Just the FAQ

EVERYTHING YOU EVER
WANTED TO WRITE ABOUT SEX*  

*But where too breathless and demure  to research! 

 

The RACY WRITING RESOURCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition.  2000.
 
sex appeal
 
NOUN: 1. Physical attractiveness or personal qualities that arouse others sexually. 2. Slang General appeal; power to interest or attract.
 
 
 
Writing is like making love.  Don't worry about the orgasm, just concentrate on the process. 
—Isabel Allende
 
The only good plot is a delayed fuck.
—Louis B. Mayer

If you write fiction you are, in a sense, corrupted. There's a tremendous corruptibility for the fiction writer because you're dealing mainly with sex and violence. These remain the basic themes, they're the basic themes of Shakespeare whether you like it or not.
    —Anthony Burgess
 
A dirty mind is a joy forever.
—Oscar Wilde


more aphorisms
 
 
 
Q. What is sex appeal? 
-Or, Was it Good for You Too? 

A. crucial to believable biology and culture in World Building, can onstage Sex in the Story and issues of fantastic carnality, after all no less consequential and significant than in either innate or extrinsic reality, indeed, such an elemental life long dimension of the human condition and the world we live in or most any other, hence reciprocally integral to much the same writing competency as, and surely among the fundamentals of fiction writing, ever properly comprise a subject matter apart

"Nothing risqué, nothing gained."  ~Alexander Woollcott

What is true love, the course if which so seldom runs smooth? What are the Epistemology and Ontology of the heart? For it remains unproblematic to state that any experience of emotion may be vivid and intense, all fulfilling Descartes' famous criteria of clarity and distinctness.

But as Sigmund Freud revealed, Descartes was, quite frankly, as self deluded as any enamored and besotted schoolboy poet! After all, much that is intense, vivid and crystal clear superficially, nevertheless is all only the tip of the iceberg, with far more beneath the murky depths, both deep within and ever outward into the real world.

For even love itself is empty of inherency and contingent upon wider context.

Love is not merely what one feels obviously, no matter the object d'amore; rather, love is the climactic revelation of how one actually relates to another, motivation and disposition of interaction along with rationalizing perceptions consistent to characterization, then all followed by a denouement of insightful free choice.

Indeed, even the tamest "child safe" and most cerebral of tales will not be truly and utterly sexless, because even the most superficial believable characters must behave at all according to their relationships, roles and gender, among all other credible background to setting and amid milieu.

Nor certainly Y/A, the Young Adult categories and genres, pandering and dripping with innocent preconscious desire. All consistently inexplicit, yet without, by any measure, the subtly of racier subtext.

Or else compelling characters must have a passion for something at all! And any prudish would be fiction writer to understand and accept even this little above, nevertheless to eliminate or ignore sexuality entirely rather than "tastefully" submerging sexuality safely beneath the surface, will write only turgid tripe. -Certainly if love at all is absent, especially from a child character, unless in psychological horror.

Stories are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the plot situation, but because of the reader or audience relationship, actual motivated feelings elicited for or even against the characters.

"Desire intrigues us, stirs the soul. We love stories about desire--tales of love, sex, wanderlust, haunting nostalgia, boundless ambition, and tragic loss. Many of the great secular thinkers of our time have made this fire, this force that so haunts us, the centerpiece of their thinking." observes Ronald Rolheiser in 'The Holy Longing.'

Even if not by anything so vulgar or blatant as any particular explicit sex act or most basic plotline of an encounter, enticement, onstage sex appeal or seduction of one kind or another or by one means or another may be crucial in a story, or otherwise, one way or another, for sex appeal generally to factor into relationship and interaction and provide the opportunity for one character to flatter, flirt, seduce, beguile, to motivate or influence, even manipulate, or, likewise, to be motivated or influenced, even manipulated, by another character, to succumb or to resist, colluding and abetting or refusing and defecting, trust or control, even in confrontation with sexual politics at it's very worst.

The three motivating principle cofactors in effective manipulation are whatever the incentive and disincentive vulnerabilities of the target(s), the tactics of the manipulator(s), and time for the relationship to develop under whatever conditions, free or captive.

The phenomenon of manipulation is best defined as undue advantage from trickery via the exploitation of affective innate and conditioned triggers or "push buttons" to undermine and overwhelm, even barrage, resistance, caution, better judgment and autonomy of the target, via insidiously motivating subtext of emotional positive incentive and negative disincentive. –As distinct from open coercion alone or substantive disinformation, lies. Typically, the manipulator obfuscates the nature of their coercion exercised, along with whatever self-serving advantage thereof, whatever their own ultimate motivation.

Positive incentive manipulation is such as deviously appeals to value in fantasy and desire, love, sex greed, promoting false hope of whatever gain, in order to circumvent or overwhelm resistance, caution, better judgment and autonomy of the target. Whereas an example of negative disincentive manipulation, such insult as condescension that after all comes of love can be less painful than insult that comes without it, or more so, or equally so, as the case may be: but be that as it may, it is, in any case significantly more harmful. This is because insult provokes anger and hostility, but hostility towards people who even sincerely profess to love you and act on your own best interest is curbed and turned inwards, internalized, and experienced on the level of inner conflict of self-hostility, namely guilt. Such deceptive appeals undermining the target’s credulity and defenses even whilst actually exercising coercion constitute often likewise internalized flagrantly manipulative behavior, conscious or unconscious, selfish, indifferent or just desperate.

Indeed, no, it does not actually "take two to tango" given an intransigent antagonist one way or another aggressing upon an entirely unwilling protagonist. Nevertheless, even dearest lovers, often no less volatile, after all, than the most hateful sworn enemies, may often find themselves bypassing, stressfully, rather than actually communicating smoothly, and thus raising tension until coming into conflict on different levels, even to the point of bitter quarrel. For whatever significance and expectations, deep as they might run, may nevertheless be revealed not to be intrinsic or universal, after all, but personal, variable and even antithetical

Because variables of rounded characterization and situation from which levels of conflict arise, must include not only anatomical sex, physique, voice and so on, as well as mannerisms and style, together with sexual preference or orientation, sexroles, gender identity and also the yin/yang of gender culture and stereotypical dysfunctionality, such as, incidentally, may also be associated Epistemologically as rational and Empirical Versus intuitive or not only culturally but more specifically to setting geographically as Occidental Versus Oriental:

All inner reflection upon life must fall somewhere upon the scale from whatever "masculine," practical, binary, linear, logistic, goal-oriented motivation ever put forth, versus "feminine," passionate, flexible, emotional, social, process-orientation.

Indeed, how perverse the destructive and dishonest lengths that some people will go simply out of decidophobic conflict aversion, ultimately the devious nastiness and harm they will do, just to avoid ever confronting error or flaw of their own, and all starting from the putative motivating goal so blithely put forth or only implied, of never hurting anyone else's feelings. A position scarcely any better balanced than the seemingly opposite extreme, the puerile and Sophomorically maladjusted Fascist ideation of truth and honesty only attainable by the utter abandonment of civility and decency, all to be despised as bourgeois and effete. 

Stereotypically, by upbringing, men have trouble expressing, much less explaining, their feelings, and women have trouble understanding, much less explaining, their reasons. And this accounts for how men and women manipulate one another. Because, to quote Sigmund Freud "that which is not expressed, is acted out,." And so, men must act out, according to damagingly immature emotionality while women must connive according to disastrously half-baked plans and dangerous social myths. Of course, there are also men and women who may actually dysfunction according to the opposite gender stereotype. It all depends upon the emotional path of least resistance under conditions of and on the level of inner conflict.

And just such stereotypic dysfunction will tend to influence audience or reader sympathy according to gender as well. Because the ambivalence of indecisive women leaves men confused or upset, while the ambivalent mixed signals of men make women frantic. Hence, Sadistic or controlling manipulation and ingratiating lies generally manifest as deliberate escalation of just such behavior in order to heighten the confusion, distress and suffering. Indeed, such are the different methods of self destructive problem solving of each gender. For cluelessly Occidental / masculine characters, even however contrived plot oriented problem solving, even to the lack of lucid and compassionate sensitivity, while, for disturbed or even hysteric feminine characters, even manipulatively pressing motivation unto melodramatic climax, no matter how needlessly tragic, plus, perhaps, an Oriental preoccupation with social standing and identity and all sacrifices pursuant to upkeep thereof.

Indeed, archetypically, any penchant for melodrama may be in some account be driven by a feminine or Oriental keen interest in nuanced social involvement, hence lack of rational detachment but hence flexibility and tolerance for ambiguity, weighing more variables productive and functionally in prefrontal cortex functions of divergent and broader holistic situational Gestalt synthesis and multitasking but paralytic, destructive, dysfunctional and oppressive in approval seeking and vulnerability to peer pressure with all to much stomach for Inductivist lies, injustice and consensus manipulation.

While, archetypically, men or Occidentals, by contrast, may be more interested in prefrontal cortex functions of convergent direct dialectical reasoning, single minded compartmentalization, focused upon one task at a time, cleaving of truth from falsehood much as victor from vanquished, without compromise, yet perhaps lacking in not only in compassionate and merciful accommodation or any other hidden agenda but also complexity, depth or subtlety.

The failure of divergence is fanaticism while the failure of convergence is incoherence.

Be a Mensch!  A synthesis of single minded convergent thinking with nuanced situational Gestalt may be achievable in the intellectual cultural Jewish trait or aptitude of justice, proportion, perspective and whole integrity, especially as refined in prewar Germany, by Einstein, Freud and Marx, Relativistically, via the integrative synthesis of divergent frames of reference or POV, everything from time dilation and inner life to a larger view of economics, overviews and special cases.

- All factors that may play into differing values and levels, priority and coping in case of conflict between responsibility to oneself and responsibility to others.

Indeed, Problem Solving and Justification are reciprocal functions, one must be shaped to rationalize the other, with integrity or else into hypocrisy. Desperate as bullies typically are for validation in all disregard of sanity and reality, indeed only a complete Sociopath is ever surprised that harm done without regard to others may injure good will in return. But all first impressions tend to uncomplicated objectification, the stimulus response of selfish desire and gratification, for advantage, amusement, comfort or sex or else threat, revulsion and avoidance. Rather, it is the individual baggage of characterization that complicates. And the first question is neither of intimacy nor distance, but zero-sum versus non-zero-sum. Why, just possibly, even a deadly enemy may be intimidated into keeping out of one's way to allow the same in return, barely resolution  forestalling zero-sum conflict for advantage at the other's cost, even to the ultimate.

Why then, must dearest lovers compromise and sacrifice all that is of real meaning? Why, only for a codependent false sense of security. Such are controlling fear based relationships. A zero-sum relationship is one in which the parties each gain only from what the other gives up, but non-zero-sum denotes productively actually coming out ahead. Reciprocal gains without reciprocal cost. Indeed, ultimately, true love should be free to Altruism, advancing the interests of the beloved, and deserves reciprocation. And so, what must accrue, lofty romantic perseverance and illusion, vulgar and cynical tit-for-tat, even jeopardy of the complete breakdown of trust? Indeed, the shortest distance, the straight line, is the least common path to any happy ending, if at all. Nor will anything so simple, with no obstacle or complication to keep the outcome in doubt, ever make for drama, only pandering at best.

A standard plotline is that of the uncertain tribulation of Romance until happy resolution. And as a common subplot, this becomes the development of a a relationship, an alliance necessary to further the main plot. Indeed, virtually all relationship of whatever kind go though stages, with choices at every stage, either to advance, stagnate, slow, reverse or exit, all beginning with some sort of first discovery, Romance even courtship, so to speak, even "the honeymoon," but cannot omit inevitably coming into conflict on many levels, misunderstanding, insecurity, power struggle, friction which is normal and even healthy (not to mention more dangerous obstacles of passion as denial, jealousy and anger), and in order to survive must reach acceptance in order to commit to substantive cooperation and collaboration or else progressively dissolve and fail, all the harder from which to recover.

The Rules, so called, codify common ruthless manipulation by women, basically by gold diggers of one stripe or another. Although, if it makes anyone feel any better, it may often be suggested that all such classic feminine whiles and connivance are but the classic tactics of the oppressed, collaboration with the abuser adaptive of real deadly captivity even dating from ancient time frame. And even in recent generations, livelihood and survival remained very much at stake.

But now a days in our affluent world, there is the painful luxury of reflection, the Socratic worthlessness of the unexamined life, and the tragedy of women playing the same games, but playing so very badly, even seemingly Masochistically, the reality of Stockholm Syndrome (even as prevalent, by degrees) being nowhere ever near as gratifying as the kinky fairy tale.

Intensity, uncertainty, every Technique
of Suspense plotting, temptation, curiosity and hesitation, all the sexual tension of freedom, autonomy, choice, responsibility, all calling to self-realization hither to inconceivable, the permissiveness of emerging and relevant romance from crushingly repressive tradition of honor killing, prostitution, arranged marriage or cutthroat mercenary matrimonial competition around the world, is the outward struggle with maddening indecision, levels of inner conflict as often arises between desires and confusion or fear, between what one wants and what one thinks one wants or ought to, desperation for validation, guilt. Between the crutches of insecurity and the yearning for genuine warmth, fraudulent conditionality versus genuine intimacy.

Indeed, the reason nice guys finish last, is because the sheer cruelty and emptiness of the old wretched game, and a very serious business it was, the sex
role of exploitative cynical struggle for survival by womankind effectively obstructed or deterred from gainful careers reserved for their men folk, depends upon frigid depraved indifference and avoiding the central tragedy of historical Romance, namely the dire danger of involvement and grave sacrifice presented in a man that a woman might care for, therefore useless from the perspective of a controlling gold digger, being however for real, emotionally accessible and at all beyond simple control by manipulation.

Now days, however, the rising standard of living has reduced real literal survival pressure enough that emotional need emerges and loneliness takes hold. But the same intergenerational transactional "script" remains, now become maladaptive.

Hence, not only do such desperate women still expertly sabotage love, but they have lost the sterner stuff for effective exploitation of men. As a result, they attain involvement, but mostly in the Ecclesiastical
futility of pointlessly unhappy melodrama, aggravation and petty vicissitude. They have lost tradition and still fallen behind the times, abiding in limbo and achieving the worst of both worlds, a decided dramatic low point
.

Hence, a sympathetic romantic heroine is one who finds in herself the courage for
growth and hope to reach out, and her romantic lead is he who awakens her. Otherwise, to paraphrase Nietzsche, even a princess of fools is a laughable bimbo herself! -And her Prince Charming is likely just another thugly playa. Antithetical foils.

Characters develop out of situation, and plot ideas emerge from characters in different situations and the actions undertaken because of their relationships and conflict on many levels, the friction entailed as characters come into contact, dramatic conflict on many levels, internal and external, classic reversal in social connection as in the estrangement of the bullied idealistic whistle blower.
 Put the whistle blowers in charge!

All manner of situations, even quite unforeseen, may present any range of obstacles, from an empty bread box standing in the way of the perfect sandwich,  perplexing riddles and secrets denying truth, engineering limitations in the path of invention or a natural disaster barring very survival, but also, no less, a bad hair day spoiling Romance or a misunderstanding threatening love.

The dramatic efficacy of revealing and motivated subtext is in frustrated desire, giving rise to need and ingenuity. Drama is the gripping and engaging tension-laden presentation of conflict on many levels, whether or not the storyline is even believable. Drama is conflict inherent to situation, conflict being more than merely an event, but a condition, a relationship. Alas, however, beware! poor staging or presentation of conflict on any level dissipates inherent drama. No Powderpuff Pitty-Pat! Throughout the plot, every Technique of Suspense plotting is heightened as things are made more difficult, the personal emotional stakes are raised, and character growth is pressed by worsening complications for an active protagonist. So navigate the various possible paths and dead ends and to find stories always dig deeper for insight into struggle.

Each event in sequence that follows from motivated character action consistent with background, must in turn initiate from observable proximate stimulus unless entirely emerging from inner life, and, either way, rather than simply remaining mysterious, known only the mind of the character, must one way or another be shown intelligibly to the audience, even if none of any other characters; either way, in turn, quite probably another vitally important plot point. Whenever the cause and effect chain ever omits such links, expect plot holes stumbling amid succession of unrelated events.

 

Sexual tension

Stories and scenes are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the plot situation, but because of the reader or audience relationship, actual motivated feelings elicited for or even against the characters.

Inevitably, to show or evoke characterization, wherein motivation should be apparent, even through thoughts, however expository, onstage sex appeal may dramatically motivate conflict on many levels, emerging through subtext, What Lurks Beneath and body language, all shown by way of each of the senses in setting, action and atmospheric tone along with the Subtle and Delicate Art of Doublespeak dialogue, may either harmonize with text, or in true Method subtext, all even disagree with text, subtly, so as to draw attention into a  deeper vein or level of conflict by being subtly wrong , with the obstacles to love promoting sexual tension; love, hate, desire, attraction, increasing the tension and pathos of every Technique of Suspense plotting and anticipation, even discomfort and aversion, character conflict on many levels among the dramatis personae, within society, against fate or simply oneself, building upon levels of inner conflict, stress, desperation, indecision and frustration that must culminated either in resignation, despair, resolve or madness, not to mention Transference and the compelling transport of high fantasy reaching From Werewolf Sex To Bunny Love, not just Writing Love Scenes, or if one prefers, Quality Sex Scenes, but everything from the 'rules' for romance writing offering concise guidance for the dramatic plot structure of melodramatic pandering affirming and empowering girl cooties, all as doubtless programmed into the Computerized Romance Writer, to erotic role-play of the sage and sexpert advice of Susie Bright.

Though as Sigmund Freud put it, "sex is everything!" Even the praising saints and poets yearn to be ravished by God wooing humanity unto Rapture! Yes, God's story is also a Romance. And where once they sought to share narcotic communion, one day soon they'll only want to jack into the Net!

Why, even a real boy like Pinocchio, yearning for his Blue Fairy, may instead become beguiled and exploited by Dracula's daughter or even the pedophile Coyote spirit of traditional Native American cautionary fables! Or, more prosaically, in the course of growing up, any ordinary person might, likewise, simply become drawn, by a crush of any sort, to relate to anyone else more human, imperfect and complicated.

Indeed, at the risk of seeming unduly Freudian, with all those big eyed bashful peek-a-boo, cuddly bump and tickle, what, exactly, is 'Teletubbies' but the most blatant and puerile porno for toddlers?! Brilliant in it's simplicity. Or has some narrative subtlety eluded me, here?

Kidding aside, 'Teletubbies', targeted at the youngest viewing audience ever in the history of television, is age appropriately educationally effective, precisely because preverbal tots do respond. Indeed, the key in writing to any younger audience or any other tender sensibility, is never expurgation but simply toning it down one way or another

And the point of truth in jest remains, that the appeal of 'Teletubbies' includes such contact and expression that is only arbitrarily distinguished and divorced from that which may be deemed sexual foreplay, indeed such that Freud might well classify as Infant Sexuality, and without which babies are well known to actually and literally die from neglect and loneliness

Sex, as it is so often said, is natural. And that becomes the rationale for pandering, even if in the guise of affirmation and validation, propaganda outright. However, the begged question remains. Indeed, as is often asked, is sex necessary? - And, distinct from just life generally,  in works of culture, specifically...

No, of course not.

After all, there are videos of yarn to fascinate house cats! (For cats, as everybody knows, though some are quite affectionate, can often be of that particularly self sufficient temperament all their own.)

Indeed, any work bowdlerized and eviscerated becomes flaccid and desiccated, as stilted and inhuman as any moving lure for dumb animals. Believable and appealing characters, however "settled", must be motivated and behave and talk according to their relationships and sexroles of whatever milieu appropriate to the setting, even in the most cerebral of stories. 

Even eschewing anything remotely explicit or graphic, the red hot purple passion prose, no matter how tame or "child safe", in capable fiction sexuality of some kind still manifests itself. For the key in writing to any younger audience or any other tender sensibility, is never actually expurgation, but simply toning it down or transposition somehow, but seldom in truly eliminating every trace of sex. 

A story that isn't at all racy may only omit overt sexuality and strong undercurrents, not sexuality at all, which is an aspect of human nature, characterization, relationship and milieu, setting. After all, as the Good Book says, "the child is father to the man".

Certainly, all manner of sexual clichés provide more than just the warning against tired prose, but also an insight into universal motivations, key to more than just passionate sex scenes as a writing exercise.

Sexual response is both innate and cultivated. Sex elicits affect and entails context. Sex, from furtive eye contact up to the exchange of bodily fluids and every surrounding ritual, is imbued with meaning and values by civilization, personal associations by the individual, and biological imperatives by evolution. 

Sex, as it is so often said, is natural. And that becomes the rationale for pandering, even if the most obsequious flattery in the guise of affirmation and validation, and propaganda outright.  Emotional appeals or motivation, to the heart, passions, gut feelings, also include loaded or slanted emotional appeal employing language that is calculated to get a particular reaction from readers, or even out and out sob stories and soppy sentimental tearjerkers, even to be rated by the number of hankies needed! manipulating readers' emotions in order to lead them to draw however unjustified conclusions.

But certainly, there are, always, of course, if not drama per se, then loftier social or entirely artistic aims in any subject matter, delicate or indelicate. And then again, for writers no less than their characters, there are often such barriers to over come as self-consciousness, even sheer anhedonic moralism and squeamishness outright.

Stories are made memorable not merely in whatever empathy or curiosity merely as to the plot situation, but because of the reader or audience relationship, actual motivated feelings elicited for or even against the characters. And any motivation may do!

Yes, leave us face it, sex appeal may simply pander to sensationalism and/or flights of fantasy, escapism and wish fulfillment for the reader's guilty vicarious pleasure. After all, as the old saying goes, sex sells! Blatant or subtle. Certainly, the erotic is a value, indeed, an  aesthetic category.

But then, even food may serve as well, gluttony as serviceable as debauchery, also depiction of fantastic wealth or opulence, dripping with money, style, richness, beyond the dreams of avarice, old money, no less than royalty or nouveau rich regardless, optionally in contrast to crushing poverty. But there is no need to approve or disapprove of such wretched excess, only to show it. And what could be more vividly exotic than Space Opera fantastic far away planets in the world of the distant future? Indeed, there is no end to variation to sensory gratification which is but the least of of sheer wish fulfillment fantasy of any conceivable desire that may be vicariously pandered to, blissfully unobstructed by any obstacle of dramatic conflict on many levels driving any sort of plot.

And of course, beyond sensory gratification or material wealth, there are also fantasies of the ego, of power, importance and recognition, even love and acceptance in any context, passion, Romance, purest exaltation attained, darkest taboos indulged, friendship, camaraderie, Utopia or transcendence. All manner of escapism, Fantasy, Self-Indulgence, and Wish-Fulfillment. After all, as C. S. Lewis observes, the only person who opposes escape is, by definition, a jailer.

"genres that are most popular tend to offer magical resolutions to irreconcilable social problems and tensions."
 
-The utopian fantasy of Deep Throat  

But, please GHOD not just the belabored bludgeoning obsessions of the writer! Only tiresome zealots need to be pandered to and stoked upon every single point of dogmatic ideology. Of course, the most truly destructive is manipulative dishonest propaganda pandering to hypocrisy. But if POV will not be thoughtful and literate, then, at least let us have good trash, pandering if we must, self indulgence of the reader, not the writer, grabbing the readers, not beating them over the head. Remember to evoke the senses, show don't tell action that actually advances the plot. And building the tension of every Technique of Suspense plotting, even in vicarious pandering, depends upon pacing.

Because, to follow another old saying, capable writing still reveals something about human nature. Even sheer vicarious pandering in it's appeal to the universal fantasies of the audience. While bad writing tells everything about the author. Particularly when it comes to such awkward self indulgence that only displays whatever especially obsessive proverbial "axe to grind", personal preoccupation, attachment or morbid fixation, prurient or otherwise, to the exclusion of all else.

Prolong the Agony by making life difficult so as to motivate characters. Don't be nice to your character! No Powderpuff Pitty-Pat! Even pander to vicarious wish fulfillment, but also inspire pathos, anticipation, every Technique of Suspense plotting even dread and even the discomfort of sheer aversion. Stir any range of emotions and force the reader to empathize, to feel. That's what makes for good entertainment, a real page turner.

And so, leave us not forget error checking, but learn a lesson in writing about sex, from the euphemistically symbolic to the clinically explicit, even the descriptive vocabulary and naming of body parts! from the past winners of The Literary Review's Bad Sex Award bestowed upon the most pretentious, tasteless, embarrassing, otiose, self-infatuated or redundant description of the sexual act published during the past year.

nevertheless, perhaps the most debilitating of all fetish to fiction writing remains the overwhelming and unthinking compulsion to censor or to Bowdlerize. Again, of necessity, the key in writing "child safe" to any younger audience or to any other tender sensibility, is never true and utter expurgation, but simply in toning down anything even remotely explicit, skirting the central question by mere tender suggestion, leaving characterization, motivation and drama intact.

‘Anyone who attempts to render sexual experience directly must face the fact that the writings which comprise it are ludicrous without their subjective content.’ [If not somewhat clinical.]
 
-Elizabeth Benedict, Joy of Writing Sex

 

Q. What is tension?

A. Tension,  every Technique of Suspense plotting, anticipation, clues and doubt as to the outcome, hence pathos and, leave us face it, discomfort and aversion, may arise even from mystery, onstage sex appeal, the unknown, opportunity and/or threat, conflict many levels with an obstacle, events unfolding or outcome in any way in doubt. Tension is stress, and the innate or conditioned emotional, neurochemical and physiological preparative change or stress response to challenge, stimuli or stressors may be either distress and dread as to threat and emergency or eustress, the euphoric stress of pleasant anticipation, even sexual tension or the demands of pleasant activities in general, creativity, power and opportunity.

Even humor or comic relief depends upon tension from an insecurity brought to a resolution called the punch line, that may be either surprising or else even obvious and anticipated, just so long as the tension builds and then crests. Teasing, well meaning or otherwise, also cultivates and builds stress, tension. So does flirtation, but likewise manipulation, rejection or indifference and harassment or threat. Tension, stress, can be either distress or eustress.

Every plotting Technique of building Suspense depends upon pacing, and for greater tension, show don't tell, and never throw the emotional circuit breaker. By every Technique of Suspense plotting, the rising tension and of dramatic conflict signifies that the resolution of whatever the central problem is such as to increasingly press character(s) inevitably to take action in struggle with whoever or whatever the antagonist in some way that must one way or another bring the very values of said character(s) into question for them.

The Stress Vulnerability Model of Psychiatric Disorders is flawed only in that what is called biological vulnerability is, of course, actually universal in the human condition. And so, the determinant is nurture, not nature. Obviously, Neurologucal heredity, biological evolved behavioral genetic nature, only and fairly consistently enables the Empirical capacities for learning by encoding from the Phenomena, from experience, from nurture, to begin with. Consistent as remain the genes themselves, emotion and experience alter the expression thereof, psychosomatically.

  Matt Ridley:
nature via nurture

Fraudulent obfuscation and denial to the contrary are only the current preferred high powered junk science marketing tactic of the Psychopharmacolical industry, pandering to compassion burn out and desperation, "soullessly" mocking and trivializing such cherished illusions as the yearning for understanding and with them all Philosophically meaningful values arising from the deep wellsprings of human emotional needs.

 

The kinky fairy tale of Stockholm Syndrome

The will to power may be benign, benevolent, malevolent or absent and ineffectual, as per culturally acquired behavioral patterns and the content of individual character. As a matter of conventional sexs, it is said that, one way or another, while the pleasure principle of power, even if only signifying opportunity, arouses men, it is mystery that keeps women involved, for better or worse, the worst being to simply and blithely act out, response to triggers of pernicious ambivalent conflicting mixed signals, even to the tragic point of veritable Masochism and it's exemption from responsibility, even the sheer eroticization of learned helplessness.

Indeed, various manipulative and destructive cliques, particularly Obscurantist cults and scams, exploit Stockholm Syndrome (prevalent in varying degrees) to draw in the mark in vein hope that things will begin to make more sense as the mystery unfolds. Alas, real life happy endings are never guaranteed in the face of passivity and love conquers nothing without backbone, the courage for individual growth.

The menace of the captor represents but also deflects a palpable threat of harm to the captive.  And this makes for an inherently dramatic and perversely absorbing  good news / bad news situation for anyone who ever feels trapped. Bad news in the danger, good news in that it may be appeased, averted by manipulation, especially if redirection and then validation of intimidation. And that is all that may be needed for various degrees of Stockholm Syndrome behavioral conditioning of damsels in distress into the very worst Pursuer-Rescuer headgames, especially from early on in life. 

Alas, there are always those so tragically hardcore and deeply disturbed, genuinely masochistic and anhedonic, that only real danger and self destruction remain acceptable and licit. Otherwise, thankfully, just as roller coasters and other popular "barf-rides" harmlessly simulate the thrill of a nearly averted vehicular disaster, classic fairy tale ravishment, bondage and captivity fantasies and erotic role-play can safely liberate into fantasy and teasing sexual foreplay all the classic drama or shameless melodrama, as the case may be, forbidden thrill and every other Technique of Suspense plotting, of hope toyed with, of the captive struggling seductively to win whatever small kindness of the threatening captor or attacker and survive, and all manner of desperate desire to be expressed, received and fulfilled in an all to blatant and obvious paradoxical intention of "Reverse Psychology."

"You can barbeque me, hang me, drown me, or skin me, but, please, please, please don't throw me into the briar patch!" said Briar Rabbit...

(Oh, don't tease me, please me!)

"Hm! She is made of harder stuff! Cardinal Fang! Fetch...
THE COMFY CHAIR!"

Indeed, the kinky fairy tale of Stockholm Syndrome, by adamant denial unfettered beyond the burdensome restraints logical contradictions in hard reality, all of the unflagging faith, goodness empathy and connection of the innocent and unrecognized virtuous victimized princess soiled dove, can in the flights of fantasy of impromptu Psychodrama, finally and truly be vindicated by finally at long last redeeming their own unflagging faith in the biggest jerk, most hopeless confirmed looser or even the very worst villain, abuser or bully! I knew there was good in you, Daddy...

Well, spank me! So much better than the real thing!

Kinky fairy tale ravishment, bondage and captivity fantasies of erotic role-play provide an outlet to express and fulfill the longing to desire and be desired, desperately. Whereas the resentment and dependency of the real life Stockholm Syndrome (prevalent in varying degrees) only accrues, even for the fairest damsel in distress ever "protected,"  just the very opposite, being taken most utterly for granted and neglected as well as abused. Indeed, a most fecund theme of ironic contrast.
 
Here, then, is offered a Science Fiction speculation as a writer's prompt:
Dramatic stories are not usually of happy experiences. Indeed, if the ugly, clumsy and brutal reality of rape even remotely resembled hot transport of mythological fairy tale ravishment fantasy, then rape would not merely have to be legalized, but made mandatory!

But what may actually yet be feasible is the nigh alchemic transformation of dysfunctional codependent trailer trash bickering into leather clad stylish hot vampire monkey sex! All it takes is the recognition of the surreal and an appreciation of the absurd. I know you want to!

Alas, women are all too often encouraged to take men and sexual opportunity for granted, and, no less prudishly intolerant than men, even to fear, revile and despise what comes to them too eager and easily, and in thrall to Stockholm Syndrom