terrifying. Indeed, to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriended him.” We standing alone who cannot or shall not join in with conventional expectations and fall into place as cogs in the machine, will only find ourselves each and all discarded and abandoned to our own devices, in our struggles and failure even mocked and reviled, taken for frauds and cranks. Of course, the essence of Entrepreneurship is serial failure, but quickly and repeatedly until success. And there's the rub! Because for many of us, that will be easier said than done. Few have the requisite accomplishment in rugged independence, indeed even actually self isolation, as often so notoriously manifest in the the most stubborn inability to delegate. Clearly, there is a gap in appropriate social support towards any prospect of entrepreneurship for the rest of us. And why should any of our betters, the great and the good, regard as respectful and trustworthy to extend money, resources and connections, to those who cannot not even be seen and counted to work together and help one another? Any frustrated desire tells a story, needs a plan, and calls out for allies.

    Cheering us all on at the starting line and then immediately and forever vanishing, "Follow your bliss!" is the shopworn motto whereby we are all extolled before being each and all abandoned to our own devices. Understandable dystress notwithstanding, economic downtime such as at hand, affords us all the most perfect occasion for vital preparation long overdue, for coming together and taking stock more seriously and constructing together the vital and substantive support which we have all been so blithely unequipped. Towards making best use of all our new free time cowering alone at home from lethal pandemic and dreaming of a better tomorrow, let us resolve to remain connected and buoy our spirits by sharing our dreams and planning together in earnest our escape not only from oppressive mediocrity but actually cutthroat competition for the very privilege.

    The ugly truth remains that such conservative measures as adaptive self-help/improvement and better individual social skills are unreliable at best, burdensome, oppressive and unfulfilling even when however rarely at all delivering as promised, whatever cretin success upon their own craven terms. Clearly the conventional solutions of ubiquitously callow common sense advice, are no solutions at all, but the very problem in the first place. Mysteriously, gifted students observed amongst their own gifted peers, no longer require the great and glorious boon of socialization: toxic and sanctioned, that violence and neglect which none dare call indoctrination, behavioral conditioning or brainwash. So instead of the sheer ersatz mediocrity of dumbing down our best and brightest just to meet the norm, what can be learned in Cultural Anthropology by observation of gifted interaction, for application to nourish the giftedness in us all and in every sphere of life?

    Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire.

    It is readily observed that the people who find it the easiest to make friends and forge new connections, commonly live better rounded and richer lives to begin with. But that may be easier said than done, indeed anything of a double bind, a catch-22, given precisely the inextricability of social needs and whatever the needs of richer and more rounded lives. Because, rather than any how-to in quest for that elusive happiness via more serious meaningful conversational engagement, with less small talk, usually the recommended path to getting a life so that an improved social life might follow, is thought to entail either a) solitary interests of ones own to prevent isolation from dulling ones wits, and incoherent gloom from overwhelming ones entire conversational repertoire, or else b) getting out of the house via the cultivation of shared interests that are, in truth, the very least of actual compatibility and popularity criteria.

    Thus, even the best and most neglected of the prevailing bad social advice, the only values based proposition amid the entire dull, superficial and meaningless repertoire, even still somehow only leads inexorably back to the rest of all the same ubiquitous common sense bad social advice. -in the final analysis, all no better than employment, formal education or recreation, just hanging out interminably, all so often dreary and futile, lonely and boring, even for the most gregarious. Can we imagine better? Easily:

    The grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology and the great clue to Eudemonia via social creativity:

One way or another, however rarely though nevertheless in accordance with repeated Empirical observation informing the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, how members in whatever sort of tribe, community or any manner of social institution, may however infrequently find themselves called upon by whatever powers that be, to participate and together experience some glimmer of joy in the process of creative solution finding together. This may occur, for examples, when whatever employers  perceive the need of creative solutions to new problems as ever arising. Or the opportunity mat arise in some context of formal education. For whatever the preciously scarce and fondly remembered special occasion of collaboration in creative solution finding typically offers one fleeting bright spot of happiness and near equality amid forever grinding and typically authoritarian oppressive sore travail. Hence Creativity can and Should be Social is the subversive concept instead, of just the opposite, a fine example to emulate, a new movement in flagrant reversal of all authoritarian norms and priorities of heteronomy, all for the sake of authentic wellbeing. Creativity can and Should be Social is the social engineering proposal that whatever appeal to authority ought to remain in reserve, arising only as and when actually ever needed, so that in paradigm shift on such flagrant subversion of hierarchy as collaboration among equals in creative solution finding, should prevail as a new norm, even obsoletizing the entire depressing social rat race, at least within a fortunate intentional social circle or test group.
 
Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire.

Conventionally and heteronymously, in every walk of life, authority routinely and continually and systematically stifles not only autonomy in general, but most particularly, creative solution finding. That is, except when and as deemed needful or advantageous by whatever powers that be, especially in light of any whatever unusual special circumstances or situation. Only thus ever arises for even the rank and file, such scarce and fondly remembered experience of creative collaboration under relaxation of hierarchical dominance, called: low hierarchical distance, meaning: near equality. And subversively proposed herein, shall be indeed to completely reverse traditional paradigm of heteronomy to authoritarianism, by instead resetting collaboration among equals in creative solution finding as the new norm and default human condition, then appealing to even ad hoc authority, only occasionally as need actually arising.  And the strategy, mechanics and proposed plan of action in implementation thereof, is dubbed: Creativity can and Should be Social.

Cultural Anthropology studies social cognition by which to predict the responses of others, entirely on the basis of hierarchical position and distance. Such is the entrenched conviction of heteronomy that the collective can never be wrong and that cooperation is impossible among equals, impossible without obedience to leadership without which we will all be quite helpless. Only in seeming afterthought, does Cultural Anthropology also observe and recognize an exception to that dreary paradigm: Indeed cooperation among equals, cooperation in creative problem-solving (better still, solution finding) , a mentality that is entirely different, offering escape from all of that dull primate politics, because cooperation in creative problem-solving, or better still: solution finding, is passionately problem-driven rather than status-driven, challenging the entirely different aptitudes of autonomy, of trustworthy and respectful democratic values in action, as amongst gifted peers and dissidents, with optimal reciprocal engagement in happily serious conversation producing intrinsic gratification from intentionally substantive communication, intentionally purposeful interaction, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, disclosure, joy in work and in play alike.

    But the fundamental social competencies as perceived by Cultural Anthropology also include, even indeed seemingly as something of a grand afterthought, such executive function as cooperation in creative solution finding, even at its most happily serious, evoking as does play, not merely private and individual but sociable and shared emotional transport of playfulness universal to all mammals. And similarly, cooperation in creative problem-solving (or better still, solution finding), as a priority of its own, being problem-driven rather than ego-driven, may even level the playing field to such conditions of near equality called: low power-distance communication style, and pleasurably engage autonomy, creativity, Positive Disintegration and growth, challenging the entirely different aptitudes of democratic values in action, as amongst gifted peers, dissident in significant paradigm shift.

    It has long been observed how gifted students amongst their own true gifted peers, suddenly and mysteriously no longer require the great and good boon of socialization! -toxic and sanctioned, that violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination, behavioral conditioning or brainwash... Wouldn't it make more sense to socialize and lift everyone to engage with and relate to one another more in accord with whatever observable gifted paradigm, than instead to dumb down our best and brightest just to norm them into fitting in, even however ill-fitting, awkwardly and reluctantly? In the alternative, just the opposite, everyone, it said, has gifted potential to be tapped. But how? - beyond the usual mealy-mouthed lip service... Indeed, if gifted is as gifted does, the how might anyone who wants to, most readily go about it amongst themselves?

    As in accordance with the Arousal Theory of motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo' October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. Everything that we do is in order to modify subjective experience thereby altering consciousness. All hence, as shall be seen, the social engineering of social stimulus struggle would contrive the deliberate introduction of specific social stimuli and social interaction, into the social environment, in order better to optimize social stimulus struggle. meeting even the unique intellectual social stimulus appetites of the  massively engorged human brain and neocortex all as rooted in evolutionary neuroscience.

Cultural Anthropology defines itself by focus upon, leave us face it: the predominating human mentality as of the pack mammals that we are, specifically of hierarchically predictive social cognition or: sycophancy anticipating the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships, all predictive of future behavior. Under heteronomy, Sheeple generally learn to become so so cynical, insecure, inhibited, waryand cagey, most strongly motivated by life long behavioral conditioning to peer pressure and the many ongoing punishment and rewards and social cognition of perceived vested interests in the advancement and preservation of social position and standing. That is why kinship and rank are viewed as so central to the human condition in society, by Cultural Anthropology, with the fully engaged egalitarian low hierarchical distance of collaborative solution finding relegated almost to mere afterthought as an exception, a special case. Individuals may find themselves less often actually valued intrinsically for ability and the content of character and potential as prospective friends and partners or allies in life, assets in rational self-interest or simply joy to be with, than instead extrinsically valued for popularity, standing and influence ever exploited in perpetual struggle jockeying for approval and dominance. Hence the recommendation to lie and pretend to have friends until one actually has any. The unpopular are shunned. It's all a matter of such suffocating priorities: social cognition makes sycophants of us all!

I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. Gentle reader, am I then your unmet friend? What opportunity in making my acquaintance? Networking, what is my value proposition? And how important can you be to me in return? And what difference does any of that make? Of course no one should expect universal love or approval or even need it. That's not the point. No matter who might ever come to enjoy my company or even recognize and perhaps even admire my best qualities, all too many nevertheless will continue to keep their distance, unlikely to include me or befriend me. It seems that I just don't fit in. 

Amid the masses, there remain two kinds of people: Those who are unhappy because they just don't fit in, and those who are unhappy because of the empty lives that they must so arduously lead simply in order to fit in. Damned if you do and damned if you don't The only wining move is not to play. The readily available avenues of social life are often more of a frustration and an obstacle course than a conduit, another joyless, senseless and alienating chore, conditional and endless and Sisyphusian. Taught to wear masks before even finding our own faces, so many of us are steadily prevailed upon increasingly to sacrifice all authenticity and, in essence, to pretend to be someone else, someone at all more acceptable to others. Otherwise, cast aside in life, one must pay the consequences. There is user hostile outcomes gap, with no results whatever one does. Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy.The soul crushing emotionally void and tedious anti-intellectual rat race of social success is typically the most aimless and demeaning drudgery and disappointment, serving as the filter of mediocrity so dystressfully testing individual conformity and tolerance for lonely boredom bereft of unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, leaving only futility in the user hostile outcomes gap.

In the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. Alas, how we often disappoint one another and ourselves by expecting too little. The paranoid herd mentality is of watching one another to keep everyone in line. The blithe unquestioning cocksure intimidation of putting one another each in our place, demands so much less of the individual, than psychological visibility and the empathic Emotional Intelligence of Actively Listening to one another to learn where the other stands. Relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, especially friendship, arises only as a side effect of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Indeed, in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” After all, curiosity is the agent of compassion. But in a milieu of suspicion and reciprocal indifference, social support will be hard won by fitting in at whatever cost of toxic and sanctioned socialization, ever ganging up on one another and finally joining the enemy, the oppressors, against ourselves. Mediocrity becomes the greatest prize. One way or another, most people are just overwhelmed, too busy with all that will be expected of us, or else failing in life, no matter putting on a brave face, haunted, lonely, demoralized and bizarre, a living warning to all others. Broken before The Great Faceless They, the castoffs of society are everywhere for each and all to chillingly understand: but for the grace of Leviathan, go I!

    In the alterative, the present proposal all hinges upon the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, the repeatable Empirical observation of how uniform submission and sycophantic heteronomy to socially cognition of hierarchical dominance is virtually suspended during the all too scarce and fleeting transitory egalitarian low hierarchical distance characteristic of creative problem solving. or better still: solution finding, happy, pleasurable, meaningful and fully engaged. But then its over and sorely missed, freedom once again quashed by oppressive mediocrity.

     Notwithstanding those malignant norms of heteronomy as observed and studied by Cultural Anthropology, and quite to the contrary in accord rather with that grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology and the truthful ramifications thereof: relationship and especially bonding and attachments of true friendship with psychological visibility, arising ever only as a byproduct of immersive full engagement in  purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! Typical and ubiquitous anti-intellectual social taboo notwithstanding. nothing else works. And in the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. We've all been had! Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy. There is a user hostile outcomes gap, no results no matter what one does. Even if somehow attainable, social success indeed from indeed as socially expected, always keeping things light and cheerful, only comes at the cost of emotional distance, only another mode of isolation, bored and lonely. Dysfunctional heteronymous social skills of calculating, manipulative and distant social success or popularity on the one hand, and healthy genuine close friendship on the other hand, therefore remain antithetical. Again: trustworthy respectful happy people talk more seriously with less small talk. And we should all emulate them together. But how?
     
    Answer: What if it became possible, via the the social engineering of social stimulus struggle, together to grow more human and enhance authentic wellbeing, by turning said priorities upon their head, setting the specific underserved stimulus appetite and correlating life satisfaction of uplifting creativity and solution finding as the default, and in more democratric sensibility, with authority called upon and resorted to only as need ever actually arising? Such Eudemonia indeed seems well feasible, although likely requiring some or other intentional community, culture, group or social circle, of ongoing creative interaction, subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding and collaboration among equals, perhaps even such as herein proposed: Creativity can and Should be Social, all quite feasible, readily doable by cofoundes in collaboration, persistent and serious people together purposely forming at least at first even a small intentional community, a closely working group or social circle, perhaps indeed as envisaged, via a continual Dialectic of synergistic innovation by collaboration in fiction writing and in Entrepreneurial new venture creation (variuos business startup).
    Truth in advertising?The business plan is often cited as the single most important document produced in the course of new venture creation (various business startup). But another crucial narrative is that of Public Relations and Marketing. What then do advertisements actually advertise? And what does the appeal of modern advertising reveal? Know your porn, fabricated temptation ever shaping and tantalizing constructed desires. Perhaps the old standby of ever such ardent invocation to the consumer luxury of modern convenience has lost it's elegance and enchantment, becoming somewhat jaded and passé, therefore deemed unaffordable for a perceived diminished value. In short, much advertising becomes flagrantly irrelevant. This may be why, in the alternative, obviously and quite simply, some advertisements actually do extol whatever salient and even tangible practical advantages of whichever product or service. And therein, there may even be found any modicum of truth in advertising. On the other hand, much advertisement openly resorts to entertainment, even to the most over the top comedy, in exchange for the viewers' attention, instead of simply annoying us. As the saying goes, sex sells. Indeed, sex often distracts the consumer, even to the point of entirely forgetting whatever is being advertised in the first place. Or else shame and disgust are effective in selling hygiene products. But as is well known, the most canny and manipulatively exploitative advertisement has always plumbed all meaningful depth of frustrated and underserved motivating human need and psychology, but again, without actual relevance or end user results. Instead, so much of advertising only so flagrantly foists upon the consumer ever the same colossally mendacious and Absurd Existentially bait-and-switch, pandering to elicit wishful magical thinking fantasy, in order rto override better judgment. This is accomplished by promoting an aura of mystique for whatever product or service. This in turn is accomplished by whatever propaganda subtext or narrative theme, repetitively conditioning in the minds of whatever susceptible target audience, an association of whatever product or service with whatever tantalizing yearnings, beauty, temptation and expectation of happiness or bliss such as in portrayal of conviviality, friendship, good times, popularity, pleasure, success and acclaim
    Notwithstanding all diversionary tactics and Existential bait-and-switch of such even transparently manipulative and stridently irrelevant marketing mystique, what then remains as the true secret of genuine and effective pursuit of happiness? In answer, an abundance of psychological research concludes that people are happier who respond to experience marketing, and spend their money on howsoever uplifting experiences, ever so transient, than those who simply acquire even the most lasting and practical useful things, let alone buying into whatever mystique. Even the anticipation of a positive experience, is fuller and more joyful that the anticipation of acquisition of even perfectly useful and desirable products. But true pursuit of happiness beyond shelling out for just whatever fleeting poignant taste, may depend upon repeatability and continuous self sustainability of peak experience, fulfillment and progress. Experience marketing may offer the most wonderful brainstorming classes, all manner of fiction writers' boot camps, or even internships at whatever kind of individual dream job. But then it's over. And there will likely be no clear and ready path forward, as with instead any ongoing interaction or endeavor.
     
    There can be no guarantee of success, but there can often be guarantee of futility in the production and consumption of mendacious irresponsible guarantees. We are all fallible. No, we can't all just pretend and fake it till you make it. Not even with all the merch! Because marketing or branding of celebrity rôle model mystique remains nothing more than mass market pipedream of cargo-cult mimesis, never actually bringing the consumer any closer to becoming any part of leading whatever kind of life desired, much less ever actually achieving notable success. Scam financial opportunities will only part suckers from their cash. .

    As my father was wont to observe, the world is divided into the knowers and the seekers, the know-it-alls and the skeptics. The knowers, all manner of know-it-all  gurus, their acolytes and social cognition, are everywhere. But to quote from the Tao Teh Ching by Lau Tzu: “Those who know do not speak. Those who speak do not know.” And indeed, some are more serious and reserved than others in their desperate undertaking of conformity, keeping their own counsel of whatever secrets they think that they have, and others more simplistic and delusional or cult like and hence more eager, mendacious and compulsively proselytizing. It's okay to want to attract attention persuasively. Only strive to be as rational, honest and open minded as you would have others be towards you. In fair play, the truth will out.

    The capability approach
    Power: True freedom bridges autonomy in the abstract and capability in the concrete.  
     
    “It is less important to redistribute wealth than it is to redistribute opportunity.”  — Arthur H. Vandenberg
    Serving as a critical situation analysis in evaluation  and interpersonal comparison of wellbeing and justice in the evaluation of individual advantage and social arrangements, the Capability Approach pioneered by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, to wellbeing and development, therefore evaluates circumstances according to impact upon individual capabilities. The Capability Approach is the idea that individual substantive freedom to lead a life one has ones own reasons to value, is both the primary end objective and the principle means towards a good life with autonomy and respect, all depending upon accessibility of whatever needed resources, and will be attainable when human beings are free to chose in actual practice and not merely in theory, indeed really able to attain that which they have reasons to consider important to do or to be or become. In this sense, human development ultimately denotes authentic wellbeing and human flourishing, even at most Eudemonic, while poverty is whatever obstructs or undermines aforesaid capability, any lack of various real practical and practicable freedoms, as manifest in whatever corresponding accessible resources, that people value and have personal reason to do so. -All applicable to the probortunity at hand.
    Social support is deemed among the key determinants of success.To have social support denotes that one is cared for, has assistance available from other people, and that one is part of a supportive social network. Indeed, while ones fewer closer friends may be valued as more important emotionally, broader acquaintance and connections are key to all manner of assistance, resource and opportunity. Creativity can and Should be Social is envisaged as both the primary end objective and the principle means towards towards that good life as herein propounded. Existing work rehabilitation and occupational therapy helps Empirically diagnose and overcome individual difficulty working effectively according to expectations. But there is simply no work rehabilitation or occupational therapy for wannabe Entrepreneurs to engage in new venture creation (various business startup) more readily, sustainably and successfully. There remains a gap in validation, in legitimizing autonomy support and social support, leaving a gap to be filled as proposed by Creativity can and Should be Social
    Capable falliblism: FoolQuest.com remains the subversive website, the action salon online, of optimal reciprocal engagement towards the social engineering of optimal social stimulus struggle via collaboration among equals. And to that end, what better than synergistic collaboration in fiction writing and in new venture creation (various business startup) all from scratch, for sharing stimulating innovation? And what more congenial path towards success together? Socrates hailed drama as most Philosophical among the arts, and Karl Popper, the favorite philosopher for scientists, discovered in hypothetico-deductive process of business planning, falliblism/non justificationism/non verificationism, his Philosophy of Science and Scientific Method, applied Epistemological Methodology, model for unfettered speculation and conjecture only then subject to the systematic doubt of scientific skepticism, Socratic Dialectical enlightenment by refutation, that also informed his politics. Popper viewed that memeplex which he dubbed: verificationism of justificationism, the demand for some sort of firm foundation from which to begin, as putting that proverbial cart before the metaphorical horse, the enduring ideological pipedream of avoiding mistakes instead of learning from them and making ongoing course corrections. 

    Of course, there can be no guarantee of success, but there can often be guarantee of futility in the production and consumption of mendacious irresponsible guarantees. The present discourse remains so daunting an outreach! This is because of the prevailing dread of uncertainty, the taboo ridden masses are so inhibited even merely in thinking privately of unpopular ideas in deep dark secret, much less open deliberation, often in the face of hostility, derision and ridicule. And yet, any individual retains the freedom of intellectual self liberation, especially those burdened only with accustomed habit, and no tremendous emotional investment in heteronomy. This remains the proverbial forbidden door, actually standing ajar and unlocked all the while. Gentle reader, won't you give this a chance? Can we improve our lot? Clearly we do have our work cut out for us. However, one key feature of any social environment remains easiest to modify and upgrade at will, by any two or more people such as I and thou: Specifically, what is to be discussed and how to conduct said discussion. Change the conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change the world! Because trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously. But for that, will be required anyone else likewise suitably open to talk with. Alas, to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him.” Am I your unmet friend?

    Most generally, that which is Utopian is anything of, relating to, aspiring towards, or having the characteristics of a Utopia; especially but not necessarily embodying impossibly ideal conditions especially of social organization. Utopism in particular, as distinct from Utopianism more generally, is ideology, like any traditional religion, despairing of uncertainty, and staving off Nihilism only by partaking in perfectionism and infaliblism, the opposite of which being faliblism which embraces human fallibility and uncertainty with equanimity, even optimism in freedom and autonomy: As Richard so famously Feynman declared:  Better unanswered questions, than unquestioned answers! Thus the opposite of Utopian, let alone Utopist, need not be cynicism at all. As Karl Popper observed, whereas sweeping grand schemes inspired by far ranging ideology have failed so catastrophically, in the alternative there is also great progress every day, in decentralized social evolution via incremental improvement or even simply harm reduction, via faliblism and piecemeal engineering that has inspired the George Soros doctrine of constructive positive intervention, all predicated upon the deliberate shortsightedness of addressing immediate and tangible crying human needs and problems in the short term, taking small reversible steps, small actions yielding big results, with responsible evolving ongoing error detection and course correction guided by controversy which is the free exchange of criticism among equals.
     
    In the famous words of Helmuth von Moltke the Elder, disciple of Carl von Clausewitz: "No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy." -nor, for that matter, whatever other sort of antagonist, obstacle or complication. Indeed, to quote Dwight David 'Ike' Eisenhower: "Plans are nothing, planning is everything." And in the words of Karl Popper: The piecemeal engineer knows, like Socrates, how little he knows. He knows that we can learn only from our mistakes. Accordingly, he will make his way, step by step, carefully comparing the results expected with the results achieved, and always on the look-out for unavoidable unwanted consequences of any reform: and he will avoid undertaking any reform pf a complexity and scope which makes it impossible for him to disentangle causes and effects, and to know what he is really doing.... Holistic or Utopian social engineering, as opposed to piecemeal social engineering...aims at remodeling the 'whole of society' in accordance with a definite plan or blueprint.”
     
     
     
    FoolQuest.com remains the subversive website of social engineering towards optimal social stimulus struggle, meaning the intentional design of social stimuli featuring in the surrounding social environment, in order best to bring about more optimal reciprocal engagement with one another. But what are the key social stimuli to be situated and feature within a social environment, most conducive to optimal social stimulus struggle? And in specific selection of frustrated life satisfaction and corresponding underserved stimulus appetite, precisely how is collaboration among equals in new venture creation (various business startup) and in fiction writing intended to meet this challenge? Answer:

    Relationship, Eros which is transport in liberating union with alien difference, and especially bonding and attachments of true friendship with psychological visibility, arise ever only as a byproduct of immersive full engagement in purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve!

    In the words of Barbara Sher: Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude. To begin with, if as we are told, indeed keeping things light is indeed so crucial to popularity and social success, then popularity and social success must come at the lonely, cagy and isolated sacrifice of all individual personal integrity and happiness. Because, as shall be seen, popularity, heteronymous sycophantic social skills and social success on the one hand, and friendship on the other, remain starkly antithetical. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate in psychological visibility, while popularity or social success depend upon boring facile superficiality and ever maintaining lonely distance. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains insurmountable, irresolvable in very principle, a user hostile outcomes gap, no results no matter what one does, only a setup for frustration, futility, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do. Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy.
    Washing our hands of dangerous viral contamination but not of vital life responsibility!
     
    The perhaps grandiose objective and agenda for deliberation of FoolQuest.com remains a uniquely innovation Axiologically driven endeavor delving into each our own individual frustrated values, undertaking together the social engineering of what has herein been dubbed: optimal social stimulus struggle, in a feasibility study to be facilitated under a striving for optimal reciprocal engagement in subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding and collaboration among equals. -All perhaps even culminating in business planning, management team formation and new venture creation (various business startup), all from scratch: beginning from the most embryonic first concept into management team formation, Capitalization and implementation. And as conceived, to include all the while also a unique bonding exercise of serious highest caliber dramatic  collaborative fiction writing and Science Fiction brainstorming, conjecture and speculation. All so very cool and perhaps of particular interest to the gifted, all the preceding strives to address intrinsic stimulus appetites remaining so vastly underserved, beginning simply byinitiation of ongoing and sustained substantive discussions, (Let's talk!), ongoing recruitment and purposeful interaction in all of the work cut out for cofoundes in collaboration. And there's the rub.
        
    In the words of George Orwell: “The main motive for 'nonattachment' is a desire to escape from the pain of living, and above all from love, which, sexual or non-sexual is hard work.” Indeed, even by the present juxtaposition thereby recontextualizing the words of Sophocles: “Without labor nothing prospers.” As misattributed to Thomas Alva Edison: “Recognizing opportunity is so difficult for most people because it goes around disguised in overalls, looking like hard work!” In the words of Theodore Roosevelt: I don't pity any man who does hard work worth doing. I admire him.” And in the words of Henry Ford: “Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason so few engage in it.” Although, to quote Elon Musk: “No matter how hard you work, someone else is working harder.” Or just perhaps thinking and even loving that much harder! Is then even reading this webpage and responding actually so terribly difficult thinking? And in comparison to what available alternatives and to what end? What experience or result? As the Yiddish saying goes: “If hard work was so wonderful, the rich would keep it all for themselves.” And indeed, when it is, they do! Indeed, to quote Anthony Marra: “Work isn’t meaningful just because you spend your life doing it.” After all, in the words of J. M. Barrie: “Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.” Or to quote: Maxim Gorky: “When work is pleasure, life is joy! When work is a duty, life is slavery.” And that may certainly apply no less to any natural preference towards thinking about anything else less dystressing. And so, is the infliction of whatever such purportedly burdensome reading and thinking difficulty at hand upon the reader, simply well avoidable by the author? Is it all my fault? Or might it be the agenda at hand, in and of itself, life itself being at all so difficult? Or is the agenda at hand so boring? Therefore, can we please just get serious: What else should be of so much greater concern, why and how so?

One enduring question that surely remains of pressing concern to all humanity from time immemorial: What is freedom and for whom? That is a question with so many disappointing inadequate pointless concrete practical answers from any life coach or online guru, and so many no less disappointingly inadequate nebulously abstract answers from all too many ivory tower experts and latter-day Mystics. Of necessity, any salient relevant and necessarily interdisciplinary solution finding must bridge the abstract and the concrete. There must be both point and thrust. Therefore, to better rephrase the question:  How might freedom be experienced? And how is whatever that experience of freedom so routinely thwarted and denied us all?

    Make no mistake: No heteronymous social cognition, no socialization so toxic and sanctioned, that none dare call out for what it truly is: utter brainwash, no malignant and oppressive "providing of structure," no behaviorally conditioning via extrinsic punishment and reward, can ever truly substitute or compensate for capability undermined rather than nurtured by social support, nor for precious autonomy thereby quashed, neither in the conscious psyche nor in society or any aspect of social life. Especially perhaps for the gifted, the agenda at hand in order to address meeting the most underserved most important intrinsic human needs, capability, motives and values of Eudemonia and authentic wellbeing fathomed by the greatest sages of antiquity as rediscovered by the cutting edge of modern science. Alas that devious oppression, alienation  and resultant unhappiness, all ubiquitously prevail. What to do?
    FoolQuest.com all hence must become no mere entertainment or diversion, and indeed may be deemed uninviting because it is so complicated and unfamiliar. Or so I am told. And yet I am still here for anyone ready to recognize opportunity or: propbortunity. For the very term 'probortunity,' of course, has been coined as a portmanteau of the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in order to press home the point that problems and the effort at solution finding, present precious opportunities for true joy. -For pleasurably and meaningful optimal reciprocal engagement promoting not only gratification and fulfillment, but even just perhaps, with persistence eventually, shared achievement and success. For to quote Seneca:
    “Luck is a matter of preparation meeting opportunity.” And in the words of Amelia E. Barr: “We have been told, for centuries, to watch for opportunities, and to strike while the iron is hot. Very good; but I think better of Oliver Cromwell’s amendment — “make the iron hot by striking it.”” Indeed, the recommendation for persistence is ever impassioned, but persistence at what, and why? Answer: To set groundwork and generate opportunity. Yet the veritable chasm persists between fantasy or desire and daunting reality ever lagging behind. Can the gap ever be closed?
    It is so often lamented that life is suffering. Hope herself enduring, is often reviled and vilified as the most perfidious escapee out from the darkest bottom depths of Pandora's Box: Ever tantalizing Hope, the accursed alluring snare along the primrose path to all the blessings and sweet release of crushed spirit and resignation into sublime apathy. Ah yes sublime apathy, defeat and cowardice in the face of life, so fervently glorified under those holiest of names: behavioral extinction AKA Zen cessation. Make no mistake, the challenges of life remain complicated, frustrating and debilitating. For grappling with Existential Absurdity remains disheartening, even harrowing. The appeal then even of complexity arising to discovery, should come as no shock, but in vast improvement over helpless despair and oppression. Existential Absurdity sticks in ones craw, impossible neither to expel nor to stomach. Whereas often even the most complex solution finding presents true hope at all in probortunity. The very term 'probortunity,' of course, has been coined as a portmanteau of the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in order to press home the point that problems present opportunities. Complex problems and phenomena might even turn out to be interesting and worthy of being taken seriously.
     
    Otherwise, allow me to apologize for wasting your time, gentle reader. Everyone is different, after all. I do not apologize, however, for being myself and wanting my own way. Nor should anyone else. And that will be the entire point: What strategic exploration in the pursuit of happiness, can ever be possible barring Axiology and philosophical abstraction on the one hand or practical implementation on the other hand? Therefore let us remain cautious of short attention and simple answers to complex problems, so often blithely accepted without question. I am informed that readers browsing this page may be confused or even averse, actually taking issue because of the present philosophical approach, whatever exactly is meant by any of that, to the sociological and psychological solution finding and implementation as to any practical endeavor at hand. Although I well know how so many actually reject all consideration of practical implementation. And thank you, gentle reader. Because, in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” And to quote Karan Gaur: “Effort is the best indicator of interest.”
     
    As my own boss, I have fired myself for utter failure and incompetence in the sore travail of life! Observing how my own bored and lonely isolation and frustration remains so prevalent among my fellow human beings, and how the most exploitative bullying and cronyism remain pervasive and pandemic in social life, I have reached the conclusion that much as conventional paths in life remain so often arduous and demeaning. Moreover the sore travail of struggle for popularity and social success, actually remains futile, counterproductive and user hostile, no matter what one does. Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy.

    And so, why should the present long winded mass of verbiage from an unemployable maladroit nebbish with a cable modem the likes of yours truly, ever be of any interest to anyone? Well may you ask, gentle reader! Answer: Because, at least at first, in careful correct language, important new ideas actually tend to be somewhat wordy. Hence aversion and incapacity dense writing becomes a serious intellectual impediment. Moreover, notwithstanding my own ill fortune and manifest ineptitude as a serial failure, nevertheless I may have something to contribute for anyone actually interested. Not only are most people so unhappy, but to make matters worse, we've had the wool pulled over our eyes, ever striving to follow the simplest worst universally unquestioned very bad social advice. 

    To begin with, if as we are told, indeed keeping things light is indeed so crucial to popularity and social success, then popularity and social success must come at the lonely, cagy and isolated sacrifice of all individual personal integrity and happiness. Because, as shall be seen, popularity, heteronymous sycophantic social skills and social success on the one hand, and friendship on the other, remain starkly antithetical. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate in psychological visibility, while popularity or social success depend upon boring facile superficiality and ever maintaining lonely distance. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains insurmountable, irresolvable in very principle, and nothing but a setup for frustration, futility, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do. Can we do any better? Yes, there is even one key feature of any social environment, that is easiest to modify and upgrade at will, by any two or more people such as I and thou: Dialectic in order to already begin feeling more hopeful and fully engaged: Change the conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change the world! Because trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously. But for that, will be required anyone else likewise suitably open to talk with. Alas, to quote Mark R. J. Lavoie: “Life dies inside a person when there are no others willing to befriend him.”

    For the unaccustomed, at least at first, effort may be required in order even to talk more seriously. Is effort in and of itself, painful, or indeed can intellectual effort actually ever become worthwhile and gratifying? Or is it only conceited even to imagine? Gentle reader, kindly ponder these very questions for yourself, before in any further meaningful depth into these densely written and difficult hypertexts. This is no idle banter, but an attempt at serious conversation as indeed discovered to be so characteristic of trustworthy respectful happier more effective people whom we might all do so well together to emulate. Any of the proposed endeavors will likely entail matters far more abstruse. In all likelihood, it must be reasonably expected that all endeavor will only grind to a halt if participants are so frustratingly prone to just flaking out at the first trace of anything difficult or unfamiliar.

    Gentle reader: Are you so desperately unhappy that you will only continue struggling to meet the expectations of others,  or are you desperately unhappy enough even to consider anything new?

    I do understand what I would so much rather be doing: making a fresh start beginning from scratch, skeptical towards the futility all prevailing common sense and heteronymously sycophantic social skills. Alas, the cost of fitting in, even if practical and feasible, is often simply just too conditional and toxic. There is no unilateral solution to social needs. Rather, its a matter of better interaction. But what does that consist of? Perhaps, conversation. But what kind of conversation, and upon what topic? What conversational mode and agenda for conversation are together both most fulfilling in their own right, and most conducive to desirable outcomes of relationship and activity over time? Considering the prevalence of unhappiness, perhaps the blithely accepted answers to these questions require reevaluation. And perhaps many people simply balk at better answers, deliberation whereupon remaining taboo even simply because effort may be required in grappling anything unfamiliar. As Eve Tushnet expounds in Eros and Education,’ Eros, so enticing and so threatening, is nothing more or less than deep reciprocal engagement traversing into alien difference. Gentle reader, please consider yourself warned!
     

    “All the lonely people, where do they all belong? —  John from Liverpool

    The colossally Absurd Existential bait-and-switch sometimes referred to as: Totalitarian Interactivity consists of any manipulative situation of irrelevance obfuscated under an illusion of choice, in a reality of control and constraint, for an audience sucked in and lead about by the nose! For quintessential example par exultance, isolating and deceptive webforms, short and simple or long and complicated, are all too often designed to elicit any hope that any detail of free association permitted and invited via individual response, thereby by implication expresses any promise of flexibility in tailored response and thereby actually makes any difference. But in truth, the bureaucratic or automated response scarcely varies and after all the wined up, one size fits all. In essence, the mark has been conned into pouring their heart out to a bot!

    Gentle reader, can you relate? Do you weary of forever striving and waiting as the grueling frustration, agitation, insecurity and dystress only mounts inside? Of continually reaching out to unresponsive and noncommittal others? Of yet again finding yourself the only one that even much gives a damn? Not only the most flagrantly messed up, but just the most ordinary people and even our best and brightest easily find ourselves disaffected with society, marginalized and friendless. People do so love to rebel against any norm, at least superficially. For no one is alone in being lonely, invalidated and misunderstood. Legions of the unloved and forgotten, ever strive to meet the ever more daunting challenges of social life in order at long last to break isolation and find one anther.

    According to 'Social Failures and Social Solutions: Evidence from OkCupid' Social failures involve social interactions, such as affect, social support and advice giving; [...] Social failures are social interactions that do not occur, but would make two or more people better off if they did. [...] Social failures capture the difference between interactions that do happen and those that should happen. Information access and management is also a crucial factor, because inaccessibility of information is also a kind of social failure. Some instances of social failure are more important than others, depending upon what might be at stake in making connections and forging relationships. And there remain many possible causes and factors in social failure, even short of pandemic serial bullying outright, including all manner of obstacles and social restrictions on interaction and relationship.

    In particular, going out alone entails a great deal of awkward killing time, only magnifying the futility of that which called: recreation, meaning recovery on one's own time and expense, in every sore travail of  employment, formal education, family life and every other dysfunctional ordeal. Major obstacles and stumbling block needing to be addressed by whatever means, include prudery, sexism, and prevailing intimidation and resultant inhibition and reticence to break the ice and make first contact, especially on the part of women towards men. All in all, social life seems less of a conduit than a filter to be navigated or or barrier to be overcome in order to avoid being winnowed out, excluded and rejected. One might simply wish for anything more engaging between strangers, to make outreach to one another more fun instead of such a discouraging ordeal of distance, inhibition and suspicion. 

    What is loneliness? Why can the wrong people leave one feeling only even all the more lonely than solitude, even amid the bustling crowds? (Remember those?) Indeed, to quote Gian Vincenzo Gravina: "A bore is a man who deprives you of solitude without providing you with company." Gentle reader, outpourings of angst and sympathy online notwithstanding, do these questions truly interest and concern anyone? On an online forum for lonely people, with no trace of irony I discovered a blithe consensus upon two salient points: 1) Loneliness is the most awful no good bad thing! 2) In order to fit in, ya gotta keep it light! Such is anti-intellectualism. And thus do people keep secret their inner selves, starving for authentic psychological visibility. Can pandemic loneliness then ever accrue as any great surprise? People often put in such tremendous time, effort and concentration into such sore travail as formal education, employment and career building, yet remaining so cavalier and haphazard about finding any joy in personal social life in which, truth to tell, most of us have only been set up for failure. No wonder lonely misery has always been so devastatingly pandemic! This subversive and disruptively innovative website, FoolQuest.com, represents the sum of my own research and imagination as to we might together interact  in order to become better fulfilled and no longer so miserable and lonely, by subversively partaking in the shared creativity of collaborative solution finding. For such, as shall be seen, is the true key to life. And what is there more important?

    “If I continually get a door wrong, is it my fault? No. In fact, if you continually get it wrong or if other people continually get it wrong, it’s a good sign that it’s a really bad door.”
     
    —  Don Norman as cited in: Frustration is a design opportunity 
     

    And yet, optimism ever rises anew, even in the face of mockery and derision at large, for all of the same folly. But futility of unflaggingly misguided optimism figuratively barking up that proverbial wrong metaphorical tree, may even be deemed malignant, in all manner of bad relationships not only with other individuals, but also that enigma of collective membership which is the relationship of the individual to society. Many therefore despair, retreat and embrace Nihilism. For as in the famous words of Henry David Thoreau: “Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.” But when the going gets tough, nerds analyze the problem! When conventional wisdom fails, It may come time to metaphorically color outside the proverbial lines, in condemnation even of the most well meaning of prevailing inoperant snake-oil and the entire panic stricken and irrelevant cult of socialization.

    Popularity or social success on the one hand, and friendship on the other, remain ever starkly antithetical. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, while popularity or social success depend upon facile superficiality and keeping distance. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains insurmountable, irresolvable in very principle, and nothing but a setup for frustration, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do. Social success and social frustration only isolate the individual in different ways. This may be why finding connection can be such an uncertain rat race, unreliable and requires such open ended investment of time, effort, amoral unprotesting perceptive subtlety and dedication, with iron will, persistence and discipline all glossed over in prevailing simplistic discourse and blithe optimism. Endurance of precisely such monotony and dystress serves to weed out boredom prone unconventional creative thinkers in order to preserve status quo. Hence the need of fundamentally subversive innovation in the reinvention of social life, a subversive fresh perspective entirely redefining the problem of socialization towards more subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding. A bold social engineering design challenge will then inform a subversive and disruptively innovative design exercise open to all. And I look forward to new solutions from interested site visitors. Creative people need a "tribe," because people and society perversely tend to discourage creativity, fostering heteronomy to conformism and undermining autonomy at every turn. And groups for particular creative fields, might not suffice, because optimum creativity, networking and social support are all interdisciplinary. Already, one possible solution meeting the parameters of said design exercise, is a proposal named: Creativity Should be Social then presented together with explanation of precisely how said proposal meets with the requirements of the aforementioned social engineering design exercise, all towards novel subversive and disruptively innovative modus vivendi and more congenial individual situation than we have known.

    We are all such proverbial square pegs: The customer is always wrong! The program never fails, you fail the program. In  the immortal words of George Carlin: Most people work just hard enough not to get fired and get paid just enough money not to quit. Carlin thus describes a condition of mass oppression and pandemic listless passive hostility, by no means limited to employment and formal education. Little wonder then that the unfulfilled typically find such little heart to apply themselves in unflagging dedication and diligence, no matter extrinsic rewards. Can there be any better way?

    What demarcates opportunity from wishful thinking? Indeed, is this very text just another scam? Well may we ask: Am I being taken in yet again? Dare I ever trust? -you may well wonder and dread... Betrayal is toxic and devastating. We may all become naturally wary and suspicious, and alas with good reason. But there is still truth to be had in the greatest mendacity: The study of marketing scams and con artistry reveals human nature and yearnings. The experience of being taken in by any scam elicits anger and shame. But that's another con all in its own right. Let's never be ashamed of ordinary human needs or appetites for joy. But let's also be honest with ourselves: Marketing scams often begin by selling whatever feeling or mystique. That is the  hook or grabber of their story. And only then, riding upon that desire, elation and wishful thinking, comes whatever promise or guarantee of whatever tangible results and success. Often such mendacity, fraud and manipulation may be characterized by hand waving and pipedreaming. In the alternative, trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously and with lees small talk, realistically and in detail, even when no less ambitiously. Moreover, in order effectively to compete with every ubiquitous sweet lie of heteronomy, and honestly assuage Existential despair in the Absurdity of the human condition, any serious undertaking that even might conceivably succeed, must in the interim sustain ongoing interaction promoting some or other yearned for emotional response and attachments.

    To wit: Ongoing pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing  fulfillment. And all of this must be accomplished without utterly compromising objectivity, thereby going beyond mere glittering generalities, and thus just perhaps in any viable strategy for success and desired results. And such is the strategic agenda of FoolQuest.com, remaining ever hard nosed and skeptical even amid the most vigorous evaluation, feasibility study and strategy in pursuit of the most utterly fantastical ambitions. Hence, what manner of empowering close social interaction or relationship involves investment of tangible reciprocal support in high activity such as pleasurably engages novel excitement, meaningfully? For such remains an agenda question and theme of deliberation for conversation even at all in and of itself uplifting and engaging, and even just perhaps ultimately fulfilling and productive, all about the experience of healthy relationships that thrive in autonomy, succeed and prosper. Trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously.

    “You’re frustrated because you keep waiting for the blooming of flowers of which you have yet to sow the seeds.”  ― Steve Maraboli, Unapologetically You: Reflections on Life and the Human Experience

     

    Executive summary

    The FoolQuest.com  agenda towards beneficial modus vivendi of lifestyle entrepreneurship:

    Creativity Should be Social and Creativity can be Popular

     
    How to start a movement:

    And lo, the star first follower shall become the true leader

    among cofounders teaching by example, showing others how to follow, demonstrating how to participate and  relate

    Does your ambition and creativity ever make you lonely? Does oppressively banal small talk often exasperate and bore you? Instead, do  you enjoy brainstorming creative writing, drama and Science Fiction? Do you dream of brainstorming subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup)? Trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously: Are you serious and persistent about feasibility study and solution finding? Can you be a trustworthy collaboration partner? Then you are needed here! -Beginning with your feedback.

     Do you ever find yourself frustrated, stymied, blocked, in a rut?  FoolQuest.comm  just might have your answer!

    Trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously together freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically, active in creativity, strategically in feasibility study, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in controversy which is the exchange of welcome criticism, with civility as autonomous equals in optimal reciprocal engagement. Happiness comes in the Menschlichkeit of unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility and genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for capable interaction and agenda setting with even adequately responsible others, in true spirit of friendship and honesty, making progress every day as a real mensch. The class of people who find it the easiest to make friends and forge new connections, overlaps greatly with the class of people who live better rounded and richer lives. Happy people thrive in autonomy and are more productive, likely to choose creative activities and cooperation, deriving fulfillment in meaningful and pleasurable engagement. Indeed, even making more money. But correlation need not imply causation, therefore the question yet remains: Which is cause and which is effect? Does serious conversation result in happiness, or is serious conversation the result of happiness? Does richer and fuller life facilitate social success, or does social success effectively enrich fuller lives? In either case, if just perhaps the process is reciprocal, functioning in either direction, then a virtuous cycle is indicated, perpetually improving only once implemented, entailing no more that whatever even tacit ratification amongst those who interact, even entirely without the approval or even the knowledge of the Great Faceless They. And that is why relationship and especially friendship arise only as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, intentionally. And so, we have our work cut out for us, but nothing so onerous. For in the words of John Cleese: Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating. The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others.

    Popularity and social success ever remain antithetical to true friendship. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, being predicated upon unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, while popularity and social success depend upon purpose defeatingly facile superficiality and ever keeping distance while keeping up pretence. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains irresolvable in very principle, and nothing but a setup for frustration, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do.  Social success and social frustration a failure only isolate the individual in different ways. This may be why finding connection is so uncertain, unreliable and requires such open ended investment of time, patient effort and dedication, with iron will, persistence and discipline all glossed over in prevailing simplistic discourse and blithe optimism. Endurance of precisely such monotony and dystress serves to weed out boredom prone unconventional creative thinkers in order to preserve status quo. Hence the need of fundamentally subversive innovation in the reinvention of social life. Because happy people talk more seriously with less small talk, and we might all do well to follow their example.

    By very premise, Cultural Anthropology studies human relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank. all predicated upon competencies and aptitudes of hierarchically predictive social cognition by which to anticipate the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships and prediction of future behavior and in order to know what one is expected to do and how to behave. By default, social order tends toward hierarchy which to be Existentially honest, consistently engenders heteronomy, the very opposite of autonomy, friendship, freedom and capability so crucial to authentic wellbeing. The emotional distance and objectification situationally inherent in compulsive heteronomy to hierarchy are antithetical to any sympathetic glimpse into one another's inner life that is called: psychological visibility. Therefore dystressful Existentially Absurd alienation, futility and lonely boredom consistently ensue. But a promising remedy may be suggested in pondering the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, even notwithstanding the paradigmatic study of heteronomy to hierarchical kinship and rank so fundamental to Cultural Anthropology, in consistent Empirical observation and grand afterthought that there are also those rare, exceptional and special moments of collaboration in creative solution finding which is characteristically egalitarian in nature as well as uplifting in freedom, progress and elation.

    Ongoing pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing  fulfillment. In those most famous words of Friedrich Nietzsche: “What is happiness? The feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” Consider then how much happier we all could be if only rather than living under the monotony and oppression of hierarchical dominance, with only such very occasional and even once in a lifetime respite, instead creative solution finding in collaboration among equals became the default experience, and in more democratic values and sensibilities, with recourse to authority of whatever kind remaining strictly as a contingency in recourse only when actually ever needed for whatever reason! Alas, radical transformation of society at large remains impractical in any short term or medium range of time and besides, impossible for any lone individual. That leaves the possibility of smaller group formation as an at all viable strategy towards implementation od any intentional social  environment better conducive to the pursuit of happiness and success. And for optimal reciprocal engagement in collaboration among equals, in collaborative solution finding together, the following regimen is proposed: An interstitial concurrent synergy of two different powerful applications of narrative, 1) on the one hand, pure creativity for its own joy, in the form of collaboration in creative fiction writing and brainstorming of interesting and original high quality drama and Science Fiction speculation, 2) and on the other hand, of applied creativity, of subversive and disruptively in endless possibility of  innovative entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup), from management team formation, business planning, feasibility study, all the way through to Capitalization and implementation, all as proposed herein as the strategic agenda of FoolQuest.com, implementation whereof being the first challenge to collaborative solution finding. Creative and informative resources, tools and guides on FoolQuest.com therefore include a selection of unfinished stories to modify, improve and complete together and subversive and disruptively innovative proposal for collaboration in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup).

    It has been opined that so called online community as of message posting boards, is no community, but more analogous to strangers in a bar. In the past,  un groups have achieved noted value is sharing information and consultation, within those bounds. One way or another, online communication even on UseNet has even at its most substantive, lacked depth and scope no less than casual communication and interaction IRL. But (anti)social media by design has eviscerated communication and interaction, while opening the floodgates upon an annoying deluge of endless empty gossip. Gleaning desired information is frustrating. A coherent discussion thread is impossible! Even establishing contact is challenging. (Anti)social media participation is pointless, silly, arduous and self-contained. How is any of this so seductive and addictive? It's repugnant! Every time I land on Facebook, I throw up my hands in consternation! As Sam Vaknim points out, (anti)social media is typically configured to be competitive and zero sum, an endless jockeying of short attention span distracted, shifted and wrested away from all others But it's still not the technology. Gentle reader, we are all routinely called upon to to sacrifice authenticity simply in order to fit it in. For such is conditionality replete with the omnipresent threat of shaming and rejection, nothing new, toxicity long predating the advent of (anti)social media. After all, what was the great innovation of Facebook but the IT for the most empty loutish anti-intellectual reaction pandering indoctrination, spectacle and gratuitously narcissistic desperately fixated veniality of one dimensionally vapid collegiate life? At the risk of anthropomorphism, not just (anti)social media, but social reality at large to begin with, tends to be so obtuse, paranoid, cagy, reluctant to communicate or interact, unfriendly, often hostile and dangerous, in aggregation, naturally, of all the disoriented, suffering and desperately terrified facile individuals adapted to such a toxic social environment. Devious and debilitating  Behavior Modification, brainwash, coercion and manipulative invalidation is everywhere and nothing new. Thus has it ever been. Indeed, historically things where much worse, and in the most backwards regions even today, yet remain so.

    For such is the debilitating and blithely fraudulent promise of heteronomy, futile and Existentially Absurd bait-and-switch, a pervasive racket of rejection masquerading as warm acceptance. There is much lip service nowadays to authenticity, egosyntonic individual conduct in harmony with personal values and preferred self-image.  Everybody needs acceptance for who they truly are, both from themselves and from others. Indeed, those of us ever intrigued by novel ideas and substantive disclosure may therefore contend with mounting exasperation when confronted by all of the shallow pretense of banal small talk. To quote Carl Gustav Jung: “The privilege of a lifetime is to become who you truly are.”  In the words of  José de San Martin: “You will be what you must be, or else you will be nothing.” Individuals may find themselves less often actually valued intrinsically for ability and the content of character and potential as prospective friends and partners or allies in life, assets in rational self-interest or simply joy to be with, than instead extrinsically valued for popularity, standing and influence ever exploited in perpetual struggle jockeying for approval and dominance. Hence the recommendation to lie and pretend to have friends until one actually has any. In the words of Adlai Ewing Stevenson: “A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular.” But with all that remains at stake fitting in, who can ever remain truly safe and secure, much less free and open? Social cognition makes hapless social cognition of us all!

    In the bright future of advanced automated Sociometry, everyone will be influential. But in the meantime, in the here and now, individual will to power demands ongoing struggle, beginning with the quest for Eudemonia and optimally positive influence upon one another. Alas, under heteronomy, people generally learn to become so cynical, insecure, inhibited, wary and cagey, most strongly motivated by life long behavioral conditioning to peer pressure and the many ongoing punishment and rewards and social cognition of perceived vested interests, relentless struggle ever jockeying in in the advancement and preservation of social position, esteem and standing. That is why kinship and rank are viewed as so central to the human condition in society, under the generally authoritarian perspective of Cultural Anthropology, with the fully engaged open and uplifting egalitarian low hierarchical distance of collaborative solution finding relegated almost to mere democratic grand afterthought. An exception, a weird and wonderful special case, by whatever unusual need or rare circumstances as decided by whatever great and good powers that be. An however infrequent and all to scarce transient positive experience then leaving such a dull and aching void in unrelentingly bored and lonely life the rest of the time. Hence frustration of uniquely human intrinsic needs of social and intellectual stimulus struggle rooted in freakish and massively inbred hideous mutation, evolutionary neurology and engorged human cerebrality. Leaving such poignant memories of those rare peak experiences of such creative interaction as ever arising, so dearly treasured in helplessness to sustain or proactively to duplicate such desirable conditions or situations regularly or systematically and at will.

    But what then if instead, priorities could be turned upon their head? What if the open and productive, non-zero-sum fully engaged uplifting and egalitarian low hierarchical distance of collaborative creative solution finding were somehow to instituted as the ongoing default, and whatever kind of responsible authority the special case, reserved for and resorted to only as and when the need whereof ever actually arising? And no longer merely, as all too often, any transitory event of , collaboration among equals in solution finding, such as any one time assigned task afterwards abandoned, or any sort of short term scheduled workshop, contest or seminar, typically concluding and vanishing entirety without any trace, with no debrief or follow up at all. In the words of Sir Isaac Newton: You have to make the rules, not follow them.” Where and when, how and by what design would follow whatever intentional implementation of any such a brave new social contract, even just for a small working group, let alone transforming the world? The helplessness of individual frustration and failure is everywhere. Might such helpless pandemic individual frustration and failure, not merely of the clearly and obviously broken and disadvantaged nor even also of the most ordinary and average, but especially of our best and brightest, their possibilities squandered, actually be in any part due to whatever conceivable larger systemic defect in society, of entrenched mediocrity and worse? And what is to be done?

    Creative people may often feel the need of any "tribe" of our own because people and society at large so perversely tend to discourage creativity and subversion, fostering heteronomy to conformism and undermining autonomy at every turn. And to make matters worse,  conventional groups for whatever common interests including particular creative fields, do not suffice, because heights of discovery and creativity, not to mention networking and social support, are often one way or another actually interdisciplinary and not segregated by specialty. Indeed, a notable key observation of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of invention, is how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and multipotential reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines.

    Worse, as a rule, rational individuals of honor ought simply to apprise one another where they stand and just talk over whatever their problems and prioritize obvious shared concerns. Alas, such seems so seldom the case. It may be generally accepted that common interests and passions remain a key factor in building relationships. But in actuality, interests in common may turn out to be the least predicator in interpersonal compatibility. Indeed, interests in common need not correlate with shared core values or character, by far more profound. Moreover, it may be generally accepted that people make friends as a result of chance propinquity by spending casual time with one another. But as shall be seen, this too simply is not true. In truth, given limited options, people have often come to accept the need to cultivate and acquiesce to tolerable relationships with whomever most continually proximate. Hence a necessity of lowered expectations and fearful timidity. A sore travail.

     
    The very premise and agenda of FooolQuest.com  is utterly unique, subversive and taboo, though it should be blatantly obvious.
    The customer is always wrong! The program never fails, you fail the program! Bah, humbug!
    Wake up, Sheeple! It's all about how human social order as the glorified pack mammals that we are, has come to fall so vastly short of innate needs and appetites of social and intellectual stimulus struggle entirely unique to ever more massively engorged human cerebrality: Specifically, for  collaboration among equals together in creative solution finding. A joy alas far too infrequent under conventional paradigm of stultifying heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And the consequences to authentic wellbeing could not be more dire.
    Ever so blithely to list unrealistic expectations among the causes of loneliness, is not unlike declaring, similarly, that unrealistic expectations lead to malnutrition, as if such were merely subjective and therefore entirely arbitrary! While of course practical needs remain ever crucial to physical survival at all, intrinsic needs and values are the very reason to go on living in the first place, and no mere arbitrary chimera or nuance of individual whimsy. Indeed,  in the biting prose of Kathleen Norris: "When you are unhappy, is there anything more maddening than to be told that you should be contented with your lot?" And exactly such foul rhetoric of sly invalidation, is merely another convolution of blaming the end users, each and all of us summarily abandoned to our own devices, indeed for the promulgation of unrealistic expectation in society, to the effect that the means at the disposal of the individual in society can possibly ever deliver as promised or hoped for, and actually ever meet individual needs and heart felt desires at all adequately. Such blind faith despite all manifest evidence to the contrary!  In truth, the proverbial elephant in the room, there remains such a user hostile outcomes gap, meaning: no results no matter one one does. It's a real shit show, and the only game in town! Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy. But how to stop playing into that racket? How indeed ever to find, nay to create, the very wherewithal and thrive?
     
    To reiterate, creative people may feel the need of a "tribe" of our own because people and society at large so perversely tend to discourage subversion and creativity, fostering heteronomy to conformism and undermining autonomy at every turn. And to make matters worse,  conventional groups for whatever common interests including particular creative fields, do not suffice, because heights of discovery and creativity, not to mention networking and social support, are often one way or another actually interdisciplinary and not segregated by specialty. Indeed, a notable key observation of TRIZ, the much renowned Russian theory of invention, is how aside from entirely new scientific discoveries, the rarest most important and powerful innovations arise in the transfer and multipotential reapplication of knowledge and methods across disciplines.

The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances or situation, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs by the Menschlichkeit of capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. So, can these aforesaid criteria possibly ever be satisfied via intentional activity and interaction? And precisely how?

 

A better way?

Solution finding must begin in responsible needs assessment in comparison with results from situation analysis. And the results are grim: As shall be seen, in every walk of life, conventional society and expected life paths are often extremely counterproductive and actually harmful. Therefore, the path to happiness, the remedy to sore travail of loneliness, boredom and desperate frustration, may consist of exercising reason and then nothing less then as much as possible reducing dependence upon whatever routine inoperant, ineffective or quite simply unfulfilling conventional modes of social life, and finding or creating anything far happier together. Creative solution finding, as shall be seen, an uplifting social interaction of thriving and authentic wellbeing, transcending the inefficiency and frustration of rejecting and domineering destructiveness of conventional social life and hierarchy as defined by Cultural Anthropology. Specifically, the case shall be presented that the key to happiness and escape from the unhappiness of more routine social expectation, with all of its senseless stumbling blocks, pointless conditionality, heartless rejection and stifling emotional distance, may be found in the inherent egalitarianism of creative solution finding and the empowering synergy concurrently between two different ongoing modes of intentional activity and interaction, of creative collaboration among equals and free exchange, specifically the pure creativity of collaborative fiction writing and brainstorming, and in the subversive disruptively innovative applied creativity in endless possibioity of of entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup) from first concept through to business planning, feasity study, management team formation, Capitalization and implementation.

Anyone aspiring and yearning to experience creative fulfillment in entrepreneurial success, in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup),, has surely become well cognizant of the most embryonic first-concept "Kitchen Table" stage or phase of new venture creation (various business startup), but there is virtually no community, support for or even literature about it. This may be because there is just no money to be made in catering to the actual needs of those who are not making any money yet, indeed if ever. Instead, the market caters to successful entrepreneurs who can pay. Meanwhile, desperate wannabes are scammed with no end of dazzling but dubious offers and opportunities. Not everyone even has the support of the likeminded, even to muddle haphazardly in efforts at new venture creation (various business startup). Any conceivable better intentional situation must proceed from some more patient longer vision than unscrupulous marketing manipulation for quickly parting suckers from their limited cash. In a nutshell, the vision of Eudemonia presented here on FoolQuest.com  is of a sort of deluxe "kitchen table" as it were, open to all free of charge, facilitating "lifestyle entrepreneurship" of subversive value in fulfilling interaction even as to nurture newly dawning friendship and to inspire participant persistence, an ongoing collaborative fiction writing as a bonding and management team building exercise, towards collaborative solution finding in business planning and feasibility study towards subversive and disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup) from first-concept all the way through to Capitalization and implementation. That is the agenda of FoolQuest.com, an outreach, with no pressure or promises, to initiate even the most preliminary discussion with anyone at all interested.

     • We Can be Heroes: Trustworthy and respectful collaboration among equals

Telling stories and working out plans
Both subversive endeavors open for anyone to join in, are related application of different powerful modes of narrative speculation. Collaboration in fiction writing will be wonderful for ever crucial team building of management teams in entrepreneurial new venture creation (various business startup) which begins in the crafting of sound business plans that tell their story, our story together. The difference is that while fiction writing seeks only for merest plausibility in the elicitation of the willing suspension of disbelief, business planning of new venture creation (various business startup), strives to discover feasibility to the satisfaction of incredulous skepticism. Towards these criteria among others, the practice of controversy, being the invited and valued exchange of criticism, is crucial to both endeavors. Polished quality writing with engaging freshness and originality, is brightened and sharpened by the process of ongoing critique, and solid credible business plans are detailed scenarios subject to rigorous feasibility study consisting of relentless faultfinding, correction and risk management. Due diligence remains ever crucial. Pipedreaming is always a roadblock to success

Disagreement is good

According to the mindset which is heteronomy, disagreement only engenders strife, and therefore all dissidence is something to be overcome, a threat to self esteem that be summarily quashed by any means necessary. But the truth is that people of good will who disagree cooperate productively all the time. Indeed, for prime example, if disagreement where actually so paralytic, science would never advance. In the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” So speak your mind, be argumentative! Let's pick apart anything remaining unclear. Enjoy it, fully engage.-As heady as love bombing, but without the cognitive dissonance hangover! “Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.” - Proverbs 27:17 (KJV) Even though intellectuality and criticality can be so nerdy, socially awkward, taboo and unpopular  Plainly, this proposal will not be suitable for anyone lacking the fundamental autonomy in order to question and criticize, to welcome like in kind in return. No flaming! Ideas can be utterly and candidly rejected with no iota of personal rejection, criticism and fully engaged controversy, that out to give no offense because any serious response demonstrates genuine respect. Intellectual criticality and autonomy are free for the having for anyone willing to invest the attention. For in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” Let us begin then, with the generosity to ourselves, of Dialectic focus upon what is important. For in the words of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least. Nothing can be more truly exclusive than self selection. And that, however paradoxically, is how to become more individual by joining a group

Ongoing Pleasure + engagement + meaning = ever self renewing  fulfillment. That may explain the Empirical observation that Happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically, bridging the abstract to the practical and concrete, strategically, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in feasibility study and controversy which is the welcome and valued exchange of criticism, with civility as autonomous equals in optimal reciprocal engagement. People pleasers are useless and slowly debilitating. criticism is inherently friendly, an expression of esteem, and that is how it should be perceived experienced among people who care enough to pay attention. Indeed, as the saying goes, no question is too stupid to ask, and no answer too wise to be given. Happy people thrive in autonomy, succeed and prosper.  and are more productive, likely to choose creative activities together. Gentle reader, do we want the same things? And is all of this truly on the level

Is there more to life than all of the freedom, productivity, power, fun and vitality of fully engaged and boundless creativity ever fueled by cheerfully vociferous and spirited debate? Yes, certainly. But the case shall be presented as to how, for fundamental socio-psychological reasons, even though so taboo and socially awkward, precisely such optimally reciprocally engaged receptivity towards free thought and expression remain ever crucial to all other value, both in principle and in practice, and in deliberate alternative to more conventional, toxic and repressively heteronymous thinking in regards to social life. People join in all manner of activity, all in order to experience new encounters, forge new interpersonal attachments and build new relationship, frequently only meeting with frustration, because aside perhaps for sheer persistence and propinquity, the true requirements for any situation nurturing of ready and enduring connection is desperately lacking. Under heteronomy to anti-intellectualism and taboo, every experience of full intellectual or emotional fulfillment or gratification or other intimacy in the truest sense, becomes a dire threat, endangering popularity and secure social standing. Only exceptionally functional smaller social circles can operate differently in order to afford any shelter from  an oppressively timid and suspicious milieu wherein any such outreach or interaction affording any glimpse into one another's inner life that is called: psychological visibility, is rendered socially awkward if not actually taboo and even regarded as a threat. As shall be further expounded, relationship and especially friendship so key to wider networking and access to vital connections a resources towards all other needs, arise only as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, as cultivated in creative solution finding, indeed as optimized in the present proposal of synergistic endeavor, but as shall be seen, systematically thwarted in the approval seeking heteronomy, distance and alienation inherent to the cult of socialization in perpetuation of the endless struggle and Absurd futility of toxic and sanctioned sycophantic social skills or toadying hierarchically predictive social aptitudes. For whom then do we bereave ourselves of good? Such a chore and a bore of lonely sore travail endured only for the advantage of privileged cronies. What a racket! Brothers and sisters, set that burden down! 

Find cogently detailed strategy herein provided, bridging from the abstract to the concrete, practically and even gainfully addressing nothing less than Eudemonia, the most important fundamental intrinsic human needs according to the cutting edge of science in concurrence with ancient wisdom of the sages of antiquity rediscovered. After all, why would any of that interest anyone for whom in order to sustain short attention, the very meaning of life and fulfillment must ever be reduced to something catchy and glib? Isn't there anything more?

Many people fall by the wayside in life because they lack the well organized unflagging self-discipline in formal education, accreditation, employment and career development. Causes hay often include the wont of social support and genius that does not suffer the skilled incompetence of fools gladly, simply in order to fit in. But many of the most successful are actually only keeping so busy merely in order to stave off such profound unhappiness. This may be because so many that are so impressively dutiful and mature in deferred gratification and heteronomy to scholastic advancement and job promotion, nevertheless remain so cavalier and haphazard about all that really matter in personal life and autonomy. Don't make plans to connect to others, but just wait and let it happen! -Or so we are told. While others do indeed work very hard, perpetually jockeying for facile popularity and social success at the sacrifice of all genuine friendship and psychological visibility. Can there be any better options?

True individuals, proverbial square pegs, defy metaphorical pigeonholing and neat identification as any readily locatable traditional target market or audience. It seems that the the very ideas of FoolQuest.com are still too new and abstract, and therefore there are no keywords by which to search the Web. And thus only the same helpless options of Absurd futility remain. But first of all, just perhaps in autonomy unanswerable to heteronomy, simply for I and thou merely between ourselves, anything cogent remains at all possible. Because nothing indispensably genuine comes as any end result or objective of fitting in, nor as any prized reward of senseless sore travail that is the rat race. Quite simply, relevance is not an outcome. Rather, engaged substantive conversation, so key to meaningful relationship, remains the only actually viable starting point for any true new beginnings and escape from stultifying superficiality. Again Trustworthy and respectful happy people talk more seriously and with lees small talk, realistically and in detail, even however ambitiously.

 
 
 

FoolQuest.com the inception of an open online pre-incubator for anyone interested to join in:

 

• Extensive collaborative creativity tools for boundless innovation

• Comprehensive fiction writing resources and unfinished stories for an ongoing online writers' bull session, from every first flash of novel inspiration into the full flower of creativity together, rigorous writing discipline and quality polished output.

A pre-incubation listing of subversive and disruptively innovative proposals for collaboration in new venture creation (various business startup), the most embryonic first concept intended for rigorous feasibility study and business planning, management team formation, development and Capitalization, all the way through to full implementation.

Because Creativity Should be Social and Creativity can be Popular  

 

 
 
 
And then learn more about the social engineering agenda by design of optimizing social stimulus struggle..
 
 
 
 _________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
          
 
 
 
Change the conversation, reset the agenda, and just maybe, change the world!         
Three essential conundrums of drama remain ever salient in real life:  
When all else fails, what has actually been desired all along?
 
People interact, engage one another, bond, become emotionally attached to one another, even entering into and forging communities, all in order to feel safe and validated. Alas that so many often tend to evaluate safety and validation superficially, erroneously and even destructively, without talking it over and thinking things through, and therefore then often so blithely falling prey to heteronomy, codependency and exploitation. Beware then the chimera of membership and granfaloon! No wonder such dangerous, irrelevant, foolish and malignantly bullying cults and cliques abound, while genuine abiding respect and autonomy support remain exceptional. And there's the rub, the overarching problem in modus vivendi, the meaning of life and experience of fulfillment. And it remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. 
 
Unmet friend: Why are you even reading this page? Does it interest you? Might the proposed interactions ever even hope to afford you any joy? Might the proposed interactions even actually promote growth and advancement of any of your own skill sets? Might the proposed interactions ever be a fun way to connect and even bond with others? Might the proposed interaction help advance your own objectives and personal success? Then either we have found one another and I am about to hear from you, or else for some reason, gentle reader, you hesitate even to read, explore and talk it over. Alas all such trepidation and hesitation, gentle, because whatever your misgivings surely must be important enough to discuss in any depth, indeed especially even the most tentative and preliminary feasibility study. Uncertainty should never taboo any subject of conversation. The mere conduct of Dialectic is always feasible! And because without compelling relevant intrinsic motivation, everything is just a chore and a bore! Therefore, if you've got a better offer, then take it.
 
Here's something new and subversive to brainstorm together that has yet to be tried: It doesn't even matter, gentle reader, if neither fiction writing at all, nor new venture creation (various business startup) in and of themselves appeal to you, notwithstanding their tremendous fascination. The point is their synergistic power of narrative in the Dialectic agenda setting of value proposition, project planning, feasibility study, innovation for collaboration and social support, strategy and design thinking all crucial and applicable no matter ones heart's desires or life purpose to share. 
 
The difference between these two specific applications of narrative, is that whereas 1) the unfounded conjecture and even Science Fiction speculation of capable fiction writing, plotting, drama and sympathetic characterization all strive at very least for plausibility in the abstract, by contrast 2) whatever futuring scenario advanced in sound business planning must then go further by skeptically and systematically investigating and revealing actual feasibility in Empirical reality. And there can be tremendous interstitial synergy concurrently between these two highly productive Dialectical and collaborative applications of narrative. Such iks the proposed an intentional endeavor in which to pleasurably and meaningfully engage one another, thereby assuaging loneliness and boredom in ongoing  immediate immediate gratification, while forging attachments and building relationship over time. Shall we then remain forever enslaved under the shopworn, craven, misanthropic and dishonest narrative, ready made, off the rack, in heteronomy to the cult of socialization? Or instead dare we liberate ourselves by the power of any at all more subversive narrative?
   
But why these two fields of collaborative endeavor in particular? Towards what advantage or joy? Answer: Think of the endless possibility an ongoing bonding and team rapport building exercise for management team building, collaborative solution finding, business planning and subversive disruptively innovative new venture creation (various business startup). Because the pure creativity, art for art's sake, of fiction writing is versatile and accessible, plausible and relatable, while innovation, being applied creativity, is effectively advanced in business planning in endless possibility of new venture creation (various business startup) and exploration in solution finding and feasibility study striving towards disruptive life changing actionable strategy and implementation. Because of the interdisciplinary intellectual stimulation and elicitation of curiosity so unique to the taboo synergy bridging the abstract and the concrete, as between the two modes of narrative. Because both are different applications of imagination, story crafting and telling, the pure creativity of fiction writing and the innovation of new venture creation (various business startup), each so richly feeding into the other. Pipedreaming, the flagrant dishonesty of retreat from reality into fantasy, is plainly dangerous. Hypothetico-deductive method might be seen as pipedreaming in reverse, beginning from unfounded conjecture, even utter fantasy, progressively retreating from sheer fantasy into ever better plausibility and feasibility. Thus may art express life as drama innovates, and life imitate art as innovation draws upon fiction.
 
Creativity Should be Social, available and transparent. Because happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically, strategically, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in controversy and feasibility study, with civility as autonomous equals in optimal reciprocal engagement. Happy people thrive in autonomy, succeed and prosper.  and are more productive, likely to choose creative activities and cooperation, deriving experience of fulfillment in meaningful and pleasurable engagement with less small talk. Happiness comes in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs for capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, that comes in true spirit of friendship and honesty, making progress every day as a real mensch. But which is cause and which is effect? That remains unclear merely from the discovered correlation. It is, however, readily observed that the people who find it the easiest to make friends and forge new connections, commonly live better rounded and richer lives to begin with. All easier said than done. And where does hat leave us? Narrative brings us together, but on what terms? For narrative us a wonderful servant but a terrible master. So what must be done?
 
 And although, to reiterate, correlation need not by itself imply causation, in the light of stimulus struggle, and especially social stimulus struggle, an answer emerges to that question: Which is cause and which is effect? Does serious conversation result in happiness, or is serious conversation the result of happiness? Yes, serious conversation absolutely makes crucial contribution to happiness. And conversely, happiness likely engenders serious conversation rather than floundering in empty small talk. Hence, both being at all true, a virtuous cycle is indicated, perpetually improving only once implemented, entailing no more that whatever even tacit ratification amongst those who interact, even entirely without the approval or even the knowledge of the Great Faceless They. Relationship such as love and friendship, is predicated upon attachment, and attachment can only begin, first of all, from engagement. And that is why relationship and especially friendship arise only as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, not impulsively or compulsively, but deliberately and intentionally, and above all, not to be deferred as as any hoped for objective or reward, but undertaken immediately in unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility as the only viable beginning. And yet, the obvious recommendation of deliberately talking together, not more cheerfully, but more seriously, somehow fails to arise: FoolQuest.com appears to be first!  And so, we have our work cut out for us, but nothing so onerous. For again, in the words of John Cleese: Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.” 
 
Hence the first glimmer of happiness, simply from sustained engagement in the present serious strategic conversation, meeting as it does, the above salient criterion. So let's all get our pointy ears on, and derive satisfaction! For to quote Friedrich Nietzsche: “Happiness is the feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.”  
 
Whereof the question then to the agenda remains: What is very principle is the very nature of serious conversation ever so crucial to happiness? And what would be a program of sustaining such ongoing happily serious conversation, so that we can together finally get with he program, and at long last the right program this time? Not to mention barest implementation strategy of any such a program. Herein is proposed to test the very hypothesis that even to conduct this very discussion will already produce positive affect to motivate and sustain ongoing strategic Dialectic towards feasibility study and productive action.

 

 

Back to the proverbial drawing board:
 

                                                         The correct indefinite pronoun denoting society is never 'it' but 'We.'

Therefore: "why isn't it... ?" may generally be the wrong question.

The interesting and responsible question remains: "Why don't/can't We... ?"                                    

 

 

 

 

 

User Hostile: The ugly truth about how things don't work  

 

Many experience an outcomes gap, meaning: no results no matter one one does.

Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhapp

All truth passes through three stages
First, it is ridiculed
Second, it is violently opposed
Third, It is accepted as being self evident

— Arthur Schopenhauer

 

A classic chicken and egg dilemma ensues: For good or ill, does society at large forge and temper each individual, or do individuals in interaction all with one another generate and manifest the immediately surrounding constructed social reality in which we individually participate? Do relationships exist in social context, or quite the reverse, does the web of relationships constitute the society and define one's experience therein?

Well, obviously, it is both, each all at once. And yet, most discourse and remediation attempting to address life's challenges so blithely continues to focus entirely upon heteronymous social skills, the individual, eager, zealous, groveling subordinate, desperately competitive cog in the machine, rising heroically to meet the needs of performance in relentless, unresponsive and ever more broad, nebulous, impersonal and fadelessly abstract society, The Great Faceless They. Thus do the all too normal toxic headgames of heteronomy cultivate not blossoming togetherness, but festering alienation. Relationship is even presented exclusively as the fruit conditional to such social aptitude and conformity and actually even subordinate thereto. Tautologically, heteronomy assumes that submission to one's place in society, only once secured, and submission in knowing thy place, the truth to set thee free, is one's prime functional alliance in life and guarantor of stability; but only given collective approval, and from which relationship in turn proceed and are subsumed. But from the standpoint of what the conformist Victorians who so cherished civic-virtue therefore first decried as Individualism and condemned as subversive: For making one's niche in life might be understood as product of forging personal alliances for oneself, even true friendship and the cultivation of nurturing relationships, all not in any sense of civic-virtue under wider collective membership.

So are your own values those of  heteronomy or of autonomy? Who might you prefer to connect with? An aspiring pillar of the community, staunch toady to social expectation: an utter tool, or a good friend to humanity, a real mensch? And to what ought one aspire? The desperation for approval, or the will to power? Yet the outdated cult of socialization, manipulative behavioral conditioning in one rancid guise or variation or another, prevails. The powerlessness of the individual without influence in society, is simply accepted and taken for granted, then played upon so manipulatively. But the malignant racket of all such often senseless imperative of interminable submissive finesse, can offer no trustworthy solution. This is because all of that festering impotent vexation and mediocrity is at the root of bored and lonely suffering and frustration in the first place. This is true even when most successful on its own misguided cretin terms exactly as advertised. Though as a setup for failure, compromise and lowered expectations, the let down is that much less subtle.  

Social success and friendship are antithetical. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, while social success depends upon facile superficiality and keeping distance. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains insurmountable, irresolvable in very principle, and nothing but a setup for frustration, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do. Social success and social failure only isolate the individual in different ways. This may be why finding connection is so uncertain, unreliable and requires such open ended investment of time, effort and dedication, with iron will, persistence and discipline all glossed over in prevailing simplistic discourse and blithe optimism. Endurance of precisely such monotony and dystress serves to weed out boredom prone unconventional creative thinkers in order to preserve status quo. In 'Fame is Desired By Those Lost in Life ,' Sofo Archom expounds upon how the alienated and unloved strive, successfully or unsuccessfully, to  become famous, hoping in vein thereby to fill the void . But a greater and far more vast legion of exactly the same lost souls, so ardently pursue just the opposite, mediocrity, in desperation for social success in order to fit in, likewise hoping in vein to fill the self same void. Were one to erase each and every instance of the word 'fame' and substitute instead the word: ';conformity,' the article would still parse no less coherently or sadly true! All hence the dire need of fundamentally subversive innovation in the reinvention of social life.  

There remains one simple and most general criteria of true social success and connection for every purpose. And that is when someone else that one might care to interact with, reciprocates, even into the long term. This then, is nothing under individual control or initiative. No individual can take collective action unilaterally. Cooperation is required. Hence, prima fascia, the Absurd futility of all social outreach. It truly is that simple and Empirical. In marketing, a 1% response is considered excellent. - not sales, but response at all. Assets of character are more often a liability if not actually despised. All things being equal, with no advantageous connections, considerable attraction or draw, popularity or glowing reputation, the circumstances are scarcely any different in marketing oneself in life: The statistics are no less appalling. How joyless!  What a chore and a bore! Indeed, likewise, even at all favorable response, tends to fall short of closing the deal. It doesn't work because it cannot work. Most commonly recommended social success strategies of propinquity amount, in marketing terms, to repeated exposure and focus upon whatever target demographic, with whatever marketing appeal, blatant or innocuous, fair or foul, honest or dishonest. But the odds remain appalling, like unto the proverbial deep and dry well. The hopelessness of the situation is mocked by very exhortation to positive thinking and even prayer. Often, people are so solitary, insular and just don't seem to want to mingle, much less to connect. Why do they even go out in public? Often people only pretend at social outreach, actually only rendezvousing with others with whom they are already well acquainted. Outsiders remain outsiders.

Initiative has been quashed and rendered moot. Simply reaching out, engaging and forming attachments, whether in making plans together and following through or in rising to sheer hedonistic spontaneity, can all be so difficult because by and large, few people are truly value maximizers. To begin with, so many people are not even robust in pleasure seeking, much less rational agents of self-interest let alone of altruistic yearning of being needed. Positive Disintegration, being individual reformulation and reprioritization of one's own core values, hence the dawning of Menschlichkeit, which is the art of being a mensch, a person of creditable humaneness and integrity, sympathetic, trustworthy, respectful and moral in perception and action, all as characteristic of autonomy, alas remains exceptional. Thus the question is begged: In every Ecclesiastical sore travail, for whom then do we bereave ourselves of good?

All manner of people and circumstance are harmful in so many different ways, but there is particular vulnerability to self-esteem and sense of power, not merely from abuse of power or humiliation in and of itself, but in shrinking self-restraint, self-control, submission, compliance, conforming to situation, backing down, especially to those most beneath contempt; all thus belittled, duller and mincing ones words in cognitive dissonance; all as bullies laugh up their sleeves. And such is life. But under such circumstances, one can only question oneself: Whatever threat averted or opportunity accrued, is it all really worth one's dignity? One cannot but nurse the festering grudge, therefore feeling only the more petty and helpless.

The Delphic maxim to know thyself remains an admonition to humility and knowing thy place. But people don't need to be pushed around and pigeon holed. That is not the truth to set us free. The liberating truth to set us free, shall be discovered upon any path unto an experience of gratification and fulfillment, the way of optimal stimulus struggle. Social and intellectual stimuli no less than any other stimuli, serve to gratify innate intrinsic stimulus appetites, entirely distinct from conditional strokes, controlling extrinsic punishment and rewards of coercive behaviorally conditioned response to social cues often glorified as social intelligence or social cognition, hierarchically predictive, submissive intimidation and taking a hint, knowing and accepting where one stands. Brothers and sisters, set that burden down! 

According to Social Failures and Social Solutions: Evidence from OkCupid Social failures involve social interactions, such as affect, social support and advice giving; [...] Social failures are social interactions that do not occur, but would make two or more people better off if they did. [...] Social failures capture the difference between interactions that do happen and those that should happen.  Information access and management is also a crucial factor, because inaccessibility of information is also a kind of social failure. Some social failures are more important than others, depending upon what might be at stake in making connections and forging relationships. And there remain many possible causes and factors in social failure, even short of pandemic bullying outright, including all manner of obstacles and social restrictions on interaction and relationship. In particular, going out alone entails a great deal of awkward killing time. Indeed, not to digress, major problems needing to be addressed by whatever means, include prudery, sexism, and prevailing intimidation and resultant inhibition and reticence to break the ice and make first contact, especially on the part of women towards men. All in all, social life seems less of a conduit than a filter to be navigated or or barrier to be overcome. 

“If I continually get a door wrong, is it my fault? No. In fact, if you continually get it wrong or if other people continually get it wrong, it’s a good sign that it’s a really bad door.”
 
—  Don Norman as cited in: Frustration is a design opportunity 

Beloved cartoon character Wile E. Coyote, self declared "super genius," is the obsessive and unteachable embodiment of lunatic perseverance. And we can all relate! Misattributed variously to Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin and Mark Twain, and nevertheless well familiar to Wile E. Coyote's creator, renowned Existentialist influenced animator Chuck Jones, the earliest known appearance of the saying is to be found in the mystery novel 'Sudden Death' by Rita Mae Brown: The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Repeated failure more reasonably ought to inspire renewed feasibility study and the quest for more viable strategy. The most common approach is in seeking to correct incorrect procedure and meet prevailing expectations, often with insane persistence and perseverance in the face of failure and disappointment. In the words of Coco Chanel “Don’t spend time beating on a wall hoping it will transform into a door.” Any specific advice effectively accepts as premise whatever raft of often unstated and unchallenged implicit general assumptions as to cause and effect tendencies. But lunatic faith in whatever entrenched rightthink notwithstanding, so long as the general premise remains Empirically false, even fractally wrong, then whatever conclusion cannot actually follow, and the soundness of whatever perhaps therfore dubious advice may then comes into question. Or if there are more causal factors, then that might tend to reduce the reliability and efficacy of said over simplistic advice. Much unchallenged common sense is generally false or causally inadequate, and the accepted advice quite useless and futile Existentially Absurd bait-and-switch!  For bait-and-switch is when the chimerical allure of one good and howsoever advantageous terms, is dangled out to beguile and ensnare the mark into resignation, defeat, and Transaction for some other, lesser and more costly approximation entirely. Then desperate hopes may endure, of later someday somehow trading it all in for ones actual hearts desire and thus recovering ones own long lost and craven bartered soul. Whereas: If You Desire Anything You've Never Had, Try Something You've Never Done.  Bravoes the ready and conventional options set before us are all painful and pointless!     

“People don’t like to think, if one thinks, one must reach conclusions. Conclusions are not always pleasant.”  — Helen Keller

In personality psychology, locus of control denotes degree to which one tends to believe that one possess control over the outcome of events in life, as opposed to external forces beyond individual control. Indeed, it has been found that lonely isolation and depression may engender prediction that outreach will only fail. And it has also been observed that pessimism, negative thinking, even depression, is often more realistic without normal face saving delusion in defense of self-esteem. Indeed, pessimists may be on to something: Experimentally, it has been discovered that people who are depressed, more accurately gauge reality including their own control, or lack thereof, over circumstances, than others do, This phenomena has been dubbed: depressive realism, sadder and wiser, less susceptible to manipulation and deluded wishful thinking. For the big lie of willful positivity rosily distorts perception, and no good will cone therefrom. In the struggles of social life, so frustratingly bored and lonely, all too many experience an outcomes gap, meaning: no results no matter one one does. But why so? Because, tautologically, there can be no unilateral self-made bootstrap well-formed plan defined as a plan wherein an individual all alone has fairly complete control over every well defined step in execution thereof, and thereby assured of success.

In the famous words of Henry David Thoreau: “Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.” Patience and persistence go unrewarded. People who find themselves excluded, feel superfluous and struggle to feel needed. Alas however, opportunity remains scarce, seldom resulting or arising, and even more seldom coming to any fruition. But how are so many entrapped into such heartbreaking sore travail and futility? Answer: Obviously, by the persistence of myth. - some or other prevailing and enduring expectation howsoever to the contrary of Empirical reality. And because, under the spell of the great collective autopilot, no real planning and investigative research of feasibility study is ever encouraged. But how so and why? Answer: Predictions of whatever howsoever more rosy outcomes may ensue from poorly understood correlations, even weak correlations, so that fairly mindless mimicry of superficial habits of howsoever popular or successful people, might not necessarily thereby actually reproduce whatever their popularity or success for anyone else. Whatever accepted guarantees relied upon by recently preceding generations are so quickly evaporating one way or another. And we all know it! This is nothing new. In truth, social success often depends so greatly upon luck and favoritism. The result is often increasing despair, defeat and alienation from conventional options in life. Life is neither a sprint nor marathon, but wandering lost from one another in a convoluted maze full of dead ends, not just erroneous and incorrect, merely wrong, but fractally wrong: Manifestly Absurd, dead wrong in examination and scrutiny from every conceivable perspective or Point of View and at every possible scale of resolution from macro to nano and everywhere in between!  Indeed, to quote Henry Louis Mencken: “there is always a well-known solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong.”

Indeed, according to the World Health Organization, depression became the leading cause of disability in the world during 2010. Many who in their hearts question status quo, surely yearn for some path towards subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding from critical reexamination of prevailing expectations and procedures. But this remains unheard of taboo in context of the individual striving for what is called, most generally, social success. For such is the ubiquity of the cult of socialization. Perhaps in truth its all just a racket after all, serving the vested interests of a privileged few and their toadies, and not the interests of the masses, indeed of each individual, as it so blithely pretends. A racket, after all, is any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality a scam or fraud, a deceptive practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for the benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many. And one old racket is artificial scarcity: The masses will always comply in ever greater effort and diligence jumping through hoops and fighting amongst ourselves for scraps, believing and rationalizing just about anything, eagerly taking the bait of whatever artificial scarcity and bait-and-switch, no matter how plainly contrived and controlled.

To quote Martin Luther King, Jr.: A nation or civilization that continues to produce soft-minded men purchases its own spiritual death on the installment plan." For in the words of Wolfgang Goethe “Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least”  Indeed, as Socrates so famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. Such is the quest for meaning without which no pleasurable engagement is sustained, and only mounting alienation remains. Indeed, it is the oppressor, in all of his guises, who in whatever lies and subterfuge, exhorts the masses to cast aside all values and principles and quite simply not to think or to criticize. Just as with PR for gambling, there will always be the handful of big winners to be held up as shining example of somehow beating the odds. In every walk of life, in broken travesty of genuine and vital competitive spirit. there will always be that handful of eager approval seekers that thrive on whatever abuse and excel. So, why can't we all be just like them? How are those all important good work habits acquired? Our rôle models in every conventional option in life, the star student, ideal employee, perfect disciple or model prisoner alike, are all characterized, beyond mere responsive obedience and passivity otherwise, not only by every obsessive-compulsive eager beaver sore travail, but boundlessly committed initiative in anticipation of their superior's desires, "paying one's dues" life long, excelling without complaint or resistance, never seeking attention by requesting explanation or assistance. Exactly such adaptation of enthusiastic approval seeking, still held up as exemplary in order to vindicate systemic failure and disappointment in most every walk of life, remains, by hierarchical design, indeed the benchmark that for better or worse, most of us will come short and fall by the wayside, make do, for each to learn their place.

As must be expected under any ever so feverish societal paradigm of figuratively cutting the allegorical foot to metaphorically fit the proverbial shoe, in making ones way in life, the standard alternatives on offer are all so very dystressful, alienating and ego dystonic sublimation, Existential bait-and-switch. Individual self-esteem suffers under the injustice of any social system that presses the individual to feel responsible for circumstances that most of us simply cannot possibly even begin to control. Most oppressive remains pandemic bullying and victim blaming. Consensus manipulation in particular, is a bitter betrayal. One way or another, social influences takes control out of the hands of the individual nevertheless treated as fully responsible for what becomes of them in society. Open to all,  FoolQuest.com strives for any more feasible course of interaction with a great deal less anguish, something at all fun and interesting, a modest beginning merely from the modest responsibility of holding up one's own end of a conversation, Dialectically.

Not surprisingly, when indeed social failure is analyzed by experts in terms of problems one way or another inherent or systemic within the very framework of society at large, the needs for change is typically addressed in that very context, in society as broadly as feasible, by whatever social programs of fairly sweeping change or at least by fairly extensive programs of intervention howsoever deemed relevant. But wholesale intervention, let alone massive programs of sweeping and definitive social change, remain far beyond the power and reach of most individuals alone. Only the extremely well connected have any such clout. There remains no transparent and readily available  guidance and resources of effective organization, for the rest of us. And so, in the meantime, the individual will still be prevailed upon to adapt and make do, one way or another. But this is an all or nothing dichotomy, a false dilemma. Change beyond individual power alone, may begin within any more narrow social context. And just as the smallest social alignment, is any relationship between individuals, the smallest unit of social process is of any particular one to one interaction or conversation.  

In the alternatives to such irresponsible aimless over reliance upon propinquity and social skills of collective membership most broadly, by which the individual is so beset with such unjustly impossible social responsibility, there are certain obvious, competent and responsible practices seemingly better at all accepted in professional life than in personal life. We need to reclaim and regain certain rudimentary lost and atrophied executive function and become at all better organized at making contacts, following up intentionally, purposefully and systematically, convivially maintaining interaction. Of course, all such efforts remain futile, unilaterally. There is no viable beginning, in solitary self-help/improvement. Nor can the lone individual implement wholesale intervention or massive programs of sweeping social change in order to reshape the world at large to their own comfort.

But in that acquaintances come to form at all more closely knit social circles or individuals look for all manner of social groups to join, thus there can be any possible middle ground between lonely and powerless self-reliance on the one hand, and broadest social integration let alone the inception of massive programs of sweeping social change on the other: Smaller social circles or relationships of two or more individuals, often tend to forge their own social contracts amongst themselves. Though again, there are polar extremes and alarming dysfunction: On the one hand, group dynamics may be unimaginatively bound to prior socialization, or else on the other hand abandoning all propriety, they may co validate and normalize any conceivable deviance no matter how senseless and destructive. Both extremes remain depressingly common. Indeed, elements of both may often coexist and manifest in the group dynamics of the self same social circle. Indeed, there may often be found no more staunch conformists than the most flagrant deviants, and no deeper conviction than such blithely Absurd hypocrisy in desperate mimesis of all that one can never truly be. Can it be that we are all missing the true social engineering design opportunity in microcosm? Because there remains a rare third option in ever actually crafting an an agenda of modest beginnings in disruptive innovation and Positive Disintegration via creative solution finding in order better even to begin coming to grips with the challenge before us of improving our lives by actually deciding how we wish to interact. Now, there's a social skill we don't often hear about! -an extreme competence  of autonomy rather than of heteronomy...  

The cutting edge of Psychological research lately finds itself ever more in closest concurrence with wisdom of the sages of old rediscovered, regarding the very nature of authentic wellbeing or: Eudemonia, that is innately the target of most relevant intrinsic motivation. Because this pertains to needs of human nature universally, therefore in theory, the present agenda should be of intense interest and priority to everyone and anyone, indeed, to all humanity. In practice however, it all only matters to a precious few. Go figure. 

Am I your unmet friendAs observed of capable and happy people, let's talk more seriously! I might no have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? Without the all-consuming social rat race, what shall we do with ourselves together? What will keep us occupied just long enough simply for metaphorically breaking the proverbial ice? To answer a question with another question: What is important to you? What makes life worth living? In short, whither aręte? What are the conditions of implementation? And what are even the minimal requisite social resources of smaller group dynamics?  It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

Spoiler alert! What follows is one answer to these above questions in the abstract, and thence practical solution finding to these above problems. Gentle readers, unmet friends: You may prefer not to read any further right now, but instead wish to put it off and see what answers you can each and/or together come up with by yourselves, anything entirely different and uninfluenced.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Universal nerd-love:

Optimal reciprocal engagement: Intellectual Stimulation & the Essence of a Woman Is socially awkward nerd-love truly the best love?

When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along?

 

Reversing the boredom prone loneliness of intelligence and creativity

Happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating , strategically, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in controversy and feasibility study, with civility as autonomous equals in optimal reciprocal engagement. Happy people thrive in autonomy, succeed, prosper, and are more productive, likely to choose creative activities and cooperation, deriving fulfillment in meaningful and pleasurable engagement. But which is cause and which is effect? That remains unclear merely from the discovered correlation. It is, however, readily observed that the people who find it the easiest to make friends and forge new connections, commonly live better rounded and richer lives to begin with. Happiness comes in in the Menschlichkeit of unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility and genuine autonomy in meeting ones needs for capable interaction and agenda setting with even adequately responsible others, in true spirit of friendship and honesty, making progress every day as a real mensch. The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. It remains so disheartening  many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.  

Alfred North Whitehead once remarked that all of Philosophy is a merely series of footnotes to Plato who liberally transcribed the famous dialogues of his beloved mentor Socrates. Indeed, the cutting edge scientific discovery that happy people talk more seriously, would hardly have come as any surprise to the most venerated of all the sages of antiquity, Socrates who so famously declared: “An unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.” And the intelligent and sensitive are indeed at greater risk of painful loneliness. And yet, we remain in the minority, even amongst the lonely. The lonely, by and large tending towards inept and uncaring misanthropic superficiality, eager marks for all of that popularity snake oil, seemingly reach consensus upon two fundamentals: Firstly, that loneliness is awful, just the worst thing. Second, that at all times, we must keep all conversation light! And the irony entirely escapes them all. The very notion even to question such cretin norms of heteronomy that have served them all so extremely poorly, simply never occurs.

Pleasure + engagement + meaning = fulfillment

The appeal to sheer herd behavior: When the masses submit to emotional distance and lonely boredom even in a crowd, and nothing seems to matter, herd mentality is what most people will respond to by default with no second thought and even actually cooperate, after a fashion, by interacting at all. And when all glittering generality, bait and preamble is stripped away, what will be dredged up remains the common popularity advice of heteronomy to the effect that in order ever to make true close friends, alone and starting from scratch, first one must long and arduously cultivate and establish many distant casual acquaintances, even for up to a year or more, full time. And this is a challenge to coherent planning and purposeful persistence, going far beyond contrivance of whatever casual appearances. But nothing genuine or substantive can ever be shared or revealed that might risk unpopularity. Furthermore, unless they are already acquainted with one another, these contacts in turn must be invited to socialize together in order in turn be introduced to one another in order to begin forming a social circle. Indeed, there can be safety in numbers, and therefore unwillingness to network may be one among several very real warning signs of untrustworthy scheming of social isolation, bullying and exploitation. But any recommended programs of facile and dull social outreach is costly in every way, highly skilled and therefore so much easier said than done, otherwise vastly unreliable, often phony and actually destructive in many ways, profoundly dishonest, lonely and boring recognizance under enemy surveillance, bereft of any glimpse into another's inner life, the unguarded and reciprocal understanding called: psychological visibility, an innate human social need. Alas however, only once this awful, long and tedious pretense is fully executed, will true friends ever be able to find one another. Since antiquity, the endurance of protracted boredom remains the test of compliance and conformity. Because the program never fails, you fail the program! And if you don't like it, you must be defective to be culled into social oblivion! Are there then truly no other alternatives to living such a dystressing lie?

Relationship, especially friendship, let alone anything more, arises only as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication,  not impulsively or compulsively, but deliberately and intentionally, and above all, not to be deferred as as any hoped for objective or reward, but undertaken immediately as the only viable beginning. This is because relationship such as love and friendship, is predicated upon attachment, and attachment can only begin, first of all, from engagement. Needlessly opaque and convoluted purpose defeating heteronymous snake oil of social skills brainwash and granfalloon membership pipedreams have got the cart before the horse! Friendship first arises, rather than somehow culminating later on in whatever hoped for eventual pay off or extrinsic reward, but only as a byproduct of engagement, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility in substantive, free and coherent communication, exploration, and/or form purposeful interaction and endeavor, even play enfolding its own intrinsic purpose, all replete with the dignity of social risk, with trust, security, ultimately openness in yielding to temptation, all the aforesaid that are the competencies of autonomy, along with executive function of organization and congenial social grace to manage and sustain contacts, reciprocally. Rather, genuine relationship, free and deepening exchange, tacitly agenda driven and transparent, in collaboration among equal. That may be why, as has been discovered, happy people talk more seriously. This would come as no surprise to Socrates, who so famously declared that: “An unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.

To quote Neil Gabler: “American society is a society in which individuals have learned to prize social skills that permit them, like actors, to assume whatever rôle the occasion demands and to "perform" their lives rather than just live them.” Competent or incompetent, whether in true hardnosed practicality or in sheer aimless and empty actingout of mimesis, many all the same remain no less consumed with the burning question of how to perform as expected and to fit in: How best to placate The Great Faceless They, thereby to obtain the key to life.

For such remains the slave mentality of Homo Domesticus, the domesticated human. Indeed, much as they may deny it even to themselves, they are fully buying in, figuratively gulping down the proverbial Kool-Aid! And even bringing into question such secret deep-seated dedication may be as alarming to them as revelation that there is no Santa Claus and no fellowship with God. Social success and friendship are antithetical. This is because friendship is genuine, substantive and intimate, while social success depends upon facile superficiality and keeping distance. Therefore the inherent contradiction remains insurmountable, irresolvable in very principle, and nothing but a setup for frustration, failure and craven exhortation to lowered expectations and making do.  Social success and social failure only isolate the individual in different ways. This may be why finding connection is so uncertain, unreliable and requires such open ended investment of time, effort and dedication, with persistence and discipline all glossed over in prevailing simplistic discourse and blithe optimism. Endurance of precisely such monotony and dystress serves to weed out boredom prone unconventional creative thinkers in order to preserve status quo. Hence the need of fundamentally subversive innovation in the reinvention of social life.

The true key to friendship and happiness flies directly in the face of all callow and cynical social success formulae of anti-intellectual positive attitude and keeping things light with interminable idle small talk. So ego alien, flying in the face of all gregarious human impulse, the trial, the test, the sore travail of socially acceptable conduct is entirely predicated upon heteronymous conformist toleration, cultivation and maintenance of distance. lonely boredom and frustration . All hence, people are either unhappy because of the isolation and loneliness of not fitting in, or else they are unhappy precisely because of the purpose defeating superficial disconnected loneliness even amid the crowd, so bereft of all psychological visibility and distant of all emotional connection, of indeed even consummate social dexterity and fitting in. And any such can only offer meaningless unfulfilling distraction at very best, and mounting bitter anguish of futility at worst. Damned if you do, damned if you don't!

Therefore, either way, distance, frustration and perseverance upon an ocean of such ongoing backhanded rejection, will never redeem itself or deliver the goods! Clearly, this remains an Absurd and futile no-win scenario. Conventional social interaction has entered the normative death throws in the devolution of complex systems, bereft of all external relevance. Therefore, not just exclusion, but paradoxically even inclusion as well, actually isolates.  Hence we contend then with textbook alienation inherent to heteronomy: We confront a process seemingly designed to press the individual to do everything the opposite of what we all really need to do and to be. It must then come as little surprise how any such arduous social success frequently comes, if ever at all, so often only at the cost of all happiness, so anathema and typically obstructed by such drone-like heteronymously arbitrary social acumen, skilled incompetence and cronyism, that everywhere buttresses the tacit institutionalization and twisted value of all the most flagrant insensitivity and ineptitude imaginable, the bad driving out the good, and worse, actingout the destructive evil that is rampant bullying. Indeed, as we have seen, gregariousness and engaging personality may even be reviled as subversive and impertinent to a malagenda of sheer heteronymous group validation in sheer denial of all such profound endemic and pandemic Orwellian alienation from the innate and intrinsic drives of human expression, connection and attachment.The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia,i n the Menschlichkeit of  meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others.

Why Nerds Are Unpopular  

All manner of people, circumstance and dishonesty can be harmful in so many different ways, but there is particular vulnerability to self-esteem and sense of power, not merely from abuse of power or humiliation in and of itself, but in shrinking in restraint, self-control, frustrated secret desire, submission, compliance, conforming to expectation, backing down to others, especially to those most beneath contempt; all thus belittled, duller and mincing ones words in cognitive dissonance; all as bullies continue laughing up their sleeves. And such is life. But under such circumstances, one can only question oneself: Whatever threat averted or opportunity accrued, is it all really worth one's dignity? One cannot but nurse the festering grudge, feeling only the more petty and helpless. The will to power is frustrated. And that's what moral restraint gets you! So, exactly what kind of morality is that after all, that perpetually enables demeaning evil? Such is what Nietzsche curses as: slave mentality. One cannot but despair: Just what is the point?

George Orwell illuminatingly fathomed how the stifling reciprocal and prevailing dishonesty of heteronomy to the chimera of collective membership remains ever antithetical to the vital honesty of autonomy and friendship. And in glorified resignation to heteronomy ever endures such dishonest industry in the extol of blissful sublime apathy. But in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: “Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.”  And to make action possible, personal freedom in practice beyond mere abstraction, accrues from individual power requiring both capability for feasible action, and autonomy which is individual temperament from which to take initiative. For the masses of humanity, in the mastery of consummate dexterity or in the ill fitting awkward wont, either way, all of the devious and toxic headgames of heteronomy to conventional social skills make us all miserable. 

“We cleave tightly to reassuring notions of what normal people are like, which means we exclude a lot – often the richest bit – of what we truly feel, want and think. We edit out our more generous, wilder, more impatient, more terrifying sides; leaving only the socially admissible husk that we artfully pretend is who we are. And simultaneously, we ensure that we are never far from something that can take us powerfully away from ourselves, and so miss out on the troubling wonders that streak across the mental horizon at every instant. 

Are Intelligent People More Lonely? 

As is explained therein, by intelligent people, what is meant is not merely more intelligent or capable, but especially those better self-aware in Emotional Intelligence. Whereas people in society are repressed, superficial and therefore lonely together, by contrast art is profound. For people of greater depth, in our solitude, the cultural record, the arts and sciences, can be turned to for helping to fill that stifling void in social life, thereby making do in our loneliness. But this argument once advanced, the self proclaimed School of Life hucksters disappointingly seems to be missing their own point. Are they even actually searching for any new problem statement towards any more innovative solutions, or only working up a more intriguing lead in just pitching nothing new at all? - merely putting a fresh coat of paint, so to speak, on everything so conventional and shopworn? Because the vaunted School of Life only falls back upon just marketing all of the same old same old. Alas, there can never be any merely intrapsychic solution to such a dire deficiency so entrenched in the very milieu, not any self-help/improvement or the most productive psychotherapy. All precisely because exactly as has been so passionately argued, the desired prize is simply not on offer. Much as even somewhat to the frustration of Sigmund Freud himself, any modality of Psychotherapy can only treat the individual patient, not the society, the environment, that deprives and traumatizes us all in the first place.

How then can any submissive regimen of sensitivity training help overcome the repressive superficiality of social life, given indeed that it is sensitivity which is frustrated and punished in society in the first place? How then, in very principle, might human interaction and social life better fill its disastrously abrogated function? And by what conceivable practical implementation? And where to start? To reiterate, breaking isolation must begin Dialectically, only by together setting agenda for the desperately missing and needed happily serious strategic conversation and feasibility study in quest of fulfillment. Well, at least its not more Behavior Modification! Again, much as with Transactional Analysis, if whatever prevailing mode of social interaction remains inadequate to fulfillment, then some better more fulfilling mode of social interaction must must be devised and put into practice. And to that end, if as so often the case, wide scale reform will not be immediately feasible, then some smaller relatable group of participants must organize and assemble.

Predictions may ensue from poorly understood correlations, even weak or simplistic correlations, so that superficial imitation of habits even as Empirically observed of the popular and successful might not reliably reproduce success at will or even at all. Standard common sense social advice, unserious, so bereft of genuine unguarded reciprocal psychological visibility, hence purpose defeating and unhappy, makes unquestioned and perhaps willfully naive and often simplistic common sense general assumptions about how social connections come about. But what if, even fundamentally, precisely such assumptions simply are not true? If so, then predictions, strategy and advice premised thereupon, may not be at all reliable. Not surprisingly then, many experience an outcomes gap, meaning: no results no matter one one does. Social success often depends so greatly upon luck and favoritism. Perhaps in truth its all just a racket after all, serving the vested interests of a privileged few and their toadies, and not the interests of the masses, indeed of each individual, as it so blithely pretends. What is need is to connect and make our own luck. And we need to know what we are doing

Epistemologically, Methodologically, truth remains an Empirical question of predicted outcomes refutable by observable results contrary to whatever said predictions. Truth is correspondence to concrete external reality in assertions. But validity is only internal self consistency within statements of abstract logic. Therefore logical validity alone is not transitive to truth. In any application of logic to external reality, a valid conclusion is actually true only given that both the major and minor premi in a syllogism are both each true in the first place. Advice typically predicts specific desired results from particular recommended actions. Thus advice typically ensues from some particular more narrow and specific minor premise, being whatever specific circumstances, and given some prior major premise, being some broader general principle or assumption. Any plan rests upon whatever assumption. Advice predicts specific results under specific circumstances, following whatever general principle or broader assumptions. Any specific advice therefore rests upon whatever implicit general assumptions as to consistent cause and effect under whatever prevailing circumstances or situation. The plan, the advice, will be no more than specific application thereof. But if whatever said generality is false, then the advice or recommendations in whatever specific application thereof, no matter the specific situation or objective, cannot logically follow. Or if there are more causal factors, then such insufficient causality might tend to reduce any reliable efficacy of predictions, strategy and the most common sense advice premised thereupon.

For example: Practice of sympathetic magic is traditionally contingent upon the long refuted principles of similarity and contiguity. Indeed in the ritualistic practice and  magical thinking of toxic and sanctioned authoritarian socialization, education and dysfunctional child rearing, it may often be assumed that since fear may be taken to resemble respect, then the inculcation of fear will eventually mature into genuine, sincere and abiding respect, and that the discipline of obedience will slowly but surely bleed though, transfer and blossom into individual self-discipline, responsibility and autonomy, debilitating guilt into into motivating empathy, and so on.

Of course, this very doctrinal con game of Existential bait-and-switch long stands refuted, debunked and exposed,  psychologically. It should come as little surprise to anyone, then, that Orwellian willful positivety, no less than blind faith, so undermines happiness, and that docile behavioral compliance is so isolating and lonely, even in all of it's most heady togetherness. But the conviction that blind faith resembles and therefore cultivates confidence, and that doubt resembles and therefore invites despair, renders the most obvious thoughts, even the proverbial elephant in the room,  so blithely taboo, subversive and threatening to peace and order. Indeed the entire toxic panic to the effect that freedom is anarchy and anarchy is strife, demands heteronomy to authority for the sake of very survival and in order to forestall debilitating anxiety, mass panic, utter chaos and complete disaster. The very notion of collaboration among equals as advocated here on FoolQuest.com, thereby becomes quite incomprehensible and inconceivable

 

When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along?

The very notion of collaboration among equals

I might no have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?

Alas that collaboration among equals remains literally inconceivable under the mindset of heteronomy to authoritarianism, because uniformity of consensus is so blithely and unquestioningly accepted as indispensable for cooperation at all. And such consensus of course, as the indispensable benefit of submission to undisputed leadership.

Indeed, the average person, inexperienced of anything more vibrant and meaningful, has become blithely jaded and accustomed to a profound social, emotional and intellectual deprivation in which so many of us find ourselves imprisoned. Effort and struggle may be all quickly dismissed and condemned as mere hardship, intolerable frustration and Existential futility. But there can also be the true life human drama of progress and satisfaction, growth, self-definition and discovery, perhaps even success. For in the words of Friedrich Nietzsche: “Happiness is the feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” Besides, exactly what are the alternatives? There has always been the extol of unearned trust and powerless surrender as the way to happiness, the choice only between acceptance and despair, merely flavors of the same intimidation.

In the famous words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” FoolQuest.com is an outreach toward the formation of just such a core group of unreasonable people applying ourselves even to the most daunting problems besetting us. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. 

Power, for good or evil, constructively or destructively, begins from the process of influence upon one another that actually reshapes the surrounding social environment, even changing the world. Alas, dronelike compliant social participation seldom actually solicits or grants input or influence into collective decision making, no matter what sort of group or activity one joins into. And this renders the exercise meaningless. Unilateral action is largely powerless, drastically limited in scope and impact upon individual life much less society at large. And slavish submission to alienating social institutions tends to be senseless, debilitating and Absurd in every way. Transactional Analysis begins to recognize that only improvement in the manner in which anyone relates to one another has any bearing. FoolQuest.com explores broader agenda for collaboration among equals in autonomy, deemed inconceivable under prevailing heteronomy that so dreads only chaos and discord, save by even slavish acquiescence to firm guidance and confident leadership in order to prevent error and assure success.

Of course there can be no guarantee of success, but there can often be guarantee of futility in the production and consumption of mendacious irresponsible guarantees. Heteronomy in society frequently presses the individual to choose between compliance in order to fit in, or the pursuit of rugged Individualism in order to get by, going it alone, unless they are not merely howsoever gifted, but specifically and considerably talented. Because only above average accomplishment commands any better terms. And beyond merely whatever above average accomplishment, for the consummately well qualified person of destiny who's extreme success earns them recognition and authority conferring the power of decision making, thence must accrue the loneliness of command.

But in the alternative, entirely another paradigm is that of collaboration among equals. Autonomy and collaboration among equals will tend to make higher demands upon and responsibility than does heteronomy, but in return may offer any true acceptance without oppressive conditionality, escaping thereby both the debilitating idiocy of fitting in and the daunting limitations of rugged isolation. But this too, all the more, will be easier said than done. 

In those words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought. Alas that in such reciprocal contempt, thinking and doing remain all too often segregated in our institutional mentality. The result is a great deal of thought gone to no practical avail, and a great deal of ill considered action so blithely undertaken. To quote Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower: “Plans are nothing, planning is everything.” And let no one imagine that planning, action or happiness are ever improved by preasure to choose between conformity or social isolation. In the words of Benjamin Disraeli: “Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” It remains, however, that self-help/improvement and social skills remediation are all nothing but delusion and denial of Existential Absurdity. You are not in control of your life, any more than I am in control of mine. We all find ourselves completely at the whim of uncooperative others in every facet of our lives. And everyone within reach to seek help from, is simply too insecure even to fight for their very lives, much less to stand up for one another. Put more simply then, and in complete good faith, powerlessness, the impotent helplessness of the human condition is terminally demeaning. And even beyond direct action, our influence upon others may often be even the more misguided and deluded. Gentle reader, unmet friend: Where is there to be found, any beginning of collaboration among equals? Thinking in terms of action, in order to act more thoughtfully, there remains only one precious beginning, immediately, over which we, I and thou, may indeed together take responsibility and share any control at all: And that is interaction between ourselves, specifically just discussion at all to begin with, and setting an agenda thereto. Because. in the words of Janine Garner, “Failing to engage Is engaging with failure. And indeed, all heteronomy is but craven and futile pseudo-engagement.

Speaking of heteronymous pseudo-engagement, what has even been called: Totalitarian Interactivity, notwithstanding whatever illusion of choice, metaphorically leads the site visitor about by the proverbial nose, channeling attention step by step, into whatever the target audience is intended to consider most important. And unless there seems to be any reason for suspicion or ambivalence, simply knowing what to do relieves dystress. But FoolQuest.com garners attention so rarely if at all, only in so far as content is seen, saliently and evocatively, to address whatever particular interests and concerns of the individual site visitor motivated in whatever their own personal dystress and thereby guided to chart their own course through these hypertexts, autonomously and independently. And so, whatever good accrues, as yet little collaboration actually results or endures. Such indeed is the ineffectual anarchy as per all dire predictions from heteronomy, all for wont of uncritical unity under leadership authority. Can we do better?

It may be despite rare favorable response to content, to the discovery of information deemed useful or the ebullience of sentiments shared, all plans of action proposed here on FoolQuest.com may nevertheless often still meet with rejection out of hand as taboo. After all, drawing attention by open criticism of status quo, let alone actually fighting back against abuse, is always risky and intimidating. But then, generally speaking, most of what is seldom or never tried and remains obscure no matter how actually quite promising and effective, only remains so neglected because of taboo, one way or another. For taboo raises conditioned dystress. And taboo need not be all that dramatic, nameless pathos calling attention to itself. Taboo is an expression of ambivalence. Small wonder then, ambivalence regarding taboo, and taboo upon ambivalence. Taboo can be a knee-jerk or a blind spot of crimestop FNORD . And if difficult personal objectives are not to be achieved only by long and arduous and onerous conformity, compliance and self-sacrifice, then any path to success can only be ferreted out by creativity, the eustress and sustainable euphoria of curiosity, investigation, feasibility study and risk assessment, along any path less taken, into those very realms of taboo thought, in quest of that proverbial better mousetrap.

Helpful to one another with all whereof oneself struggles even without answers, expertise or authority, autonomy and collaboration among equals fosters relationship and not objectification so characteristic of heteronomy to hierarchical dominance. And where does any of that begin, if not between any two or more individuals?  As shall be demonstrated, sustained engagement in the present strategic Dialectic and feasibility study, can be key to the first glimmer of happiness. If you've got a better offer, then take it.   Here we are, I and thou. Why hesitate: Let's talk it over. This is important. I look forward to hearing from you.

 
 
 
Inevitably salient trust issues pursuant to collaboration among equals
Too good to be true?  

A parable: Imagine a seminar on how to form a regulation bowling team. The great regulation bowling team formation guru, perhaps none other than The Dude Lebowski, regales the acolytes enthralled, with great purls of wisdom!  And the attendees assembled together share all manner of sensitive personal disclosure, reciprocally sworn to silence once the seminar adjourns. Because what happens and all that is said at the regulation bowling team formation seminar, stays at the regulation bowling team formation seminar. So solemnly vow do they all. And from the regulation bowling team organizing guru they learn the purportedly foolproof secrets towards each their similar objectives. Afterwards, eyes henceforth forever averted, they all quietly disperse, each once again alone, into the dark night of the soul, never to interact again, each having girded their loins for the solitary and arduous networking and recruitment outreach at hand.

Nobody at all even seems to have noticed that there were exactly enough people in the room right then and there, for the formation of a regulation bowling team! Easier said than done of course, but then, what isn't? Any notion of organizing, of intentional group formation, if not utterly ignored, is typically oversimplified so that the weak effort, stillborn, only drifts apart, entirely forgotten. Any serious innovation of intentional interaction by design, of tailor made social contract, remains unheard of.

Although it seems only fair enough to wonder, perhaps the author only so deplores and finds so baffling and distasteful some or other perfectly ordinary modes of human interaction that said author simply isn't very good at and with which said author has become extremely frustrated and embittered. And what an arrogant luzer! In my defense from any such even the most temptingly invited Ad Hominem, it should hardly come as any surprise to discover that anyone might ever prefer instead to play to whatever their own self perceived strengths, and would much prefer any imaginable setting, milieu or situation in any way at all more conducive thereto. And my intention is to pose that question, not only for myself, but also as to what that might mean for each of us, and how best to bring it about. For though the world often seems so rife and overrun with all those know-nothing know-it-alls, we seekers in life yet endure. And to reiterate, here on this website  FoolQuest.com, find my own subversive Message in a Bottle. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. 

Socialization, toxic and sanctioned, is that violence and neglect which none dare call: Indoctrination or brainwash. The doctrine of the cult of socialization turns upon what is called: osmosis, of "soaking up" memes even throughout childhood, a concept of intuition shaped by behavioral conditioning. Thence faith is placed in the Zen no-mind autopilot to provide for correct and normal living in heteronomy to uncritical second nature in an unexamined life. All manner of taboo questions thereby banished from very thought, deserve our fullest attention in order ever to achieve collaboration among equals. For as Socrates famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. And in the skepticism of rational science and systematic doubt, by default any hypothesis cannot be credible without compelling evidence in support. And thus, for example, supernatural claims will not be taken seriously until ever actually corroborated. But for believers in the paranormal, there is simply no knowing which scoundrel, in a world of charlatanry, might nevertheless somehow be blessed to work miracles. Thus in the antirational surreal malignant optimism of faith so famously embraced as the evidence of things unseen, does hope ever spring eternal, from the very reasoning by which the very search rightly ought to be abandoned as untenable, being premised as it is, upon entirely unreliable Epistemological Methodologically depending entirely upon miracle of its own in order ever to yield discovery; only consistent, after all, with most religion, wherein religious knowledge itself is proclaimed as only resultant from ancient miracle and prayer for miracle anew. Indeed, it turns out that the most far-fetched scams repelling to all but the most gullible, craftily induce only the most promising marks to self-select.

“The real confidence game feeds on the desire for magic, exploiting our endless taste for an existence that is more extraordinary and somehow more meaningful. [...] As long as the desire for, for a reality that is somehow greater than our everyday existence, remains, the confidence game will thrive” declares Maria Konnikova, author of 'The Confidence Game.' Because in the words of Friedrich Nietzsche: “If we have our own why in life, we shall get along with almost any how.” Konnikova's advice is never to be greedy for anything better and more easy, but always to pay full price in any of life's transactions. As if no one ever got the shaft that way! A racket is any dishonest scheme or ongoing transaction, all not as it contrives to present itself and as is tacitly accepted or endured by the majority of those involved, but in actuality a scam or fraud, a deceptive practice of coercion and manipulation conducted for the benefit of a few cronies at the expense of the many. Are not various rackets are even highly respectable confidence games of finesse, attrition and Existential bait-and-switch, all predicated upon the most conventional and pedestrian lowered expectations, and all just to avoid disappointment? Or are radically lowered expectations indeed our only salvation to realism? Indeed is all appeal to an existence that is more extraordinary and somehow more meaningful, all exploration into the very nature of uniquely individual peak experience, indeed the very discussion, by definition exactly such deception and exploitation, merely one sort of confidence game or another? Indeed, is Philosophy itself, as so often alleged, nothing more than the most ancient bait down ever the same primrose path, just hoping it will all make more sense later on?

Otherwise, what are the salient characteristics of the genuine article? One answer is that since the con game mimics the appearance of the genuine opportunity, therefore the true golden opportunity will be, at least at first blush, indeed indistinguishable from the facile con game.  And therefore, with any airtight scam, even the most skeptical and rigorous due diligence will only engage the mark all the more and suck them in ever deeper. Hence indeed it has been observed that the best defense is never to to take the bait if it seems too good to be true, and always simply to walk away, regardless of temptation and opportunity presented. Indeed vulnerability is costly, but so is chronic mistrust.

And yet, another answer is that the genuine quest for an existence that is more extraordinary and somehow more meaningful, may nevertheless quite simply lack the time honored allure of the con game, and may even therefore  be taken by many as a very inept con game indeed. Uncertainty and fallibility are notions that will never escape the lips of any seasoned confidence trickster, even however respectable, imagining themselves beyond every familiar deception of their own nefarious art. But those Fake it Till You Make it confidence tricksters themselves may often turn out to be the most vulnerable of all marks, yearning as they do, more than anyone else, for an existence that is greater and more extraordinary and somehow more meaningful.

As the saying goes: “A friend is someone who knows the song in your heart and can sing it back to you when you have forgotten the lyrics.” Alas, however, the worst most malignant untrustworthy yet profoundly understanding false friend may learn that very tune, even the more clear as bell. For there remain five enduring core human motivations for continually trusting the wrong people: To hook the mark, the untrustworthy individual appears as first to offer the understanding one so desperately craves, charismatic validation all one so one craves to believe about oneself, that at long last somebody finally recognizes and appreciates ones talents. Confidence is gained plumbing the depth of the nature of the gaps in one's confidence and self-esteem and all that one so longs to believe about oneself and one's life, all of that precise flattery, exactly one yearns to hear, so one follows them and omits due diligence. Alas, the outcome of trusting the wrong people, when it all goes so terribly wrong, can be most traumatic. Perhaps that at all helps explain how so many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

Now, the core pitch of FoolQuest.com may seem particularly laughable and indeed foolish, being so entirely insubstantial because of exactly the the frank honesty of any proposition of starting from scratch. Worse, its about starting from scratch together, responsibly, in Socratic Wisdom without pretense, embracing all due diligence of skepticism and systematic doubt without false reassurance. It's not much of a hook, unless that validation of fundamental competence that one one so dearly yearns for accrues only by way of friendship in autonomy. And the risk begins in even getting ones hopes up. Moreover, if even seems to be going well, there is no telling what greater escalating personal investment will be called for, including in all good conscience, every endeavor to draw in others as well. The initial investment is in the autonomy of Socratic Dialectic, the concerted effort of simply in holding up ones end of discussion over time.

As my father Professor Joseph Agassi was wont to observe, the world is divided into the knowers and the seekers, the know-it-alls and the skeptics. The knowers, all manner of know-it-all  gurus, their acolytes and social cognition, are everywhere. But to quote from the Tao Teh Ching by Lau Tzu: “Those who know do not speak. Those who speak do not know.” And indeed, some are more serious and reserved than others in their desperate undertaking of conformity, keeping their own counsel of whatever secrets they think that they have, and others more simplistic and delusional or cult like and hence more eager, mendacious and compulsively proselytizing. It's okay to be want to be persuasive. Only strive to be as rational, honest and open minded as you would have others be towards you. In fair play, the truth will out.

A coach or online guru,  leading the site visitor about by the nose, first needs to draw in the mark by making whatever often simplistic point, into further involvement and eventually whatever billable guidance. Whereas here on FoolQuest.com full access for all comes free of charge to all; and I respond personally to all inquiries. What then am I selling? It's more about what I am buying into. I am not trying to fob off anything on others, then standing apart and keeping my distance. I am offering my full participation for like in kind. This is all on the level without pretense, just another wannabe reaching out to fellow aspirants. I might no have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? Alas, the rare site visitors who are passionately interested, tend to be self-directed and find their own way through whatever content even actually to pour over, that one way or another, information or sentiment, that they will most strongly respond and relate to. And that's pretty damn good for just reading! But in the words of Benjamin Disraeli: “Action may not always bring happiness; but there is no happiness without action.” Alas that steadfast, trustworthy and respectful partners in collaboration remain even more scarce. I am sometimes recruited into the ill-fated projects proposed by others. This has taught me about the oft neglected fundamentals of functional and fulfilling collaboration towards success, what to expect, and all that prospective collaboration partners would be wise to discuss beforehand.

Any tremendously successful would be guru riding in on high horse, charismatically reaching out to uplift the hoi polio, is all too often in actuality naught but another scheming and exploitative charlatan. And yet for some reason, though precisely by contrast, my own manifest and life long candidly abject failure may nevertheless fail to reassure! It remains, however, that the influential might seem somewhat incompetent were they ever to endorse or invest in those unfortunates not only remaining ineffective at helping themselves, but who will not even show the world any effort towards constructive cooperation even just amongst ourselves, in seeking to investigate and address unmet needs. Gentle reader, unmet friend, let's just be adults: What you see is what you get. There are no tangible assets or celebrity endorsements. I have no credentials to show. You may be any kind of expert or not, but I myself claim no authority. I make no confident short term predictions. I present no impressive charts and graphs. I can't even do math. Content must therefore stand or fall upon whatever its own relevant merits. And I want to find out what you think, and not just how you react. I make no unrealistic promises. I'm still just another wannabe with a cable modem! So maybe I'm just kidding myself like everybody else. But what should I take seriously that you will not? I don't want your money or your devotion. There is no deadline or other such pressure. I am not here to psyche you up and then leave you in the lurch. Therefore do me similar kindness. At this juncture, I ask of you no more demanding investment than at all attentive reading and discussion: Dialectics including as ever required, whatever careful meta-discussion and clarification, upon ratification of the salient agenda at hand. And I do as much for others. But thank you, nevertheless. For in the words of Simone Weil: “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” We live in an attention economy. And in an attention economy, in the sheer exchange of attention, optimal reciprocal engagement, the prime agenda of this website, FoolQuest.com, remains in very principle perhaps the greatest bargain even conceivable. And to begin with, interaction with yours truly is a personal investment that tends to yield good returns. Indeed, without false modesty, this is one of the reasons that I make such a good friend. Gentle reader, I await your response ever with keen anticipation. And yet, for all to see, there is no hurry or pressure.

In any genuine opportunity, due diligence is crucial. Alas, to reiterate, ones own due diligence may function as the convincer drawing the mark into a well crafted and airtight scam or any trap of desire and wishful thinking. The safest thing may be just to walk away without another thought. Alas however, chronic mistrust may conceivably become costly in social failure, lost opportunity, isolation and vulnerability to exploitation. In the detection of danger, false positives may be costly. It often seems that we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. As life is so often said to be the journey and not just the destination, the challenge ever remains to travel well, so to speak. And that will be easier said than done. Alas, whatever one desires, if even actually feasible, there will often be a cost, a sacrifice for oneself or others, a price likely too high, even purpose defeating and therefore pointless, Absurd, one way or another; and some or other howsoever daunting risk as well. Indeed, Konnikova contends that only insistence upon paying whatever realistic full price at whatever expected sacrifice, affords protection from cons that purport to offer something for nothing. Further more, risk cannot be eliminated, only managed. Which brings us to any need for working agreement: There is only one thing, immediately, over which we, I and thou, may indeed together take responsibility and share any control at all: And that is the present taboo strategic discussion upon an agenda of how better to foster and cultivate ingenuity, innovation and liberating individual power over social life, putting our heads together in more effective collaboration, testing my own prediction that by talking more seriously with one another, we can indeed be at all happier even in the immediate short term, indeed that the very deliberation together, reciprocal engagement already breaking helplessness and lonely isolation, can therefore be found interesting and uplifting all on its own. And this seems like a small personal investment for something of any intrinsic value come what may. But there remains the risk of talking to strangers.

Therefore let us all only hope that we won't simply con ourselves! Let us then undertake any modicum of honest soul searching and feasibility study. Reciprocity at all will be undermined by sheer chronic mistrust and the toxic terror of somehow being taken in. For such inspires the boneheaded dysfunctionality of individual sabotage squandering group effort, veritably snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. If there is any commitment, it is simply to one another at all. For many are those who will yet prefer the secure certainty in all of nothing all to themselves, to the uncertainty in part of something, of hope t all, with anyone else.

There remains a middle ground between lonely and powerless self-reliance on the one hand, and massive programs of sweeping social change beyond individual reach, on the other: Smaller social circles or relationships of two or more individuals, often tend to forge their own social contracts amongst themselves. Though again, there are polar extremes: On the one hand, group dynamics may be unimaginatively bound to prior socialization, or else on the other hand abandoning all propriety, they may co-validate and normalize any conceivable deviance no matter how senseless and destructive. Both extremes remain depressingly common and even cult like and exploitative. Moreover, elements of both may coexist and manifest in the group dynamics of the self same social circle. Indeed, there may often be found no more staunch conformists than the most flagrant deviants, and no deeper conviction than in such blithely Absurd hypocrisy in true to life Comedy of Manners, desperate mimesis of all that one can never be.  

But far more rarely, from the practice of Menschlichkeit derives the sensation of power, respect and friendship experienced via any serious input and consultation from individual participants, there can even be a third option in an agenda of modest beginnings true rebellion and Positive Disintegration via creative solution finding in order better to meet individual needs. Now, there's a social skill we don't often hear about! -an extreme competence  of autonomy rather than of heteronomy, unique to collaboration among equals...  

 
Abandoned each and all to our own devices
Why must it all be so difficult? Herein are submitted some very adult radically obvious suggestions, that seem better at all accepted in professional life than in personal life, in the alternatives to social skills, collective membership most broadly, and aimless over reliance upon propinquity: First of all, let's all work to regain that lost and atrophied executive function: Let's all become at all better organized at making contacts, following up intentionally, purposefully and systematically, and convivially maintaining interaction. But then what? Without the all-consuming social rat race, what shall we do with ourselves together? What will keep us occupied just long enough simply for metaphorically breaking the proverbial ice? To answer a question with another question: What is important to you? What makes life worth living? In short, whither aręte?
 
People online, so desperate for any illusion of certainty in such an uncertain world, are so often gathered in such nigh religious fervor of eager cult-like internalization and pep rally co-validation of prevalently unquestioned assumptions, earnest preparation and mighty struggle towards social success, as though they were all cramming for an exam. Knee-jerk conformists are often indeed exactly so callow and emotionally retarded. Truly, they are all very much alone even together, and figuratively barking up the proverbial wrong tree! For such indeed is heteronomy to the cult of socialization. Prevailing wisdom ever extols the crucial importance of making friends, networking and establishing for oneself a social circle. But loneliness and despair often motivate entry into bad relationships and worse social circles. Social reality, however consequential, remains consensus chimera, while individual people are real. Building any sort of more functional and congenial social circle, might best begin not with any grand social vision, but first with discourse upon any notion of a more functional protocol, interpersonally, better fitting than will be found available off-the-rack, so to speak. One that nurtures autonomy and authenticity instead of cultivating heteronomy and dependency. In theory, we each and all benefit from the purest freedom of association. But in practical implementation, one may often find oneself at the mercy of others, all one's efforts neither appreciated or reciprocated. There is no effective script to follow, no secret of wisdom to share. What then can one do? Can anyone ever sidestep the Great Faceless They, and simply reach out to one another in order to stop playing anyone else's game? Here we are, I and thou.
 
We must all expect to confront interpersonal or relationship challenges, but not until first overcoming whatever barriers to entry, social hurdles and stumbling blocks in one's path, of making connections to begin with which often first entails integration and embedment into society, very much easier said than done, prevailing opacity demanding all manner of convoluted special aptitudes, full time. Clearly, there are many people, one way or another, who fail in society or anything else because of their own shortcomings and personal difficulties of one kind or another. But that doesn't explain everything, because the most ordinary people and indeed highly capable and personable individuals, our best and brightest, frequently also fail in society and in life. Is then any deficiency in society conceivable, in social opportunities and demands placed upon individuals? We all know that society frequently fails to meet our various different individual needs. Why then do even the most ruthless and Machiavellian nevertheless often seem to assume that social integration is somehow foolproof? Frequently, it simply is not. Indeed, failure is inbuilt and pervasive, perhaps because, purposefully, social life is less of a conduit than a filter. Security takes precedence over accessibility, and frequently, neither accrue. And it remains hardly unusual to find oneself setup for failure. It is not even clear that any service to the end user is even a priority in society at large. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. Perhaps society is not user friendly but actually user hostile even by design and Absurd. Indeed, the very concept of socialization both suggests and then obfuscates that very conclusion, cynicism which comes as no shock to anyone with any modicum of street-smarts.Conventional options in life are all so oppressive and unhappy. It's a jungle out there! Nothing works. Far from serving the individual, the function of society is simply to push us each out of the way. Take the hint or become bullied outright. Indeed life in society, often being so cutthroat competitive, may often take on such paranoid subtext, like unto recognizance under enemy surveillance! No wonder anyone feels insecure. Obviously it is necessary for the individual to adapt to any society. And so, guidance to that end becomes crucial. But with social adaptation and guidance thereto, as with anything else, if of necessity some is good, it hardly follows that more is better, or that its all the same anyhow.
 
And truth to tell, many folks are downright unfriendly, distant and even hostile, indeed, one way or another, crazy jealous, exploitative, conspiratorial, and willfully obstructive between others. And often this is cultural. But even putting aside real palpable ill will and bullying outright, there remains, as shall be seen, all manner of frustrating inefficiency in making connections and cementing attachment, interpersonally. And we may often look to peer groups to smooth the way, even simply to sustain propinquity long enough, even however awkwardly and artificially of the most dharmic social skill. And there's the rub! Because, if it's hard enough to find even just one friend, how then will be any easier to identify, locate and befriend whatever sort of suitable social collective entity? According to legend, Diogenes struggled to find even one lone and singular honest soul, let alone an honest crowd. Hence, joining groups or entering social circles in order to meet new people, only devolves one difficulty into an even more daunting challenge. Indeed, it may often be recommended, just the opposite, to assemble social groups from proximate and extended existing connections. So, which comes first? How many are lucky enough to have true friends networking for them? More often, the group has its own covert agenda and the individual, exploited, one way or another, must simply make do. Society then offers no conduit or primrose path, but inflicts a social minefield full of needless and insane stumbling blocks and barriers to entry, all leading to traps of collective exploitation as the only refuge. Any better is fortunate, highly functional and exceptional. Society cannot love you. Society is not be your friend. Society is the baleful oppressor ever watching everything that one does. And accordingly, those who may see fit to come forward volunteering to correct anyone who opens their eyes, would never dare so to overstep all bounds by such flagrant presumption of their own superiority and anyone else subordination, except by so blithely believing themselves somehow to be channeling something so vastly great and good, transcendent beyond themselves. For such is the pervasive delusion of all heteronomy, that frighted false fire with no genuine warmth.
 
Quoth the Bard: “All the word's a stage!” And to quote Neil Gabler: “American society is a society in which individuals have learned to prize social skills that permit them, like actors, to assume whatever rôle the occasion demands and to "perform" their lives rather than just live them.” Competent or incompetent, whether in true hardnosed practicality or in sheer aimless and empty actingout of mimesis, many all the same remain no less consumed with the burning question of how to perform as expected and to fit in: How best to placate The Great Faceless They, thereby to obtain the key to life. For such remains the slave mentality of Homo Domesticus, the domesticated human. And much as they may deny it even to themselves, they are fully buying in, figuratively gulping down the proverbial Kool-Aid! And even bringing into question such secret deep-seated dedication may be as alarming to them as revelation that there is no Santa Claus and no fellowship with God!
 
Social support is deemed among the key determinants of success. To have social support denotes that one is cared for, has assistance available from other people, and that one is part of a supportive social network. Indeed, while ones fewer closer friends may be valued as more important emotionally, broader acquaintance and connections are key to all manner of assistance, resource and opportunity. What won't people do for such a prize? And what will people sink to without it?  But what does the ever burning question of how to fit in socially, even actually mean in the first place? After all, clearly working out the right question must precede finding any accurate or useful answer, and therefore problem statement remains ever crucial to solution finding.
 
Indeed, some might better rephrase the question at hand, even as most anciently, towards the striving for correctly skilled conduct within dharma: How to transcend all anxiety and learn such peerless and consummate skill to then initiate more capable and operant interaction with one another? But capable and operant in what way or sense, and all to what end or purpose? Well, obviously, towards performance as expected in order to fit in, thereby to placate The Great Faceless They from whom all good things flow, thereby at long last to obtain the key to life! For such is slave mentality, toadying social cognition and sycophancy by which to predict the responses of others, prediction of future behavior entirely on the basis, not of care or empathy and Emotional Intelligence, but of rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, and in recognition of third-party social relationships, all distinctly and uncomfortably non-egalitarian. It is after all, a truism and hard to deny, that of course compromise is necessary for getting along in society. Not merely compromise, but toadying sycophantic open ended and unrequited dedication life long, is the traditional expectation. Dharma is a bitch!
 
Heteronomy, conformism and the endless dance of popularity frequently become Orwellian, all consuming, draining and tremendously costly, undermining not only autonomy, independent thinking and ambition, but even the human capacity to genuinely relate to one another, to form relationship and friendship. Indeed, that's Why Nerds Are Unpopular: Because nerds so often have authentically meaningful time consuming genuine  interests and values of their own to share, with neither the time nor passion for the endlessly complicated dance of being "cool". Whereas, by interaction and accommodation only with one another as equals or near equals, individuals are even known even quite deliberately to afford one another whatever respite from onerous expectations of always "being on" and demands of society at large. With good friends one can be genuine and at ease and forge alliance in abiding trust. Indeed,. precisely such egalitarianism of collaboration among equals is characteristic of cooperation in creative solution finding, problem-driven rather than status-driven, and thus the great exception to toadying social cognition, as recognized even in seeming afterthought by Social Anthropology. And more on this presently. 
 
After all, which comes first? Is all human interaction subordinate within the framework of society and its intractable norms, or rather, is the very fabric of society woven from relationship between individuals into an extended network? Obviously, that is only a matter pf perspective: Both assertions are always true. But which perspective will be more fruitful in discovering any true key to life at all? It may bear mention that the very term: 'Individualism,' was only coined as a pejorative in disparagement towards a perceived trend of retreat from civic-virtue, favoring instead whatever responsibility merely to each ones own more proximate relationship networks. But what reason for such a trend? Perhaps what is more capable and operant, less superficial and more mature and genuinely happy, is actually to be found in Emotional Intelligence, the vulnerable empathy of  to one another first, I and thou, one to one, before even worrying about finer points and challenges of group dynamics, let alone whatever Social Intelligence and social skills or aptitudes in such desperate and toadying sycophantic quest of broader approval and social integration with every coveted reward of status, power and better more preferential access to vital resources in society.
 
Therefore, not to put the proverbial cart before the horse: As it turns out, autonomy in strong and compatible relationships may be revealed as the true bedrock strengthening position of social embedment most proximately, only then in turn networking outward for inclusion and accommodation within society at large affording access not only to vital connections and resources, but best opportunity altruistically as well. Otherwise getting along in society may easily degenerate into an unpleasant and arbitrarily heteronymous pipedream and snake oil. It's all a matter of give and take, of reciprocity and welcome: Why would anyone want to put in so much more effort so unappreciated, than they tend to perceive as ever expended in return? The ever platitudinous social success gurus urge us to step out from our comfort zones. Bah, humbug!
 
Rather, does not the entire focus of exactly such risk taking and challenge, the very exploration towards understand, mapping and carving out some comfortable niche at all? After all, who do you prefer to meet? An aspiring pillar of the community, staunch toady to social expectation: an utter tool, or a good friend to humanity, a real mensch? And to what do you yourself aspire? The desperation for approval, or the will to power? Yet the outdated cult of socialization, manipulative behavioral conditioning in one rancid guise or variation or another, prevails. The powerlessness of the individual without influence in society, is simply accepted and taken for granted, then played upon so manipulatively. But the malignant racket of all such often senseless imperative of interminable submissive finesse, can offer no trustworthy solution. This is because all of that festering impotent vexation and mediocrity is at the root of bored and lonely suffering and frustration in the first place. This is true even when most successful on its own misguided cretin terms exactly as advertised. Though as a setup for failure, compromise and lowered expectations, the let down is that much less subtle.
 
Indeed, what if community is considered as no more than the aggregate of constituent relationships? What if indeed, seeming social aptitude and circumstance, are one way or another conditional upon and subordinate to relationships? What if getting along in society is not actually the key to life? What if rather, the recognized bedrock of functional individual friendship, remains the true foundation of any extended social circle? What if its not the junction of Individuals, somehow to reach out into society, but of relationships to network? What if all things being relative to frame of reference, the social world really does revolve around you? We have clearly seen that happiness depends upon how we engage and relate to one another, each of us, I and thou, gentle reader, just for starters. Needlessly opaque and convoluted heteronymous snake oil of social skills brainwash and granfalloon membership pipedreams have got the cart before the horse! 
 
After all, ostracism, exclusion and social isolation operate not by some abstract divorce of the target Individuals from society as an entity, but by whatever practical means off relational bullying, veritable social network terrorism by whatever means of sabotage and skullduggery undermining connectivity between Individuals. Under heteronomy and the veneration of authority, society has always remained  suspicious, hostile, threatening, in short: the enemy, and whatever social skills, aptitudes or cognition however rationalized or romanticized, can be like handling venomous snakes, full time: Better together with trusted friends than all alone with shifty cronies. Whereas the benefits and protections afforded the individual in society, all flower under democracy, autonomy and skeptical suspicion towards authority, especially that of society in the abstract. 

 

 
        
 
 

 

 
 
 
 

The  agenda design exercise

It may be argued that values expressed in implementation by whatever due process remain ever crucial, whereas agenda should remain open. -Such indeed being the Rationale of the Rotating Moderation technique. Be all that as it may: Pressing problems are indeed all too often so dangerously long in ever even entering onto the public agenda sometimes called: The media political frame.  For Professor Joseph Agassi, clear agenda is of paramount practical necessity: "The problem of the choice of problems or the critical consideration of agenda enables us to coordinate and be critical - on our view, to be rational - about the selection of problems [and] [...] thus increase the scope of rationality" - 'Rationality, Problems, Choice' with John R. Wettersten, Philosophica 22, 1978 (2), pp. 5-22.

Agenda selection however, may also be important for a different and less expected particular psychological reason: Given that Happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically, strategically, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in controversy, the exchange of welcome criticism, with civility as autonomous equals in optimal reciprocal engagement, then if purposeful conversation indeed increases happiness, if greater happiness is indeed attainable but contingent upon such as aforementioned known parameters of discussion, then can those parameters simply be agreed upon and adhered to deliberately? Yes, this is crucial. Otherwise there can only be work at cross-purpose. And yet, might there also be any benefit from at all more strategy? Indeed, taking initiative in serious conversation, can a topic of conversation or agenda actually be tailored to that purpose? Lighter topics are traditionally selected  in order to manage the agreeable tone of dinner table conversation. Are there similarly and conversely topics of conversation more conducive to other different conceivable attitudes of human interaction? Obviously. From time immemorial, orators have selected different topics and tone in order to influence the mood and behavior of their audience and to steer conversation accordingly. Perhaps even beginning to forge relationships and social circles differently and on our own terms by talking more seriously together with less small talk, creativity in substantive communication towards purposeful interaction, may at all beneficially derive from some distinct suitable agenda for deliberation and collaboration. What then might be desirable parameters and qualities of a suitable agenda as so specified? It is intended that individuals suitably triggered and stimulated, with more readily engage one another more responsively. (Take that any way you like!) One possible answer is that discourse, and therefore the agenda, must be such as first of all to elicit, pleasurably and meaningfully engage, the key desires to be fulfilled. And to this end, the agenda must be pertinent, relevant to values and objectives motivated by those desires. In the words of Friedrich Nietzsche: “Happiness is the feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.”  Hence, in order better to empower participants in said deliberations, the tailor made agenda must bridge intrinsically motivating abstract interest for the metaphorical journey, with strategic deliberation and feasibility study towards whatever desired objectives, the proverbial destination. - All in blatant defiance of prevailing taboo. upon relevance in and of itself.

The task of crafting just such an agenda is the agenda design challenge!

One proposed suitable agenda follows.

When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others.

Spoiler alert! Gentle readers, unmet friends: You may prefer not to read any further right now, but instead wish to put it off and see what you can each and/or together come up with by yourselves, anything entirely different and uninfluenced.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  agenda by design is an agenda of design.
 
The objective will be nothing less than individual imagination of social paradise: exploration of the prospect of actually tailoring social environment to the intrinsic needs of each individual. Precisely this exploration, even being so abstract, will help cultivate that deeper reciprocal perception and understanding which is called: psychological visibility, a core value of friendship.
 
From analysis and feasibility study, planningmust move from broadest first concept to execution in detail, thereby engaging creative solution finding, a capacity and intrinsic need entirely unique to the sizably evolved human brain, remaining uniquely egalitarian among all other social aptitudes as investigated by Cultural Anthropology.
 
As according to Aristotle, happiness is contingent upon the exercise but also the communication of the meaningful values of imagination, free will, personal choice, independence, competence and achievement, together with connection, self awareness and conscience informed by rationality. Moreover, happiness is not merely and actively experienced, but interactive expression and response, affiliation and shared enthusiasm. That is why even the journey of ongoing strategic discourse in earnest seeking happiness, can already be so involving and uplifting. 
 
As per the agenda design challenge, deliberation together upon the agenda by design/agenda of design herein proposed, is advanced experimentally towards cultivation of such all important happily serious conversation, substantive communication and purposeful interaction, optimally conducive to happiness and forging relationship. It is proposed that precisely such an agenda will, first of all, help to elicit and sustain productive and crucial happily serious conversation. The question on the agenda by design, being an agenda of design, is:
 
How even to frame the challenge of actually tailor designing social environment to the intrinsic needs of each individual? One answer follows.
 
Spoiler alert! Gentle readers, unmet friends: You may prefer not to read any further right now, but instead wish to put it off and see what you can each and/or together come up with by yourselves, anything entirely different and uninfluenced.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overcoming the boredom prone loneliness of intelligence and creativity
 
The social engineering of optimal social stimulus struggle, is one way to frame the challenge of actually tailoring social environment to the intrinsic needs of each individual. Discourse pursuant to the social engineering of optimal social stimulus struggle in answer to the agenda by design/agenda of design challenge, is preliminary to the FoolQuest.com design exercise, a specific procedure towards identification of individually unique pleasurable triggers and indicators of value, those rare and fleeting experiences of fulfillment in fully engaged pleasurably heightened sensation of meaning,  sensation of meaning, and how maximally to incorporate exactly such very particular stimuli featuring into a social environment.
 
There are two possible contexts wherein to frame the very concept of all important attachments such as love and friendship. Most obviously, friendship is a relationship over time, but love and friendship are also understood an immediate experience. Perhaps the latter peak experience may be found conducive to more optimal cultivation of the former over time, indeed more so than mere propinquity alone.
 
Defining our terms:
What are stimuli?
 
In order better to understand and appreciate the key concept of stimulus struggle, it might first be at all helpful to clearly understand what are stimuli and it what sense the very word is even used. Of course, stimuli, unless subliminal, are consciously perceived. And yet, a stimulus as most narrowly defined, is quite different from the content of sensation most broadly. A stimulus that hardly stimulates, that provides so little stimulation, is not much of a stimulus. Moreover, to begin with, a stimulus most narrowly, is not merely any perception or information, even however Empirical. For example, good food tempts all the senses. Marketing and advertising employ no end of stimuli associated with food. But the experience of peeling potatoes might somewhat fail to arouse, one way or the other, very much more than boredom and irritation. Moreover, an explanation is not a stimulus. Hence, the directions to the cafeteria, even as provided on a floor plan posted for all to see, and useful information as that might be, might not in and of themselves be all that stimulating at all. However the colors used on the signage might be either soothing pastels or vibrant fluorescent hues. And what applies to stimulation in general, applies no less to social and intellectual stimulation, in that likewise, not every Empirical input or information is necessarily all that that stimulating.
A stimulus is an incident suddenly altering experience of the surrounding environment, a momentary event in any way arousing attention and interest, perhaps in violation of expectations, even thence eliciting quick appraisal and triggering response, negative or positive. A stimulus so instantly draws attention to itself by such stark contrast with just prior conditions. Stimuli may be anything perceived and experienced, however reference to stimuli is generally meant in the sense more of visceral arousal rather than merely cognitive input and information. Indeed the sensation, literal or figurative, is immediately different.
Stimulus struggle, what every living thing is doing all the time, is no more or less than the perpetual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surounding environment. And this includes every crucial social stimulus provided by anyone triggering and eliciting response from anyone else within the same social environment or situation, a process so desperately undermined and subverted under heteronomy in the perpetual rat race out in the endless emotional wastelands of the social minefield.   
Arguably, stimuli are the most fundamental meaning of life! To begin with, by definition, tautologically, in the mere literal sense of meaning and linguistic denotation, any definition of life, biologically, as a complex system, must one way or another consider the function of stimulation triggers and arousal. Moreover, in any deeper sense of meaning and value, in any relevant figurative or poetical sense of ever being truly alive, arousal by stimuli likewise figures prominently. Otherwise one may complain of feeling dead inside. Though many crave exactly such release into sublime apathy, however qualified and ambivalent,  from life and suffering but without the greater extreme of actual suicide. All such Mystical self-abnegation remains so inherently misanthropic, even decried as cowardly, because by nature we are all sensation seekers. And as Sir Isaac Newton said, the way to to master nature is to serve her. - meeting needs, not thwarting them...

A dog in the park, perhaps coming up and wagging his tail, is a stimulus featuring in the surrounding environment, but a dog appearing and begging only when you yourself begin eating your sandwich, constitutes a response from the surrounding environment. And the present exercise concerns elicitation of innate positive response from the individual, not conditional strokes of inductive  behavioral reinforcement of any desired new conditioned behavior. Ongoing stimulus struggle entails that we spend our lives struggling to elicit desired response. It's nice when instead, all too rarely, whatever little gratification comes unconditionally. Also, it's far simpler to program or design stimuli featuring within the environment, than to orchestrate responses laying in wait to be triggered by the subject. Not to get ahead of ourselves.

And because we are social beings, all of this applies no less for social stimuli in specific, than for stimuli in general. There are many complex aspects of social interaction, but at the most fundamental and obvious level, social interaction remains the exchange of social stimuli and response. The most rudimentary stimulus appetite is event hunger, the craving for interesting events. Hence the most rudimentary social stimulus appetite would be social event hunger, a craving for stimulating occurrences of social interaction.  

Because of the relentless infiltration amoral and Moralistic misanthropic stealth Behaviorism ever so respectably insinuating itself into every field of scientific inquiry, formal education and walk of life, indeed because of the pernicious fallacious view of Social Psychology as merely an application of Behaviorism, social stimuli may be blithely treated as identical with social prompts. Not so! A social stimulus featuring or situated within a social environment, is a manifest concrete entity (as opposed to an abstraction) producing social stimulation eliciting universal innate social response that are the subject of intrinsic social stimulus appetites.  - as opposed to varying  behaviorally conditioned  social cues prompting in turn, extrinsic elicitation of conditional strokes...

Social prompts are only intelligible at all as shaped by and subtext of social expectations to be met by approved behaviors in elicitation of conditional strokes within extrinsic reward and punishment systems. Hence response varies between cultural milieu, individual personality, experience and behavioral conditioning. Whereas response to implementable effective stimuli, yes, very much including social stimuli, is innate and thus possibly gratifying in its own right. Behavioral conditioning only aims at the inculcation of compulsive compliance and inhibition, but liberating impulsive responses triggered by (social) stimuli correlate with (social) stimulus appetites, the most rudimentary of intrinsic needs, values and motivation.

In animal studies, social stimuli no differently than stimuli in general, may be introduced experimentally under controlled conditions, into the environment of the test subject. But in the context of human interaction, for some reason the term 'social stimuli' is all too often blithely employed interchangeably in denotation of social cues that are learned, or more precisely, behaviorally conditioned. What sly and devious propaganda of Nihilistic value destruction and heteronomy! Intellectual stimulation from the social environment remains ever paramount to all endeavor of FoolQuest.com And because we are conscious, what applies to stimulation in general, applies no less to social and intellectual stimulation, in that likewise, not every Empirical input or information is necessarily all that stimulating. Hence, then, the dire risk of even actually harmfully persistent  boredom and loneliness. After all, the engaging and invigorating trigger of intellectual stimulation ever remains an intrinsic need, even neurologically. Intellectual stimulation opens the way for the enthusiastic autonomy of egalitarian close collaborative creative solution finding and thereby liberation from hierarchical heteronomy. Intellectual stimulation Is an intrinsic human need. Intellectual stimulation differs psychologically with individual character, and will therefore defy precise definition. Intellectual stimulation engages thought and imagination to challenge ambitious capability to insightfully identify and find creative solutions to problems. And yet intellectual stimulus deprivation remains pandemic. Clearly, either the system is broken, or else individual failure and confusion can actually be intentional, even deliberately brutal boring Absurd and irrelevant Zen surreal by design, brainwash to break the will, indeed as it has been since antiquity.

A hallmark of the compliant and complacent conservative character or personality is the the boundless capacity to endure boredom. And in the annals of formal education as readily observed in so many other social institutions such as religion, politics and employment among others,  the tradition is recorded even most anciently in Plato's Academy, of deliberately and calculatingly quashing the very intellectual freedom and Dialectical intellectual stimulation so cherished by and fatal to Plato's beloved but impractical mentor Socrates, via the deliberate infliction of boredom in order so diligently to weed out innovators by contrast so often characterized by boredom proneness, and of novelty that ever threatens change. For many are the sages of old in fervent embrace of the value of social stability at any cost, the maintenance of sheer conservative inertia even in the most arbitrary status quo. -And therefore concerning themselves in all gravity with the contrivance of reliable production process and systematic filters of endlessly bland mediocrity enduring to this day, bureaucratically screening out deficiency and excellence alike and entirely without distinction. Indeed such remains the function of peer review in academic publication, and worse, of the FDA in the approval of medicines. No snake oil and no breakthroughs either. For in every context and walk of life, such is heteronomy and the dread of all temptation into nonconformity replete with any possibility ever of Socratic Wisdom in acknowledgement of ignorance and uncertainty, with ongoing error detection and correction in the name of progress day by day.

 

What is the social engineering of social stimulus struggle?

Social engineering is an application of social science in effort to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors as desired in whatever target population great or small, from vast nation states to far smaller working groups and social circles. Social engineering may conceivably focus upon any different aspects of the human condition in society, with any range of objectives, including the optimization of social stimulus struggle. As in accordance with the Arousal Theory of motivation, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the name coined by anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo' October 1 1969, for the perpetual striving of all living things, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And by extension, social and intellectual stimulus struggle denotes the perpetual striving of evry human psyche, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of social and intellectual stimulation and arousal from the immediate social environment. Indeed, everything that we do is in order to modify subjective experience thereby altering consciousness. All hence, as herein proposed, the social engineering of social and intellectual stimulus struggle would contrive the deliberate introduction of specific social stimuli and social interaction, into the ummediate social environment, in order better to optimize social and intellectual stimulus struggle.

Boredom after all, is an acute lack of excitement and often accrues from the dire mismatch of intrinsic motivation and relevantly pleasurable activity to unique individual value, given any dearth of adequately engaging alternatives often for want of authentic autonomy supportive respect and often in response to pressure. Stimulus struggle then is the struggle against boredom, and social stimulus struggle is the struggle against loneliness consisting of any deficiency or discrepancy between ones own desired versus actually achieved or at all available, quality of social interaction, stimulation, arousal and communication.

The social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle, is one way to frame the challenge of actually tailoring social environment to the intrinsic needs of each individual. Discourse pursuant to the social engineering of optimal social stimulus struggle in answer to the agenda by design/agenda of design challenge, is preliminary to the FoolQuest.com design exercise, a specific procedure towards identification of individually unique pleasurable triggers and indicators of value, those rare and fleeting experiences of fulfillment in fully engaged pleasurably heightened sensation of meaning, and how maximally to incorporate exactly such very particular stimuli featuring into a social environment.  Indeed, quantitatively and qualitatively optimal investment and exchange of time and attention together that we all so crave, in synergy so crucial to authentic well being.

As in accordance with the Arousal Theory of Motivation, according to anthropologist Desmond Morris in 'the human zoo' October 1 1969, in order to meet the all consuming challenges of survival in the wild, constantly foraging for resources and opportunity in order to survive, all opportunistic species including Homo Sapiens, have evolved to become intensely exploratory, with "a biologically built-in demand for a high stimulus input from his environment. In a zoo (or a city) it is clearly these opportunist species that will suffer most from the artificiality of the situation. Even if they are provided with perfected balanced diets and are immaculately sheltered and protected, they will become bored and listless and eventually neurotic. But opportunist animals do not give up easily. They react to the unpleasant situation with remarkable ingenuity." But what if instead of merely reacting individually, intelligent human beings might overcome slavish drone like domestication and become proactive in collaboration?

Stimulus struggle, what every living thing is doing all the time, is no more or less than the perpetual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. And this includes every crucial social stimuli provided by anyone triggering and eliciting response from anyone else within the same social environment or situation, a process so desperately undermined and subverted by heteronomy in the perpetual rat race out in the endless emotional wastelands of the social minefield. In any alternative, what then are the most promising options in the social engineering of any fundamentally better situation, the social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle? How can individuals more happily interact? Exactly how might change be effected, so happily overcoming resistance and inertia? And what precisely is the bearing of creativity? These are no idle question, but the ever daunting outreach of FoolQuest.com! Everyone is different. perhaps somehow neither fiction writing nor new venture creation (various business startup) appeal. Fear not however. I do not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?

in the words of Simone Weil: "The malheureux need nothing else in this world but men capable of paying attention to them. The capability to pay attention to the malheureux is something very rare, very difficult; it's almost a miracle. Almost all those who think they have this capacity, don't. Warmth, the heart's reaching out, pity, all these are not sufficient. [...] Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” And in the words of Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.” Indeed, inattention, indifference and distance, are already invalidating, let alone more overt invalidation, denigration and abuse particularly as of pandemic serial bullying. Whereas, validation may come in the form of sympathy and understanding, indeed as expressed in agreement, approval or indeed amplification upon anything another says. However, as the saying goes: “Actions speak louder than words” because in the words of Karan Gaur: Effort is the best indicator of interest.” The very term 'probortunity,' of course, has been coined as a portmanteau of the two words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' in order to press home the point that problems present opportunities. And the probortunity at hand here on FoolQuest.com consists in the challenge of best filling the gap, meeting underserved need, via creative solution finding in design thinking social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle, most especially and particularly collaboration among equals, the most generously validating exchange of effort and interest indeed speaking louder than so often facile verbal positive strokes, let alone the malignant conditionality of dysfunctional codependent co-validation. Creativity can and Should be Social. Collaboration in fiction writing and new venture creation (various business startup) may serve as powerful Dialectical tools toward subversive and disruptively innovative solution finding in the social engineering of more optimal stimulus struggle, even tailor made to the individual. Gentle reader, what are your own frustrated life satisfactions and corresponding underserved stimulus appetites?

There are two possible contexts wherein to frame the very concept of all important attachments such as love and friendship. Most obviously, friendship is a relationship over time, but love and friendship are also understood an immediate experience. Perhaps the latter peak experience may be found conducive to more optimal cultivation of the former over time, indeed more so than mere random and incidental propinquity alone.

Heaven is an imagined condition of plenty of whatever has been most scarce in any given life experience. And Heaven on Earth would be any thriving association wherein individual needs are routinely fulfilled rather than frustrated. In 'The Conquest Of Happiness' 'Chapter 1: What makes people unhappy?' Bertrand Russell writes: "The typical unhappy man is one who, having been deprived in youth of some normal satisfaction, has come to value this one kind of satisfaction more than any other" Perhaps Russell is too quick to dismiss as mere fixation, whatever one's favored, most valued and cherished kind of unmet satisfaction. Instead, there might be here an important self-knowledge of what one craves most dearly. Can such various satisfactions be investigated and categorized?

I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? As G. E. Moore contends, pleasure is not an end in and of itself. And it bears mention how this applies no less for optimism, peace of mind or any other sought for mental state or emotional condition. Rather, as G. E. Moore contends, pleasure, not to mention  optimism, peace of mind or any other sought for mental state or emotional condition, is only a second order indicator of value. The problem with narcotics, recreational or by prescription, is that they are irrelevant, bypassing as they do, evaluation, directly activating the pleasure centers of the brain, disengaging from external reality. Similarly, the anti-rational magical thinking of purported power of positive thinking, endeavors to behaviorally condition a more cheerful mood, dishonestly bypassing better judgment and Empirical reality testing. It doesn't work. But if it did, would that actually be at all prudent or even desirable? Friendship and acceptance are predicated upon empathy, unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility and genuine acceptance, whereas, just the opposite,  expectations of willful positivity are the very height of conditionality, effective oppressive coercion to suppress all criticism, controversy, complaint or alarm, enforced by all manner of punishment and reward. In animal experiments,  the social stimuli typically under consideration are innate, but for human subjects, typically the social stimuli under consideration are of approval and disapproval in the toxic and sanctioned process of socialization, that violence and neglect which none dare call: indoctrination or brainwash. Why so? Is not peer pressure manifest in herd mentality that is our legacy from all other mammals? And have human beings somehow evolved to transcend innate social and emotional motive and need? Hardly!

The TRUE MEANING of LIFE, remains that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Such happiness is achieved in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, a highly desirable situation should the opportunity present itself. Indeed, as per social engineering herein proposed, intentional pleasurable and engaging social stimuli featuring within the social environment, should be of innate stimulus appetite, unconditionally, sans triggers of behaviorally conditioning as by conditional strokes. More than this, the aforesaid intentional pleasurable and engaging social stimuli featuring within the social environment, must be relevant, triggering motivation and value. But how? Answer: by the identification and correlation of individually unique and even hither to frustrated life satisfactions as defined by Russell, with their corresponding immediate triggers or social stimuli. Because it is hypothesized herein, that for any life satisfaction over time as defined by Russell, there may be corresponding immediate stimuli, pleasurable second order indicators of value, as posited by G. E, Moore.

Towards social engineering an intentional social environment for the optimization of social stimulus struggle, first imagine cheating by just scripting actors in order to produce the intended experience, superficially, or similarly, programming non player characters in a videogame simulation. Then go deeper and commit to the World-Building in earnest, so that actors will not be required. Indeed, any behavior or interaction that may ever conceivably be scripted, may conceivably be elicited by whatever situation, more organically. And tailoring whatever situation is of essence in designing social environments to satisfy hither to deprived and personally valued satisfactions in life, after triggering the corresponding immediate stimuli and appetites. A possible step-by-step design procedure is elaborated in further detail in he design exercise

Indeed, such is the human condition, that the key to wellbeing is to be found in stimulus struggle, which is what we are all already doing all of the time. And for social beings such as humans, this pertains especially every crucial social stimulus provided by anyone triggering and eliciting arousal and response from anyone else within the same social environment. - Hence: social stimulus struggle... The simple premise then, is that much unhappiness accrues from sheer under-stimulation: boredom and loneliness one way or another, let alone whatever excessive dystress.

To reiterate, a dog in the park, perhaps coming up and wagging his tail, is a stimulus featuring in the surrounding environment, an unconditional stroke, whereas a dog appearing and begging only when you yourself begin eating your sandwich, constitutes a response to the correct trigger, from the surrounding environment. a conditional stroke. However, the present exercise concerns elicitation of innate positive response from the individual,  not conditional strokes of inductive  behavioral reinforcement of any desired new conditioned behavior. The proverbial shoe is figuratively crafted to fit the metaphorical foot. The foot need not be cut to fit the shoe. Ongoing stimulus struggle entails that we spend our lives struggling to elicit desired response. It's nice when instead, all too rarely, even whatever small gratification ever comes unconditionally, featuring within the surrounding environment, readily available, standing in plain sight. Also, it's far simpler to program or design stimuli plainly featuring within the environment, than to orchestrate conditional strokes, obscure responses hiding  in wait to be triggered by the subject.

Stimuli featuring or situated within a (social) environment, may be said to take the first move, rather than coming in response as does a conditional stroke. Social stimuli featuring or situated within a social environment, initiate simply by being blatant and unavoidable within said social environment. A stimulus is a trigger for whatever response. As a feature within an environment, a stimulus, unlike a conditional stroke, does not itself need to be activated or triggered: It only needs to be anything at all concrete and glaringly obvious enough to be experienced, so as to as to gratify some or other stimulus appetite, triggering innate response with no prior behavioral conditioning. Even moving shadows in vaguely human form may be features within a social environment, that are also social stimuli triggering some response. Real events in which the any of latter may be involved, are the outside source of stimulation experienced. Social stimuli here refer specifically to the objects of immediate term events experienced, however one might categorize them. piquing any manner of intrinsic appetite which is an impulse, as distinct from compulsive or behaviorally conditioned social cues or prompts of extrinsic reward and punishment triggering or eliciting skilled correct operant versus howsoever incorrect or inept inoperant response. Any appetite systematically and continually gratified may conceivably yield its corresponding life satisfaction. But approval seeking only accrues emptiness, irrelevance and alienation from just being controlled. Behaviorally conditioned social cues or prompts are extortion and conditionality, whereas social stimuli triggering innate response, are unconditional stroke, engaging temptation free and clear, even a pure gift, gratification with no other objective except for intrinsically motivating good and wellbeing.

 

Added dimensions of social stimulus struggle unique to humanity, are rooted in massively inbred hideous mutation and the evolutionary neuroscience of sapient consciousness:

“That which doesn't kill me, makes me stronger.”  Friedrich Nietzsche:

“That which doesn't kill me, makes me stranger.”  Ćon  Flux

Primarily, Cultural Anthropology defines itself by focus upon, leave us face it: the predominating human mentality as of the packmammals that we are, specifically of hierarchically predictive social cognition or: sycophancy anticipating the responses of others, merely via the recognition of members of one's own social group in order to form direct relationships consistent with rôles of relative social standing, degrees of kinship and rank, recognition of third-party social relationships, all predictive of future behavior. And yet, as per the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, as an all too fleeting respite from that grind, alas only temporarily suspending the prevailing unhappiness of mediocre heteronomy, their remains the fully engaged low hierarchical distance of creative solution finding, remains an all too rare, ever yearned for and fondly remembered but poignantly transient and even damn near euphoric high point in life, friendship, joy and happiness. And yet precisely such repeatable Empirical observation and salient realization, endures as as the great afterthought of Cultural Anthropology of what differs humanity from other animals biologically: the unique intellectual social stimulus appetites of the highly evolved and massively engorged human brain and neocortex.  Indeed, part and parcel of evolution driven by competition within our species, far beyond any needs of survival and adaptation to the surrounding environment, already well achieved. Moreover, the discovery of the wisdom of crowds, might even suggest that human reasoning evolved along with the human brain and society, for deliberation together, comparing individual reasons. More heads are better than one. And disagreement is productive.

Charles Darwin famously wrote of evolution driven by natural selection and reproductive success via the survival of the fitter,  which in the popular rubric then became: the survival of the fittest. Turning the phrase yet again, in The Survival of the Sickest, the authors  Dr. Sharon Moalem and Jonathan Prince remind us that even howsoever at all advantageous mutation remains only  a kinder term for birth defect, gene damage and horrible deformity, accumulating as passed down from generation to generation, because they indeed promoted survival long enough for reproductive success. For example, terminal sickle cell anemia, in the interim protects from malaria, and cellular aging might ever have served as a very costly and ultimately lethal defense against cancer.

As it turns out, humanity diverged from the chimpanzee even more recently in evolutionary history, than had previously been known. Amazingly, only a hand full of key genes differentiate humans from chimps. To wit: Healthy baby chimpanzees walk up right, but begin walking on their knuckles into puberty. However, a genetic birth defect of the pelvis still observed cropping up occasionally among chimpanzees, accounts for adult human beings walking upright, advantageous for wading into the tides and foraging for shellfish. And the weakest bite in the animal kingdom, is that of the human being, because of the most blatant damage and deformation to the genes for our jaw muscles. In distinct stretches of the genetic sequence, one of the two paired chromosomes is actually missing! Such weak and genetically deformed jaw muscles allow the human skull from birth to enlarge over time in accommodation the sheer bulk of the adult human brain affording humanity the wit and innovation to chop, grind and cook food, indeed precisely as necessitated by such weak and disabled jaw muscles, and more efficient at getting more nutrition out of food and thereby economizing upon time and resources. Again. only one of the handful of key genetic birth defects that diverge and differentiate humans from our nearest relatives, the chimps, whereas the calamity of a healthy and genetically whole jaw muscle produces a human with a skull the size of a chimpanzees, a pinhead (Down's Syndrome). 

In no vengeful and misogamist caprice of The Lord All Mighty, but merely via evolution from massively inbred hideous mutation, hath multiplied the suffering of women in childbirth: Rather, standing and walking upright has favored the evolution of narrow hips, thereby narrowing the birth canal. No other female animal, but only human women, suffer such agony in labor as the bones of the pelvis must so painfully separate in order to accommodate the tremendous size of the baby's head through a narrowed birth canal. -Indeed, like passing a bowling ball, just as the saying goes. And pregnancy would be even much longer and worse without neoteny, or: infancy, which is a continued gestation even outside of the womb.

Throughout life, the massive human brain places considerable demands upon bodily resources, and yet it still is never enough. Hyperbaric medicine has discovered that barring intervention, none of us, no matter how normal and healthy, are actually ever getting quite enough oxygen to fully and optimally meet the needs of the brain.

The key pertinence of evolutionary neuroscience, to consciousness, creative solution finding and human social stimulus struggle:
When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means. It is frequently observed how intelligent people are often more lonely. Autonomy, honestly thinking for oneself and walking one's own path means traveling through life alone, even in a crowd, and struggling to find any common ground because no one can relate. All to often, even the most rational of skeptical criticism is taken as hostile and therefore received with hostility. But controversy which is the free exchange of criticism is inherently friendly, an expression of esteem. Mammals, forming attachment, can become dearest friends, even most profoundly, but among all known life forms, only for human intelligence can abstract ideas factor into unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, and only human beings can be intellectual partners, much as intellectualization is so Cretin maligned as superficial and utilitarian at best. Here on FoolQuest.com in the social engineering of more optimal social stimulus struggle and in Creativity Should be Social project proposal, the uniquely human intellectual needs of such highly evolved engorged cerebrality, expression or else isolation, are looked to in all hope as the fulcrum of optimal reciprocal engagement and better networking all for leveraging all other values of friendship thereby, and thus achieving the resolution of boredom and loneliness..

It has even been inferred, from the much celebrated discovery of the wisdom of crowds , that human reasoning evolved along with the human brain and society, for deliberation together, comparing individual reasons. More heads are better than one. And disagreement remains ever productive. Throughout life, the massive human brain places considerable demands upon bodily resources, and yet it still is never enough. Hyperbaric medicine has discovered that barring intervention, none of us, no matter how normal and healthy, are actually ever getting quite enough oxygen to fully and optimally meet the needs of the brain. Evolution of an ever larger brain was driven beyond the needs of adaptation to the environment, by competition within the species. Therefore, while all opportunistic and therefore at all boredom prone species contend with stimulus struggle, and with social stimulus struggle in particular, there are unique biological factors and features in the human condition pertaining to stimulus struggle with particular bearing upon social stimulus struggle. Again, stimulus struggle is particularly acute in humanity, because of the evolution of the human brain, first in meeting the challenges of the natural environment, but then in competition within the species. The result was the human brain so exceeding of the challenges of nature, and consumed with unprecedented intrinsic motivations and biological purpose in the quest for motivation, all simply for staving off loneliness and boredom, even without such day to day violence and desperation as increasingly quelled by ever improving sociopolitical stability lulling the masses into such blithely complacent heteronomy.

As Socrates famously declares: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. But why so? Perhaps because of the manner in which the human species does not merely abide within nature as other animals do, but also depart therefrom. Even under the same sky and ever taking with us the same biosphere, yet with all manner of technology, we have augmented our bodies with tools in order to reshape our environment, and deployed the tool of language in order to advance our societies. But more than this, the unique needs of human consciousness equipped with capacity for linguistic logic, similarly abides within and yet departs from nature alone, because of analytic thinking and the much maligned ego, mythically the gift of the fire-bringer Prometheus. Creative problem solving (or better still: solution finding), a key function of analytical thinking which is the product of engorged human cerebrality, remains unique among all other social aptitudes as investigated by Cultural Anthropology. This is because except for creative problem solving, all of the social aptitudes as investigated by Cultural Anthropology are hierarchically predictive, much in accord with the nature of pack mammals that we still are, meaning that expectations are clear, of response to any social stimulus, merely from relative hierarchical position of those involved. Such is heteronomy. Whereas as per the grand afterthought of Cultural Anthropology, creative solution finding, so uniquely egalitarian socially, is indeed both capacity and intrinsic need entirely unique to human evolutionary neuroscience.

Many  struggle simply to avoid unpleasantness. And that is a sore travail. But others actually enjoy and embrace struggle, engaging with the disruptive and uncomfortable as meaningful growth opportunity and even the great blessing.of Positive Disintegration. Struggle engenders focus and reflection. “To whom much is given, much is required.”  Luke 12:48 NKJV. But if only we shall rise to the unique and vital challenge of sapient consciousness and the human condition, of intentional purposeful interaction and intentional substantive communication, of intentional creative solution finding and collaboration, then stimulus struggle so-called, as at rare optimum may become easy and delightful, not dire struggle at all, then is 'struggle' the correct word? Answer: To be Existentially honest, yes, sometimes, all too often it is. A brief word, however, in defense of true struggle: Not only pleasurable engagement, but sometimes even ongoing engagement in struggle, difficulty and discomfort, can be a blessing, frequently remaining needful and invigorating for growth, both of character individually and of meaningful relationships. For such is life. But that remains no excuse for coercion and abuse supposedly in order to build character, as in formal education among other needlessly destructive ordeals. Not to digress. By contrast, all too infrequent gratifying high points of optimal stimulus struggle so called, can be effortless and spontaneous, far from struggle at all. Gratifying high points of optimal stimulus struggle, struggle so called, shape and express personal values of aręte, experience of excellence in life. Stimulus struggle, struggle indeed, thereby motivated, thence escalates under such heightened expectations that inspire progress. Human happiness greatly hinges upon the efficacy of stimulus struggle, particularly of social stimulus struggle. First of all, pleasurable wellbeing is attained during optimal stimulus struggle, particularly social stimulus struggle. Secondly, it may be that more optimal social stimulus struggle remains the true key to life, after all! More optimal social stimulus struggle heightens performance, sustained cooperation and results. More optimal social stimulus struggle is more sociable. Better sustained and more optimal social stimulus struggle is more optimal also for making connection, forging and nurturing relationships, even friendship. But more optimal social stimulus struggle in the gratification incident hunger, is more specific, focused, experiential and observable than more broadly any objective of the better meeting of needs. All therefore, better understanding of social stimulus appetites remains ever crucial.

Solitary struggle may be fruitless and lonely. And solidarity joining together in struggle, remains a glittering generality, heady togetherness so often ilusiary and a prelude to betrayal and futility. And yet, struggle and resistance have value. Struggle is more than only suffering in frustration and sulking. Since antiquity and into the modern day, the extol of powerless acceptance and surrender as the path to sublime apathy retains enduring popularity and acclaim. Crushing despair is thereby cherished as a great gift. And yet hope springs eternal, and we remain compelled to struggle and resist. Health and fitness is not passive freedom from adversity and wont, but successful struggle. For Bertrand Russell contends  in his 'The Conquest Of Happiness,'  'Part II: Causes of happiness, Chapter 10: Is happiness still possible?' happiness is often observed to require just the right level of challenge, neither to easy and boring nor too difficult and discouraging: dramatic struggle with suspense as to an outcome even at all in doubt, all just for any stimulating element of surprise. Struggle, however, is the forceful effort to get free of restraint or constriction. In the words of Friedrich Nietzsche: “Happiness is the feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.” And that is the entire point, the striving to improve. even to optimize, all important conditions of stimulus struggle especially socially, even thereby promoting optimal reciprocal engagement interpersonally, key to Eudemonia and human flourishing.

Heaven is an margined condition wherein everything scarce has become plentiful and easy. And Heaven on Earth means bringing such dreams into fruition. But how indeed might any such a thing ever actually be accomplished? The average person, inexperienced of anything more vibrant and meaningful, has become blithely jaded and accustomed to a profound social, emotional and intellectual deprivation in which so many of us find ourselves imprisoned, herd mammals that we are.

The  social engineering feasibility study at hand, remains precisely how, in what way or manner and by what strategy of means, step-by-step process or procedure, to optimize social stimulus struggle via the implementation of whatever more gratifying and effective modes of social interaction, after all else has failed, that which has actually been yearned for all along, perhaps achieved by the purposeful introduction of key social stimuli into the social environment, even doing so intentionally and at will.

It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont not only of the wherewithal, the channels and the means, but often of the sheer imagination. The average person, inexperienced of anything more vibrant and meaningful, has become blithely jaded and accustomed to a profound social, emotional and intellectual deprivation in which so many of us find ourselves imprisoned. Effort and struggle may be all quickly dismissed and condemned as mere hardship, intolerable frustration and Existential futility. But there can also be the true life human drama of progress and satisfaction, growth, self-definition and discovery, perhaps even success. Besides, exactly what are the alternatives? Many extol a choice only between acceptance and despair, merely flavors of the same intimidation. Indeed, in the famous words of George Bernard Shaw: “Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.” And to quote Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” FoolQuest.com is an outreach toward the formation of just such a core group of unreasonable people applying ourselves even to the most daunting problems besetting us.

Just for example, in the Virtual Reality of a video game for children, it will be simple enough to program, so that all of the non-player characters will all respond by dancing in joyous approval, whenever the player successfully ties their shoes. But one might never need to tie ones shoes. What if, only given the option, one wears only loafers or buckle shoes? Then all such extrinsic rewards and contrivance of Behavioral Modification will have gone to waste! Moreover, such conditional strokes might be more difficult to achieve in reality, especially in any intentional situation instead of cheating and just using actors instructed in whatever desired responses. However, placing by design, among social stimuli featuring in an intentional social environment, even a single dancer throwing Frisbees pleasurably engaging passersby into playing catch, would be far more straightforward. And it just might raise a smile. True, human needs are often for desired kinds of responsiveness. Nevertheless instead it may be more practical simply to take initiative, to feature by design whatever social stimuli within an intentional social environment, than to by whatever means to socially engineer desired even complex responses.

Innate intrinsic impulses and appetites may be elicited or stimulated no less readily than behaviorally conditioned responses can be triggered. Why then are social stimuli generally assumed to consist of social cues, meaning sly subtext of conformity and heteronymous coercion? after all, social stimuli can be, quite to the contrary, permissive or gratifying. As shall be seen, they can even be uniquely individual, and perhaps even intentionally so tailored, implemented and tested. When the surrounding physical and psychological environment features cues howsoever associated or connected by whatever contrivance, to whatever set target objectives, the subject may thereby be directed towards whatever those objectives, by whatever open, simple and clear instructions, or else as by whatever at all more sinister advertising or propaganda manipulation and coercion. For such is subjugation under Behavior Modification having no other criteria save for compliance that will be deemed adaptive. And that is like cutting the foot to fit the shoe! It then falls to "unreasonable people"  with the audacity instead to help change our world for the better. To wit: The present social engineering design challenge in the optimization of social stimulus struggle will be to investigate, design and then feature and empower in a surrounding environment, whatever might be discovered actually missing and yearned for, and not any cunning Existential bait-and-switch of manipulative sublimation or coercion. To provide social stimuli and outlets correspondent to motivating intrinsic appetites, without extrinsic reward or punishment. Liberation, freedom, after all, is power, meaning opportunity to act upon and gratify individual desires.
 
"Motivation-Reaction Units" as dubbed by Dwight Swain, are micro level scene structure, wherein something happened and then someone reacts, stimulus followed by response. And the concept applies no less in real life drama and World-Building. Stimuli prominently feature in an environment, whereas responses are hidden, waiting, for good or ill, to be triggered. We all yearn for an environment responsive to our needs, but plot oriented featuring stimuli are by far simpler to design and to script, implement and direct, than character driven response. Indeed, stimuli featuring in the surrounding environment effectively engage the individual subject, without waiting to be triggered. Hence, for the sake of simplicity and reliability, featuring stimuli will be the focus herein, rather than responsiveness. It is intended that individuals suitably triggered and stimulated, with more readily engage one another more responsively. (Take that any way you like!)
   
To wit: We all form each our own vivid picture of fulfillment in what we want our lives to be and to experience, and particularly in the imagination of an ideal and better engaged social circle, the better to connect to vital resources and meet personal needs, tangible and intangible, all crucial to experiencing optimal fulfillment in authentic well being and human thriving. What then would be the invitation to your dream job, your personal calling to Camelot? For many, it might be brainstorming at Ideo, the far famed prosperous paradise of corporate creativity. But surely solution finding for our own life's struggles and frustrations, will be as challenging as any problem solving opportunity, or: probortunity set before the elite gathered to brainstorm at Ideo. 'Probortunity' comes indeed as most apt portmanteau of the words: 'problem' and 'opportunity,' because problem solving affords novel opportunity for achievement of success and experience of fulfillment. So why not put our heads together? And after all, isn't the culture of helping, trust and accessibility, integral to real close collaboration, and a great part of the world renowned noble expectations in cultures the likes of Ideo? Then let me help: Why not form our own Ideo (as it were), a thinktank and (pre-) incubator with ourselves as clients? Let us put to the test the following prediction: that even merely the very conversation will transpire as already uplifting in and of itself.
That is the most general idea behind Creativity Should be Social. But not to get ahead of ourselves...
 
The present section is an introduction framing the problem for the design exercise to follow, setting an agenda wherein readers are invited to fully participate in particular and personal needs assessment analysis, after all else has consistently failed, at long last coming to grips with all that has actually been yearned for all along, in turn then planning and action together for better meeting said needs.
 
Science has pretty much established that your circumstances are not very relevant to your happiness. declares Stephen Mills with such blithe and unoriginal cocksurety. “He who hath so little knowledge of human nature as to seek happiness by changing anything but his own disposition, will waste his life in fruitless efforts and multiply the grief he proposes to remove.” opines Samuel Johnson. Bah, humbug! Clearly present circumstances have every bearing upon happiness, no less so than personality and psychiatric issues from the past. Happiness is a reactive inner condition variable to changeable external circumstances. And we've heard it all before. How paradoxically effete the introversion of all such ever popular Zen self-reliance becomes! For as in the celebrated words of John Donne: "No man is an island." It is true of course, that happiness remains quite distinct from mere material success. But it hardly follows therefrom, that happiness is entirely derived from inner life and any simple choice in self-help/improvement of the right thinking along with solitary individual behavior sets or: habits, going it alone. How boring, lonely, alienated and unfulfilling! What is it that is actually missing from our lives? Any compelling vision of happiness and enthusiasm, indeed of Eudemonia, however vastly else any such ideas and expectations vary individually, in one way or another still all consist of activity and human interaction bringing the exchange of social stimuli meeting innate intrinsic needs motivating stimulus struggle. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.
 
By very nature, all living beings are perpetually engaged in stimulus struggle, which is the name given to the perpetual striving of us all, to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation and arousal from the surrounding environment. Indeed, the key to wellbeing is to be found in stimulus struggle, which what we are all already doing all of the time. And for social beings such as humans, this pertains especially every crucial social stimulus provided by anyone triggering and eliciting response from anyone else within the same social environment. - Hence: social stimulus struggle.
 
The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. And this is why happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically, strategically, intentionally, purposefully and substantively, in controversy, the exchange of welcome criticism, with civility as autonomous equals, thriving and are more productive in optimal reciprocal engagement and likely to choose creative activities and cooperation, deriving fulfillment in meaningful and pleasurable engagement. It is readily observed that the people who find it the easiest to make friends and forge new connections, commonly live better rounded and richer lives to begin with. Happiness comes in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs for unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, capable interaction and agenda setting with even adequately responsible others, in true spirit of friendship and honesty, making progress every day as a real mensch
 
And although, to reiterate, correlation need not by itself imply causation, in the light of stimulus struggle, and especially social stimulus struggle, The answer emerges to that question: Which is cause and which is effect? Does serious conversation result in happiness, or is serious conversation the result of happiness? Yes, serious conversation absolutely makes crucial contribution to happiness. And conversely, happiness likely engenders serious conversation rather than floundering empty small talk. Hence, both being at all true, a virtuous cycle is indicated, perpetually improving only once implemented, entailing no more that whatever even tacit ratification amongst those who interact, even entirely without the approval or even the knowledge of the Great Faceless They. And that is why relationship and especially friendship arise only as a byproduct of purposeful interaction and/or substantive communication, intentionally,  not impulsively or compulsively, but deliberately and intentionally, and above all, not to be deferred as as any hoped for objective or reward, but undertaken immediately as the only viable beginning. And yet,  the obvious recommendation of deliberately talking together, not more cheerfully, but more seriously together, somehow fails to arise: FoolQuest.com appears to be first!  And so, we have our work cut out for us, but nothing so onerous. For in the words of John Cleese: Creativity is not a talent: it's a way of operating.

Hence the first glimmer of happiness, simply from sustained engagement in the present serious strategic conversation and feasibioity study, meeting as it does, the above salient criterion. So let's all get our pointy ears on, and derive satisfaction! For to quote Friedrich Nietzsche: “Happiness is the feeling that power increases - that resistance is being overcome.”  

Pleasure + engagement + meaning = fulfillment.
When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?
It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

Here we are, I and thou. Why hesitate: Let's talk it over. This is important. I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Intentional Community

As Epicurus most anciently observed, human beings are by and large so frequently inept at achieving happiness. We often tend to find ourselves figuratively barking up the metaphorically wrong proverbial tree. However actually motivated psychologically, such prevailing misguided and even irrational inoperant behavior does seemingly correspond with all manner of false premise as to the means and causes of happiness. One way or another, a common theme remains the diversionary allure of extrinsic motivation away from true fulfillment of relevant intrinsic motivation. Therefore, if we are truly free and in control of own individual faculties at all, then let us first reflect each upon our scarce and prized moments of happiness.

Consider if you will, the simple and elegant social engineering initiative of Epicurus who declared: “Not what we have but what we enjoy, constitutes our abundance.” Epicurus espoused Eudemonia to be found in freedom, friendship and thought, recommending never to eat alone. Epicurus and his followers set up a sort of anti-materialist slacker farm commune simply in order to be able to eat well while living modestly within their means and by a fairly light workload, thereby to to fend off the dystress of burdensome social and financial obligation, all in order to support and sustain an ongoing convivial philosophical dinner conversation. Indeed, for Epicurus, the garden serves as a symbol for his ideal of ataraxia (ἀταραξία), of tranquil pleasure. All thus could they live lives of relative ease, day to day, in freedom, friendship and thought: Freedom is defined in negative terms, as freedom from the rat race, friendship around the dinner table still leaving open every question as to the nature of friendship, and intelligent discussion as intellectual stimulation, food also for thought and reflection, leaving open any question as to how and why communication ever triggers deeper cognition, and further questions as to the nature of and reasons for whatever corresponding satisfaction. All interesting questions. In any case, such was the simple and elegant strategy of Epicurus in stimulus struggle which is the continual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation, including gastronomical, social and intellectual stimulation, from the environment, for staving off boredom and loneliness. A travesty of the rôle of gardening in the ideal and intentional community of Epicurus, rears its ugly head in modern recommendations of community gardening providing behavioral structure of regularly scheduled activity and association sustaining propinquity while also producing any interaction and sense of involvement to draw participants together. Not to digress.

Indeed, Online, in the virtual world, the real world logistical problems and material necessities confronted by Epicurus, all fall away! All that remains, is to define, initiate and sustain the desired conversation. And nothing turns out to be more difficult! Largely because discourse and planning bridging between the philosophical and the pragmatic or practical, the strategic and the tactical, the abstract and the concrete, remains so heteronymously taboo. Among the burning issues to discuss, are various lifestyle considerations and yearned for freedoms, wherein one might find the slacker frugality of Epicurus both disagreeably austere and over simplistic, if actually not somewhat dull. Indeed, not everyone so appreciates farming or gardening, or going off the grid. There also remains every question of what one might seek from human interaction, relationship and attachment, from friendship, and in human endeavor. That is where the analysis of the range of social stimulus appetites enters, and of the kinds of corresponding discrete events. And inevitably must arise the social engineering challenge of harmonizing often conflicting priorities, by creative solution finding.

The various designed and chosen lifestyles of what are called: intentional communities, are typically such as are supported by brick and mortar infrastructure even far beyond the modest and simple dormitory, dining hall and gardens of Epicurus and his followers, indeed even on the scale of an actual entire town, with residence therein and management and operation thereof, all according to whatever ideology. For example, communes of every stripe and scale, indeed, realistically, at least initially, any smaller intentional social circle or group. Indeed community may simply comprise any number of individuals linked by any manner of common policy, endeavor or enterprise, one way or another, either by happenstance haphazardly, or indeed, intentionally. Most ambitious of all, the United States of America were founded upon a constitution, an intentional social contract superseding  previous social contract arising over time and into which we are all simply born, entirely unconcluded. Any new venture creation (various business startup), inception proceeding in accordance with a rigorous business plan, might therefore be regarded as an intentional community of some kind. Ideo, for example: The culture of design thinking, which is itself the carefully crafted product of design thinking. A large corporation is typically comprised of many employees all supported by highly capable organization and impressive physical infrastructure. But any organized human interaction on any scale, might benefit from any better planning from inception onward, no less that by inevitable evolution by trial and error thereafter. So a garage startup or a virtual company online, although entirely without any such complex resources as Ideo or any other major corporation or similar institution, might still be undertaken as intentional community subject to some or other manner of design thinking. Moreover, if community is indeed no more than aggregate relationship, then in that context, why does no one consider the application of whatever appropriate design thinking, in the better framing of purposeful relationship intentionally? This very question persists from antiquity, no less relevant today and into the indefinite future. This proposal is a call to action beginning with feasibility study of any prospect of more optimally arousing and gratifying our underserved social stimulus needs via even immediate scale intentional community. -Something so crucially important, typically left to chance or to whatever powers that be, setting agendas of their own and sealing our fates. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

Every inane cult like bogus success scam proffers glowing claims of efficacy and results, only given inductee perseverance and sacrifice. But life, so the saying goes, is also the journey and not just the destination or objective no matter how noble and appealing. Therefore even though, of course, planning and execution ever remain an exercise in deferred gratification, in the interim the ongoing arousal and gratification process of more optimal stimulus struggle free from threat, remains no less key to authentic wellbeing or: Eudemonia. -Stimulus struggle being the perpetual striving to regulate, to obtain and maintain, the optimum kind and degree of stimulation, including social stimulation, from the environment, for maintaining optimum degree and kind of arousal, thus staving off both boredom and loneliness...

And all of this will be especially important in order to sustain any long and arduous struggle in subversive and disruptively innovative close collaboration, inventing, developing and constructing any new beginnings together, when nothing less will do because turn-key readily available conventional options are all so oppressive. Hence, in order to forestall otherwise inevitable attrition, let us confront the challenge to functional relationship and therefore to effective social engineering and planning even on a fairly immediate scale, of intentional intrinsically fulfilling exchange of social stimuli from interaction in close collaboration. The present text is a proposal to the agenda to seriously consider precisely an entirely feasible immediate scale social engineering of intentional community, and then an outreach for interested founding participants. Such are the frontiers of autonomy.

                               
When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along?
I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together? 

To quote Charles F. Kettering: “A problem well stated is a problem half solved.” In the words of Anthony Jay:The uncreative mind can spot wrong answers, but it takes a very creative mind to spot wrong questions.” Not why isn't there anything better to do, in the passive voice, but in the active voice: Why aren't we doing something better, or even talking it over? What stops us? And better, how exactly?

The TRUE MEANING of LIFE is that HAPPINESS is subjective wellbeing, an INDIVIDUALLY REACTIVE STATE VARIABLE to howsoever favorable circumstances, objectively. Happiness comes in Eudemonia, in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs by capable interaction with even adequately responsible others. The cutting edge of Psychological research lately finds itself ever more in closest concurrence with wisdom of the sages of old rediscovered, regarding the very nature of authentic wellbeing or: Eudemonia, that is innately the target of most relevant intrinsic motivation. Because this pertains to needs of human nature universally, therefore in theory, the present agenda, the proposal at hand, should be of intense interest and priority to everyone and anyone, indeed, to all humanity. In practice however, it all only matters to a precious few. Go figure. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

Therefore: ask not why none of this is on the agenda, but ask why don't we, I and thou and thou too, gentle readers, together raise the question to an agenda all our own? If we can't decide policy for the world around us, policy making typically residing so distantly and alien from the masses who must endure the results, anyone in reaching out to one another might still be invited to take responsibility instead of simply leaving all happiness to chance and submission. It's never just going to happen! Let us come to terms just among ourselves, gentle readers, towards social engineering of optimized or at least improved social stimulus struggle which is something more proximate, how we interact, what we all do constantly. Perhaps this is the essence of philosophy, that the very conversation, so long neglected, can be uplifting. In the words of Henri-Louis Bergson: “Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.” Relevance which is in and of itself actually taboo, demands Case Based Reasoning bridging of the abstract and concrete, for reason and strategy to guide feasibility study and practical action and Empirical reality of what is practical, to inform hypothesis and strategy. This is Dialectical inquiry of feasibility study, investigation and analysis towards strategy, in outreach, offer, solicitation, and call to action in collaboration, to anyone at all, who like me, aspires and seeks for some path of collaboration upon which to strive for and ever realize such values in our own lives. This is an agenda and a proposal how.

If the very notion seems complicated, uncertain and daunting, indeed: easier said than done, then what else is to be expected? But it is important to work things through, because serious concerted action begins from serious conversation and focus. It has long been observed how gifted students amongst their own true gifted peers, suddenly and mysteriously no longer require the great and good boon of socialization! Wouldn't it make more sense to socialize and lift everyone to engage with and relate to one another more in accord with whatever observable gifted paradigm, than instead to dumb down our best and brightest just to norm them into fitting in, even however ill-fitting, awkwardly and reluctantly? In the alternative, just the opposite, everyone, it said, has gifted potential to be tapped. But how? - beyond the usual mealy-mouthed lip service... Indeed, if gifted is as gifted does, the how might anyone who wants to, most readily go about it amongst themselves?

There is a procedure, and has been for thousands of years: The Dialectic of Socrates, who famously declared: An unexamined life is not worth the living for a human being. Important close relationship arises only as a byproduct of intentionally purposeful interaction and intentionally substantive communication, and never otherwise. Accept no substitutes! And no one else need approve! For happiness, Epicurus espoused freedom, friendship and thought. Alas that the average person, inexperienced of anything more vibrant and meaningful, has become blithely jaded and accustomed to a profound social, emotional and intellectual deprivation in which so many of us find ourselves imprisoned. By contrast, happy people talk more seriously together, freely, and with less small talk, deliberating Dialectically in controversy,  the exchange of welcome criticism, with civility as autonomous equals optimal reciprocal engagement. happy people thrive in autonomy, succeed and prosper.  and are more productive and likely to choose creative activities, deriving fulfillment in meaningful and pleasurable engagement. Happiness comes in the Menschlichkeit of meeting ones needs for unguarded and reciprocal psychological visibility, capable interaction with even adequately responsible others, making progress every day. In the words pf Barbara Sher: “Isolation is the true dream killer, not your attitude.”

Acquaintance and common interest are known occasionally to culminate in collaborative endeavor, or at least the attempt. But people who honestly believe in the feasibility of ambitious collaboration between equals at all, much less for themselves, tend to be those fortunate few already engaged in stimulating and congenial employment, already experienced with being provided for in what is called: low hierarchical distance, meaning: near equality, in the context of responsible and fully engaged creative work together within corporations and other institutional frameworks and settings. But that of little help for the masses in desperation for new beginnings from the grass roots, for opportunity in order to escape the rat race. Alas, all too many living bereft of any encouragement, applicable mastery and rôle modeling, doubt the very feasibility of collaboration between equals, much less their own ability. Such individuals may respond poorly. The support enjoyed by the fortunate, is something that the rest of us must learn to provide one another. Let that become our mission. We might never change the entire world, but why should that limit proximate interaction socially engineered for optimal or at least improved social stimulus struggle, what ever that may mean for each of us?

The Internet has opened a new era of grass roots activism under new paradigms of cooperative endeavor, but it is not enough. There are still gaps to be filled, poorly served crying needs yet to be met. We must together reacquire the now atrophied and confused gregarious shared initiative and personal discipline that steadily comes to be regulated and subsumed by such institutional behavioral structure that it threatens and has challenged throughout history. A renaissance of collaboration among equals, is yet to come. If you are reading this, then perhaps that signifies that you have self-selected at least for the frustrated desire.

In the words of Frederick Law Olmsted: After all is said and done, much is said and little is done. Perhaps the disparity is in any part because of all that still remains unsaid and unquestioned. Heteronomy finds agreement agreeable, and disagreement disagreeable, condemning us all to the fools' paradise of mutual silence in the dark. But autonomy recognizes honesty and criticism as inherently friendly. And better unanswered questions that unquestioned answers. If happiness is in any part, the product of the kind of discussion that happy people maintain, then let our first priority be simply to come together and emulate the aforesaid conversation modality as observed of happy people. By so doing we may even hope to begin to learn how to collaborate creatively as equals: how to identify needs, frame objectives, solve problems, research and work out plans, and then carry them forth, effectively; and perhaps even how to expand our circle of collaboration as needed. Let this become our agenda. Because all such function and capacity, Empirically remains of practical necessity to fulfillment and success, to worldly happiness as best we understand it:

When all else has failed, what has actually been desired all along? Answer:  Pleasure + engagement + meaning = fulfillment. Being that engagement is the intrinsically motivating beginning of the state or condition of attachment which is an ongoing, remembered or anticipated and even yearned for state of engagement, hence according to Self-Determination Theory, secure attachment to one another is characterized by attention and responsiveness to one another's needs when turning toward one another to obtain comfort and care. By contrast, there is the Orwellian mindblind fixation of the libido upon the collective so abstractly as an ideal, that stifles the sympathetic and relevant engagement in external reality inhabited and experienced by other thinking and feeling individuals Thus does heteronomy via a desperate transference love for collective identity and authority, undermine individual interpersonal attachment and sensitivity which are capacities of autonomy. And this is why the blithe ubiquitous preoccupation with conventionally heteronymous social skills ever remains a snare of such toxic irrelevant futility. It remains so disheartening  how many people experience the same frustrated yearnings, and yet so utterly fail to find one another and connect, for wont of the wherewithal, the channels and the means.

I might not have what you want, but dare we seek for it together?

Other prime features of autonomy include initiative being: the forward looking vision and motivation of enterprise and determination that affords any capacity to begin proactively, or to follow through energetically, with a plan or task, together with the need for meaningful engagement fending off boredom and loneliness. Heteronomy, the ever cagey and calculating enemy of autonomy, is ever the active enemy of engagement and attachment, of transparent agenda, of open passion and interest of every kind, in one another especially.

Indeed, at the core of any individual yearning for collaboration freely amongst equals, is some personal vision of intrinsically fulfilling human interaction that also might even be productive towards personal success. The paradigm does not need to be Ideo or Epicurus, but the differing examples are each quite handy by way of illustration. Instead, it might be the imagination, ever yet realized or not, of anything entirely quite different. Therefore this is a proposal to the agenda, an agenda for anyone on speaking terms to set, for the dialectical critical exploration, and construction of each our own personal vision of intrinsically fulfilling and productive human interaction, not only individually but perhaps also discovery of any common ground thereof between us in order to find focus that has been wonting.

And that is why you are invited: Join in on the forum. Invite others.

The following is a project proposal, open to all, for intentionally setting an agenda of substantive communication towards purposeful action in close collaboration in solution finding for challenging probortunity of life's struggles and frustrations, to which most of us find ourselves so bewilderingly abandoned to our own devices.

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”  — Margaret Mead

“Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable people attempt to adapt the world to themselves. All progress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people.”  — George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

Post to the for all to join in, oremail to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif it's sensitive and private.

If any of this is found to be of any interest, then please give your best considered directly relevant response to the content.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Copyright 2015 - 2024 by Aaron Agassi

 

 

 

 

 

 
                              
Act now!
 
CONTACT:
 

 
choose the topic forum most
appropriate to the subject
content of your message

 

OR email to: aaronagassi@comcast.netif its private

 

Copyright Aaron Agassi  2015-2024